C 2/06/93 601301439 MEMBER NAME EDITFILE (RUN94.S) M *********************************************************************** * * * PART 12 PART 12 * * H1 LUMI LOGBOOK * * * * HERA LUMINOSITY RUN 1995 * * * * * * Enter command LLC under NEWLIB in order to add new information * * Press PF3 button when finish your editting to save the file. * * If you don't yet have LLC command defined, copy it from the * * 'F11LEV.CLIST(LLC)' into your clist member 'userid.CLIST(LLC)' * * * * Use command: F ===== to find all messages, and then select * * those you are interested in * * * * The following commands allow to inspect earlier logbook parts: * * * * LL1 ........ list Part 1 of the Lumi Logbook: Jun'91 - Aug'91 * * LL2 ........ list Part 2 of the Lumi Logbook: Aug'91 - Dec'91 * * LL3 ........ list Part 3 of the Lumi Logbook: Jan'92 - May'92 * * LL4 ........ list Part 4 of the Lumi Logbook: Jun'92 - Aug'92 * * LL5 ........ list Part 5 of the Lumi Logbook: Aug'92 - Nov'92 * * LL6 ........ list Part 6 of the Lumi Logbook: Nov'92 - Jun'93 * * LL7 ........ list Part 7 of the Lumi Logbook: Jun'93 - Nov'93 * * LL8 ........ list Part 8 of the Lumi Logbook: Nov'93 - May'94 * * LL9 ........ list Part 9 of the Lumi Logbook: May'94 - Jul'94 * * LL10........ list Part10 of the Lumi Logbook: Jul'94 - Nov'94 * * LL11........ list Part11 of the Lumi Logbook: Nov'94 - Apr'95 * * * * S.Levonian Opened: 27/04/95 at 15:00 * * Closed: 30/01/96 at 15:00 * * * *********************************************************************** 27.04.1995 ================= F11LEV === New Chapter of the logbook .. Congratulations to LPI community: we opened 12-th part of the LUMI Logbook! The reason is obvious: Lumi-95 run has (almost) started, and it is convenient to keep all information related to the real data taking together. You can inspect earlier parts by the commands LL1-LL11, where LL11 = LIST 'F11LEV.H1.LUMI.LOGBOOK.PART11' I wish everybody a successful work during this luminosity run. Before leave to Moscow I shall try to summarize briefly a situation in the area of my own responsibility and I would like everybody to follow this example: it would be useful to describe in few lines the status and the main problems in your area. 28.04.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Very Preliminary Calibration It were written 2 sets of H1Lumi Runs with all H1Lumi Monitoring sub- triggers:101396-101398 yesterday 27.04.95 from 22:04 up to 22:17 and 101505-101508 today 28.04.95 from 07:04 up to 07:44. These H1 Runs were written with Ee=27.52 and Ep=820 Gev (Ie=~2mA and Ip=~0.7 mA). On Line Calibration of Lumi subbranch was not good with different reasons. So - standard calibration (Relation Coefficients defining) was not made. It were built histos of ET-,ET1- and PD1-cells responses and it is possible to make very preliminary estimations of some relative calibra- tion coefficients. So - if CCe28=1.0 then: e28 = 1.0 e29 = 1.0 e30=1.13 e31=0.8 e32=1.13 e33=1.06 e34 =0.86 e21 = 1.5 e22 = 0.85 e23=1.12 e24=0.9 e25=1.13 e26=1.38 e27 =1.00 CCet02 as seems is near 10 MeV/FADCcount (OnLine value (divided on 3.65 is near 2.9MeV/FADCcount) - if suppose that 2300 FADCcounts peak is connected with 24 GeV energy of electrons. It is possible to see histos with cells FADC responses at the next LOOK binary sets at DESY IBM (with different range of FADCcounts resp.) and to try make own conclusions: H1KFOM.LOOK.R101505 (0-2000) FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R101505A (0-4000) FAST03 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R101505B (0-3000) FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD Histos 12001-12006 - ET1 cell responses (FADC counts) Histos 17008-17049 - ET cell responses (FADC counts) Histos 19001-19025 - PD cell responses (FADC counts) I cannot say anything about PD-cells relative CC(not so simply as seems 29.04.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Relation Coeff.Set Run101505 Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 101505-101508 data sample. It were selected 24954 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M2326.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 41005 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M2326.C00 -C 24554 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S92.M2326.C00 -C It were got 17744 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 13895 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.566 0.474 0.542 0.231 0.806 0.532 0.537 0.782 0.482 1.695 0.457 0.367 0.784 0.358 0.712 0.660 0.597 0.532 0.534 0.507 0.673 0.692 0.753 0.729 0.659 0.636 0.554 0.527 0.707 0.946 0.718 0.396 0.598 0.499 0.494 0.552 0.516 0.577 0.246 0.499 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.169 1.281 1.325 1.967 2.214 2.191 2.113 1.598 1.785 1.387 2.052 1.709 1.470 1.789 1.855 2.137 2.222 1.422 1.415 2.044 1.112 1.937 2.054 2.629 0.000 As You can see these digits are far from 1.0 values - due to Luminosity subbranch was not good calibrated. Runs 101505-101508 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 25.0K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.51 0.91 27.55 0.88 27.55 0.87 Runs 101505-101508 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 40.0K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 ??.?? ??.?? 28.93 1.68 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones after 3rd step of calibration with ET&PD&nVC events from 10C-sample (H1 Runs 89877-90419 - near 56.0 K events). CCvcs value was got from last VCs calibration at 10B-sample of ETPDVC events (H1Runs 89264-89877 - see message from 27.10.94 at LL10). (CCvcs start = 4.167 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with enough good statistics). 29.04.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Run101505 Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned sample with events from Runs 101505-101508: H1KFOM.TLOOKQ4.R101505 (12666 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R101505 9332 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put positive sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (+0.7%) and a enough good resolution digits (14-16%) for (08-24)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.TLOOKQ2.R89877 23894 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.TLOOKQ3.R89877 40060 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value (by mistake) was used as 6.6 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. It was made attempt to use so called classsical option of calibration (without Relation Coefficient Set defining). As seems result is the same. 29.04.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Run101505 It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.000 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 1.000 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.51.So CCvcs = 6.600*0.51=3.366Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Run 101505 up to 101508. Runs 101505- 101508 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 24.0K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 0.87 Runs 101505- 101508 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 40.0K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.52 0.98 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.419 3.893 4.162 2.411 6.034 4.019 3.982 6.227 2.714 3.999 4.940 2.801 7.422 3.660 9.422 4.628 5.109 4.608 4.151 4.702 3.984 5.121 4.949 5.409 3.697 4.158 4.293 3.428 5.275 5.005 3.522 3.526 4.526 4.334 4.027 e42= 4.096 3.887 4.330 1.951 3.720 4.147 4.018 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00=2.105 1.512 1.380 2.378 2.577 1.397 2.174 2.799 2.506 1.650 1.729 3.810 2.727 2.783 1.828 2.947 3.062 2.583 2.125 2.392 p20=1.302 1.709 2.096 3.094 2.549 vcs= 3.366 Energy spectrum VCdep is changed in compare with last year: at last year more or less significant part of statistics was finished near 12-13 GeV at this year - near 7-8 GeV. 30.04.1995 ================= F11LEV === LUMI overview and Bye-bye ... I was not able to prepare a comprehensive overview of all what is going on. Lack of time: as usual, just one day less than needed. Therefore, I give here only some fragmental comments on selected important aspects of our tasks. 1) Lumi h/w. ------------ Here I fully rely on the experience and intuition of Igor. First lumi data, written to LUMIMON files, shows, that basically the system is in a working shape, although the calibration is not yet adjusted, and the trigger rates information is not sufficient. 2) Data structure. ------------------ There were several new banks implemented both online and offline. Also known bugs in the old bank content were fixed. This seems now to be OK. The DDL description of up-to-date lumi banks is ready and has been sent to U.Martyn (H1BANKS librarian). It is not yet implemented in the official cmz file, and therefore LHB 'bank' command still shows old information. An H1 note, describing LUMI data structure and tools is still in preparation. However, a complete list of LUMI BOS banks can be found in WWW (Luminosity --> files --> BOS banks) 3) L1 --> L4 --> L5 chain ------------------------- First complete set of LUMI trigger elements and subtriggers was defined and implemented after our common discussion and few iterrations with CT group. Get the status via WWW (Luminosity --> online news --> lumi trigger bits and subtriggers). Further studies are necessary to define most efficient physics triggers using new H1 subdetectors (Spacal, ET1, ...). V.Andreev is expected to participate actively from ET1 side. Contact person for eTAG gamma-p physics at DESY - A.Rostovtsev. Actual prescalings for our basic monitoring triggers must be tuned to real conditions. Definite requests from our side are given in my presentation at H1 trigger meeting 21/03/95. L4 strategy w.r.t. LUMI data has been modified in a good for us direction: presently ALL accepted events got reconstructed by LREC at L4, and in addition they all are classified by ECLUMI routine of N.Gogitidze, installed at L4. As a consequence, LUMMON routine of 1994 is obsolete, and will not be used. Instead, L4 monitoring histograms are created by LREC itself (see LRSUMM routine). The real experience should show, how to classify them into the following categories: A) standard shift histos. These should be checked, in the long term automatically. We have to provide an information, WHAT should be checked (peaks, holes, mean values, dispersion,...). Each histogram of this class got a refence plot. B) expert histos with or without reference plot. Not checked in the standard loop. They suppose to help to understand a problem discovered in A. C) not displayable on L4. These may be needed e.g. for calibration, or which are only checked offline. I will keep in touch with K.Mueller and R.Beyer in that respect in near future from Moscow. An additional important checks were proposed, using our experience of last year operation: occasional losses of Lumi information, rare unphysical spikes in Lumi values, NAN appearing from time to time, etc. Although there exists a well established offline tool allowing to recover most of the known losses of lumi information, it is important to detect such a situation at themost early stage. For that purpose, a special routine was provided by L.Shtarkov, which perhaps could be used both at L4 and offline (testing TCL files). So far it only performs one of the mentioned above tasks, and I propose, that L.S. continue to work in that direction, to implement others. For installation of this routine at L4 I propose L.S. to contact directly Rolf Beyer (I can write him a mail in advance, but I have unfortunately no time to check the code for some L4 standards: I hope it is OK, but must be tested in a real work at MIPS). L5 status is OK. New LREC is instaled since 2 days and works without crashes. Debugging was made fith first real LUMIMON data. 4) LREC status -------------- ~f11lev/lrec/lrec95.car card file from LREC cmz file which will go to the official H1REC ~f11lev/lrec/lrec95.DB.banks database banks used by LREC, which are new or modified compared to old version See detailed report in LL11. Important! All further modifications to LREC must start from this new version. Do it safely only when it is included in the official H1REC cmz. ~f11lev/lrec/lrec95.cmz can be used for playing around until that happens. Further modifications means: improvement of the rec.quality (coordinates, energies at the boundaries). 5) LUMIMON creation/processing/analysis --------------------------------------- This is in very good shape. See reports of N.G. on DQ meetings and coming regular messages in LLO. Information via WWW is also up-to- date. 6) Luminosity information in WWW -------------------------------- Present status is OK. However, the main difficulty is to keep it always up-to-date. Here a common effort of the group is required. From the offline side, I will closely watch the situation. Yu.S. is asked to do the same from the online side. Please provide him with all necessary information, or fill in WWW yourself (but after some discussion and authorization: don't use WWW as a garbage collector!) Well, it is time to fly to Moscow. Hope it is not my last message in LLO, and I will continue remotely. Have a smooth lumi running. 30.04.1995 ================= H01GOG === LUMIMON data processing ..... First reasonable lumi data which appeared on LUMIMON files HERA03.H01.LUMIMON.C9500022 - 26, have been processed by a standard job, using latest LREC version (at IBM: F11LEV.H1REC.LOAD): HERA03.H01.LUMIMON.C9500xxx | v +-------------+ | #LMONI0 | +-------------+ | v H01GOG.MLOOK.C9500xxx The output LOOK files contain 2 areas: 'LREC' - with standard LREC historgams for L5 level, and blank area - with n-tuple NT(1), having a format described below. NAM(1) = 'RUN' ! run number NAM(2) = 'RQ' ! run quality: 1=G, 2=M, 3=P, 0=unknown NAM(3) = 'BUNCH' ! bunch number (0-219) NAM(4) = 'BTYPE' ! bunch type (see JBUNCH in H1UTIL) NAM(5) = 'ATRIG' ! actual trigger (bit packed: ! 0 - METAG (s86) ! 1 - MET44 (s90) ! 2 - MPDNVC (s92) ! 3 - MWATVC (s93) ! 4 - MPLUMI (s94) ! 5 - MSLUMI (s95) ! 6 - MPDLOW (s91) ! 8 - LETZT0 (s80) ! 9 - LETDCN (s83) ! 10 - LE1ZT0 (s85) ! 16 - LDIS (s0) ! 17 - random) * NAM(6) = 'TEL1' ! Lumi trigger elements (bit packed: ! bits 0-7 copied from 112-119 TEL1 bits NAM(7) = 'RIE' ! Ratio of the total to pilot e-current NAM(8) = 'W' ! event weight (1+Downscaling factor) * NAM(9) = 'EE' ! reconstructed ET energy [GeV] NAM(10)= 'E1' ! reconstructed E1 energy [GeV] NAM(11)= 'EP' ! reconstructed photon energy [GeV] NAM(12)= 'EV' ! energy deposit in Water Veto [GeV] * NAM(13)= 'XE' ! x(ET) reconstructed [cm] NAM(14)= 'YE' ! y(ET) reconstructed [cm] NAM(15)= 'XP' ! x(PD) reconstructed [cm] NAM(16)= 'YP' ! y(PD) reconstructed [cm] NAM(17)= 'X1' ! x(E1) reconstructed [cm] NAM(18)= 'Y1' ! y(E1) reconstructed [cm] Summary table for the processed files you can find in WWW: Physics Working Groups ===> Files ===> data files of 1995, which will be regularly updated in future. 01.05.1995 ================= H1KSHE === New LumiYear has started!!... Today early morning " v den mezdunarodnoi solidarnosty tru- diashihsia vsego mira" first this Year luminosity run has started. This LumiRun 672 has the following attributes: Start time 3:12, Stop time 7:00, Ie = 1.5 mA, Ip = 2.7mA peak Lumi = 100 mb-1sec-1, peak sp Lumi = 380 mb-1sec-1mA-2 Due to this occasion the two lumi system standalone calibration runs were recorded. H1 Run 101902 (96117events) with not correct 12 Gev - thre- sholds. H1 Run 101903 (404029 events) with standard thresholds. 1/05/95 ==================== H1KSHE === Lumi RUN# 672 Start lumi run672 date: 1/5/95 Collision time: 3:12:01 - 7:00:12 at Usik's History: Currents (mkA): Ie= 1449.00, Ip= 2800.00 Peak luminosity: 9.786 mb-1 s-1 <--- near 62 mb-1 s-1(a.f.) Peak spec.lumi : 27.491853 mb-1 s-1 mA-2 <--- near 180 mb-1 s-1 mA-2 Number of collided b.: 10 (time -> near 04:40) Number of e-filled b.: 12 Number of p-filled b.: 10 at Egor's history pictures: Number of e-pilot b.: 2 Peak Lumi: near 100 mb-1 s-1 Number of p-pilot b.: 0 Peak Spec.Lumi: near 380 mb-1 s-1 mA-2 (time -> near 05:40) HERA total lumi: 580.189 mkb-1 Who is right? H1 Run total lumi: 342.8909 mkb-1 H1 data taken lumi: 141.0382 mkb-1 H1 Runs: 101880 - 101928 HERA - physics: 577.124717 mkb-1 H1Run - physics: 342.8909 mkb-1 H1data - physics: 141.0382 mkb-1 H1 Runs: 101880 - 101928 Tot curr/rate factor: 0% C/R F H1Run gated: 0% Rand.C.F: 49.51% RCF Run gated: 24.64% Relative ET trigg accept.: 0.4471 P.S. As Egor explained - Usik's values were non-right (a.f.) 01.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Relation Coeff.Set Run101903 Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Run 101903 data sample. It were selected 22229 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M3033.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 98223 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M3033.C00 -C 25481 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S92.M3033.C00 -C It were got 12732 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 9885 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.917 0.811 0.920 0.531 1.253 0.834 0.825 1.289 0.622 0.840 1.058 0.598 1.226 0.816 1.574 0.923 0.912 0.986 0.993 1.080 0.884 0.745 0.963 0.980 0.902 0.902 0.923 0.817 1.063 1.049 0.748 0.735 0.933 0.982 0.882 0.000 0.807 0.899 0.405 0.772 0.861 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 0.763 0.594 0.585 0.869 0.000 0.500 0.825 1.042 0.995 0.625 0.742 1.033 1.002 1.045 0.766 1.117 0.975 0.938 0.923 0.944 0.478 0.715 0.739 1.173 0.000 As You can see these digits are near 1.0 values - due to Luminosity branch was more or less good calibrated: Run 101903 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 22.0K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.44 0.88 27.45 0.85 27.46 0.84 Run 101903 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 98.0K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.43 0.94 27.45 0.92 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones after 3rd step of calibration with ET&PD&nVC events from previous sample (H1 Runs 101505-508 - near 24.0K events). CCvcs value was got from last VCs calibration at same sample of ETPDVC events (H1Runs 101505-508 - see message from 29.04.95 at LL12). (CCvcs start = 3.366 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was almost non-succesful (with enough good statistics). 01.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Run101903 Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned sample with events from Run 101903: H1KFOM.TLOOKQ4.R101903 (15062 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R101903 11733 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put neagtive sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-12.19%) and a very bad resolution digits (35%) for (14-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.TLOOKQ2.R89877 22099 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.TLOOKQ3.R89877 82781 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 3.366 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 01.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Run101903 It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.122 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.889 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.09.So CCvcs = 3.366*1.09=3.669Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Run 101903: Run 101903 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 22.0K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.52 1.04 Run 101903 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 98.0K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.52 1.13 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.421 3.909 4.449 2.588 6.036 4.019 3.977 6.424 2.968 4.258 5.186 2.819 5.985 3.957 9.321 4.743 5.227 4.883 4.559 5.536 4.094 5.386 4.985 5.633 3.771 4.226 4.736 3.578 5.129 5.000 3.519 3.529 4.529 4.726 4.167 e42= 4.096 3.887 4.330 1.951 3.721 4.147 4.018 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00=2.102 1.526 1.445 2.360 2.577 1.401 2.006 2.808 2.522 1.633 1.663 3.749 2.694 2.786 1.889 3.043 2.956 2.579 2.035 2.406 p20=1.302 1.715 2.115 3.087 2.549 vcs=3.669 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample. 01.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Very Preliminary CCet44 ..... It were produced very preliminary CCet44-values from data sample Run101903 (32181 events with s90-trigger). It were selected for calibration 6708 events (with using of ThrA and ThrB - see earlier meassages). it were used for calibration 6262 events with PhArm reconructed energy). Very preliminary values of CCet44 are the next: CCet00 = 8.077 CCet01 = 8.378 - almost no satistics for calibration at this cahnnel CCet02 = 9.044 CCet03 = 8.295 CCet04 = 8.205 all units - MeV/FADCcount CCet05 = 8.389 02.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === New Very Preliminary CCet44 It were found different little bugs at ET44 calibration procedure and after recalculation of CCet44 it were produced next CCet44 values for data sample Runs 101505-101508: et0=8.388 et1=8.356 et2=6.765 et3=8.164 et4=8.330 et5= 8.352 final values of weights: 21.590 0.655 3881.560 4.760 24.551 0.674 start values of CCet44: 8.352 8.352 8.352 8.352 8.352 8.352 It were selected 99640 events with ET44=1 and only at 12234 events it was found some reconstructed energy at PD-detector. After cuts with ThrA=19.14 GeV and ThrB=1.15GeV -> 4053 events were used for ET44 channels calibrations. ET44rec+Pdrec spectrum for these 4053 events seems as optimistic: Mean = 27.51 GeV Sigma= 1.36 GeV. 03.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Events for ET44-calibration It were selected ET44=1 trigger element triggered events from data sample Run101505-101508. It were selected 99640 events from this data. It was built 100th ntupel which is kept at LOOK binary data set at IBM storage: H1KFOM.LOOK.R101505D FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD During making of this ntuple it were used Relation Coefficients Set for ET and PD, CCvcs and CCet44 which were proclaimed earlier for this sample (see messages from 29.04.95 and 02.05.95). Structure of 100th ntupel is the next: NAM(1)='ETD' - ET Deposited Energy (GeV) NAM(2)='PDD' - PD Deposited Energy (GeV) NAM(3)='VCD' - VC Deposited Energy (GeV) NAM(4)='ET1D' - ET44 Deposited Energy (GeV) NAM(5)='RUN' - Run Number NAM(6)='ETTS' - Trig. Sum for ET (FADC counts) NAM(7)='PDTS' - Trig. Sum for Photon Arm (FADC counts) NAM(8)='ETPD' - Trig. Sum for ET44 (FADC counts) NAM(9)='ET1T' - not used NAM(10)='TE' - IETag+IVC*2+IPD*4+IET*8+IET44*16+IPDlow*32+IPDhigh*64 - or 128 (if there is no TEL1,1-bank at event) NAM(11)='TB' - S95+S94*2+S93*4+S92*8+S91*16+S90*32+S86*64+S85*128 - or 256 (if there is no TLV1-bank at event-Random Trig) NAM(12)='TBR' - S95+S94*2+S93*4+S92*8+S91*16+S90*32+S86*64+S85*128 - or 256 (if there is no TLV1-bank at event-Random Trig) CALL BNT (100,0,NVEC,NAM) TB are active subtriggers and TBR - raw ones. From analize of contents of this ntupel it became clear that main 'sources' of data samples for ET44 channels calibration are the next: s90 & s93 (ET44&VC) 63% s90 & s91 & S93 (ET44&PDlow&VC) 16% s90 & s85 (ET44&nVC&nPDlow) 12 % It means that it is reasonable at OnLine ET44 Calibration to install trigger for 4th branch at Luminosity subbranch not ET44 but ET44&VC. 03.05.1995 ================= H01LNS === new L4 histos of S.L. ====== The first look at the new set of S.L.'s histos for L4: 1.) Histos on Hits per Channel are empty, 2.) Histos on Efficiencies are empty, 3.) Histos on X,Y are filled and looking OK, 4.) Histos on Energies are filled but E are too low, see below, 5.) Histos on Sums_of_E display the BRMSSTR peak, but see below. 5.a)Table for Sum_of_E==ET+PD+VC, for OLD and NEW Taggers Note espesially the low values of mean energy for NEW ---------------------------------------------------------------- LRUN# H1-----Runs Nevents BRMSSTR---peak Lower-E--peak A/A ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ OLD tagger --------------- # xxx 101505-1508 ~ 70 K 29.82 +/- 2.06 6.82 +/- 2.46 ~10 # 672 101898-1925 ~171 K 27.47 +/- 1.77 9.93 +/- 1.74 ~10 ------------------ NEW tagger --------------- # xxx 101505-1508 ~ 18 K 18.6 +/- 1.3 low ~100 # 672 101898-1925 ~ 7 K 18.0 +/- 1.3 ~8. +/- ~2. ~10 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Comment: Two samples of H1-Runs that are shown in this table are ~ the same as were used by A.F. for calibrations. Conclusions: * X,Y histos prove that the new system should be OK. * There is a little worry about the not filled histos on Hits per Channel and on Efficiencies. * At present, histos on Det-Energy seem unreasonable, they show the Energies all lower than ~ 10 - 5 GeV. * They should be OK, because the E-Sums are ~OK, nevertheless comparing to E-Sums is looking strange. * E_Sums are looking OK, they show reasonable peaks: OLD tagger is looking fully OK, even in calibrations, * NEW tagger shows strange, too low Energies in a peak, Probably, NEW was wrong calibrated, at the time of L4. 03.05.1995 ================= F11LEV === new L4/L5 histograms ....... For information concerning LREC histograms. 1) L4 historgams are not yet final, because LREC installed at L4 is still an intermediate version (not latest, announced 30-Apr). L5 should be final ones, because Ralf Gerhards re-installed LREC at L5. Note also, that final LREC requires new function from future release of H1UTIL (EXTEL1) and thus cannot be installed at L4 before H1UTIL is released. 2) Efficiency plots will be empty until a correct macro will be provided for L4 and L5 !! These plots are only created in MACRO, not in LREC (due to the multiprocessor environment). LREC filles only conditional histograms, which are used to create eff.plots (by dividing these histograms) in corresponding LOOK Macro. These macros I shall send to Ralf and Kartharina when LREC will be officially installed everywhere. Eff.plots ARE created inside LREC ONLY in a single processor mode (e.g. offline user code, calling LREC). 3) There are no histograms with hits per channel in new LREC. 4) Calibration is used from the database. Since A.F. did not update LFRC and LESC banks in DB, this explains wrong scales for ET, PD and ET1. Shapes, however are correct. 03.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === LESC & LFRC Update Later... As You can see from messages at LogBook about Calibration there are 2 Relation Coefficients Sets for ET and PD, 2 values of CCvcs and none Relation Coefficients Sets for ET44 (only Calibration Coefficients). Both Relation Coefficients Sets for ET and PD are significantly different due to obvious reason - at first set of H1Lumi Calibration Runs (during only e+beam presence) - Runs 101505-101508 - OnLine Lumi Calibration did not work (bad start conditions, short time for getting good Luminosity subbranch calibration, bad looking at OnLine Energy distributions etc.). After getting calibration results from Run101505-508 it were made some corrections at start values of CCet,pd at OnLine Calibration and during Run 101903 calibration at OnLine was made more or less OK. But at this period all another branches (calibra- tion of VC with ET&PD&VC events and calibration of ET44 with ET44-ev.) were switched off for putting all attention on 'main' calibartion which is ground for all another on-line calibrations. So we had not any H1Runs with standard set of OnLineCalibrations - no any hopes on good DataBase calibration banks which are standard working with existed LREC package. And last - after getting of last calibration results (Run 101903) Yura Soloviev and Egor made tuning of some channels HV. So - it is better to have 1.s at Data Base then wrong values. 03.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === New Very Preliminary CCet44 It were made different little tunings at offline ET44 calibration procedure (which as seems will be added to online procedure too) and after recalculation of CCet44 it were produced next CCet44 values for data sample Runs 101505-101508: et0=8.266 et1=8.357 et2=7.355 et3=8.173 et4=8.305 et5= 8.357 final values of weights: 24. 0.655 2798. 3.2 16.7 0.65 start values of CCet44: 8.352 8.352 8.352 8.352 8.352 8.352 It were selected 99640 events with ET44=1 and only at 12234 events it was found some reconstructed energy at PD-detector. After cuts with ThrA=19.14 GeV and ThrB=1.15GeV -> 4053 events. It were added additional cuts (high thresholds on ET44dep<25GeV and on PDrec<4 GeV) and only 2427 events were got for calibration. ET44rec+Pdrec spectrum for these 2427 events seems as optimistic too: Mean = 27.64 GeV Sigma= 1.30 GeV. There are some plans to improve start values of CCet44 with V.Andreev 's procedure of estimation start values of CCet44. I have some plans to improve procedure on making of more quantity of iterations with intermediate rewind data sample and with finding of some criterium for finishing of ET44 calibration procedure for sample. 03.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Start H1DataTaking'95 Tonight Today at 16:30 H1 Run Coordinator (F.Sefkov) informed me that it is possible to wait first Luminosity Run'95 for experiments tonight. He asked to be somebody from Lumi experts on short call or may be to be at North Hall tonight. If Lumi Run will be at this night then from this Lumi Run it will be started calculation of Hera Produced, H1 Run Gated etc. Integrated Luminosity values. Lumi RUN#672 will be not accounted at all these values. 03.05.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Programs Development Today it was made new release of H1LumiOnLineFIC2 program (for FIC2- processor). Only InitCalibration.f and InitCalibration44.f subroutines were updated - new default values of CCet,CCpd,CCvcs and CCet44 were installed from last calibration data at Run 101903. These are creation dates and memory size of last release: H1LumiOnLineFIC2.......MPST MPS ....233920 Wed, May 03, 18:11 1995 Release was booted into FIC2 today at 18:15. 04.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === HERA Activity Last Night ... It was not Luminosity Run last night as it was promised earlier. P-beam activity yesterday evening had started at 19:15. P-beam was injected several times (near 5 p-injections). Last injection was at 21:40 with Ip=7mA and after p-beam lost during this injection up to 05:00 it were not fixed any activities of both HERA beams. At 5:00 HERA e+beam activity had started. 2 injections were fixed. Ie+max was near 3.5mA.Ramping was succesful during 2nd positron filling From 06:20 up to 08:05 stable 27.52 GeV e+beam lived at HERA. H1Lumi detectors were at parking positions at this time. Some problems were fixed with positron beam measurements during this filling (absence of Ie+ near 07:00 and between 07:55 and 08:05). Today morning HERA p-beam activity started at 08:40 and in progess now (10:00) Ip total near 3.0-3.2 mA, number of bunches 10. 04.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Final CCet44s for R101505-508 It were made different little tunings at offline ET44 calibration procedure (which as seems will be added to online procedure too) and after recalculation of CCet44 it were produced next CCet44 values for data sample Runs 101505-101508: et0=5.908 et1=5.913 et2=7.657 et3=5.922 et4=5.917 et5= 5.913 final values of weights: 3.5 0.65 3141.9 0.74 5.46 0.65 start values of CCet44: 5.913 5.913 7.884 5.913 5.913 5.913 It were selected 99640 events with ET44=1 and only at 12234 events it was found some reconstructed energy at PD-detector. After cuts with ThrA=19.14 GeV,ThrB=0.85GeV,ET44dep<25GeV,PDrec<5GeV and PDrec>1.2 GeV it were selected for calibration only 2387 events. ET44rec+Pdrec spectrum for these 2387 events seems as optimistic too: Mean = 27.48 GeV Sigma= 1.15 GeV. Start values were tuned with V.Andreev's calculated relation values for peaks dispositions at et2dep, et0dep and et4dep (as 21:1). It was changed PDrec<5GeV threshold (from 4 GeV). It was added new obvious cut on PDrec>1.2GeV (pedestal distr. cut). ThrB was tuned on 0.85 value from 1.15 (connected with decrementing of calibration coefficients at et1,et3 and et4). Peaks dispositions at FADCcounts distribution are the next: et2 - 2232, et0 - 137.8, et4 - 133, et1- 7.5, et3 - 67.5, et5 - 21.3 (all units - FADC counts). Energy distributions which were produced during 1st iteration of ET44 channels calibration it is possible to see at histos 58(ET44rec), 62(PDrec),63(VCdep) and 61(ET44rec+PDrec) at the next LOOK-binary data set at IBM storage: H1KFOM.CLOOK12.R101505 FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD 04.05.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Programs Development Today it was made new release of H1LumiOnLineFIC2 program (for FIC2- processor). Six subroutines (InitConstant1.f,SumEnergy44.f,LREC044.f, TriggerSelection.f,InitCalibration44.f,Calibration44.f) were updated. It were introduced all cuts and new values of tuning constants for ET44 channels calibrations. These are creation dates and memory size of last release: H1LumiOnLineFIC2.......MPST MPS ....234238 Thu May 04, 17:22 1995 Release was booted into FIC2 today at 17:30. 04.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Preliminary CCet44 Run101903 It was made attempt to produce CCet44-values with the same procedure as for events from Runs 101505-508. It were selected ET44=1 labeled events from LUMIMONs 30-33. It were produced next CCet44 values for data sample Run 101903: et0=6.009 et1=5.913 et2=8.886 et3=5.918 et4=5.842 et5= 5.913 final values of weights: 7.1 0.65 10810.2 0.8 20.0 0.65 start values of CCet44: 5.908 5.913 7.657 5.922 5.917 5.913 It were selected 51952 events with ET44=1 and only at 31922 events it was found some reconstructed energy at PD-detector. After cuts with ThrA=19.14 GeV,ThrB=0.85GeV,ET44dep<25GeV,PDrec<5GeV and PDrec>1.2 GeV it were selected for calibration only 7874 events. ET44rec+Pdrec spectrum for these 7874 events seems as optimistic too: Mean = 27.65 GeV Sigma= 1.29 GeV. Energy distributions which were produced during 1st iteration of ET44 channels calibration it is possible to see at histos 58(ET44rec), 62(PDrec),63(VCdep) and 61(ET44rec+PDrec) at the next LOOK-binary data set at IBM storage: H1KFOM.CLOOK2.R101903 FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD There is enough large difference with CCet44 for Run101505-508 (near 14%). From possible reasons it is possible to proclaim non good Ph.Arm calibration at Run 101903. If You remember we had estimation of Global Energy Shift for PhotonArm spectra near +12% (and this value was accounted at lrinit.f-subroutine for final values of CCpd. May be better to use Relation Coefficients and CCpd from LRPP-banks for more right CCet44-calibration. 5/05/95 =================== clerbaux === Lumi RUN# 673 Start date/time of Run 673 : 5/5/95 0:15:22 Collision time for H1 data taken: 2:45:54 - 2:46:01 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 1.18, Ip= 6.06 Start lumi value: 0.02 nb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.34 nb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided b. = 3 e+(-) bun. = 3, p-bun. = 30 e-pilot = 0, p-pilot = 27 HERA total lumi: 0.18 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 102457 - 102457 5/05/95 =================== clerbaux === Lumi RUN# 674 Start date/time of Run 674 : 5/5/95 3:39:09 Collision time for H1 data taken: 4:50:53 - 4:51:00 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 2.13, Ip= 5.18 Start lumi value: 0.04 nb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.59 nb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided b. = 14 e+(-) bun. = 16, p-bun. = 29 e-pilot = 2, p-pilot = 15 HERA total lumi: 0.18 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.06 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 102459 - 102459 05.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === No LUMIMONs at 673,674 LRuns During last two Lumi Runs (673 and 674) it was not switched on any from Lumi monitoring subtriggers at all recorded H1 Runs (102451- -102459) during period from 00:15:22 up to 04:51:00. So no any data for attempts of calibrations. OnLine Calibration of CCet and CCpd had produced new CCet and CCpd values (after correction of start values and after last HV tuning). First impression from view on produced values is optimistic - CCp11 got value near its neigbours cells. Energy distributions at OnLine pictures are looking as better then at previous Lumi Run (672). VC-calibration and ET44-calibration were switched off at OnLine - due to all attention on 'main' (ground) CCpd,CCet-calibration. 05.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === New Final CCet44s for R101505 V.Andreev found yesterday bug at ET44 Calibration OffLine-procedure and today CCet44 were recalculated again: final values of CCet44 (after 3 iterations): et0=6.133 et1=6.129 et2=8.201 et3=6.156 et4=6.130 et5= 6.129 final values of weights: 10.7 0.65 10848.4 1.087 17.72 0.65 start values of CCet44: 5.913 5.913 7.884 5.913 5.913 5.913 and it was made 3 iteration with tuning of ratio 1:21. It were selected 99640 events with ET44=1 and only at 31975 events it was found some reconstructed energy at PD-detector. After cuts with ThrA=19.14 GeV,ThrB=0.85GeV,ET44dep<25GeV,PDrec<5GeV and PDrec>1.2 GeV it were selected for calibration only 7912 events. ET44rec+Pdrec spectrum for these 7912 events seems as optimistic too: Mean = 27.64 GeV Sigma= 1.22 GeV. Energy distributions which were produced during 3rd iteration of ET44 channels calibration it is possible to see at histos 58(ET44rec), 62(PDrec),63(VCdep) and 61(ET44rec+PDrec) at the next LOOK-binary data set at IBM storage: H1KFOM.CLOOK15.R101505 FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD 6/05/95 ================== Movsesian === Lumi RUN# 675 Start date/time of Run 675 : 6/5/95 10:56:25 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:34:05 - 12:34:12 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 1.4, Ip= 6.33 Start lumi value: 0.09 nb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.4 nb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 16 e+(-) bunches = 17, p-bunches = 30 e-pilot b. = 1, p-pilot b. = 14 HERA total lumi: 0.26 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.21 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 102820 - 102862 P.S. at 12:33 HERA p-beam was lost. Due to bad BG conditions HV on H1 Trackers were not switched on. Twice HERA Clock errors had appeared during this Lumi RUN with all consiquences (crash of FIC#1-profram(SPUR), slow rates of all Luminosity subbranch triggers, wrong measurements of Lumi by Usik's applications etc.). In principle Lumi system worked OK during this measurements. At start of Lumi measurements it was found that Egor's bunch counters were masked (may be crates were switched off tonight). HERA e+beam lived up to 14:55. ZEUS Lumi team had some collimator positions measurements with more or less stable e+ beam. HERA clock error became enough often guest at H1. 06.05.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Programs Development Today it was made new release of H1LumiOnLineFIC2 program (for FIC2- processor). Three subroutines (LREC44.f,LREC044.f and LUREAD44.f) were updated for tuning of ET44rec-production. Now ETrec44 is looking for as reasonable. These are creation dates and memory size of last release: H1LumiOnLineFIC2.......MPST MPS ....234328 Sat May 06, 13:16 1995 Release was booted into FIC2 today at 13:20. During stable e+beam it were tested start values of CCet44 at OnLine Energy distribution spectra (produced with LREC44-package for selected for calibration ET44&VCv-triggered events): ETrec44+PDrec - mean value 27.57 GeV Sigma = 1.22 GeV; ETrec44 - mean value 24.76 GeV Sigma = 1.05 GeV; PhArmrec - mean value 2.81 GeV Sigma = 0.61 GeV; VCdep - mean value 0.77 GeV Sigma = 0.40 GeV; ET44dep+PhArmdep - mean value 2.73 GeV Sigma = 0.61 GeV; ET44dep - mean value 21.72 GeV Sigma = 1.02 GeV; PDdep - mean value 1.98 GeV Sigma = 0.58 GeV. Yesterday evening I switched on all 4 branches at Luminosity subbranch Trigger1 - ET&PD&nVC&nRandom - for CCet,CCpd-calibration Trigger2 - ET&PD&VC&nRandom - for CCvsc-calibration Trigger3 - VCv&nRandom - for LUMMbank histos Trigger4 - ET44&VCv&nRandom - for CCet44 calibration. 7/05/95 ==================== Dlugosz === Lumi RUN# 676 Start date/time of Run 676 : 7/5/95 0:13:36 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 9:10:55 - 12:14:58 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 4.48, Ip= 2.13 Start lumi value: 0.03 nb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 nb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 3 e+(-) bunches = 29, p-bunches = 6 e-pilot b. = 26, p-pilot b. = 3 HERA total lumi: 1.27 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.15 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.01 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.01 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 4 % , DT corr.: 9 % , Tot eff.: 4 % H1 Runs: 103087 - 103150 P.S.-Today morning it was found that ET44-response had decremented. More or less similar behaivour of ET44&VCv-events sample for ET44 channels calibration was found after making of CCet2=9.5 MeV/FADCcount and all another CCet=7.125 (75% from CCet2 value). Reason of decrementing is unknown. Rate at ET44 was fixed at start time of LumiRun near 200 kHz, It was fixed trip at one of ET44-channels at start period of Lumi Run (most probably that tripped channel was et2). - HERA Clock errors were fixed again during this LumiRun. - No any H1Runs with LUMIMONs at this Lumi Run too. 07.05.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Programs Development Today it was made new release of H1LumiOnLineFIC2 program (for FIC2- processor). One subroutine (Calibration44.f) was updated only for tuning of CCet44-production. These are creation dates and memory size of last release: H1LumiOnLineFIC2.......MPST MPS ....234398 Sun May 07, 12:56 1995 Release was booted into FIC2 today at 13:00. 08.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Temporary Access into HERA... Yesterday afternoon it was made good 60 bunches p-beam with Ep=820 GeV and Ip near 10 mA. It was made 2 attempts of e+filling (1st - at 16:00 with 66 bunches and with Ie+near 7 mA - lost after some minutes after end of ramping, 2nd - at 17:20 with 66 bunches and Ie+ mear 6.5 mA - lost during ramping) with this p-beam and during 2nd filling ramping 30% of p-beam was lost. This p-beam was dumped at 18:40 and new HERA stable p-beam was prepared only at 22:30 after set of unsuccesfull fillings between 19:00 and 21:40. Ip was fixed near 4 mA. From 23:00 up to 04:45 it were fixed 9 attempts of e+filling with Ie+ from 3mA up to 7 mA. All attempts of ramping finished with e+beam lost situations. At 05:35 p-beam was dumped and it was announced temporary acceess into HERA: "Temporary Access.Restart about 23:00". During 1st,4th and 7th e+fillings the ramping was finished and H1 Shift Crew made all needed manipulations with H1Lumi system for preparing of Lumi measurements - so we had 'empty' Lumi RUNs: 677,678,679: 7/05/95 ==================== Dlugosz === Lumi RUN# 677 Start date/time of Run 677 : 7/5/95 23:45:00 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:53:23 - 23:53:31 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 5.27, Ip= 3.91 Start lumi value: 0 nb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 nb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 30 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 30 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 103258 - 103260 8/05/95 ==================== Dlugosz === Lumi RUN# 678 Start date/time of Run 678 : 8/5/95 1:28:09 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:28:35 - 1:31:00 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 0.32, Ip= 3.90 Start lumi value: 0 nb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 nb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 30 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 30 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 103263 - 103263 8/05/95 ==================== Dlugosz === Lumi RUN# 679 Start date/time of Run 679 : 8/5/95 3:06:18 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:06:59 - 3:09:31 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 3.07, Ip= 3.90 Start lumi value: 0 nb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 nb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 30 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 30 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 103264 - 103264 9/05/95 ==================== maracek === Lumi RUN# 680 Start date/time of Run 680 : 9/5/95 6:12:09 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 10:47:07 - 10:47:14 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 4.42, Ip= 6.12 Start lumi value: 0.08 nb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.56 nb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 9 e+(-) bunches = 12, p-bunches = 30 e-pilot b. = 3, p-pilot b. = 21 HERA total lumi: 0.6 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.52 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 103503 - 103534 P.S.-Near 06:25 significant part of e+beam was lost (near 75%) -Peak Lumi was fixed near 06:35 ( near 8*10**28 cm-2sec-1) Peak Spec.Lumi was fixed near 09:20 (near 7*10**29 cm-2sec-1mA-2 after beam separations experiments; -Between 08:50 and 08:57 and between 09:03 and 09:19 HERA people made some manipulations with beam (beam separations) and Lumi value at this period was near zero; -e+beam was dumped at 10:45 as it was proclaimed by HERA people p-beam is living and there is some hope that new e+filling will be with the same p=filling; -It were fixed next messages at Egor's 'DAQ monitor'-application window: 07:53:28 LRTL bank is not transmitted - red 07:53:30 Slave FIC Reboot is succesful - green 07:53:31 Master FIC Reboot is succesful - green 08:02:27 LRTL bank transmission appeared alive - green -This Lumi RUN is first with ET44 OnLine calibration - it is possible to look for at off-line CCet44 behaivours with time (LR1P-banks are presented at each H1-events). -at this Lumi RUN it were not installed any from H1Lumi monito- ring triggers too (as at previous ones). 09.05.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Calibration ........ During last Lumi RUN #680 full scale OnLine Calibration worked. It means that CCet,CCpd,CCvcs and CCet44 calibration coefficients updated during all period of Lumi RUN. For calibration it were used next branches af Luminosity subbranch: trigger 1 - ET&PD&nVC&nRandom - for CCet and CCpd updating; trigger 2 - ET&PD&VC&nRandom - for CCvcs updating; trigger 4 - ET44&VCv&nRandom - for CCet44 updating; Note: VC- amplitude sensetive VC-trigger, VCv - fron sensetive VC-tr. nRandom - for excluding of generator pulses which are used for trigger thresholds monitoring at Egor's tools. trigger 3 - VCv&nRandom - for LUMM-bank histos production. Next CCvalues were produced at OnLine (values fixed near 09:48 today): Note: all CCet and CCet44 must be multiplicated on 3.65,CCpd - on 3.89 CCvcs - on 1.00 for getting MeV/FADCunits units. ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e07= 1.179 1.167 1.166 1.173 1.171 1.174 1.175 e14= 1.271 0.865** 1.269** 1.527** 0.879** 1.417** 1.305** e21= 2.094* 1.359* 1.444* 1.512* 1.276* 1.390* 1.240* e29= 1.722* 1.688* 1.567* 1.171* 1.328* 1.425* 1.312* e35= 1.192 1.163 1.074 1.173 1.185 1.177 1.153 e42= 1.174 1.174 1.174 1.183 1.176 1.174 1.174 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00=0.791 0.674 0.588 0.684 0.784 p05=0.571** 0.505** 0.818* 0.669* 0.590** p10=0.443* 0.798* 0.934* 0.753* 0.484** p15=0.711* 0.829* 0.724* 0.592* 0.612** p20=0.732 0.492** 0.522** 0.737 0.784 vcs=3.253* ==> ET44 Calibr.Coefficients Final Status et0= 1.913* 1.952 et2= 2.583* 1.950** et4= 1.987* 1.952 Note: *) -labeled channels are 'good' calibrated(weight more then 10.) **) -labeled channels are 'middle' calibrated (1. at this time slice was fixed as -0.6 cm at this time slice was fixed near 0.0 cm -firstly at this year it were changed shapes of PDrec and ETrec spectra for ETPDnVC-events (may be it means that another beam conditions appeared at this Lumi RUN, CCet44 were changed into more large side - response decremented - may be it is sign of another beam conditions too - another acceptance etc.). -rate with time of ET44-trigger element is looking as reasonable at this Lumi RUN (from Egor's history pictures). -all H1Runs from this Lumi RUN were recorded with Temporary logging Mode and there are no LUMIMONs at trigger setting of all recorded H1Runs. -p-beam which was used at this Lumi RUN was dumped at 13:17. 12.05.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Calibration ........ During last Lumi RUN #684 full scale OnLine Calibration worked. It means that CCet,CCpd,CCvcs and CCet44 calibration coefficients updated during all period of Lumi RUN. For calibration it were used next branches af Luminosity subbranch: trigger 1 - ET&PD&nVC&nRandom - for CCet and CCpd updating; trigger 2 - ET&PD&VC&nRandom - for CCvcs updating; trigger 4 - ET44&VCv&nRandom - for CCet44 updating; Note: VC- amplitude sensetive VC-trigger, VCv - fron sensetive VC-tr. nRandom - for excluding of generator pulses which are used for trigger thresholds monitoring at Egor's tools. trigger 3 - VCv&nRandom - for LUMM-bank histos production. Next CCvalues were produced at OnLine (values fixed near 09:13 today): Note: all CCet and CCet44 must be multiplicated on 3.65,CCpd - on 3.89 CCvcs - on 1.00 for getting MeV/FADCunits units. ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e07= 1.183 1.158** 1.166** 1.133** 1.197** 1.174 1.252 e14= 1.328 0.789* 1.364* 1.581* 0.929* 1.542* 1.300* e21= 1.813* 1.236* 1.462* 1.476* 1.186* 1.365* 1.239* e29= 1.576* 1.348* 1.496* 1.120* 1.270* 1.267* 1.165* e35= 1.192 1.167 1.003** 1.183 1.190 1.176 1.152 e42= 1.174 1.174 1.175 1.184 1.176 1.174 1.174 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00=0.763** 0.602** 0.484** 0.655** 0.785 p05=0.390** 0.479* 0.724* 0.627* 0.525** p10=0.451* 0.669* 0.767* 0.664* 0.452* p15=0.685* 0.668* 0.748* 0.562* 0.604** p20=0.691** 0.425** 0.541** 0.696** 0.785 vcs=3.695* ==> ET44 Calibr.Coefficients Final Status et0= 1.998* 1.952 et2= 2.392* 1.968** et4= 1.955** 1.952 Note: *) -labeled channels are 'good' calibrated(weight more then 10.) **) -labeled channels are 'middle' calibrated (1. at this time slice was fixed as -0.8 cm at this time slice was fixed near -0.5 cm - changed with time from -1.0 cm up to +1.0 cm, changed with time from -0.5 cm up to +0.3 cm before p-beam was lost it was fixed enough large changing at from +0.5cm to -1.9 cm during 7 min. (near 05:38). Xpd,Ypd plot fixed this non-standard beam position (due to enough long time existed). - ET44 rate during all Lumi RUN was near twice more then ET, ET44 rate during all Lumi RUN had correlated with another H1Lumi Trigger elements rates (VC,PD,ET) but sometimes only ET44 'reacted' on some changing at beam conditions (at 01:10, 01:55, 03:12, 04:07) with fast goto another rates; - some "average" rate values of ET44 near 150kHz,ET - near 65 kHz, PD - near 100kHz, VC - near 200 kHz. - "Something happened" time slice (near 02:54) rates ET*PD trigger rate was fixed at 02:54 near 360kHz ET*PD(bkg) rate was fixed at 02:54 near 280kHz VC trigger rate was fixed at 02:54 near 1500kHz VCmon trigger rate was fixed at 02:54 near 160kHz(little VC) PD trigger rate was fixed at 02:54 near 900kHz ET trigger rate was fixed at 02:54 near 650kHz ET44 trigger rate was fixed at 02:54 near 550kHz Luminosity at this time slice was fixed as 0.840 mkb-1sec-1 Sp.Lumi at this time slice was fixed as 0.380 mkb-1sec-1 Ie at this time slice was fixed as 12.5 mA Ip at this time slice was fixed as 35.6 mA at this time slice was fixed as +0.5 cm at this time slice was fixed near 0.0 cm This "somethimg happened" event started at 02:45 and finished at 03:05. We did not find any correlation with e-beam BG, P-beam BG, beam positions, some messages at H1 LogBook etc.). Peak rates were fixed at 02:54 at all H1Lumi detectors (rates were more then at start Lumi Run). Usik's Lumi values at this period were another then FIC#2's values. 13.05.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Calibration ........ During last Lumi RUN #685 full scale OnLine Calibration worked. It means that CCet,CCpd,CCvcs and CCet44 calibration coefficients updated during all period of Lumi RUN. Next CCvalues were produced at OnLine (values fixed near 12:05 today): Note: all CCet and CCet44 must be multiplicated on 3.65,CCpd - on 3.89 CCvcs - on 1.00 for getting MeV/FADCunits units. ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e07= 1.183 1.157 1.161 1.126** 1.209 1.174 1.329** e14= 1.353 0.761* 1.418* 1.598* 0.988* 1.576* 1.358* e21= 1.811* 1.268* 1.518* 1.465* 1.166* 1.338* 1.288* e29= 1.567* 1.248* 1.493* 1.147* 1.291* 1.302* 1.203* e35= 1.200 1.167 0.965** 1.184 1.190 1.183 1.152 e42= 1.174 1.174 1.175 1.184 1.176 1.174 1.174 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00=0.750** 0.590** 0.390** 0.607** 0.786 p05=0.350** 0.473* 0.726* 0.590* 0.490* p10=0.456* 0.665* 0.771* 0.664* 0.447* p15=0.687* 0.627* 0.776* 0.566* 0.633** p20=0.688 0.414** 0.538** 0.695 0.785 vcs=3.894* ==> ET44 Calibr.Coefficients Final Status et0= 2.052* 1.952 et2= 2.595* 1.984** et4= 2.118** 1.952 Note: *) -labeled channels are 'good' calibrated(weight more then 10.) **) -labeled channels are 'middle' calibrated (1. Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.003 0.986 0.990 1.144 1.051 1.000 1.028 1.005 0.949 0.964 0.945 0.933 0.957 0.832 0.869 0.917 0.882 0.925 0.956 0.927 0.914 0.847 0.923 0.918 0.879 0.880 0.875 0.854 1.123 1.008 1.000 1.049 1.000 1.003 0.990 0.000 0.999 1.003 1.013 1.002 0.998 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 1.004 1.016 0.785 0.993 0.999 0.922 1.043 0.975 0.975 0.950 1.004 1.034 1.054 1.062 0.951 1.037 1.024 0.950 0.915 0.970 0.990 0.967 1.041 1.043 0.999 As You can see these digits are near 1.0 values - due to Luminosity branch was more or less good calibrated: Runs 104319-104326 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 77K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.44 0.94 27.43 0.90 27.43 0.90 Runs 104319-104326 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 75K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.41 1.03 27.40 0.99 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from OnLine Calibration (see message from 13.05.95 CCvcs value was got from OnLine Calibration too (corrected on factor 1.1845 - see message at LL11 from 21.03.95): (CCvcs start = 3.894*1.1845=4.612 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with very good statistics). 15.05.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Run104319 Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned sample with events from Runs 104319-104326: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R104319 (60620 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R104319 50654 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-3.05%) and a very good resolution digits (13-14%) for (18-24)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R104319 76965 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R104319 74972 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 4.612 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 15.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Run104319 It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0305 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.984 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.041.So CCvcs = 4.612*1.041=4.801Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Run 104319: Runs 104319-104326 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 77K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.51 0.90 Runs 104319-104326 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 75.K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.52 1.01 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.335 4.228 4.210 4.945 4.752 4.288 5.084 5.039 2.628 4.972 5.512 3.400 5.479 4.107 5.834 4.617 4.980 4.939 4.193 4.432 4.481 5.156 3.679 5.336 3.881 4.504 4.397 3.961 4.959 4.244 3.528 4.622 4.347 4.332 4.158 e42= 4.285 4.284 4.304 4.374 4.303 4.281 4.285 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00= 2.880 2.300 1.163 2.321 3.058 1.190 2.006 2.880 2.432 1.792 1.861 2.827 3.088 2.790 1.660 2.756 2.495 2.838 2.075 2.389 p20= 2.642 1.571 2.182 2.645 3.054 vcs= 4.801 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last samples - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 6.5-7GeV. 15.05.1995 ================= F11LEV === LUMIMON data, L4/L5 plots ... 1) Missing LUMI enents on LUMIMON-49 from dedicated LUMI runs can be most likely explained by the fact, that the general data logging job on dice1 do not create LUMIMON minievents for temporary data. I have to check this with Ralf Gerhards. Selection/classification routines themselves are OK both on L4 and online logging. Anyway, it would be better to record any useful for us data in a permanent mode in future. I checked LUMIMON-49, there are no runs between 104316 and 104328 on this file at all. Moreover, there are no LUMI subtriggers in all LUMIMON files from 35 to 49 (H1 runs 102348-104347). Does it mean, that even in normal Lumi Runs lumi subtriggers are switched off? If yes, this is bad, because we cannot cross check online luminosity for these Lumi runs (674-687). 2) Due to the multiprocessor environment at L4 and L5, part of the LUMI control plots can only be created in LOOK macros (see my explanation earlier, 3-May-95). Corresponding macros can be copied from IBM: F11LEV.L4.LUMI.MACRO F11LEV.L5.LUMI.MACRO I also sent L4 macro-commands to Rolf Beyer, in order to incude them into a standard general L4 macro in NH. 16.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set R104319 Today it was firstly defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44- channels. It were selected 68936 events with ET44 from Runs 104319- 104326 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44.M708712.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 15865 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 5266 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.85 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV19.14&et1d<25&epd>1.2&epd<5.0&argt>0.85&vc.eq.1)' and it was built histo of EPD+ET1R*0.962. It was got 3594 events for this histo and X-peak 27.52 GeV and sigma 1.57 GeV So - it is possible to update LESC-bank for introducing of this Global Energy Shift for ET44-channels (0.962). Has anybody some objections? 18.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === New Glob.Shift in H1DataBase As final action of all 18.05.95 tuning steps it was made update of LESC bank at H1DataBase with S.Levonyan's tool. Bank-ID Rtyp Dtyp Version 1.Run L.Run Words Date Author Bank LESC (_582) 67 e-p data 505181525 104317 0 4 950518 H1KFOM 19.05.1995 ================= F11LEV === LUMI monitoring triggers ... Dear online colleagues, please insist on including all lumi monitor triggers in the system (enable them) in all Lumi runs! Minimum required for the offline lumi cross check is s91 - those MUST be always on. I do not understand, what H1 can gain disabling this small amount of very useful events. So, if not full set of lumi mon. triggers (as agreed in March-April) then in the following priority: s91 - with = 0.2-0.4 Hz - always! s86, s90 - to allow bgr. control for gamma-p physics, and to understand e-spectra and beam conditions PS: The request to include Lumi mon. trigger was done to E.Elsen today morning on operational meeting. Sofar we had no lumimon triggers due to the fact that H1 was always operating in phase 0 due to the problem to switch on trackers. (YuS). 20/05/95 ================= Movsesian === Lumi RUN# 690 Start - End of Run 690: 20/5/95 0:57:26 - 1:53:18 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:53:11 - 1:53:18 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 1.54, Ip= 2.03 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 9 e+(-) bunches = 12, p-bunches = 10 e-pilot b. = 3, p-pilot b. = 1 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105012 - 105021 20/05/95 ================= Movsesian === Lumi RUN# 691 Start - End of Run 691: 20/5/95 1:55:43 - 2:28:10 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 2:28:03 - 2:28:10 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 1.44, Ip= 2.00 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 9 e+(-) bunches = 12, p-bunches = 10 e-pilot b. = 3, p-pilot b. = 1 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105021 - 105021 P.S. Usik was called at near 02:00 due to HERA-people could not find Lumi. Lumi RUN #691 had appeared as attempt "to redefine" pilot bunches (really only one pilot bunch with 58 mkA existed). 20/05/95 ================= Movsesian === Lumi RUN# 692 Start - End of Run 692: 20/5/95 2:29:10 - 4:10:53 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 4:10:45 - 4:10:53 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 1.39, Ip= 1.98 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 12, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 12, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 0.03 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105021 - 105022 20/05/95 ================= Movsesian === Lumi RUN# 693 Start - End of Run 693: 20/5/95 11:28:28 - 17:54:44 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 13:27:53 - 17:54:44 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 7.5, Ip= 6.94 Start lumi value: 0.2 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.42 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 28 e+(-) bunches = 51, p-bunches = 30 e-pilot b. = 23, p-pilot b. = 2 HERA total lumi: 2.03 nb-1 HERA - physics: 1.82 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.9 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.6 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 46 % , DT corr.: 59 % , Tot eff.: 31 % H1 Runs: 105034 - 105066 P.S. First Lumi RUN with M-labeled at H1EP H1Runs (105040-105043 and 105051-105065). LUMIMONs were ON from H1Run 105051 (20.05.95 14:45:44) - first M-labeled H1Run with LUMIMONs. 21/05/95 =================== Cormack === Lumi RUN# 694 Start - End of Run 694: 21/5/95 10:28:01 - 16:18:34 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:18:27 - 16:18:34 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 24.81, Ip= 45.29 Start lumi value: 0.8 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.15 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 12.87 nb-1 HERA - physics: 11.45 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105119 - 105150 22/05/95 =================== Waugh === Lumi RUN# 695 Start - End of Run 695: 22/5/95 1:38:02 - 1:42:50 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:42:43 - 1:42:50 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 17.06, Ip= 33.81 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105177 - 105177 P.S. e+beam was lost soon after end of ramping 22/05/95 =================== Waugh === Lumi RUN# 696 Start - End of Run 696: 22/5/95 5:04:15 - 5:32:13 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:32:05 - 5:32:13 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 18, Ip= 33.77 Start lumi value: 0.04 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 15, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0.81 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105181 - 105182 P.S. e+beam was lost soon after end of ramping 22/05/95 ============ Richard Kashow === Lumi RUN# 697 Start - End of Run 697: 22/5/95 11:48:34 - 12:21:17 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:21:09 - 12:21:17 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 24.74, Ip= 33.50 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 1.41 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105212 - 105218 22/05/95 =================== ????? === Lumi RUN# 698 Start - End of Run 698: 22/5/95 17:34:36 - 3:25:09 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 18:09:12 - 3:25:09 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 22.5, Ip= 21.25 Start lumi value: 0.7 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.29 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 179 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 5 HERA total lumi: 14.96 nb-1 HERA - physics: 14.07 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 8.8 nb-1 H1data - physics: 4.88 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 62 % , DT corr.: 54 % , Tot eff.: 34 % H1 Runs: 105263 - 105335 23.05.1995 ================= F11LEV === New LUMI Ev.Display ........ New version of LUMI Event Display, including new tagger, is ready and tested. I sent a correction cradle to present H1ED librarian for official release. It may, however, take quite a while until it is available in H1, since Roly Martin is on holiday till 27 of May. Now the command LUMI shows our 3 detectors on top zone, and on the bottom the same lumi sketch remains. Also units have been corrected for SHOWLUMI command, according to our change in LRTL bank. 23.05.1995 ================= F11LEV === First M-lumi runs on LUMIMON First runs of Medium quality, written to LUMIMON 58, show, that the prescale factors for our triggers are badly off. Especially, s91 was downscaled too much (2000001) such that for ~1.5 nb-1 data there were only 53 events collected (at least factor of 4-6 too few). On the other hand, prescale for s90 was often to small, giving very many events (OK, may be people wanted to study ET-1 specifically?) For some M-runs (105040-43, 64-65) lumi mon. triggers were disabled. Thus, tuning of the prescale gaps for lumi.monitors s86-s95 is still required. The same is true for LUMIMON-62: - no lumi.triggers for many M-runs (e.g. 105330-335) - too large s91-prescale (2000001) -> 500 events for ~4 nb-1 - too small s90-prescale (40001) -> 10930 events -"- Propose: s91: 2000001 -> 200001, s90: 40001 -> 128000 PS: Yesterday I did request to E.Elsen to reduce S90 at phase 3 by factor 3 and to increase S91 by factor 4-5,he promised to do it. Problem is that there is no final trigger coctail due to the not standard HERA operation. (YuS). 24/05/95 =================== zhokin === Lumi RUN# 699 Start - End of Run 699: 23/5/95 23:42:22 - 7:41:20 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:23:45 - 7:41:20 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 21.37, Ip= 40.67 Start lumi value: 1.41 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 170 e+(-) bunches = 185, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 10 HERA total lumi: 29.04 nb-1 HERA - physics: 27.22 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 19.91 nb-1 H1data - physics: 11.13 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 72 % , DT corr.: 55 % , Tot eff.: 40 % H1 Runs: 105452 - 105529 P.S H1Run 105529 is first G-labeled Run at H1 Data Taking 95. 25/05/95 =================== dinezza === Lumi RUN# 700 (jubileum) Start - End of Run 700: 24/5/95 14:31:31 - 1:16:31 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 14:53:05 - 1:16:31 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 20.83, Ip= 39.24 Start lumi value: 1.68 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 171 e+(-) bunches = 186, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 9 HERA total lumi: 34.02 nb-1 HERA - physics: 32.94 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 22.94 nb-1 H1data - physics: 18.32 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 69 % , DT corr.: 79 % , Tot eff.: 55 % H1 Runs: 105576 - 105658 P.S. It were recorded 14 G-labeled at H1EP H1Runs during jubileum 700th Lumi RUN. 25.05.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Calibration ........ During last Lumi RUNs full scale OnLine Calibration worked. It means that CCet,CCpd,CCvcs and CCet44 calibration coefficients updated during all Lumi RUNs. Next CCvalues were produced at OnLine (values fixed near 14:00 today): Note: all CCet and CCet44 must be multiplicated on 3.65,CCpd - on 3.89 CCvcs - on 1.00 for getting MeV/FADCunits units. ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e07= 1.196 1.181** 1.231** 1.066** 1.323** 1.175 1.397** e14= 1.783** 0.765* 1.475* 1.679* 1.004* 1.560* 1.329* e21= 1.766* 1.252* 1.518* 1.474* 1.294* 1.480* 1.309* e29= 1.687* 1.399* 1.599* 1.172* 1.321* 1.339* 1.206* e35= 1.207** 1.190 0.948** 1.228 1.216 1.182** 1.185 e42= 1.174 1.174 1.175 1.184 1.189 1.174 1.174 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00=0.541* 0.541* 0.374* 0.552** 0.789 p05=0.287* 0.502* 0.754* 0.641* 0.483** p10=0.483* 0.731* 0.782* 0.677* 0.460* p15=0.677* 0.665* 0.713* 0.558* 0.648** p20=0.593** 0.415* 0.525* 0.643** 0.788 vcs=4.167* ==> ET44 Calibr.Coefficients Final Status et0= 2.185* 1.952 et2= 2.348* 1.918** et4= 2.229* 1.952 Note: *) -labeled channels are 'good' calibrated(weight more then 10.) **) -labeled channels are 'middle' calibrated (1. 0sec t>10sec t>20sec t>30sec t>40sec t>50sec t>60sec 10000 1248 155 29 6 2 0 t> 0min t> 1min t> 2min t> 3min t> 4min t> 5min t> 6min 10000 0 0 0 0 0 0 t> 0min t>10min t>20min t>30min t>40min t>50min t>60min 10000 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NEV(all_runs)= 179450 NEV_seleted(all)= 20000 (current R=104316) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- t> 0sec t>10sec t>20sec t>30sec t>40sec t>50sec t>60sec 20000 2784 382 77 22 5 1 t> 0min t> 1min t> 2min t> 3min t> 4min t> 5min t> 6min 20000 1 0 0 0 0 0 t> 0min t>10min t>20min t>30min t>40min t>50min t>60min 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- start_of_kabak vvv ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NEV(all_runs)= 278632 NEV_seleted(all)= 30000 (current R=105040) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- t> 0sec t>10sec t>20sec t>30sec t>40sec t>50sec t>60sec 30000 3417 639 301 230 208 200 t> 0min t> 1min t> 2min t> 3min t> 4min t> 5min t> 6min 30000 200 195 192 185 178 172 t> 0min t>10min t>20min t>30min t>40min t>50min t>60min 30000 140 81 3 0 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NEV(all_runs)= 321367 NEV_seleted(all)= 40000 (current R=105315) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- t> 0sec t>10sec t>20sec t>30sec t>40sec t>50sec t>60sec 40000 4962 862 374 248 209 200 t> 0min t> 1min t> 2min t> 3min t> 4min t> 5min t> 6min 40000 200 195 192 185 178 172 t> 0min t>10min t>20min t>30min t>40min t>50min t>60min 40000 140 81 3 0 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NEV(all_runs)= 344938 NEV_seleted(all)= 50000 (current R=105488) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- t> 0sec t>10sec t>20sec t>30sec t>40sec t>50sec t>60sec 50000 6923 1098 399 254 211 201 t> 0min t> 1min t> 2min t> 3min t> 4min t> 5min t> 6min 50000 201 195 192 185 178 172 t> 0min t>10min t>20min t>30min t>40min t>50min t>60min 50000 140 81 3 0 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- LUMI ALARMS on "NO_LRTL_for_time > 1_min(!)". SELECTED RUNS: ep*cc(!) --------------------------------------------------------------------- "time_of_LRTL_absence" is shown in the last column ------------vvvvvv LUMI_ALARM: no_LRTL A# 1_F R_104170 ep*cc 13.05.95 RUN# 685 ! 1_min LUMI_ALARM: no_LRTL A# 30_F R_104333 ep*cc 14.05.95 RUN# 687 ! 30_min LUMI_ALARM: no_LRTL A# 1_F R_104351 ep*cc 14.05.95 RUN# 687 ! 3_min LUMI_ALARM: no_LRTL A# 1_F R_105472 ep*cc 24.05.95 RUN# 699 ! 1_min LUMI_ALARM: no_LRTL A# 1_F R_105491 ep*cc 24.05.95 RUN# 699 ! 1_min LUMI_ALARM: no_LRTL A# 1_F R_105502 ep*cc 24.05.95 RUN# 699 ! 1_min LUMI_ALARM: no_LRTL A# 1_F R_105525 ep*cc 24.05.95 RUN# 699 ! 22_min LUMI_ALARM: no_LRTL A# 1_F R_105527 ep*cc 24.05.95 RUN# 699 ! 23_min --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: 1.) The beam configurations "other then ep*cc" are not shown here. 2.) For Ee=12 GeV (not shown here) N_of_ALARMS is larger ~*10 (!). 3.) The LUMM is not shown here. Usially it is absent with the LRTL 4.) The TCUR is not analyzed here. Usially it is ok when_no__LRTL. 5.) This job was done at the TCL's 7-18 of 1995, in off-line mode. 6.) The L4-ON-line version of the tool is not yet ready, no hurry. --------------------------------------------------------------------- CONCLUSIONS: 1.) The LRTL is dissappiering more often then it is wanted to do. 2.) Times of LRTL_absence are up to 30 minutes, difficult to believe. 3.) Beyond the LUMI RUNS# the situation is even much-much worse. L.Shtarkov, DESY, 25.05.95 26.05.1995 ================= F11LEV === Few remarks on last lumi data 1) Up to now (incl. LUMI RUN 700) all prescale gaps for lumi monitors (s90-s95) are far from optimal. Only s86 is ~OK, as expected. I am especially worried about miserable amount of s91 events, which makes impossible any offline cross-check of the luminosity. The aim was (and is) to cross-check and to correct each sample of ~150-200 nb-1 with sufficient precision (i.e. to have ~20K s91 events with E > (8-10)GeV). This corresponds to ~200 s91 ev./nb-1 (~50% of s91 satisfies the condition E > (8-10)GeV). Presently (see summary table of N.G. in WWW) this number is ~40/nb-1. Obviously, similar problem exists for the offline calibration procedure (see last message of A.F.) If the situation remains unchanged in the next LUMI RUN, I shall again write an official request to Elsen and Straumann myself. 2) There were several runs with missing lumi information in database found. The situation is familiar from the last year's experience. So far however, in none of these cases the fault of online LUMI has been observed. In 80% the missing LH1R/LH1T banks were explained by the "crash" of the standard TCL job on dice, caused by the temporary DB access problem. In few cases (e.g. runs 105525, 105630) there were no LRTL banks found in H1TCL files (18,19), but these banks were written to the raw data (HERA04.H1RAWD), such that in all cases my old offline tool was able to recover the missing lumi banks in database. Thus no evidence so far on the malfunctioning of the online LUMI system in that respect. Both Ralf Gerhards and Jan Olsson are informed on these situations. The measures must be taken in their area. 26/05/95 ================== dinezza === Lumi RUN# 701 Start - End of Run 701: 25/5/95 20:45:16 - 9:23:45 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:15:19 - 9:23:45 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 22.1, Ip= 37.34 Start lumi value: 1.02 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.25 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 37.23 nb-1 HERA - physics: 36.4 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 28.34 nb-1 H1data - physics: 19.6 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 77 % , DT corr.: 68 % , Tot eff.: 53 % H1 Runs: 105721 - 105803 26.05.1995 ================= F11LEV === LUMIMON data ................ Below is a fragment of LUMIMON-65 processing output. Numbers labelled s91, s86 and s90 are downcale factors. -999 means, the corresponding trigger was disabled. Conclusion: s86 and s90 are now both reasonably OK, s91 is still by factor of ~2 too few (too large downscaling). Not clear, why for many M runs lumi mon. triggers were disabled. For these runs offile lumi correction is impossible. L [nb-1] R(Ie) s91 s86 s90 RUN = 105609 G 0.7944 12.399 1000001 65537 65536 RUN = 105611 G 1.3875 12.437 1000001 65537 65536 RUN = 105616 G 2.9412 12.471 1000001 65537 65536 RUN = 105619 G 3.4004 12.412 1000001 65537 65536 RUN = 105621 G 3.6523 12.377 1000001 65537 65536 RUN = 105625 M 5.4941 12.409 -999 -999 -999 RUN = 105627 M 5.5152 12.355 -999 -999 -999 RUN = 105628 M 7.3957 12.359 -999 -999 -999 RUN = 105630 M 10.7301 12.399 -999 -999 -999 RUN = 105633 M 12.9001 12.321 -999 -999 -999 RUN = 105636 M 13.9499 12.295 -999 -999 -999 RUN = 105650 M 14.2808 12.317 -999 -999 -999 RUN = 105652 M 14.6945 12.334 1000001 65537 50001 RUN = 105655 M 14.8233 12.285 1000001 65537 50001 26/05/95 ================== dinezza === Lumi RUN# 702 Start - End of Run 702: 26/5/95 15:39:52 - 15:44:19 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:44:11 - 15:44:19 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 0, Ip= 0.00 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105854 - 105854 26/05/95 ================== dinezza === Lumi RUN# 703 Start - End of Run 703: 26/5/95 20:18:09 - 20:26:30 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 20:24:01 - 20:26:30 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.45, Ip= 60.58 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105866 - 105866 26/05/95 ================== dinezza === Lumi RUN# 704 Start - End of Run 704: 26/5/95 21:34:41 - 21:47:54 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:47:46 - 21:47:54 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.5, Ip= 60.53 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 105866 - 105866 27/05/95 ================== ??????? === Lumi RUN# 705 Start - End of Run 705: 27/5/95 4:43:24 - 11:53:06 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:09:58 - 11:53:06 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.01, Ip= 33.60 Start lumi value: 2.1 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.49 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 31.62 nb-1 HERA - physics: 30.35 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 21.64 nb-1 H1data - physics: 16.89 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 71 % , DT corr.: 77 % , Tot eff.: 55 % H1 Runs: 105875 - 105958 27/05/95 ================== barrelet === Lumi RUN# 706 Start - End of Run 706: 27/5/95 15:56:56 - 17:03:31 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:03:22 - 17:03:31 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 27.51, Ip= 64.74 Start lumi value: 3.03 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.35 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 10.35 nb-1 HERA - physics: 6.95 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 106004 - 106025 27/05/95 ================== naumann === Lumi RUN# 707 Start - End of Run 707: 27/5/95 23:44:57 - 23:50:43 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:50:35 - 23:50:43 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.62, Ip= 52.62 Start lumi value: 0.01 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 189, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 10.35 nb-1 <----- as seems non-right HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 106072 - 106072 28/05/95 ================== naumann === Lumi RUN# 708 Start - End of Run 708: 28/5/95 5:22:33 - 10:00:58 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:22:42 - 10:00:58 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 24.23, Ip= 52.99 Start lumi value: 2.21 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.38 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 18.28 nb-1 HERA - physics: 17.66 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 4.9 nb-1 H1data - physics: 4.39 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 27 % , DT corr.: 87 % , Tot eff.: 24 % H1 Runs: 106076 - 724249387 (106086)<-due to glob. quench(I.S) --------- >>>> ???? new "feature?" (S.L.) 28.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === View on Selected Events .. It was made attempt to select some useful for H1Lumi OffLine Calibra- tion data from latest 8 LUMIMONs (62-69). It were selected: 6503 events ETPDnVC (3220 with S94-trigger); 9873 events ETPDVC (4049 with s95-trigger); 2859 events s92; 132809 events ET44 (56243 with s90-trigger, 31210 with s85). It is not enough statistics for making OffLine Calibration yet. Latest Relation Coefficients and CCvcs at H1DataBase together with last release of LREC (inside H1REC 07.00/03) put the next results: Runs 105252-106076 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 6.5K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 27.73 0.94 27.74 0.90 27.78 0.89 Runs 105252-106076 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 10K events) all events xetcut Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 27.88 1.16 27.88 1.09 29/05/95 ================== naumann === Lumi RUN# 709 Start - End of Run 709: 28/5/95 23:34:48 - 6:52:28 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:31:14 - 6:52:28 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 22.97, Ip= 45.58 Start lumi value: 1.21 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.28 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 35.35 nb-1 HERA - physics: 28.87 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 24.22 nb-1 H1data - physics: 20.05 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 83 % , DT corr.: 82 % , Tot eff.: 69 % H1 Runs: 106265 - 106291 29/05/95 ================== tasevsky === Lumi RUN# 710 Start - End of Run 710: 29/5/95 15:07:50 - 16:36:02 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:45:38 - 16:36:02 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 22.21, Ip= 44.86 Start lumi value: 1.04 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.22 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 5.56 nb-1 HERA - physics: 3.56 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 1.99 nb-1 H1data - physics: 1.51 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 54 % , DT corr.: 72 % , Tot eff.: 41 % H1 Runs: 106323 - 106338 30/05/95 ================== tasevsky === Lumi RUN# 711 Start - End of Run 711: 30/5/95 10:30:17 - 23:51:47 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 10:59:38 - 23:51:47 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 23.61, Ip= 49.98 Start lumi value: 2.07 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.39 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 172 e+(-) bunches = 186, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 14, p-pilot b. = 8 HERA total lumi: 51.29 nb-1 HERA - physics: 49 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 30.71 nb-1 H1data - physics: 17.87 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 62 % , DT corr.: 58 % , Tot eff.: 36 % H1 Runs: 106416 - 106555 31/05/95 ================== tasevsky === Lumi RUN# 712 Start - End of Run 712: 31/5/95 2:09:31 - 4:54:13 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:33:59 - 4:54:13 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 24.9, Ip= 49.29 Start lumi value: 1.78 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.32 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 13.4 nb-1 HERA - physics: 9.38 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 7.23 nb-1 H1data - physics: 6.18 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 76 % , DT corr.: 84 % , Tot eff.: 65 % H1 Runs: 106563 - 106569 31.05.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Event Selection for calibr. Today it were prepared first data sets for calibration which were produced from LUMIMONs 62-73 (985772 events). It were selected: 13735 ETPDnVC events 20325 ETPDVC events 9963 s92 events and 34020 s91 events 190439 ET44 events At Nelly's classification I found only 5816 s92 events at these LUMIMONs. It were selected 34020 s91 events (at Nelly's classification it were found only 17295 s91 events at 62-73th LUMIMONs). It is not understandable yet. Selected events were tested with H1ED and I did not find any nons91 and nons92 event at data set H1KFOM.S9291.M6273.C00 Who knows - is it possible that calssification at L4 is made not for all H1Lumi-events? All selected events are kept at the next data set at /acs/user/fomenko pool: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M6273.C00 39334680 13735 events H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M6273.C00 58184280 20325 events H1KFOM.S9291.M6273.C00 114178680 43983 events (34020s91+9963s92) H1KFOM.ET44.M6273.C00 260041320 H1KFOM.ET44.M6273.C01 239583960 190439 events at both data sets In principle it is possible to try first calibration 95 with events selected from LUMIMON data set (with possible recalibration after more statistics collection). At these data sets it were collected data from H1Runs 105252 - 106563 recorded from 22.05.95 up to 31.05.95 (10 days). 01.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Central Power Failure Yesterday at 17:34 Central Power Failure happened. At this period HERA p-beam with 820 GeV and Ip=46.5mA existed at HERA p-ring. During night and today morning all DESY accelerators were switched off. Problem under study as proclaimed at HERA TV-screen (09:00 today). 01.06.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 1A Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 105252-106563 data sample (1A).It were selected 13735 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M6273.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 20325 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M6273.C00 -C 9963 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M6273.C00 -C It were got 13735 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 7261 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.984 0.965 0.935 1.297 0.968 0.000 0.959 0.730 0.835 0.799 0.807 0.870 0.876 0.813 0.916 0.951 0.877 0.886 0.911 0.856 0.866 0.799 0.887 0.883 0.870 0.852 0.878 0.837 1.182 0.856 1.023 1.010 0.979 1.011 0.970 0.000 0.999 1.004 1.030 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 1.422 1.109 0.796 1.089 0.000 1.022 1.056 1.060 0.972 0.962 0.979 1.044 1.055 1.069 0.954 1.087 1.027 1.017 0.997 0.952 1.161 0.973 1.018 1.058 0.993 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=4.801 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 105252-106563 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 14K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.33 0.90 27.33 0.87 27.37 0.87 Runs 105252-106563 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 20K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.52 1.07 27.53 1.02 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from Run104319 Calibr. (see message from 15.05.95 CCvcs value was got from this Calibration too (see message from 15.05. 1995): (CCvcs start = 4.801 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was very succesful (with not very good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was not made due to poor statistics. 01.06.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 1A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1A sample with events from Runs 105252-106563: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R105252 (15581 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R105252 5492 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-1.5%) and a very good resolution digits (15-18%) for (6-24)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R105252 13590 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R105252 19940 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 4.801 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 01.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 1A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.015 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.999 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.917.So CCvcs = 4.801*0.917=4.403Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Run 105252: Runs 105252-106563 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 14K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.52 0.90 Runs 105252-106563 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 20K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.59 0.99 With attempt to make correction factor for CCvcs less then 0.917 LOOK peak finder mean value made jump into 27.46 area (for ETPDVC-evts) P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.335 4.226 4.199 4.544 4.744 4.288 5.057 5.110 2.296 4.465 4.944 3.336 5.243 4.119 5.773 4.582 4.995 4.749 4.347 4.660 4.268 5.017 4.734 5.177 3.853 4.426 4.423 3.908 5.231 3.679 3.524 4.533 4.349 4.373 4.186 e42= 4.285 4.283 4.307 4.432 4.303 4.281 4.285 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00= 2.861 2.319 1.179 2.322 3.058 1.151 2.165 3.029 2.451 1.794 1.931 3.073 3.005 2.821 1.708 2.820 2.501 2.945 2.257 2.392 p20= 2.640 1.566 2.070 2.639 3.054 vcs= 4.403 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last samples - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 6.5-7GeV. 01.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 1A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 1A.It were selected 190439 events with ET44 from Runs 105252- 106563 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44.M6273.C00-C01 -C From this data set it were selected 50835 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 13828 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.85 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV19.14&et1d<25&epd>1.2&epd<5.0&argt>0.85&vc.eq.1)' and it was built histo of EPD+ET1R*0.955. It was got 11K vents for this histo and X-peak 27.53 GeV and sigma 1.51 GeV So - it is possible to update LESC-bank for introducing of this Global Energy Shift for ET44-channels (0.955). 02.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === New Glob.Shift in H1DataBase As final action of all 02.06.95 tuning steps it was made update of LESC bank at H1DataBase with S.Levonyan's tool. Bank-ID Rtyp Dtyp Version 1.Run L.Run Words Date Author Bank LESC (_582) 69 e-p data 506021118 105252 0 4 950602 H1KFOM 02.06.1995 ================= F11LEV === LUMIMON classes ............ The only possible explanation for the difference between Nelly's WWW LUMIMON statistics and Fomenko's selection of s91, s92 events could be (on my view) the use of class=26. In WWW summary table only CLASS=26 is used (standard TRIGGER SET=0). If A.F. used ALL LUMIMON events, not requiring class=26, then the difference may come from that. The difference in the total # of events on files 62-73 also supports this assumption. Note, that we did such a classification intentionally, because in other trigger SETS (1,2, ...?) the meaning of s90-s95 could be completely different. May be, that for s91 and s92 they were (by accident?) the same, but in many cases we know (and observed in practice), that the same subtrigger number is used for different triggers in different TRIGGER SETS. At L4 the classification is made for ALL Lumi events, unless the FARM crashes. But in latter case the events will not be even written to LUMIMON files, so this cannot be an explanation of the difference. P.S. I just checked the assumption, that "additional" s91,s92 (etc.) events come from FPACK class NOT = 26. And this is indeed the case So, may be (but I am not completely sure) these events are still OK for calibration purposes, but they definitely cannot be used for lumi cross-check/correction or for physics analysis (corresponding runs are even not Poor quality, they simply are not in H1EP, and often are taken during lumi tuning, or so; see e.g. run 106563, 106579-106595). 02.06.1995 ================= H1KSHE === PD low bit problem.......... As was found today the time slice for PD low tr.bit in the LUMI Event Display is drasticaly differ from other our trig. bit time slices. Fortunatly HERA has started today positron's study and i had exelent coditions for check everything. Finaly i have found the reason of the problem. All our tr. bits behaviour (incl. PDlow) are OK up to input in central trigg.bit distributer box, but at the output from this box the PDlow (TB1) is drasticaly changed. The behaviour of the PDlow after tr.b.distr.box looks like bad contact somewhere inside. I've sent mail to Felix Sefkow allready asking to fix the problem. P.S. (S.L.) It is good, that this nasty problem was found and traced back to its reason. However, could Igor (or somebody else) give more information, namely: 1) Since when lumi TB1 was deteriorated in CT ? 2) What does it mean for the s91 subsample? Most likely, we cannot use an absolute number of s91 events for offline lumi estimate, or can we? For example, if the time slice is wrong, then it will be discrepancy between the trigger decision (from TLV1 bank) and energy readout (LRPE --> LPDR banks). Furthermore, I think this information, after careful study, must be reported on DQM, and all concequences should be clearly explained to the community. A good way is to look through H01GOG.MLOOK.C95... files and study the behaviour of s91 events, etc. Unfortunately here in Moscow a graphical possibilities are very poor, but I also shall try to look into these files. The distribution of various trigger elements over time slices can be studied using LUMIMON files; H01GOG.MLOOK files contain only one (central=standard=0) time slice. 06.06.1995 ================= H1KSOL === PD low bit problem.......... S91 ST bit was deteriorated since 11.05.95 (Lumi Run#684). There was no connection of one pin on the backplane of distribution box in CT crate. It seems that we cannot use S91 for Lumi offline correction for that time. Since today morning all is OK. 07.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === CC Behaivours with Time.... Today firstly it was made the analyze of calibration coefficients behaivours with time at 1A-sample of events (H1 Runs 105252-106563). It were analized CC behaivours during 10 days (from 22.05.1995 up to 31.05.95). a) CCet44: only CCet2 was changed significantly (+-10%) around mean value near 9.1 MeV/FADCcount; At start of Lumi RUN CCet2 ordinary makes jump at its value into high level and CCet2 is decrementing during Lumi RUN and has min value at the end of Lumi RUN. b) CCvcs: CCvcs was changed more or less reasonable (+-8%) around mean value near 4.09 MeV/FADCcount. At start of Lumi RUN CCvcs ordinary makes jump at its value into low level and CCvcs is incrementing during Lumi RUN and has max value at the end of Lumi RUN. c) CCet: All hot cells CCet (e21-e34) have more or less similar behaivours with time - each new Lumi RUN is the reason of CCet jump into more high level (near +5-7%) and CCet slowly decremented to end of e+filling. CCet29 had jumps up to 16%. d) CCpd: Hot channels CCpd(p11,p12.p13,p15,p16,p17) have the same behaivour as CCet - incremention after start of Lumi RUN and decremention during Lumi RUN (jumps at start of Lumi RUN near +10%, CCp13 - up to +20%). 08.06.1995 ================= F11LEV === Offline lumi calculation.... A standard procedure of the luminosity calculation based on the s91 event sample from LUMIMON files 62-74 has been performed. I remember about the trigger bit problem, reported by Igor (although I cannot quantify the effect - can anybody?), so this was only done in order to check, that the complete chain works technically and is ready for the analysis. The results are the following. H1 runs: 105288 - 106568 (G+M only) Online L: 122.52 nb-1 --> 108.0 nb-1 (removing G+M runs, where all LUMIMON triggers were disabled) Offline L: 75.5+-2.9 nb-1 Calibration: E_scale = 1.018+-0.011 (+1.8+-1.1%) Resol. = 18.8+-4.6% Conclusions: 1) The procedure works fine 2) The calibration and resolution of PD-arm is OK 3) Offline/online difference in L is ~30%, which could mean anything (either online L is OK and 30% of s91 events were lost due to the bad CT-connector or # of s91 events is nontheless OK and online lumi is on 30% too high, or both s91 and online L are wrong) 4) An attempt to use s93 sample for offline L estimate was unsuccessful (miserable statistics). 5) s91 statistics is also small by factor of 2-3, leading to ~4% statisticall error for ~100 nb-1. 09.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === More about CC-changing/time Most sensitive to e+fillings and to changable conditions at HERA tun- nel are: et2,p13,e29 and vcs. During one e+filling CCet2 is changed up to 13% from start value and always into low direction. It means then immediately after satrt of new Luminosity Run CCet2 is became largest and during Luminosity Run always CCet2 is decrementing (sometimes up to 13% - at Lumi RUN 711 for example). Ordinary the range of CCet2 changing during one Lumi Run is from 5% up to 12%. CCe29 is most sensetive from all hot channels CCet: up to 13% too (during Lumi RUN 701). Ordinary - 4%,5%,7%,8%,10% and 11%. Always CCe29 had maximal value at start of Lumi RUN and lowest - at middle of Lumi RUN - a little incremented to end of Lumi RUN. CCp13 is most sensetive from all hot channels CCpd: up to 20% (during Lumi RUN 701). Ordinary - 3%,5%.6%,10%,13% and 14%. Always maximal CCp13 is at start of Lumi RUN and lowest - at end of Lumi RUN. CCvcs is changed up to 12% during one Lumi RUN (Lumi RUN 709).Ordinary CCvcs changing range during one Lumi RUN is near 3%,4%,4.5%,7%,8.5% and 10%. Always behaivour of CCvcs is vice versa as all previous CC - minimal value CCvcs had at start of any Lumi RUN. During Lumi RUN CCvcs became more and more and CCvcs maximal value is achieved at end of Lumi RUN. During last 4 Lumi RUNs (709-712) it is seen permanent incrementing of CCvcs (at the end of Lumi RUN 712 CCvcs had value on 20% more then at start of Lumi RUN 709). May be it is interesting to proclaim some digits which are connected with 1A-sample of events for calibration. These are mean values of CCet,CCpd,CCet44 and CCvcs from 14658 LREP,LRPP and LR1P banks for hot channels and its sigmas (all values at MeV/FADCcounts): ==> Mean Values of OnLine CCet (1A-sample): e28=6.160 5.239 5.929 4.417 5.096 5.033 ?.??? e21=6.494 4.873 5.729 5.396 4.734 5.381 4.925 ==> Sigma Values of OnLine CCet (1A-sample): e28=0.128(*) 0.147(!*)0.064 0.056(*) 0.107(*) 0.082 ?.??? e21=0.116 0.133 0.106 0.056 0.118(*) 0.123(*) 0.104(*) ==> Mean Values of OnLine CCpd (1A-sample): p15=2.601 2.454 2.937 2.229 ?.??? p10=1.893 2.853 2.883 2.657 1.786 p05=1.125 2.007 2.850 2.503 1.865 ==> Sigma Values of OnLine CCpd (1A-sample): p15=0.038 0.060 0.076 0.056 ?.??? p10=0.042(*) 0.080(*) 0.104 0.115(!) 0.009 p05=0.033 0.034(*) 0.059 0.038 0.019 ==> Mean Values of OnLine CCet44 (1A-sample): et4=7.977 7.124 et2=9.083 6.984 et0=8.098 7.124 ==> Sigma Values of OnLine CCet44 (1A-sample): et4=0.021 0.000 et2=0.275(!) 0.021 et0=0.046 0.000 ==> Mean and Sigma Values of OnLine CCvcs (1A-sample): vcs=4.110 0.162(!*) Response degradation is seen at the next hot cells (not more then 1% per day) (*)-labeled: e25,e26,e27,e28,e29,e31,e32 p06,p10,p11 vcs (at last 4 Lumi Runs) 1% from CC value is seen at e25 and p11. At all another proclaimed channels response degradation is less then 1% from CC-value per day. 09.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Relation Coefficient for vcs Today it was made attempt to produce Relation Coefficient value for VCs-channel for 1A-sample. With using of 01.06.95 Relation Coefficient set for ET and PD and with using of Global Shifts and CCvcs which were produced 01.06.95 for data sample 1A it were processed ETPDVC- events from 1A-sample (21568 events) and it was produced 100th ntupel at which it were presented FADC-response of VCS-channel (VCF) and CCvcs online value (CCV). It was find Relation Coefficient vor VCS from histo: do '/xc=(xet<6.0&xet>-6.0)' bins 200 22 32 do 'hs(400)=nt(100)(etrec+(pdrec-vcdep)+1.069(ccv*vcf/1000000.)@(xc)' LOOK peak finder shows for 400th histo - mean value 27.52GeV and sigma=0.98 GeV. For 'old' histo (etrec+pdrec) - mean value = = 27.57 GeV and sigma = 0.98 GeV with xc cut. In principle it is possible to use Relation Coefficient for VCS at LREC inside H1REC if Sergey Levonyan will change VCDEP-calculation formula and if at LFRC-bank I'll put 1.069 value but not 4.403 as it was before. High mentioned 100 ntupel is kept at next LOOK-binary data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.LOOK.R105252.ETPDVC.CCVCS FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD What is S.Levonyan's opinion? Is it needed to introduce Relation Coefficient for VCs-channel? 09.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Event Selection for calibr. Today it were reprepared data sets for calibration which were produced from LUMIMONs 62-74 (included 74th LUMIMON).It were selected: 14658 ETPDnVC events 21568 ETPDVC events 10502 s92 events and 35765 s91 events 52449 ET44VC events All selected events are kept at the next data set at /acs/user/fomenko pool: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M6274.C00 42106680 14658 events H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M6274.C00 61926480 21568 events H1KFOM.S9291.M6274.C00 120415680 46267 events (35765s91+10502s92) H1KFOM.ET44VC.M6274.C00 139902840 52449 events At these data sets it were collected data from H1Runs 105252 - 106569 recorded from 22.05.95 up to 31.05.95 (10 days) - Lumi RUNs 698-712. 13.06.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === H1Lumi OnLineSW Tools Status Today it was made new attempt to collect into one list all OnLine SW products which are ready on today for working inside H1Lumi OnLine System. Its are working or inside H1Lumi/H1Lumi2 MacIIs or inside some from 3 FICs or inside HERA's MacII or inside ZEUS's MacII or inside any MacII at H1 LAN area: a) ReadOut SW Tools: -------------------- 1) TwinFIC1..............26.04.95 23:44 88926 application (MPW RTF) 2) TwinFIC1slave.........27.04.95 01:39 42172 application (MPW RTF) b) OnLine Luminosity Measurement,OnLine Calibrations, Monitoring and Control Tool: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3) H1LumiOnLineFIC2......07.05.95 12:56 234398 application (MPW RTF) c) H1Lumi System Monitoring and Control Tools: ---------------------------------------------- 4) LTH1..................07.06.95 22:10 75583 application (MPW Pasc LongTermHist..........23.05.95 15:37 64481 application (MPW Pasc 5) DAQmonitor............12.05.95 21:40 40760 application (MPW Pasc 6) T_MonitorNC...........30.04.93 19:52 1177286 SuperCard application 7) BeamProfile...........09.08.94 20:41 157968 application (MacApp) 8) BeamPosition..........03.09.93 17:11 26726 appl.(former DA) 9) Energy_fic1...........15.04.93 13:10 19776 appl.(former DA) 10) Energy_Newb09.........03.09.93 17:12 19570 appl.(former DA) 11) Intensity_b09.........03.09.93 17:13 26103 appl.(former DA) 12) Bunches_hw............03.09.93 17:11 18475 appl.(former DA) 13) NewFastLumiMonitor95..11.11.91 15:17 894720 SuperCard project SharedFile............12.06.90 00:00 505706 SuperCard project 14) Beam_Currents (beams currents and transmission monitoring) d) Tool for supporting of OnLine Luminosity Measurements: ---------------------------------------------------------- 14) Beam_Currents.........08.06.95 20:13 51050 application (ThinkC) BeamC.Rsrc............11.06.95 15:32 52885 resource file e) OnLine Luminosity Measurements Presentation and Distribution Tools: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 15) LTV...................06.06.95 13:11 89344 application (ThinkC) LTVmon.Rsrc...........06.06.95 13:08 101209 resource file 16) Lproc.................14.05.95 16:36 32876 application (ThinkC) Lserv.Rsrc............13.04.95 16:55 16204 resource file 17) H1_Lumi...............07.06.95 00:37 66194 application (ThinkC) H1_Lumi.Rsrc..........09.06.95 16:54 99892 resource file 18) H1Lumi_10minutes_Monitor 09.05.95 13:19 44196 application (ThinkC) Lfclient.Rsrc........... 01.06.95 13:38 23654 resource file 19) H1Lumi_2 _hours_Monitor. 29.05.95 13:45 44062 application (ThinkC) L2hclient.Rsrc.......... 29.05.95 14:21 23872 resource file 20) H1Lumi_20_hours_Monitor. 29.05.95 13:54 44082 application (ThinkC) LLclient.Rsrc........... 29.05.95 14:21 23236 resource file 21) Lserver4unix..........09.10.94 21:57 46090 application (ThinkC) Lserv.Rsrc............05.10.94 16:24 16073 resource file f) SlowControl Tools: --------------------- 6) T_MonitorNC (connected with Central SlowControl System - BBL3 alrms 14) Beam_Currents(connected with Central SlowControl System - SlowEvent 22) CAEN..................02.05.94 08:40 126652 SuperCard Project 23) MovablePlatforms......03.02.91 19:10 113792 SuperCard Project P.S. For all SuperCard Project - creation dates are written into list, for all other - last modification dates are written into list. for any case - application disposition: H1Lumi2:HD_LPI:Development:LTVMonitor: LTV H1Lumi2:HD_LPI:Development:Lproc: Lproc H1Lumi2:HD_LPI:Applications:LAN_Appls: H1_Lumi H1Lumi2:HD_LPI:Applications:LAN_Appls: H1Lumi_10minutes_Monitor H1Lumi2:HD_LPI:Applications:LAN_Appls: H1Lumi_2 _hours_Monitor H1Lumi2:HD_LPI:Applications:LAN_Appls: H1Lumi_20_hours_Monitor H1Lumi2:HD_LPI: T_MonitorNC H1Lumi2:HD_H1LUMI:OnlHistory: LongTermHist,LTH1 H1Lumi:HD_LPI:MPW:Wdog: DAQmonitor H1Lumi:HD_LPI:Applications:Lserever4unix: Lserver4unix H1Lumi2:HD_LPI:Applications: MovablePlatforms H1Lumi:HD_LPI:Applications: CAEN H1LumiOnLine Applications Standard/Option Operation: ---------------------------------------------------- + standard operation |FICs H1Lumi H1Lumi2 HERAMac ZEUSMac anyMac o option | Mac Mac ---------------------------|------------------------------------------ TwinFIC1 | + | + TwinFIC1slave | + | + ---------------------------|------------------------------------------ H1LumiOnLineFIC2 | + | + -----------------------|---|------------------------------------------ LTH1 | + | + DAQmonitor | + | + o T_MonitorNC | + | + BeamProfile | o | o o BeamPosition | + | + o Energy_fic1 | o | o o Energy_Newb09 | + | + o Intensity_b09 | o | o o Bunches_hw | + | + o NewFastLumiMonitor95 | o | o o -----------------------|---|------------------------------------------ Beam_Currents | + | + -----------------------|---|------------------------------------------ LTV | + | + Lproc | + | + H1_Lumi | + | + + + o H1Lumi_10minutes_Monitor o | o o o o H1Lumi_2 _hours_Monitor| + | + + + o H1Lumi_20_hours_Monitor| + | + + + o Lserver4unix | + | + -----------------------|---|------------------------------------------ CAEN | o | o MovablePlatforms | o | o ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 17.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === HERA p-beam activity ....... Yesterday after 11:30 it was fixed first activity of HERA p-beam after large rapairing at HERA p-ring. From 11:30 up to 14:35 it were fixed 3 p-beam injections with Iptotal max near 13.2 mA. After pause 14:35 - 21:05 during all nignt and today morning it were made 15 p-beam injections with Iptotal not more then 2.5 mA. 18/06/95 =================== Rybicki === Lumi RUN# 713 Start - End of Run 713: 18/6/95 2:00:53 - 3:04:59 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:02:09 - 3:04:59 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.19, Ip= 22.64 Start lumi value: 0.01 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 0.07 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.02 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 108334 - 108336 18/06/95 =================== Rybicki === Lumi RUN# 714 Start - End of Run 714: 18/6/95 5:17:16 - 5:51:48 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:51:36 - 5:51:48 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.42, Ip= 22.56 Start lumi value: 0.09 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.04 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 0.3 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 108341 - 108341 18/06/95 =================== Rybicki === Lumi RUN# 715 Start - End of Run 715: 18/6/95 5:54:49 - 5:55:10 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:55:03 - 5:55:10 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 21.75, Ip= 21.97 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 108341 - 108341 18/06/95 =================== Rybicki === Lumi RUN# 716 Start - End of Run 716: 18/6/95 5:59:10 - 12:09:57 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:09:48 - 12:09:57 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 21.49, Ip= 21.96 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 189, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 0.45 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 108341 - 108348 18.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Some Comments to LastLumiRUNs Yesterday after 19:10 HERA p-beam injection was started and near 20:30 p-beam with Ip=23mA with 180 bunches and with Ep=820GeV was prepared. HERA e+beam injections were started after 22:00. First succesful ramping of e+ring was fixed near 02:00 tonight with Ie total near 30mA. At this period was fixed start of Lumi RUN #713. Movable Platforms were put into Working Position. VCrate was fixed near 1.4 MHz, PD total rate was fixed near 0.7 MHz, ET total rate - 0.4 MHz, ET44 total rate - 0.18 MHz, ET&PD total rate - near 0.25 MHz. Very low Lumi value was measured - near 40 mb-1sec-1, Specific Lumi - near 10 mb-1sec-1mA-2. Some manipulation with Lumi tuning at H1 IP were started and after 5 min. of tuning at all H1Lumi Detectors it were fixed huge rates: VC - near 8.7MHz, PD - 5.6MHz, ET - 1.3 MHz, ET44 - 0.7 MHz, VC tunnel counter - near 0.5MHz, ET&PD rate - near 1MHz. Near 02:20 all rates skipped on value on one order less: VC - 1.2Mhz, PD - 0.5MHz, ET - 300 kHZ, ET44 near 180KHz, VCtunnel - near 170 kHZ,ET&PD - near 200KHz. was fixed near -0.7cm, near -0.15cm. Luminosity value was low and it were made some Lumi tuning attempts but without success. Near 02:55 during tuning into -1.5 cm region it was fixed max Lumi value at this Lumi RUN - near 250mb-1sec-1 and Specific Lumi near 80mb-1sec-1mA-2. Near 02:57 it was lost significant part of e+beam (27mA-->6mA) and Lumi RUN #713 was finished and e+beam was dumped soon. Second e+filling with existing p-beam was started at 04:10 and at 05:17 e+beam was ready and Lumi RUN #714 had started. Near 05:25 it was fixed maximal Lumi value at this Lumi RUN as 600mb-1sec-1 and Specific Lumi as 170mb-1sec-1mA-2. During additional tuning manipulati- ons at all H1Lumi detectors again were fixed huge rates (from 05:25 up to 06:00). Ie total decremented on 0.5mA per one minute at this period. Lumi RUN 714 was finished (as seems due to HV trip happened). Lumi RUN #715 was started and finished due to new HV trip. Lumi RUN #716 was started near 05:59 after HV 'recovering' and was finished near 12:09 today. Lumi value had extremly low value. Analyze of 2-dimensional plot for ET-hits (at ET&PD&nVC OnLine sample shows that most of e+hits are disposed at nearest to e+beam crystals. It means that at HERA existed some non-standard e+beam. OnLine Calibration shows that for ET&PD&nVC events peak energies are next: PDrec - near 12.8 GeV, ETrec - near 14.4 GeV. For ET44&VC events PhotonArmRec Peak Energy is near 4 GeV. 18.06.1995 ================= H1KAND === Offline lumi calculation.... A procedure of the luminosity calculation based on the LUMM bank has been performed. The results are the following. H1 runs: 105288 - 106568 (G+M only) Online L: 122.81 nb-1 Offline/online L difference: PD_low trigger ???? PD trigger -12.3 % PD_high trigger -10.2 % Conclusions: 1) The main error (2-3%) in this values is from uncertanty of the trigger thresholds, not enough statistic s93 sample. 2) Offline/online difference in L is almost the same or order as was in last year for e+p collision. 3) The PD_low trigger thresholds has "strange" behavior and was not used for L calculation. 19.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === e+beam Energy Changing ...... Sorry for late information - but only some days ago I read at ZEUS LUMI VAX news that Ee+ for data taking 95 is changed (on request HERMES-team) and Ee+=27.554 GeV now. At H1 Run Summary I found this new value of Ee+ at H1 Run 106449 (Lumi RUN #711). At previous H1 Run (with same e+filling and same Lumi RUN) 106448 Ee+=27.519 GeV. So - 30.05.95 between 12:40:35 and 13:29:11 (during e+filling (?)) Ee+ was changed from 27.519 GeV on 27.554 GeV. During rest of Lumi RUN #711 and during Lumi RUN #712 Ee+ was 27.554 GeV. The same value was fixed at latest Lumi RUNs (#713-716). e+ beam energy changing is not so large (only +0.13%) but during Global Energy Shifts tuning it is possible to use this new value. 19.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === CC Behaivour at Lumi RUN #713 It were selected 1892 ET&PD&nVC events, 2629 ET&PD&VC-events, 3016 s92 events, 2463 s91 events and 14057 ET44 events from H1Runs 108334-108336 which were recorded during Lumi RUN #713 (from 01:34 up to 03:05 18.06. 95). Its are kept at /acs/user/fomenko - pool: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M713.C00 26.4 Mbyte 1892 events H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M713.C00 38.9 Mbyte 2629 events H1KFOM.S9291.M713.C00 85.0 Mbyte 5479 events (3016 s92 and 2463 s91) H1KFOM.ET44.M713.C00 260.0 Mbyte H1KFOM.ET44.M713.C01 21.5 Mbyte 14057 events at both data sets It were built set of vectors with CC behaivour with time at this Lumi RUN. Its are kept at LOOK-binary data set at IBM: H1KFOM.LOOK.R108334 FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD 1501-1506 CC behaivour of ET44 channels; 2221-2234 CC behaivour of ET channels (most hot 14 channels); 2405-2419 CC behaivour of PD channels (most hot 15 channels); 2426 CC behaivour of VCs channel. Vectors were built for ETPDnVC-sample - so 'time'-scale - from 0 to 1892. Event number at ETPDnVC sample is 'time'-axis at these vectors. CCvcs decremented (fast,during collection of first 100 ETPDnVC events) on 14% and had stable "low" value up to end of Lumi RUN #713. p10,p11,p12 and p13 had similar CC behaivour with time - fast growing (on 8-20%) at start of Lumi RUN and changing into low direction during Lumi RUN (total changing regions: p10 (+8% -> -6%), p11 (+10% -> 0%), p12 (+20% -> -6%), p13 (+13% ->-8%)). Percents are calculated from CC start values. ET-channels had similar behaivor too at Start of Lumi RUN - all CCet "skipped" into high direction (up to 10-12% from start value). CCet29 had largest changing region (from +13% to -26%). Most hot channel at ET44 - et2 had changing region from -10% up to +5% from start value. 20.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === LUMIMONs at Lumi RUNs 713-716 It were selected ordinary used for calibration events from last Lumi RUNs 713-716. Its are kept at /acs/user/fomenko - pool: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M713716.C00 22960 events (57.9 MByte) H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M713716.C00 13654 events (34.1 MByte) H1KFOM.S9291.M713716.C00 30029 events (74.8 MByte)-15851s92,14178s91 H1KFOM.ET44.M713716.C00 88767 events(221.2 Mbyte) Data sets which were produced for Lumi RUN 713 were combined at these data set with more late data (see yesterday message at LLO) and were deleted from /acs/user/fomenko- pool. There are 1072 (near 5%) ETPDnVC events with ovfl at PD channels, 746 (near 3%) ETPDnVC events with ovfl at ET-channels and 680 ETPDnVC events with ovfl at ET44-channels. Next hot channels had largest overflow statistics: e25(231),e29(176), p06(126) and p13(159). It were processed ETPDnVC events with standard LREC-package and it was built 100th ntupel which is kept at LOOK-binary data set at IBM: H1KFOM.LOOKA.R108334 FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD All energy and coordinate distributions are looking for as very far from standard. 22/06/95 =================== Rybicki === Lumi RUN# 717 Start - End of Run 717: 22/6/95 7:44:34 - 10:59:15 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 10:17:43 - 10:59:15 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 0, Ip= 0.00 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 4.64 nb-1 HERA - physics: 4.64 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 1.44 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.71 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 30 % , DT corr.: 46 % , Tot eff.: 14 % H1 Runs: 108822 - 108845 P.S.Beam Currents LAN Transmission was alived at 08:34 after E.Elsen intervention (see H1RUN pinboard message from C.Niebuhr). At 08:34 Ip=45 mA, Ie=12 mA. Peak Luminosity value was achieved near 09:56 -> Lumi=1.15mkb-1s-1 Sp.Lumi=0.45mkb-1s-1mA-2 (Ie total at this time was near 11 mA). Between 08:34 and 09:56 it was looked for situation when estimated Background ET*PD Rate was more then Total ET*PD Rate (bad e+beam orbit as seems). 22/06/95 =================== Rybicki === Lumi RUN# 718 Start - End of Run 718: 22/6/95 13:44:05 - 13:47:12 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 13:47:05 - 13:47:12 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 27.77, Ip= 44.28 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0.01 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 108903 - 108904 P.S. Rybichki reported that after ramping of e+beam at this Lumi RUN Ee+ was 27.52 GeV. 22/06/95 =================== Gebauer === Lumi RUN# 719 Start - End of Run 719: 22/6/95 15:47:32 - 16:01:43 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:01:34 - 16:01:43 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.2, Ip= 44.00 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 131 e+(-) bunches = 141, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 10, p-pilot b. = 49 HERA total lumi: 0.12 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 108927 - 108935 P.S. Ee+ after end of ramping was 27.52 again. At 15:50 large part of e+beam was lost (29mA->6mA) and at 16:00 e+beam was dumped. Same problem was fixed again - estimated BG ET*PD Rate was more then Total ET*PD Rate. Beam position was far from standard - >+2.0 cm. 22/06/95 =================== Gebauer === Lumi RUN# 720 Start - End of Run 720: 22/6/95 18:39:52 - 18:50:10 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 18:50:02 - 18:50:10 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.9, Ip= 43.69 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0.02 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 108943 - 108943 P.S. Soon after end of ramping significant part of e+beam was lost (at 18:41) and at 18:48 rest of e+beam (near 2 mA) was dumped. 23/06/95 =================== Gebauer === Lumi RUN# 721 Start - End of Run 721: 22/6/95 19:58:17 - 7:25:41 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:25:12 - 7:25:41 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.42, Ip= 43.56 Start lumi value: 1.84 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.28 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 47.22 nb-1 HERA - physics: 44.81 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 108944 - 109038 P.S. Peak Lumi value was achieved at 20:40 (Lumi=2.0 mkb-1sec-1). Peak Specific Lumi was fixed near 21:10 as 0.32 mkb-1sec-1mA-2. = -1.0 cm and =+0.3 cm during this Lumi RUN; Total ET*PD Rate was changed from 296 kHz to 32 kHz; VC Total Rate - from 1536 kHz -> 145 kHz; PD Total Rate - from 750 kHz -> 66 kHz; ET Total Rate - from 384 kHz -> 36 kHz; ET44 Tot.Rate - from 188 kHz -> 20 kHz. Ee+ = 27.554 GeV after end of e+ ramping again (not 27.52 as at part of yesterday Lumi RUNs). 23.06.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Calibration ........ During last Lumi RUNs full scale OnLine Calibration worked. It means that CCet,CCpd,CCvcs and CCet44 calibration coefficients updated during all Lumi RUNs. Next CCvalues were produced at OnLine (values fixed near 11:00 today): Note: all CCet and CCet44 must be multiplicated on 3.65,CCpd - on 3.89 CCvcs - on 1.00 for getting MeV/FADCunits units. ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e07= 1.234 1.241** 1.243** 0.987** 1.416** 1.175 1.619** e14= 2.342** 0.789* 1.645* 1.842* 1.151* 1.963* 1.456* e21= 2.226* 1.467* 1.843* 1.710* 1.459* 1.069* 1.441* e29= 2.074* 1.455* 1.763* 1.343* 1.465* 1.494* 1.288* e35= 1.236** 1.212 0.918** 1.249 1.222 1.205 1.195 e42= 1.175 1.175 1.175 1.153 1.189 1.174 1.174 ==> PD & VC Calibr.Coefficients Final Status p00=0.470** 0.569** 0.332** 0.534** 0.795 p05=0.319* 0.634* 0.750* 0.616* 0.462** p10=0.581* 0.794* 0.784* 0.696* 0.455* p15=0.677* 0.705* 0.811* 0.469* 0.650* p20=0.576** 0.433* 0.622* 0.626** 0.795 vcs=5.051* ==> ET44 Calibr.Coefficients Final Status et0= 2.113* 2.000** et2= 2.726* 1.884** et4= 2.178* 2.007** Note: *) -labeled channels are 'good' calibrated(weight more then 10.) **) -labeled channels are 'middle' calibrated (1. ET Calibr.Coefficients Changing from 25.05.95 status e14= +31.3% + 3.1% +11.5% + 9.7% +14.6% +20.5% + 9.6% e21= +26.0% +17.0% +21.4% +16.0% +12.8% -27.8% +10.1% e29= +22.9% + 4.0% +10.0% +14.6% +10.9% +11.6% + 6.8% et26-response - single at ET hot channels unity which had incremented enough significantly (on 28%). ==> PD Calibr.Coefficients Changing from 25.05.95 status p05=+11.0% +26.3% - 0.5% - 3.9% - 4.3% p10=+20.3% + 8.6% + 0.3% + 2.8% - 1.1% p15= 0.0% + 6.0% +13.7% -16.0% + 0.3% ==> VCs Calibr.Coefficients Changing from 25.05.95 status vcs=+21.2% ==> ET44 Calibr.Coefficients Changing from 25.05.95 status et0= - 3.3% + 2.5% et2= +16.1% - 1.8% et4= - 2.3% + 2.8% 24/06/95 =================== Gebauer === Lumi RUN# 722 Start - End of Run 722: 23/6/95 15:41:29 - 0:34:12 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:34:03 - 0:34:12 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.2, Ip= 40.04 Start lumi value: 2.08 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.35 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 35.49 nb-1 HERA - physics: 34.64 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 109054 - 109113 25/06/95 =================== Gebauer === Lumi RUN# 723 Start - End of Run 723: 25/6/95 5:34:46 - 7:50:28 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:49:46 - 7:50:28 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.67, Ip= 40.17 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 0.12 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.12 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 109261 - 109265 25/06/95 =================== Gebauer === Lumi RUN# 724 Start - End of Run 724: 25/6/95 15:59:00 - 23:30:47 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:30:41 - 23:30:47 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 16.86, Ip= 37.82 Start lumi value: 0.53 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.17 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 95 e+(-) bunches = 105, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 10, p-pilot b. = 85 HERA total lumi: 13.96 nb-1 HERA - physics: 13.61 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 109278 - 109296 26/06/95 ================== A. Mehta === Lumi RUN# 725 Start - End of Run 725: 26/6/95 4:36:21 - 13:57:38 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:11:35 - 13:57:38 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 27.06, Ip= 47.42 Start lumi value: 1.74 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.34 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 32.02 nb-1 HERA - physics: 29.21 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 22.5 nb-1 H1data - physics: 20.59 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 76 % , DT corr.: 91 % , Tot eff.: 70 % H1 Runs: 109297 - 109366 P.S. Peak Lumi was obsreved near 04:54 with Lumi = 2.075 mkb-1sec-1 Max value of Sp.Lumi was fixed near 13:50 as 0.40 mkb-1s-1mA-2. At 12:30 HERA-people proclaimed "Machine Studies" and had some playing with beam position etc. up to 13:05. After 13:05 up to end of Lumi RUN highest Specific Luminosity at Lumi RUN was observed (averaged value near 0.38 mkb-1sec-1mA-2). 27/06/95 ============== Yakov Vazdik === Lumi RUN# 726 Start - End of Run 726: 26/6/95 17:36:12 - 5:21:24 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 18:17:18 - 5:21:24 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.81, Ip= 46.14 Start lumi value: 1.51 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.23 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 43.91 nb-1 HERA - physics: 41.9 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 32.09 nb-1 H1data - physics: 27.59 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 76 % , DT corr.: 85 % , Tot eff.: 65 % H1 Runs: 109393 - 109441 P.S. Peak Lumi was observed near 18:21 with Lumi = 2.0 mkb-1sec-1 =-1.5cm,=-0.1cm at this time. Max value of Sp.Lumi was fixed near 19:10 as 0.32 mkb-1s-1mA-2. =-0.5cm,=-0.2cm at this time. 27.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Preliminary Calibration ..... It was made preliminary calibration of ET and PD channels with ET&PD&nVC-events from 83-87 LUMIMON-data sets. At this sample no any events from *M and *G Runs - but preliminary estimation as seems is useful. There is evidence that resolution changed into bad side - sigma at ETrec+PDrec histo with 'best' cuts is only 1.15 GeV (at sample 1A this value was 0.89 GeV). May be this is result of significant degradation of cells responses - may be as result of changing at beam conditions (there are again difference at ETrec and PDrec spectra in compare with ones from 1A-sample - again energy regions with different slope dN/DE had appeared). More detail view on CCet and CCpd changing (at percents from 01.06.95 values) - Photoproduction Branch: ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Changing from 01.06.95 status e14= + 0.2% + 1.3% + 5.9% + 0.9% + 8.2% +10.4% + 2.8% e21= +30.6% +23.5% +24.1% +22.6% + 5.2% - 3.0% +12.0% e28= +28.9% - 5.1% +12.6% +13.7% + 7.6% +12.1% + 6.2% ==> PD Calibr.Coefficients Changing from 01.06.95 status p05=+ 8.3% +14.7% +10.0% + 6.9% - 0.3% p10=+21.3% + 6.4% + 2.4% + 0.7% - 0.5% p15=- 4.1% + 3.1% +11.9% - 1.1% - 0.6% 27.06.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === Difference ZEUS/H1 Ph.Profile It was seen from ZEUS Lumi Monitor and from H1 Lumi Monitor that there is sigma difference at Photons Profiles at Photon Detectors. As example: ZEUS H1 SigmaXpd(cm) 1.71-1.77 1.54-1.59 SigmaYpd(cm) 0.89-0.98 0.70-0.78 May be really ZEUS Lumi is seeing more photons then H1 Lumi and this is the reason of permanent difference at ZEUS and H1 Lumi? 27.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Beam Scan 26.06.95 Results Today Yura Soloviev said that results of yesterday Beam Scan (from 12:30 up to 13:00) were reported on today HERA meeting. It was said that at H1 Interaction Point Y-size of e+beam is more then at ZEUS IP and it could be the reason of H1 Lumi value less then at ZEUS on 15-20 percents. Yesterday scan said that both ZEUS and H1 Luminosity measure- ments are right. 27/6/95 ==================== Gebauer === Lumi RUN# 727 Start - End of Run 727: 27/6/95 11:49:27 - 21:34:50 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:34:43 - 21:34:50 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.84, Ip= 49.93 Start lumi value: 2.62 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.38 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 48.56 nb-1 HERA - physics: 45.07 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 109474 - 109497 28/06/95 =================== vazdik === Lumi RUN# 728 Start - End of Run 728: 27/6/95 23:19:05 - 0:04:03 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:03:55 - 0:04:03 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.09, Ip= 48.93 Start lumi value: 1.13 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.17 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 4 nb-1 HERA - physics: 3.5 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 109513 - 109547 28.06.1995 ================= F11LEV === H1 vs ZEUS comparisons ..... Yesterday A.F. wrote: 1) "May be really ZEUS Lumi is seeing more photons then H1 Lumi and this is the reason of permanent difference at ZEUS and H1 Lumi?" 2) "Yesterday scan said that both ZEUS and H1 Luminosity measurements are right." (A.F.) In that respect: 1) Be careful with too fast conclusions. There might be many reasons for the claimed difference. For example: - the difference in the coordinate resolution for H1 and ZEUS PDs, - the difference in the procedure, calculating R.M.S. (sigmas) (e.g. LOOK peak finder gives different result from the gauss fit) - finally, if the HERA scan results are correct, than the larger beam size in the IP corresponds to the smaller divergences (angles), because the product of these two values must be constant (~ emittance). Since the size of the beam spot at PD is determined mainly by the angular divergence in IP, this also goes in the same direction. 2) Having seen last ZEUSBEAM message, I would say, that the scan showed that both H1 and ZEUS lumi are wrong. At least there is a big discrepancy with the theoretically expected values of L_sp. More investigations are needed. 28/06/95 =================== vazdik === Lumi RUN# 729 Start - End of Run 729: 28/6/95 6:12:32 - 7:20:55 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:20:45 - 7:20:55 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 23.6, Ip= 40.23 Start lumi value: 1.64 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.37 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 5.16 nb-1 HERA - physics: 3.37 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 109580 - 109584 28.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === H1Lumi Photon Profile ETPDVC It is needed to add that there is some difference at Photon Profile 'shape' for ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC samples of events. As seems all is more or less OK with Photon Profile 'shape' for ET&PD&nVC events. But for ET&PD&VC-events it is seen some 'cut' on -4.0 cm border. If somebody will look for two-dimensional plot (or 2 dimensional histo 'HD') with Xpdrec versus Ypdrec it is possible proclaim that 'left' part of coordinate distribution (from max to Xpd negativest values) has 'not enough' statistics (as seems there is some 'cut' for photons at Xpd negativest area). If take into account that ET&PD&VC sample is near 90% of ET&PD events - so we can underestimate 'quantities' or rates of photon hit connected events (both ET&PD and PDlow). This effect was seen at last year too after making around -1.5cm. May be collimator cuts some photons - may be something else? But I am not shure that it is not effect of coordinate reconstruction for VCs existing energy (different coordinate reconstruction branch). It would be possible to think about collimator moving for test of its influence (or both collimator and PhArm detectors). I am agree with S.Levonyan that difference at sigmas can be provided with difference at sigma calculation algorithms but from 'eyes' estimation - wide of visible at linear scale spectra is more at ZEUS-distributions. And main - there is no evidence on any assimmetric shape of Xpd-spectrum at ZEUS area. We have for ET&PD&VC-events enough large assimetric factor (sometimes seems up to 20% photons are cutted with 'something' at -4.0 cm border).It would be good if photons with < -4.0cm for ET&PD&VC-events were not cutted but 'swapped' into > -4.0cm region due to some hints at reconstruc- tion algorithm with VCs-existing energy. At last Lumi RUNs it was seen that when HERA-team makes near -0.5cm - Specific Luminosity becomes more and vice versa - when H1 Shift Crew asks to HERA-team to install on recommended -1.5cm value - Specific Luminosity becomes less. May be these facts are supporting the supposition about some photon cuts at negativest regions. P.S.(S.L.) For ET&&PD&&VC events, where E(VC)>0.25GeV, the coordinates are reconstructed by the modified "center-of-gravity" method (see LREC1). This means, that x,y_rec values cannot be closer than 0.5*d_cell to the detector edge (i.e. |x,y|<4cm) Therefore I think the photons are not lost, but badly reconstucted in the boundary layers. The assymetry, in case of =-1.5cm is clearly seen even in Monte Carlo events, where there are no extra cuts except of "truba Malinovskogo" from the negative x-direction. Such defect of the coordinate rec. should not influence the luminosity measurements. Changing L_sp with position of the beam at PD, simply reflects that beam optics has changed, leading either to indeed better collisions, or to the changing in ET-acceptance and hence in the coincidence rate. 28.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Prelim. Global Shifts,CCvcs It was estimated Global Energy Shift for PD-cells with using of 70th histo with near 1950 entries (poor statistics) of s92-events at early mentioned sample Runs 108822-109282 (Lumi RUNs#717-724, LUMIMONs 83-87).Global Energy Shift for this data sample is near 1.110. Energy Resolution is bad (35%) for PD Energy regions from 14-22 up to 35 GeV. Global Energy Shift for ET cells was produced as 0.9475 and CCvcs = 1.226*4.403=5.398 MeV/FADCcounts. So - response of VCs at Photoproduction Branch was decremented on 22.6 percents (at averaging) from 01.06.95 status. Mean and sigma values at ETrec+PDrec spectra (after correction on Global Energy Shift and new CCvcs): ET&PD&nVC - mean 27.55 GeV Sigma=1.17 GeV (best cuts) - 3587 entries; ET&PD&VC - mean 27.54 GeV Sigma=1.28 GeV (best cuts) -12058 entries. Xetrec vs ETrec plot shows that e26-response is incremented and CCet26 is not good calibrated. 28.06.1995 ================= H01GOG === No L4 Lumi plots, etc........ Since Sunday evening (25.06.95, 20:40) no L4 Lumi plots exist. The last H1 Run with L4 Lumi plots is 109288. Since that time no new LUMIMON tapes appeared as well. The reason is not clear yet. It is not an online logging problem (I have checked this with Ralf today). Most likely something is wrong with the L4 s/w. I have talked with K.Mueller and R.Beyer, they are investigating the problem. Everything should be clear tomorrow, hopefully. 29.06.1995 ================= H01GOG === L4 s/w bug is found! ........ The suspicion of a problem with the L4 s/w was confirmed! R.Beyer has found and fixed the bug in the L4 code. The problem was that on Sunday evening he changed the code in such a way, that ECLUMI and LREC routines were not called at all. Now it should work properly again. 29.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Last Days HERA Activity ..... After end of Lumi RUN#729 (yesterday morning near 07:20) it was pause at HERA activity up to 00:30 29.06.95. At 00:30 it was injected e+beam with low current (near 3.8mA) which existed up to 02:20. At 02:40 2nd low current e+injection was made (Ie+ not more then 1.5 mA) and e+beam existed up to 08:15 today morning. At 10:55 HERA p-beam injection had started and it was injected Ip total near 47 mA but at 11:56 this beam was lost. New p-injection started at 13:00 and it was injected Ip total near 60 mA - during ramping some part of beam was lost and at 14:30 p-beam with Ep=820 GeV and Ip total near 52 mA was ready. At 14:40 e+ beam injection was started and when Ie+=36 mA e+ beam was lost. Now (16:20) it is made the preparing of new e+beam injection. Proton beam exists at HERA p-ring with 180 bunches, Ip=51.9mA and Ep=819.883 GeV. At 16:38 HERA p-beam was lost. 29.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === 0.5 Gbyte HD at H1Lumi MacII From yesterday H1Lumi MacII is equipped with 0.5 Gbyte hard disc which replaced 120 Mbyte HD used before. All SW was swapped into new disc. Old disc is removed from system forever. E.Wunch made it due to 120 Mbyte HD was needed for Central Slow Control system. 30/06/95 =================== Gebauer === Lumi RUN# 730 Start - End of Run 732: 30/6/95 0:48:39 - 4:04:45 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:50:12 - 4:04:45 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 22.21, Ip= 51.25 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 16.92 nb-1 HERA - physics: 16.92 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 13.98 nb-1 H1data - physics: 12.83 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 82 % , DT corr.: 91 % , Tot eff.: 75 % H1 Runs: 109927 - 109935 29.06.1995 ================= H1KSHE === New e+ beam tilt............. Today i was informed by the H1 night shift that, the HERA night shift has found the new optimal e+beam tilt. This corresponds: x = -7.7 mm, y = 17 mm for our PD beam position monitor. As have seen from online history the both changing x( -15 -> -7.7) and y(0 -> -17) gives ~7% effect on sp.luminosity, so ~14% in total. P.S.(S.L.) For Andreev: it is interesting to see, whether single PD lumi rates confirm this improvement. An effect might be either real increase of luminosity (then it must be seen from "PD-lumi" as well), or increase of the ET-acceptance (then PD-rates should not confirm lumi rise). On practice, perhaps both effects happened. 30.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Lumi RUN without H1Lumi ..... Today at 09:38 HERA Clock was switched off at all H1 Subdetectors (H1Lumi included) due to large upgrade at H1 Central Trigger. Beam Currents are not retranslated to H1Lumi from this time too. It is not possible to measure Luminosity. At HERA p-ring p-beam with Ep=820GeV and Ip near 48.5mA existed (this beam was injected yesterday near 21:00 and was used at Lumi RUN# 730th). Near 9:30 HERA e+beam injection was started and near 14:00 e+beam with Ee+=27.542 GeV and Ie+ near 27 mA was ready. ZEUS Lumi measured Luminosity from 14:00. HERA Clock appeared at H1Lumi near 15:00 but beam currents not yet. 30.06.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Rate Details for New Tilt.... From Egor's History pictures it is possible to see next facts: 1) Lumi RUN# 730 started with near -1.5cm and near -0.2 cm This period was from 0:45 up to 02:15. Peak Specific Lumi was fixed as 0.305 mkb-1sec-1mA-2; 2) From 01:35 up to 02:12 Specific Luminosity degradated from value near 0.30 up to 0.25 and (as seems) it was made standard 'tuning' of specific Lumi at H1 IP - really Specific Lumi 'jumped' into 0.30 value again (without any changings at and ); 3) At 02:15 was changed from -1.5 to -0.5cm and this value was kept up to end of Lumi RUN#730. Specific Luminosity became 0.33 at 02:15 and was unchangable up to 02:20 when was changed from -0.25 cm to +1.8cm. At this time (02:20) Specific Luminosity became 0.36 mkb-1sec-1mA-2 and this value was kept up to 02:33 when was changed from +1.8cm to near 0.0cm. At 02:33 Specific Lumi became 0.34 and slowly decremented up to 0.33 value when Lumi RUN#730th was finished. was slowly changed from 0.0 up to +0.6 cm. 4) Rates behaivours at this times (kHz): 02:12-02:15 02:15 02:20-02:33 02:33 02:33->03:47 VCtot 460 -505 -Large Large-450 450 -465 -455 455-450 450-365 PDtot 180 -203 -205 205-205 205 -220 -213 213-200 200-165 ETtot 103 -113 -113 113-115 110 -120 -117 117-110 110- 94 ET&PD 70 - 78 - 74 74- 86 84 - 89 - 88 88- 84 84- 70 VCbgr 18.8-19.6-Large Large-14.5 14.4-14.8-14.8 14.8-13.3 13.3-10.8 PDbgr 6.3- 6.2- 6.1 6.1- 5.9 5.9- 6.3- 6.3 6.3- 5.9 5.9- 4.65 ETbgr 4.4- 4.3- 4.2 4.2- 4.2 4.2- 4.5- 4.5 4.5- 4.2 4.2- 3.3 ET&PDb 2.2- 2.2- 2.2 2.2- 2.3 2.2- 2.4- 2.4 2.4- 2.2 2.2- 1.7 Background rates are presented only for e+pilot bunches. 01/07/95 =================== vazdik === Lumi RUN# 731 Start - End of Run 731: 1/7/95 14:14:31 - 15:51:50 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:51:41 - 15:51:50 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.3, Ip= 51.75 Start lumi value: 2.07 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.3 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 10.9 nb-1 HERA - physics: 4.98 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 110057 - 110092 02/07/95 =================== kurca === Lumi RUN# 732 Start - End of Run 732: 1/7/95 18:50:57 - 2:30:09 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 18:51:27 - 2:30:09 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.75, Ip= 49.49 Start lumi value: 1.77 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.26 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 26.39 nb-1 HERA - physics: 26.28 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 16.77 nb-1 H1data - physics: 3.47 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 63 % , DT corr.: 20 % , Tot eff.: 13 % H1 Runs: 110113 - 110211 02/07/95 ================= schuhmann === Lumi RUN# 733 Start - End of Run 733: 2/7/95 11:06:02 - 14:12:05 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 14:11:57 - 14:12:05 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 27.29, Ip= 45.83 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 157 e+(-) bunches = 171, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 14, p-pilot b. = 23 HERA total lumi: 0.11 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 110244 - 110247 02.07.1995 ================= F11LEV === Lumi optimization at H1 IP... As follows from the results of the recent beam scan and attempt of the lumi optimization in H1 IP, the optics in 1995 is again different from 1994. In this context, and also because of the big difference between H1 and ZEUS L_sp, more exercises are expected, in which e-beam parameters (tilt, offset, etc.) will be varied significantly within a short time. In such a case ET-acceptance may also vary strongly, thus providing inadequate L_sp plot (for which we assume that ET-acc. is constant). Therefore, for such procedures another L_sp plot for HERA would be better suited, namely L_sp based on the single PD-rate ("ZEUS method"). Since all the data are available online for such a plot, I propose to prepare and test it (at least as an option, to be used for such special cases of large changes in e-beam parameters). A disadvantage of the PD-method -- variations of the CC and/or trigger thresholds -- are expected to be much less significant for the time (typically fairly short) of the scan/optimization procedure. Another point: as it was stressed several times (and now once again) a knowledge of the absolute PD position w.r.t. z=0 axis is very important for ET-acceptance calculation. Remember, one of the critical parameters is beam tilt (angles in IP) which we define from the center of the photon spot at PD. To get a correct result, a precise position of PD (with an error of at most 1.5mm) is necessary! 02/07/95 ================= schuhmann === Lumi RUN# 734 Start - End of Run 734: 2/7/95 14:23:28 - 19:47:58 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 19:47:50 - 19:47:58 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.96, Ip= 45.49 Start lumi value: 2.25 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.31 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 27.93 nb-1 HERA - physics: 26.36 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 110247 - 110317 03.07.1995 ================= H1KSOL === To the big ado around new ... beam optics for Lumi As you all know 30.06. "new set of beam optics" was found for "optimum" Lumi at H1. At the same day we (Igor and me) checked the ratio of ETLumi(beamgas subtracted) to PDLumi.It turned out that this ratio did not changed after new beam optics set (it was before 48.5%,and after 47.5%). That means that the increasing of Spec.Lumi was due to the better tuning. On the other hand I found quite different attitude to this in HERA Control room (with respect to H1).They do not attach much importance to that fact and believe that this procedure should be perfomed when H1 magnet will be on (this is even written in HERA LogBook by John Maidment who perfomed this procedure on 30.06). Moreover,yesterday I was in HERA CR and (thanks to HERA shift crew) we changed beam optics to the previous setting (at least to this direction).And the result was that Lumi at H1 increased by about 25-30%,e+ background decreased by factor 6,and after final tuning Sp. Lumi at H1 got 3.3E29 compared to 1.9E29 before. At the same time Sp.Lumi at ZEUS was 4E29 and such a difference can be explained by effective beam size at H1 IP. 03.07.1995 ================= F11LEV === Lumi optimization at H1 IP... I agree, that the lumi tuning made 30/06 is not the "final word" of course. However, it would be good to understand all the details of that exercise. After the data became available offline (H1TCL-35 file) I had a quick look on the Lumi history plots (coordinates, rates, L, L_sp, etc.) created by LUMTCL job (LRATES routine from F11LEV.TOOL95.cmz) from LRTL and LUMM banks. The results are summarized in the table below. Time is an absolute time for 30.06.95. Rates are pure lumi-rates (i.e. e-gas bgr subtracted). dL are relative changes in the luminosity during the tuning procedure, derived by 3 methods (rates): e*gamma, single gamma, single e. Time 2:15 2:20 2:33 ---------------------------------------------------------------- [mm] -16 -> -6 -6 -6 [mm] -3 -3 -> +17 +17 -> +3 L_sp [10^27] 300 -> 333 358 349 -> 335 R(ET*PD) [kHz] 48 -> 54 58 57 -> 53.5 R (PD) [kHz] 116 -> 123 133.5 130 -> 121 R (PD_l) [kHz] 127 -> 134 145 141 -> 132 R (ET) [kHz] 53.3-> 57.1 63 61 -> 56.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------- dL(coinsidence) +11% +7.5% -6.5% dL(gamma) +6% +8.3% -7.1% dL(e) +7% +10.5% -8.1% ---------------------------------------------------------------- In conclusion: 1) There was a real improvement in the luminosity achieved, not just acceptance effects. However numericaly different methods give different results. 2) Change of the horizontal tilt () lead to significantly different results between the two methods of lumi measurement (ET*PD and PD; here an average estimate between PD and PD_low were used) This can be understood, if the ET-acceptance is simultaneously increased by ~5%. The last assumption is however in contradiction with single ET-rate history, which only increased by ~7%. (not by ~11%). 3) Change of the vertical tilt () lead to the similar result: ~ 8% increase of Sp. luminosity. Thus, not everything is clear. Note, that trigger thresholds were not looked at and were assumed constant during these ~20 min of the tuning procedure. 03/07/95 =================== h1kjoe === Lumi RUN# 735 Start - End of Run 735: 3/7/95 14:42:53 - 15:15:37 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:15:30 - 15:15:37 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.5, Ip= 55.18 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0.11 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 110340 - 110340 P.S. At 14:52 part of e+beam (near 30%) was lost and near 15:00 about 75% from Ie+ rest value was lost and at 15:15 rest of e+beam was dumped. 04/07/95 =================== pascaud === Lumi RUN# 736 Start - End of Run 736: 3/7/95 18:43:27 - 5:00:25 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:00:18 - 5:00:25 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.1, Ip= 54.71 Start lumi value: 2.46 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.35 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 65.6 nb-1 HERA - physics: 65.6 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 110340 - 110452 06.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === HERA Activity at Last Days.. After end of Lumi RUN#736 and after 04.07.95 access into HERA tunnel HERA p-beam activity started at Wednesday morning near 07:50. It was injected Ip total near 56 mA and near 08:25 this proton fill was lost. At 13:50 new p-fill was started and after injection of Ip total near 54 mA p-beam was lost again near 14:40. HERA p-ring alived again near 01:53 tonight when Ip total near 59 mA was injected. This p-beam was lost bear 02:25. New p-filling was started near 03:17 with low p-currents. At 03:55 Ip total near 46 mA was injected with 2 injection steps and 04:08 this filling was lost or dumped. At 04:12 it was fixed new one step p-beam injection (24 mA Ip total) and at 06:10 this beam was lost. Last p-fillings of this night were made from 06:48 up to 08:00 (more then 20 mA of p-beam for one injection phase was fixed several times).Now 'Short break' is proclaimed by HERA. As seems last Machine Studies was connected with possibility to make new p-filling for enough short time. Promised investigation of Lumi optimization at H1 IP is delayed. HERA p-ring alived again near 16:00. It were fixed some unsuccesful one phase injections (60 bunches with Ip total not more then 11 mA). 07.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === H1Lumi Dedicated Runs ...... Today during Lumi RUN# 737 H1Lumi Dedicated Runs were recorded. Set of H1Lumi Dedicated Runs (110923-110931) were recorded from 13:17 up to 16:10 during different manipulations of HERA-team with beams optics and beam tilt. s90-s95 trigger bits were ON with prescale gaps tuned on more or less equal quota of each from 6 H1Lumi monitoring triggers at H1DataFlow. Prescale gaps were installed on values:2048(s90),8192(s91),1024(s92),16384(s93),512(s94) and 2048(s95). From Run 110928 all prescale gaps were divided on factor 2 (1024,4096, 512,8192,256,1024). First 3 Runs (110923-110925) were recorded only with Luminosity and CentralTrigger branches. Runs 110926-110931 were recorded with Central Tracker branch (idea to use vertex reconstrucrion from CJC for X,Y,Z-vertex monitoring if vertex exists at event - coincidence with any from s90-s95 triggers). Full Reconstruction and Farm were ON at Runs 110923-110929. At Runs 110930,110931 Farm and Full Reconstruction were off (for posibility LR1F,LREF and LRPF passing into RawData). It were recorded near 1 million of events at all mentioned Runs. H1 Main magnet was ON. OnLine Energy Histos shapes changed again (there are no energy regions with different dN/dE slopes as it was fixed at all June 95 Lumi RUNs at ETrec and PhotonArmrec histos). 07/07/95 ================== schuhman === Lumi RUN# 737 Start - End of Run 737: 7/7/95 12:09:55 - 20:28:33 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 14:02:26 - 20:28:33 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.4, Ip= 28.90 Start lumi value: 1.99 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.51 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 30.57 nb-1 HERA - physics: 30.47 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 17.03 nb-1 H1data - physics: 7.59 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 55 % , DT corr.: 44 % , Tot eff.: 24 % H1 Runs: 110896 - 110989 P.S.1) This is first Lumi RUN after recovering of H1 Main Solenoid. From this Lumi RUN H1 Main Magnet is ON. This is first Lumi RUN (after 31.05.95) at which first 7 Good H1 Runs were recorded after long pause connected with HERA p-ring recovering and H1 Main Solenoid recovering. 2) From Start of Lumi RUN up to 12:26 C4-scaler (ET&PD) did not operate with right manner (Igor recovered) - up to this time Usik's SW cannot calculate Lumi values for Lumi Presentation and Distribution tools. 3) From Start of Lumi RUN up to 12:57 HERA MacII was at non-opera- ted and non-rebootable status (H1Lumi_2 _hours_Monitor crashed and even reboot did not help, only Force Quit). Yura cancelled this application from StartUp items up to best times. HERA team started Lumi optimisation at H1 IP after 12:57 when Yura recovered HERA MacII. 4) Significant part of time from this Lumi RUN (from 13:17 up to 16:10) was connected with attempts of HERA-team to make Lumi optimisation at H1 IP. H1Lumi Dedicated Runs were recorded during this period (110923-110931). It was achived enough good Peak Specific Lumi value (near 0.51 mkb-1sec-1mA-2) -- for the first time after Lumi RUN #705 (0.54 value, 27/05) 08/07/95 ================== schuhman === Lumi RUN# 738 Start - End of Run 738: 8/7/95 6:25:21 - 6:40:40 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 6:38:26 - 6:40:40 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.58, Ip= 44.40 Start lumi value: 0.03 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.02 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 173 e+(-) bunches = 188, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 7 HERA total lumi: 0.02 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.01 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.01 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.01 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 9 % , DT corr.: 9 % , Tot eff.: 9 % H1 Runs: 111110 - 111110 08/07/95 =================== J.Ebert === Lumi RUN# 739 Start - End of Run 739: 8/7/95 9:10:02 - 16:49:50 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 11:47:11 - 16:49:50 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.49, Ip= 43.86 Start lumi value: 1.77 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.33 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 41.14 nb-1 HERA - physics: 29.99 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 15.75 nb-1 H1data - physics: 3.62 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 52 % , DT corr.: 22 % , Tot eff.: 12 % H1 Runs: 111115 - 111151 09/07/95 =================== J.Ebert === Lumi RUN# 740 Start - End of Run 740: 9/7/95 0:45:37 - 4:24:22 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 4:24:15 - 4:24:22 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.44, Ip= 53.71 Start lumi value: 0.92 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.12 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 32.19 nb-1 HERA - physics: 31.6 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 111170 - 111198 08.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Lumi Optimisation Overview.. Data from Egor's History Files were analized from 07.07.95 13:16 during 2.5 hours (up to 15:46) - period of Runs 110923-110930 recording 1) periods with enough large Specific Lumi and , values: a) 13:20 - 13:27 - near 0.50 up to 0.52; =-0.60cm =+0.20cm b) 13:30 - 13:40 - near 0.51 up to 0.52; =-0.60cm =+0.35cm c) 13:49 - 13:52 - near 0.50 up to 0.51; =-0.60cm =+0.15cm d) 14:12 - 14:17 - near 0.49 up to 0.50; =-0.60cm =+0.15cm e) 14:30 - 14:34 - near 0.51 up to 0.52; =-0.80cm =+0.10cm f) 14:50 - 14:51 - near 0.48 up to 0.49; =-0.80cm = 0.00cm g) 15:12 - 15:14 - near 0.47 up to 0.48; =-0.60cm = 0.00cm. 2) periods with different and Lsp changing range: a) 13:16 - 14:17 - around -0.6cm; Lsp=from 0.31 up to 0.52 b) 14:17 - 14:23 - around -0.1cm; Lsp=from 0.34 up to 0.41 c) 14:23 - 14:27 - around -1.5cm; Lsp= around 0.38 d) 14:27 - 14:30 - around -0.2cm; Lsp= around 0.48 e) 14:30 - 15:12 - around -0.8cm; Lsp=from 0.25 up to 0.52 f) 15:12 - 15:46 - around -0.6cm; Lsp=from 0.43 up to 0.48. 3) periods with different and Lsp changing range: a) 13:16 - 13:34 - incrementing from 0.0 up to +0.35cm; Lsp=0.31-0.52 b) 13:34 - 13:40 - around +0.3cm; Lsp=0.51 c) 13:40 - 13:49 - decremnting from +0.35 up to +0.10cm;Lsp=0.48-0.49 d) 13:49 - 14:17 - around +0.15cm; Lsp=0.42-0.51 e) 14:17 - 14:34 - around +0.10cm Lsp=0.34-0.52 f) 14:34 - 14:38 - decrementing from +0.10 up to -1.4cm;Lsp=0.43-0.52 g) 14:38 - 14:50 - around -1.4cm; Lsp=0.25-0.46 h) 14:50 - 14:52 - around 0.0cm; Lsp=0.49 i) 14:52 - 15:12 - around -1.5cm; Lsp=0.43-0.45 j) 15:12 - 15:46 - around 0.0cm. Lsp=0.43-0.48 09.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Lumi Optimisation Overview.. There are 3 time periods at early mentioned H1Lumi Dedicated Runs recording period: a) time period from 13:16 up to 14:12 (more or less stable and but PDbkg and ET&PDbkg rates behaviours correlated with e-beam bkg.rate show that it were made some playing with beam optics): time PDbkg ETPDbkg e-beam bkg.(kHz) Ratio (ETPDbkg/PDbk) 1) 13:16-13:18 low low 0.31 0.464-0.458 H 2) 13:18-13:25 high low 0.23 0.402-0.412 S 3) 13:25-13:25 low low 0.23->0.18 0.441 H 4) 13:25-13:32 high low 0.18 0.407-0.419 S 5) 13:32-13:32 low low 0.18 0.458 H 6) 13:32-13:38 high low 0.18 0.405 S 7) 13:38-13:45 high high 0.18->0.31 0.415 S 8) 13:45-13:45 high high 0.31->0.40 0.425 S 9) 13:45-13:52 high high 0.40 0.413 S 10) 13:52-13:52 low high 0.40->0.53 0.455 H 11) 13:52-14:00 high high 0.53 0.412 S 12) 14:00-14:00 high high 0.53->0.70 0.412 S 13) 14:00-14:01 high high 0.70 0.412 S 14) 14:01-14:01 low high 0.70->0.65 0.463 H 15) 14:01-14:04 low high 0.65 0.463 H 16) 14:04-14:04 high high 0.65->0.93 0.403 S 17) 14:04-14:12 high high around 0.9 0.403 S high and low labels at PDbkg and ET&PDbkg rates reflect so-called high acceptance and low accepatance (or acceptance 1st and 2nd) - it means that at all period there are 2 more or less stable level of background decrementing. Rate(ETPDbkg)/Rate(PDbkg) ratio can help at estimation of ET-accepance changing (H->S and vice versa). b) time period from 14:12 up to 15:12 (as seems it were made only playings with tilt - and only changings at tilt were a reasons of e-beam bkg.rate changing): This period is connected with some 'intermediate' levels of PDbkg and ETPDbkg rates changing (some levels between 2 previously mentioned 'stable' levels). c) time period from 15:12 up to 15:46 with non-changable and but with some collimator position study. 09.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Selection for Calibration... From H1Lumi Dedicated Runs (110923-110931) it were selected: 240925 etpdnvc 260+100.0 Mbyte 245645 etpdvc 260+108.1 Mbyte 341542 s9291 (178399 s92 + 163105 s91 + 38 both) 260+243.2 Mbyte 248826 et44 260+109.4 Mbyte Selected events per H1Lumi dedicated Runs: Run etpdnvc etpdvc s9291 et44 110923 2966 21216 34396 15734 <- Run for Prescale Gaps tuning 110924 11770 10331 20922 10539 110925 32989 22176 40623 30145 110926 15365 10406 19186 14738 110927 23505 16086 29674 22960 110928 27437 29696 35205 27719 110929 97926 105139 125781 98001 110930 3177 3395 3938 3166 <- Runs without Farm (L4), thus 110931 25790 27200 31817 25824 <- no LUMIMONs for them! (S.L.) 09.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Pipeline Delay Shifted ..... Analyse of LREF,LRPF and LR1F-banks (Runs 110930-110931) shows that during H1Lumi Dedicated Runs recording the Pipe-Line Delay was changed on value near 40-50 nsec. It is possible to see signal from ET-channels at last 3 bins of FADC window (ordinary at 7-8 bins), signal from PD-channels at last 3-4 bins (ordinary at 7-8 bins), signal from VCs - only at last bin (and only bin with begin of signal front - as seems) and signal from ET44 cells - at last 3 bins (ordinary at 7-8 bins). L4-histos at H1Lumi Dedicated Runs predicted this situation - Peak at ETrec+PDrec+Vcdep histo was shifted on factor near 1.5-2 into low energy region. This shift appeared after H1 Centarl Trigger Upgrade and it is needed to check - is it permanent feature and it is needed to change FADC-shifts for all channels at H1Lumi energy channels or this shift existed only at Lumi RUN 737. P.S. Today during last phase of Lumi RUN 742 it was recorded test Run with LREF,LRPF and LR1F-banks (H1Run 111276) for checking pipe- line delay at H1Lumi FADCs at this Lumi RUN. 09/07/95 ================== D.Lacour === Lumi RUN# 741 Start - End of Run 741: 9/7/95 6:26:01 - 16:29:14 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 10:57:35 - 16:29:14 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 27.35, Ip= 52.88 Start lumi value: 3.11 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.43 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 71.8 nb-1 HERA - physics: 67.59 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 16.91 nb-1 H1data - physics: 8.64 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 24 % , DT corr.: 50 % , Tot eff.: 12 % H1 Runs: 111208 - 111266 P.S.At 16:20 significant part of e+beam was lost (50%) and Lumi RUN was finished at 16:29. But at 16:46 Movable Platform were moved into working position and next Lumi RUN was started with same beams (good background conditions etc. - request from HERMES- team and ZEUS-team to keep these beam conditions for data taking with low background). 09/07/95 =================== J.Ebert === Lumi RUN# 742 Start - End of Run 742: 9/7/95 16:46:35 - 17:28:19 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:47:04 - 17:28:19 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 4.7, Ip= 49.36 Start lumi value: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.36 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 1 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.99 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.82 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.45 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 75 % , DT corr.: 48 % , Tot eff.: 41 % H1 Runs: 111272 - 111278 P.S. H1 Run Coordinator promised to decrement Prescale Gaps for s91-s95 triggers on factor 3 - it means that statistics of our LUMIMONs must be incremented (current rates were fixed as 0.09Hz for s91-s95 and near 1 Hz for s90). 09.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Pipeline Delay Shifted ..... Same result was obtained with data from test Run 111276 - 40-50nsec shifted into 'right' direction signals are seen at all H1Lumi energy channels. As seems it is needed to install new default values for FADC-shifts (changing on 4). This is the result of H1 Trigger Upgrade. 10/07/95 ================== A.Zhokin === Lumi RUN# 743 Start - End of Run 743: 10/7/95 0:21:02 - 0:34:20 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:34:13 - 0:34:20 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.97, Ip= 53.47 Start lumi value: 0.03 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0.61 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 111317 - 111319 10/07/95 ================== A.Zhokin === Lumi RUN# 744 Start - End of Run 744: 10/7/95 3:23:58 - 5:19:54 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:17:34 - 5:19:54 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.81, Ip= 53.28 Start lumi value: 4.54 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.5 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 21.06 nb-1 HERA - physics: 18.59 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 111328 - 724249387 <-- 111330 (error due to Power Trip) P.S.Main Power Trip happened today early morning (near 04:51). All is OK with H1Lumi HV. Movable Platforms were moved into parking position by Shift Crew after Power return (near 05:17). H1Lumi 'forgot' some values kept at Dual Ported Memory - Last H1Run for Lumi RUN 744, 3 Integrated Lumi Values per 1995 H1 Data Taking Period(HERA Produced, H1 Run Gated, H1 data taken) - it will be needed to restore these values. For Lumi RUN 744 these values are 21.1nb-1, 20.5nb-1, 18.8nb-1. P.S. It were recovered 3 Integrated Lumi values (09:00) by Yura: 935.941 nb-1 - HERA Produced B09F5AE8 737.803 nb-1 - H1 Run Gated B09F5AEC 547.701 nb-1 - H1 Data Taken B09F5AF0 10.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Lumi = 4.7*10**30cm-2sec-1... Tonight (near 03:35) it was achieved next record Luminosity value at H1 IP - Lumi=4.7 mkb-1sec-1 (4.7*10**30cm-2sec-1). Time slice of this record: Ip=53 mA, Ie=34 mA, Lsp=0.525 mkb-1s-1mA-2 =-1.5cm,=0.0cm,VCrate= 930kHz,PDrate=350kHz,ETrate=250kHz, ET44rate=145kHz,ET&PDtotalrate=165kHz. 10.07.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Programs Development It were made new releases of program for FIC1_Master and FIC1_Slave. It were changed so-called FADC-shifts connected with PipeLine Delay. FADC shifts were installed on nthe next values: ET: 199->195; PD: 143->139; ET44: 190->186; NC:140->136 These are creation dates and program sizes of last release: TwinFIC1...............MPST MPS .....88946 Mon, Jul 10, 10:43 1995 M TwinFIC1slave..........MPST MPS .....42192 Mon, Jul 10, 10:43 1995 M Releases were booted into both FIC1s today near 10:50. Binary images of both programs at Wdog-directory were replaced too for using its at 'DAQ monitor'-application activity. 11/07/95 ================ o.kaufmann === Lumi RUN# 745 Start - End of Run 745: 11/7/95 2:08:55 - 11:42:31 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 4:02:54 - 11:42:31 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 204.8, Ip= 0.00 <-non-right values Currents at the 03:02 (mA): Ie= 22.7, Ip=41.60 <-from history Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 19, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 19, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 45.46 nb-1 HERA - physics: 45.46 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 26.06 nb-1 H1data - physics: 17.79 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 57 % , DT corr.: 68 % , Tot eff.: 39 % H1 Runs: 111503 - 111627 P.S. 1) It was first Lumi RUN with new FADC shifts at H1Lumi-channels at Photoproduction Branch (shifted on 4 bins - near 40 nsec). Egor checked L4-histos - peak at histos ETrec+PDrec+VCdep became more reasonable - shifted into needed direction. 2) Peak Lumi was fixed near 03:50 with L=2.3mkb-1sec-1 and Peak Specific Lumi was fixed around 06:50 with Lsp=0.525mkb-1sec-1mA-2 and with =-1.4cm =+0.2cm 3) Lumi measurement started near 03:00 due to problem with bunch currents delivering to H1Lumi and to H1CTRIG existed (J.Coughlan recovered). More or less reasonable Lumi value was achieved at 03:40. 4) proton beam was lost near 11:34 and positron beam existed up to 12:40. 11.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Dedicated Runs Calibration... At previous 2 days it was made attempt of calibration on data samples from H1Lumi Dedicated Runs 110923-110931. Due to presence of 40-50 nsec shift at PipeLine Delay (only at Photoproduction branch of H1Lumi) all CC became more on factor near 1.5-2. and relation coefficients too. Signal from VCs was out of FADC window range - so it was impossible to make calibration of VCs. Samples with antiVC is OK. It is possible to use s92-sample and ETPDnVC sample for different analysis.Standard ET44-calibration was not made (due to VCs-signal absence) - it is possible to think about ET44&nVC-calibration (if it will be needed). Next results of calibration were obtained: Calibration Coefficients (start values from 1A-sample - with prelimina ry calibration (precalibration) with SumE>15GeV): e07= 7.611 36.525 32.967 9.958 17.057 4.298 11.805 e14=20.102 4.311 8.289 8.281 5.538 8.379 6.877 e21=11.474 8.821 9.720 8.479 7.395 8.340 7.101 e28= 8.989 6.342 8.708 6.335 7.627 7.923 6.755 e35=14.900 8.144 9.983 5.321 4.615 4.845 4.911 e42= 4.365 5.491 6.274 7.546 4.443 5.278 4.285 p00= 2.645 4.005 2.527 2.209 3.066 p05= 1.896 3.456 4.518 4.144 2.287 p10= 3.207 4.350 4.797 4.370 2.906 p15= 4.076 3.983 4.732 3.539 2.878 p20= 2.854 2.764 3.035 3.131 3.083 vcs= 4.403 <-- CCvcs (from 1A-sample) - non-right Relation Coefficients: e07=1.636 0.000 0.000 2.728 2.851 1.001 1.687 e14=1.925 1.366 1.301 1.048 1.272 1.251 1.148 e21=1.342 1.502 1.381 1.307 1.398 1.416 1.217 e28=1.279 1.467 1.316 1.318 1.354 1.365 1.374 e35=3.533 1.782 3.112 1.091 1.017 1.070 1.069 e42=1.018 1.277 1.448 1.789 1.024 1.231 0.000 p00=1.912 1.804 2.213 1.154 0.980 p05=1.593 1.579 1.506 1.737 1.289 p10=1.544 1.465 1.654 1.606 1.711 p15=1.590 1.522 1.551 1.607 1.243 p20=1.344 1.686 1.504 1.411 0.986 Runs 110923-110931 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 241k events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.45 1.31 27.42 1.24 27.42 1.24 It were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned sample with events from Runs 110923-110931: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R110923 302002 entries FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R110923 147474 entr.at 70 h. FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-2.7%) and a enough reasonable resolution digits (22-23%) for (6-24)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R110923 237479 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R110923 243289 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 4.403 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. The same shapes of ETrec and PhotonArm rec spectra were obtained as at online. It were estimated Global Energy Shifts for this sample of events: 1.027 for PD-channels and 0.9855 for ET-channels. Mean value and sigma at ETrec+PDrec histo (after correction on Global Energy Shifts) 27.54 GeV and 1.237 Gev (157304 entries with 'best cuts' into bins 200 22 32). CCvcs defining is impossible. 12/07/95 ================ o.kaufmann === Lumi RUN# 746 Start - End of Run 746: 12/7/95 1:33:50 - 8:14:30 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:05:26 - 8:14:30 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.41, Ip= 42.74 Start lumi value: 2.61 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.45 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 42.2 nb-1 HERA - physics: 40.54 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 14.96 nb-1 H1data - physics: 8.93 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 36 % , DT corr.: 59 % , Tot eff.: 21 % H1 Runs: 111723 - 111841 P.S. During this Lumi RUN it was achived 1.0pb-1 of HERA produced Integrated Lumi at H1 IP from start of H1 Data Taking 95. Next values of Integrated Luminosity values were collected at H1Lumi after end of Lumi RUN# 746: 1023.600 nb-1 - HERA Produced 782.272 nb-1 - H1 Run Gated 576.750 nb-1 - H1 Data Taken 134.650 nb-1 - H1 Physics PPS. This can be compared to ZEUS values (rounded): 1427. nb-1 - HERA produced 410. nb-1 - ZEUS data taken 300. nb-1 - ZEUS physics 12.07.1995 ================= F11LEV === Data base problem ........... Corrupted DB file on IBM was restored yesterday evening, but with status of 10/07 9:00 am (see pinboard message from L.Criegee). This resulted in a partial loss of information in the database (e.g. lumi banks LH1R/LH1T for runs > 111330). Please, keep this in mind in case of unexpected DB problems in your jobs. Note, that some banks need to be recreated. I shall do it for LH1R and LH1T families. Check that all your banks are OK, if there are any. 12.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Counts of ETPDnVC per LumiRun H1DataBase Peak values StartBeams LRun ETPDnVC HERA pr.Ie Ip Lgatd L Lsp Ie Ip nb-1 mA mA nb-1 mkb.. mkb.. mA mA ------------------ 1A-sample (10 days) 22.05-31.05.1995 ------------- 698 494 14.96 22 21 5.21 0.94 0.365 22.50 21.25 699 442 29.04 16 40 11.59 1.60 0.450 21.37 40.67 700 851 34.02 21 39 18.84 1.80 0.420 20.83 39.24 701 2022 37.23 21 37 20.44 1.60 0.400 22.10 37.34 702 0 0.00 24 50 0.00 - - - - 703 66/2 0.00 - - - - - 29.45 60.58 704 66/2 0.00 - - - - - 26.50 60.53 705 2016 31.62 25 33 17.67 2.30 0.540 26.01 33.60 706 555 10.35 25 64 5.11 3.30 0.380 27.51 64.74 707 22 0.00 27 52 0.05 - - 26.62 52.62 708 1676 18.28 22 53 15.74 2.25 0.400 24.23 52.99 709 3001 35.35 27 45 28.51 2.20 0.470 22.97 45.58 710 455 5.56 22 44 3.12 1.40 0.275 22.21 44.86 711 1866 51.29 23 50 19.86 2.40 0.400 23.61 49.98 712 850 13.40 23 49 11.10 1.80 0.350 24.90 49.29 ------------------ H1Magnet is OFF ---------------------------------- --18.06.95----- Large Rates 4 Lumi Runs (after HERA p-ring recovering) 713 1892 0.07 29 22 0.06 - - 30.19 22.64 714 20836/3 0.30 - - - - - 31.42 22.56 715 20836/3 0.00 - - - - - 21.75 21.97 716 20836/3+227 0.45 14 21 0.02 - - 21.49 21.96 ? 31 ---22.06.95------- 1B-sample (13 days) 22.06-04.07.1995 ------------- 717 599 4.64 12 44 1.71 1.15 0.450 - - 718 1 0.01 27 44 0.00 - - 27.77 44.28 719 0 0.12 6 44 0.01 - - 29.20 44.00 720 94 0.02 10 43 0.00 - - 30.90 43.69 721 4103 47.22 30 43 19.49 2.00 0.320 31.42 43.56 722 2143 35.49 29 40 23.36 2.20 0.380 31.20 40.04 ? 6 723 11 0.12 28 40 0.13 - - 28.67 40.17 724 1771+??? 13.96 17 37 12.45 0.75 0.270 16.86 37.82 -------------- Problems with LUMIMON making at L4 --------------------- 725 ???? 32.02 26 47 23.34 2.10 0.390 27.06 47.42 near 130 726 ???? 43.91 30 46 29.77 2.00 0.320 29.81 46.14 H1RAWD were 727 ???? 48.56 31 50 4.87 2.90 0.420 30.84 49.93 got without 728 ???? 4.00 - - - 1.90 0.300 26.09 48.93 LUMIMON 729 ???? 5.16 - - - 1.60 0.400 23.60 40.23 making -------------- LUMIMONs are making again ------------------------------ 730 1794 16.92 22 51 12.85 1.85 0.360 22.21 51.25 ---30.06.95--- H1CTRIG upgrade ---------------------------------------- 731 0 10.90 - - - 2.30 0.300 32.30 51.75 732 221 26.39 14 47 3.48 2.00 0.300 26.75 49.49 ? 19 733 42 0.11 - - - - - 27.29 45.83 734 466 27.93 19 45 1.23 2.30 0.330 31.96 45.49 735 0 0.11 - - - - - 30.50 55.18 ---04.07.95--- Shifted Pipeline Delay found at Runs during Lumi RUN 736 ------------------ 1C-sample ( 8 days) 04.07-11.07.1995 ------------- 736 440 65.60 25 54 45.57 2.60 0.380 31.10 54.71 ---07.07.95--- H1 Magnet is ON (H1Lumi Dedicated Runs at 737th)-------- LRun ETPDnVC HERA pr.Ie Ip Lgatd L Lsp Ie Ip 737 1964 30.57 27 29 10.74 2.00 0.520 31.40 28.90 738 17 0.02 31 44 0.02 0.03 0.020 29.58 44.40 739 1364 41.14 22 44 12.17 2.60 0.470 28.49 43.86 740 1129 32.19 29 53 9.60 3.30 0.500 31.44 53.71 741 3782 71.80 18 53 37.64 3.50 0.470 27.35 52.88 742 84 1.00 4 49 0.45 0.43 0.370 4.70 49.36 same beams 743 24 0.61 29 53 0.24 1.85 0.230 29.97 53.47 744 2106 21.06 34 53 18.80 4.70 0.525 33.81 53.28 ---11.07.95--- New FADC Shifts ---------------------------------------- ------------------ 1D-sample ( ? days) 11.07-??.??.1995 ------------- 745 1723 45.46 19 41 13.57 2.30 0.525 22.70 41.60 746 329+??? 42.20 ?? ?? ??.?? 2.61 0.505 28.41 42.74 For today we have: 1B-sample 108822-110277 (10275 etpdnvc) - 22.06-04.07.95 1C-sample 110407-111330 (10913 etpdnvc) - shifted PipeLine Delay 1D-sample 111538-...... ( 3297 etpdnvc) - 11.07.95 -?????? 12.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === LRTL ALARMS ................. A LIST OF LRTL DISAPPEARANCES, TIME .GE.10 MIN, TCL#10-39 --------------------------------------------------------- LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 30_F R104333 ep*cc 14.05.95 30_min 0 0 4 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 10_F R105585 ep*cc 24.05.95 10_min 0 0 1 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 14_F R108823 ep*cc 22.06.95 14_min 0 6 5 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 17_F R109079 ep*cc 23.06.95 17_min 0 0 5 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 14_F R109092 ep*cc 23.06.95 14_min 0 0 6 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 15_F R110119 ep*cc 01.07.95 15_min 0 0 6 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 21_F R110141 ep*cc 01.07.95 21_min 0 0 5 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 26_F R110171 ep*cc 01.07.95 26_min 0 0 2 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 14_F R110173 ep*cc 01.07.95 14_min 0 0 6 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 25_F R110179 ep*cc 01.07.95 25_min 0 0 6 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 12_F R110181 ep*cc 01.07.95 12_min 0 0 5 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 10_F R110190 ep*cc 02.07.95 10_min 0 0 5 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 22_F R110276 ep*cc 02.07.95 22_min 0 0 6 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 14_F R110411 ep*cc 03.07.95 14_min 0 0 6 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL A# 12_F R110983 ep*cc 07.07.95 12_min 0 0 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: 1. In this List only the cases of TIME.ge.10_min are collected. 2. ALARMS were taken from TCLs(!), the TCL numbers 10 -39, but #37. 3. All the relevant RAWD(!) were checked, but not yet reported. 4. Most RAWD are without ALARM, for some RAWD ALARMS are as at TCLs. 5. The relavant list taken for TIME.ge.1_min is ~3 times longer. 6. In most cases of "no_LRTL", the LUMM is absent, the TCUR is ok. 7. This LLO-message is fragmental because of difficulties of Pitomnik. L.Shtarkov, Pitomnik. 12/07/95 ================ o.kaufmann === Lumi RUN# 747 Start - End of Run 747: 12/7/95 15:46:01 - 20:20:47 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:54:36 - 20:20:47 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 22.8, Ip= 53.46 Start lumi value: 2.67 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.44 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 188, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 14, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 37.32 nb-1 HERA - physics: 33.37 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 15.48 nb-1 H1data - physics: 5.19 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 46 % , DT corr.: 33 % , Tot eff.: 15 % H1 Runs: 111923 - 111975 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 15:55 with L=2.8mkb-1sec-1. Peak Specific Lumi was fixed near 19:30 with Lsp=0.5mkb-1sec-1mA-2 13/07/95 ================== A.Zhokin === Lumi RUN# 748 Start - End of Run 748: 13/7/95 9:05:09 - 10:17:06 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 9:54:38 - 10:17:06 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 23.57, Ip= 58.58 Start lumi value: 3.21 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.47 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 13.14 nb-1 HERA - physics: 6.09 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.94 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.01 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 15 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 112064 - 112080 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 09:22 with L=3.4mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 10:12 with Lsp=0.49mkb-1sec-1mA-2 13.07.1995 ================= F11LEV === s91 event rate .............. Amount of s91 events on the last LUMIMON files is still insufficient. We need ~1% stat.precision of the offline lumi determination for each 200-250 nb-1 sample. For that ~30K s91 events (before any selection) is necessary, --> 150ev/nb-1. What do we have: LUMIMON file L [nb-1] N(s91) N(s91)/L Fraction from needed 105 33.6 874 26 1/6 106 15.8 771 49 1/3 107 22.1 4435 200 OK 108 8.6 601 70 1/2 In all these files prescale gap for s91 was mostly 1000000, only in few runs in LUMIMON-106 it was 250000. Thus, it is not clear for me, why in 107 file there were so many s91 events, compared to other files. Is this related to changing readout timing in our system? By the way, is this now tuned and fixed finally? 13.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 1B Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 108822-110277 data sample (1B).It were selected 10274 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83108.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 31076 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M8392.C00 -C /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M93108.C00 -C ???? events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M8387.C00 -C /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M8892.C00 -C It were got 10274 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 4172 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.964 0.937 0.925 1.265 0.918 0.000 0.851 0.585 0.760 0.784 0.745 0.833 0.763 0.778 0.878 0.967 0.873 0.918 0.926 0.935 0.890 0.860 0.912 0.879 0.880 0.826 0.872 0.824 1.125 0.827 1.052 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.956 0.999 0.999 1.005 1.061 0.992 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 1.622 1.052 0.920 1.136 0.000 1.040 1.032 1.073 1.064 0.986 1.016 1.049 1.042 1.060 0.941 1.001 0.974 1.045 1.104 0.947 1.158 1.032 1.067 1.108 0.989 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=4.403 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 108822-110277 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 10K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.39 1.17 27.31 1.10 27.31 1.12 Runs 108822-110277 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 31K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.13 1.21 27.14 1.14 <--it is seen that CCvcs too small As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 1A-sample Calibr. (see message from 01.06.95 CCvcs value was got from this Calibration too (see message from 01.06. 1995): (CCvcs start = 4.403 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was almost unsuccesful (with very poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was not made due to poor statistics. Data from Lumi RUNs 725-729 and end of Lumi RUN 724 were not analyzed (LUMIMON-data sets were not produced - selection from H1RAWD is enough difficult procedure - and as seems not needed due to data from these LUMI Runs are P-labeled due to H1 Main Magnet was off). 13.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 1B Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1B sample with events from Runs 108822-110277: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R108822 ( 7691 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ4.R108822 1949 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ4-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-9.5%) and a very bad resolution digits (35%-boundary value) for (12-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R108822 8944 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R108822 25950 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 4.403 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 13.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 1B It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.095 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.952 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.170.So CCvcs = 4.403*1.170=5.152Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Runs 108822-110277: Runs 108822-110277 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 10K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.16 Runs 108822-110277 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 31K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.20 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.335 4.234 4.206 4.538 4.742 4.288 5.062 5.121 2.348 4.922 5.100 3.565 5.372 4.294 7.454 5.451 6.156 5.677 4.611 4.655 4.742 6.176 4.211 5.696 4.341 4.812 4.960 4.117 4.997 3.665 3.520 4.533 4.349 4.373 4.186 e42= 4.286 4.284 4.312 4.439 4.303 4.281 4.285 p00= 2.864 2.313 1.180 2.321 3.058 1.330 2.513 3.318 2.612 1.785 2.323 3.265 3.127 2.884 1.694 2.722 2.587 3.310 2.146 2.334 p20= 2.551 1.729 2.587 2.643 3.055 vcs= 5.152 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last samples - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 6.5-7GeV. 13.07.1995 ================= F11LEV === lumi mon.trig. rates ........ LUMIMON file L [nb-1] N(s91) N(s91)/L Fraction from needed 109 9.7 1490 154 OK On the other hand, s90 (ET44) has ~10K events. Is is really necessary so many of them? 13.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 1C Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 110407-111275 data sample (1C).It were selected 8791 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83108.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 13179 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M8392.C00 -C /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M93108.C00 -C 4091 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M8387.C00 -C /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M8892.C00 -C It were got 8791 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 5257 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.655 0.000 0.000 2.971 2.945 0.000 1.666 2.025 1.600 1.271 1.234 1.411 1.362 1.248 1.445 1.501 1.461 1.369 1.365 1.480 1.273 1.323 1.527 1.362 1.392 1.462 1.432 1.427 3.047 1.788 3.048 1.078 0.000 1.041 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.464 1.800 1.025 1.232 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 1.892 1.744 1.879 1.140 0.000 1.416 1.539 1.533 1.562 1.287 1.411 1.414 1.582 1.478 1.659 1.547 1.369 1.461 1.656 1.239 1.349 1.637 1.441 1.296 0.984 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=5.152 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 110407-111275 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 9K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.57 1.40 27.53 1.33 27.44 1.33 Runs 110407-111275 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 13K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 25.14 1.71 25.20 1.64 <--it is seen that VCs is absent As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from Dedic.Runs.Calibr.(see message from 11.07.95 CCvcs value was got from 1B-sample calibr.(see message from 13.07. 1995): (CCvcs start = 5.152 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with statistics near 3.6K events). Selection of G and M H1Runs was not made due to poor statistics. 13.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 1C Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1B sample with events from Runs 108822-110277: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R110407 (10438 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R108822 3689 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-6.6%) and a very bad resolution digits (32-35%-boundary value) for (6-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R110407 8400 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R110407 12549 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 5.152 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 13.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 1C It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.066 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.955 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs was not defined - it is impossible due to absence of VCs signal at H1DataFlow at H1Runs from 1C-sample. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Runs 110407-111275: Runs 110407-111275 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 9K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.30 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 7.602 44.848 31.508 10.889 17.955 4.298 11.870 21.023 4.976 8.211 9.509 6.194 9.042 7.415 11.850 8.759 10.131 8.665 7.485 9.052 7.334 8.961 6.628 9.133 6.642 8.161 8.302 7.232 13.206 8.152 9.887 5.322 4.615 4.849 4.911 e42= 4.365 5.491 6.282 7.528 4.447 5.282 4.285 p00= 2.638 4.038 2.452 2.208 3.066 1.779 3.500 4.654 3.909 2.287 3.115 4.192 4.702 4.179 2.830 4.183 3.716 4.632 3.785 2.873 p20= 2.856 2.762 3.287 3.152 3.080 vcs= ?.??? <-- undefined (VCs signal is absent or not connected with current event at all if exists. Energy spectrum VCdep is non-right. It is impossible to use data from this sample for PhotonArm Energy estimation if VC=1 - for ET-arm as seems all is OK and for PDnVC- triggered events PhotonArm Energy estimation is more or less valid. Right ET44-channels calibration on the first view is impossible too (at least with standard procedure) for this sample. P.S. 14.07.95 it was found that really it is possible 'to prolong' 1C-sample up to H1 Run 111330 at this case - additional 2132 events with ET&PD&nVC trigger would be used for calibration. 13.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Remark on ET44 Calibration .. At last some days V.Andreev investigated problem connected with MonteCarlo ET44-accepance estimations with beam parameters estimated from ET32-data. As seems there are some evidence that PhotonArm energy is underestimated for ET&VC-events. Possible reason is enough large Veto-deposited energy quota at PhotonArm Energy for these events. It was remembered some investigation of 'unlinearity'-effects at small energy region for VCdep-energy (see message from 28.04.1993 at LL6). First Vova's estimation shows that parametrization of VCrec= =f(VCdep) from (27.54-ETrec-PDrec+Vcdep)=f(VCdep) two-dimensional distribution makes 'right'-direction correction of PhotonArm energy for ET44&VC-events. May be it will be needed to make some 'upgrade' of ET44-channels calibration with preliminary 'correction' of VCdep energy on 'VCrec'. In principle good test of this supposition would be calibration with ET44&nVC-sample with PDrec<5 GeV. As seems these type of events must be at s90-samples. 13/07/95 ================ o.kaufmann === Lumi RUN# 749 Start - End of Run 749: 13/7/95 16:26:44 - 17:25:58 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:25:51 - 17:25:58 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.26, Ip= 57.13 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 9.49 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 112129 - 112132 P.S. At 17:20 large fraction of positron beam was lost during Lumi optimization announcement (30mA -> 2 mA) and at 17:25 e+beam was dumped. Luminosity RUN was not proclaimed. Peak Lumi was fixed near 16:35 with L=3.85 mkb-1sec-1. Peak Specific Lumi with large currents was achieved near 17:00 with Lsp=0.410 mkb-1sec-1mA-1. 14/07/95 ================ o.kaufmann === Lumi RUN# 750 Start - End of Run 750: 14/7/95 0:57:13 - 1:08:38 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:06:17 - 1:08:38 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 18.5, Ip= 52.33 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0.31 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 112168 - 112170 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 01:03 with L=1.25mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 01:03 with Lsp=0.26mkb-1sec-1mA-2 before e+beam was lost. 14/07/95 =================== rick === Lumi RUN# 751 Start - End of Run 751: 14/7/95 2:34:12 - 3:42:33 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:34:13 - 3:42:33 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 20.2, Ip= 52.23 Start lumi value: 2.45 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.47 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 8.95 nb-1 HERA - physics: 6.54 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.67 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.06 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 10 % , DT corr.: 7 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 112177 - 112196 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 02:55 with L=2.51mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 03:12 with Lsp=0.48mkb-1sec-1mA-2 13.07.1995 ================= H1KSHE === LUMM bank contents .......... Since Lumi Run 745, due to request of V.Andreev and evident profit, the PDlow bit bunch rate monitoring was changed by PD high bit. Knowledge of PD high background rate is much more useful for alternative lumi calculations. Temporary the old PD high location was replaced by ET44 tr.bit. So, currently (since Run 111503) for the LUMM bank contents we have the following changes: PD low --> PD high PD High --> ET44 No one trigger bit rate as far as all present rates are not leaved out of monitoring and storing due to corresponding online applications running. It means any trigg. rates can be reproduced at any moment. 14.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 1D Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 111538-112132 data sample (1D).It were selected 5738 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83110.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 9062 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M93110.C00 -C 2416 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M93110.C00 -C It were got 5738 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 3136 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.833 0.793 1.369 0.735 0.000 0.756 0.478 0.767 0.842 0.711 0.792 0.848 0.819 0.936 0.974 0.926 0.909 0.987 0.904 0.880 0.855 0.944 0.922 0.892 0.914 0.951 0.878 1.192 0.796 1.066 0.914 0.956 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.071 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.348 0.990 0.918 1.205 0.000 0.995 1.089 1.041 1.231 1.030 1.101 1.068 1.110 1.084 0.975 1.152 1.053 1.076 1.021 1.050 1.234 0.974 1.218 1.034 0.968 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=5.152 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 111538-112132 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 6K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.42 1.23 27.20 1.07 27.22 1.06 Runs 111538-112132 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 9K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 26.53 1.14 26.53 1.08 <--it is seen that CCvcs too small As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 1B-sample Calibr. (see message from 13.07.95 CCvcs value was got from this Calibration too (see message from 13.07. 1995): (CCvcs start = 5.152 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was not made due to poor statistics. 14.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 1D Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1D sample with events from Runs 111538-112132: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R111538 ( 6426 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R111538 2168 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.0%) and a enough reasonable resolution digits (18-21%) for (12-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R111538 5642 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R111538 8943 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 5.152 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 14.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 1D It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.040 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.991 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.554.So CCvcs = 5.152*1.554=8.006Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Runs 111538-112132: Runs 111538-112132 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 6K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.10 Runs 111538-112132 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 9K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.17 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.335 4.254 4.209 4.641 4.724 4.288 5.066 5.121 2.425 5.635 5.222 3.410 5.516 4.679 7.544 5.551 6.256 5.682 5.194 5.460 4.970 6.014 4.309 6.199 4.381 5.196 5.407 4.464 5.212 3.667 3.496 4.611 4.353 4.373 4.186 e42= 4.286 4.284 4.312 4.490 4.303 4.281 4.285 p00= 2.865 2.315 1.244 2.317 3.058 1.339 2.623 3.180 2.965 1.787 2.431 3.425 3.361 3.178 1.708 3.158 2.888 3.522 2.463 2.357 p20= 2.551 1.733 2.831 2.652 3.056 vcs= 8.006 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last samples - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 6.5-7GeV. 14.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Counts of ETPDnVC per LumiRun H1DataBase Peak values StartBeams LRun ETPDnVC HERA pr.Ie Ip Lgatd L Lsp Ie Ip nb-1 mA mA nb-1 mkb.. mkb.. mA mA ---11.07.95--- New FADC Shifts - ET44 at LUMM-bank--------------------- ------------------ 1D-sample ( 3 days) 11.07-13.07.1995 ------------- 745 1723 45.46 19 41 13.57 2.30 0.525 22.70 41.60 746 1699 42.20 29 42 8.00 2.61 0.505 28.41 42.74 747 732 37.32 23 53 13.73 2.80 0.500 22.80 53.46 748 356 13.14 24 58 3.56 3.40 0.490 23.57 58.58 749 1224+x 9.49 33 57 7.08 3.85 0.410 33.26 57.13 ------------------ 1E-sample ( ? days) 14.07-??.??.1995 ------------- 750 ???? 0.31 20 52 0.29 1.25 0.260 18.50 52.33 751 ???? 8.95 20 52 2.60 2.51 0.480 20.20 52.23 15.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === HERA-activity in last days .. Yesterday after end of Lumi RUN# 751 a lot of problems appeared at HERA. Some problems were resolved up to 14:00 and from 14:27 up to 14:48 it were fixed attempts of p-beam injections (up to 17 mA). But at 14:48 due to again appeared problems with power supply activity of HERA p-ring was stopped. At 20:14 it was injected e+beam with Ietotal near 30 mA. This beam was ramped and existed up to 05:18 15.07.95. New positron fill (without protons at HERA) started at 09:10. It were injected 171 bunches with Ie+total near 34 mA. This beam was ramped. At 11:17 Movable Platforms were moved into working position - H1 Shift Leader decision. HERA clock was switched on e+beam syncronisation. FADC shifts at Luminosity branch were incremented on 20 nsec (2 units) for beam position measurements possibility (147->149,91->93). Calibra- tion procedure were not switched on and Lumi measurement too. 'Positron Run' was proclaimed by HERA team. Positrons were lost at 13:37 by accident preparing for proton fill. 15.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 1B Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 1B.It were selected 25062 events with ET44&VC from Runs 108822-110277 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83110.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 25062 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 4127 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.85 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.930 0.828 0.786 1.402 0.733 0.000 0.754 0.478 0.758 0.861 0.742 0.866 0.874 0.914 0.908 0.987 0.947 0.915 1.013 0.925 0.904 0.881 0.949 0.921 0.901 0.920 0.960 0.875 1.227 0.793 1.062 0.931 0.957 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.304 0.997 0.986 1.207 0.974 1.021 1.075 1.036 1.277 1.029 1.083 1.057 1.087 1.065 0.969 1.131 1.048 1.077 1.011 1.046 1.234 0.963 1.221 1.036 0.965 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=8.006 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 111538-112549 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 9K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.36 1.18 27.30 1.13 27.34 1.10 Runs 111538-112549 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 13K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.50 1.26 27.42 1.20 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 1D-sample Calibr. (see message from 14.07.95 CCvcs value was got from this Calibration too (see message from 14.07. 1995): (CCvcs start = 8.006 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was not made due to poor statistics. 16.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Ext.Smpl.1D Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 'extended' 1D sample with events from Runs 111538-112549: H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ4.R111538 ( 9456 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ3.R111538 2784 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ3-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-5.75%) and a enough reasonable resolution digits (15-20%) for (12-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ2.R111538 8406 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ3.R111538 13090 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 8.006 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 16.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Ext.Smp1D It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0575 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.972 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.013.So CCvcs = 8.006*1.013=8.110Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Runs 111538-112549: Runs 111538-112549 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 9K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.51 1.13 Runs 111538-112549 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 13K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.26 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.349 4.282 4.206 4.751 4.711 4.288 5.076 5.121 2.417 5.642 5.525 3.805 5.728 5.306 7.319 5.603 6.409 5.725 5.331 5.570 5.129 5.875 4.131 6.067 4.410 5.179 5.478 4.466 5.355 3.665 3.477 4.698 4.357 4.373 4.186 e42= 4.286 4.284 4.312 4.522 4.303 4.281 4.285 p00= 2.748 2.324 1.338 2.313 3.058 1.365 2.539 3.190 3.019 1.789 2.349 3.202 3.197 3.026 1.705 3.070 2.836 3.450 2.405 2.359 p20= 2.551 1.730 2.817 2.660 3.057 vcs= 8.110 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last samples - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 6.5-7GeV. 16.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Counts of ETPDnVC per LumiRun H1DataBase Peak values StartBeams LRun ETPDnVC HERA pr.Ie Ip Lgatd L Lsp Ie Ip nb-1 mA mA nb-1 mkb.. mkb.. mA mA ---11.07.95--- New FADC Shifts - ET44 at LUMM-bank--------------------- ------------------ 1D-sample ( ? days) 11.07-??.??.1995 ------------- 745 1723 45.46 19 41 13.57 2.30 0.525 22.70 41.60 746 1699 42.20 29 42 8.00 2.61 0.505 28.41 42.74 747 732 37.32 23 53 13.73 2.80 0.500 22.80 53.46 748 356 13.14 24 58 3.56 3.40 0.490 23.57 58.58 749 1224 9.49 33 57 7.08 3.85 0.410 33.26 57.13 750 25 0.31 20 52 0.29 1.25 0.260 18.50 52.33 751 245 8.95 20 52 2.60 2.51 0.480 20.20 52.23 ? 126 alone e+beam 15.07.95 (H1Runs 112383-112401) 752 457 17.63 31 49 3.55 3.80 0.510 34.54 49.39 753 4017 79.88 30 44 37.15 3.30 0.570 30.00 44.65 754 ???? 53.40 24 43 14.18 2.65 0.485 27.24 43.22 16/07/95 =================== D. Kant === Lumi RUN# 753 Start - End of Run 753: 16/7/95 5:51:31 - 17:49:00 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:21:06 - 17:49:00 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30, Ip= 44.65 Start lumi value: 3.51 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.56 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 159 e+(-) bunches = 173, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 14, p-pilot b. = 21 HERA total lumi: 79.88 nb-1 HERA - physics: 75.97 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 49.03 nb-1 H1data - physics: 24.01 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 64 % , DT corr.: 48 % , Tot eff.: 31 % H1 Runs: 112472 - 112609 P.S.1) Peak Lumi was fixed near 06:25 with L=3.3mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 12:10 with Lsp=0.57mkb-1sec-1mA-2 At 12:40 it was switched on local timing at H1CTRIG and Lumi and Specific Lumi were decremented on 40-45% (F.Sefkow). At 13:20 F.Sefkow switched off local timing at H1CTRIG (back to standard) - Specific Lumi and Lumi made jumps into high direction on almost existed up to 12:40 level. 2) At this Lumi RUN new record value of Specific Lumi for this year was achieved (0.57 mkb-1sec-1mA-2). Previous record was fixed at 27th May 1995 during Lumi RUN# 705 (0.54 mkb-1sec-1mA-2). 3) For today it is Lumi RUN with largest HERA Produced Integrated Luminosity value at this year ( 79.88 nb-1). Previous record was fixed at Lumi RUN# 741 09.07.95 ( 71.80 nb-1). 17/07/95 =================== D. Kant === Lumi RUN# 754 Start - End of Run 754: 16/7/95 20:26:00 - 4:32:39 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:07:00 - 4:32:39 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 27.24, Ip= 43.22 Start lumi value: 2.61 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.45 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 53.40 nb-1 HERA - physics: 50.61 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 33.81 nb-1 H1data - physics: 15.66 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 66 % , DT corr.: 46 % , Tot eff.: 30 % H1 Runs: 112610 - 112693 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 20:38 with L=2.65mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 01:12 with Lsp=0.485mkb-1sec-1mA-2 17.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === no LRTL_alarm for TCL#40-43.. Sample protocol for LRTL alarms .gt.1_min for TCLs # 40-43: OPEN> File opened:data/95/spec/HERA03.H1TCL.C9500040 OPEN> File opened:data/95/spec/HERA03.H1TCL.C9500041 LUMI_ALARM:no_LRTL 2_min A# 2 R_111563 LR# 745 ep*cc 11.07.95 M,R=0,5 OPEN> File opened:data/95/spec/HERA03.H1TCL.C9500042 OPEN> File opened:data/95/spec/HERA03.H1TCL.C9500043 Conclussion: Practically no ALARMS for these runs. 17.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made compression of old data sets (1B+1C+1D+new 2LUMIMONs) into M83114.C00-family data sets (H1Runs 108341-112624): From H1 Runs (108341-112624) it were selected: 35385 etpdnvc 79.4 Mbyte 66191 etpdvc 139.7 Mbyte 90860 s9291 ( 17973 s92 + 72555 s91 + 332 both) 163.7 Mbyte 92816 et44vc 201.1 Mbyte It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets and removed some intermediate 83112-family data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83114.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83114.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83114.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83114.C00 17.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Extend.1D Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to reproduce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 111538-112624 'extended' data sample (1D).It were selected 10546 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83114.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 15384 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83114.C00 -C 4066 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M83114.C00 -C It were got 10546 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were skipped data from standalone e+beam collection (due to non- standard syncronisation and pipeline delay) and as result it were used for calibration 4558 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.929 0.825 0.789 1.406 0.725 0.998 0.754 0.473 0.766 0.867 0.780 0.830 0.886 0.890 0.912 0.988 0.945 0.908 1.000 0.915 0.901 0.879 0.946 0.914 0.901 0.917 0.957 0.875 1.219 0.793 1.063 0.931 0.957 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.999 1.006 1.082 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.318 0.998 0.993 1.205 0.000 1.014 1.082 1.025 1.235 1.030 1.087 1.063 1.093 1.076 0.967 1.132 1.051 1.078 1.014 1.046 1.237 0.961 1.221 1.037 0.965 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=8.006 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 111538-112624 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 10K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.29 1.14 27.26 1.09 27.26 1.10 Runs 111538-112624 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 15K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.45 1.24 27.42 1.18 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 1D-sample Calibr. (see message from 14.07.95 CCvcs value was got from this Calibration too (see message from 14.07. 1995): (CCvcs start = 8.006 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was not made due to poor statistics. 17.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Ext.Smpl.1D Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 'extended' 1D sample with events from Runs 111538-112624: H1KFOM.XLOOKQ4.R111538 (10627 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ4.R111538 3144 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ4-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-5.55%) and a enough reasonable resolution digits (15-21%) for (12-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.XLOOKQ2.R111538 10342 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.XLOOKQ3.R111538 15073 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 8.006 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 17.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Ext.Smp1D It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0555 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.975 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.010.So CCvcs = 8.006*1.010=8.086Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from Runs 111538-112624: Runs 111538-112624 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 10kevents) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.10 Runs 111538-112624 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 15K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.53 1.19 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.346 4.282 4.252 4.752 4.714 4.287 5.072 5.121 2.470 5.766 5.934 3.621 5.917 5.138 7.307 5.596 6.367 5.753 5.344 5.552 5.119 5.803 4.140 6.049 4.441 5.169 5.446 4.462 5.315 3.665 3.472 4.698 4.357 4.373 4.186 e42= 4.286 4.285 4.319 4.531 4.303 4.281 4.285 p00= 2.763 2.318 1.339 2.313 3.058 1.350 2.555 3.127 2.914 1.789 2.335 3.235 3.217 3.019 1.705 3.069 2.843 3.454 2.402 2.359 p20= 2.551 1.727 2.818 2.660 3.057 vcs= 8.086 Energy spectrum VCdep is different in compare with last samples - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 8-9GeV. 17.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Ext.Smp.1D Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Ext.Smp.1D.It were selected 28717 events with ET44&VC from Runs 111538-112624 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83114.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 28717 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 2876 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.85 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV have as seems non-significant 'jump'from value near -0.8 into -1.3 cm. 18/07/95 =================== ?????? === Lumi RUN# 755 Start - End of Run 755: 18/7/95 4:45:55 - 17:10:32 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:47:22 - 17:10:32 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.74, Ip= 65.22 Start lumi value: 4.43 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.48 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 106.54 nb-1 HERA - physics: 106.06 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 67.58 nb-1 H1data - physics: 27.56 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 63 % , DT corr.: 40 % , Tot eff.: 25 % H1 Runs: 112845 - 112990 P.S.1)Peak Lumi was fixed near 06:12 with L=4.52mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 09:43 with Lsp=0.488mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) "Jump" at ET&PD Bkg Rate near 06:00 from near 100 kHz to 10 kHz 3) For today it is Lumi RUN with largest HERA Produced Integrated Luminosity value at this year (106.54 nb-1). Previous record was fixed at Lumi RUN# 753 16.07.95 ( 79.88 nb-1). 4) During this Lumi RUN it was crossed boundary 1.0 pb-1 of H1 Run Gated Integrated Luminosity: 1350.273 nb-1 - HERA Produced 1004.360 nb-1 - H1 Run Gated 686.690 nb-1 - H1 Data Taken 18/07/95 =================== ?????? === Lumi RUN# 756 Start - End of Run 756: 18/7/95 17:17:43 - 18:22:00 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:18:32 - 18:22:00 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 10.27, Ip= 61.90 Start lumi value: 1.29 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.4 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 4.13 nb-1 HERA - physics: 4.03 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 1.82 nb-1 H1data - physics: 1.15 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 44 % , DT corr.: 59 % , Tot eff.: 27 % H1 Runs: 112991 - 113003 P.S.1) Peak Lumi was fixed near 17:16 with L=1.31mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 17:26 with Lsp=0.410mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) Lumi RUN with same beams which were used at Lumi RUN# 755. 18/07/95 =================== ?????? === Lumi RUN# 757 Start - End of Run 757: 18/7/95 20:24:02 - 22:17:35 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 22:15:15 - 22:17:35 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.1, Ip= 61.07 Start lumi value: 2.59 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.37 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 18.5 nb-1 HERA - physics: 1.78 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.05 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.02 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 2 % , DT corr.: 13 % , Tot eff.: 1 % H1 Runs: 113017 - 113046 P.S.1) Peak Lumi was fixed near 20:45 with L=3.70mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 20:45 with Lsp=0.412mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) Both beams were lost near 22:17 19/07/95 =================== D. Kant === Lumi RUN# 758 Start - End of Run 758: 19/7/95 7:23:13 - 8:19:25 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 8:19:16 - 8:19:25 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.73, Ip= 52.49 Start lumi value: 3.58 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.48 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 4.73 nb-1 HERA - physics: 3.34 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 113070 - 113079 P.S.1) Peak Lumi was fixed near 08:05 with L=3.60mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 08:05 with Lsp=0.487mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2)near 07:00 H1Lumi2 MacII was rebooted.It was fixed 3 hours pause at LongTermLumiHistory-files and at Usik's history pictures (Beam Currents were not written into history from near 03:00 up to 07:00 for example). From 03:00 up to 07:00 H1Lumi MacII was at non-operational status. 19.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === HERA-clock pause vs Lumi RUN. Today near 11:05 both beam were ready for start of Lumi RUN (end of e+ring ramping) but from 11:05 HERA-clock was switched off at H1 due to some manipulation at H1CTrig. HERA-clock and beams bunch currents appeared at H1Lumi near 11:31 and Lumi RUN# 759 was started. Near 11:48 Luminosity RUN was proclaimed with enough low Specific Lumi at H1 IP (near 0.280 mkb-1sec-1mA-2) and with enough strange beam position ( near -2.3 cm and near +0.65cm). Near 11:56 and were tuned into more or less standard values and Specific Lumi became more then 0.4 mkb-1sec-1mA-1. At 12:06 positron beam was lost. 19/07/95 =================== D. kant === Lumi RUN# 759 Start - End of Run 759: 19/7/95 11:32:48 - 12:06:56 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:06:49 - 12:06:56 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 25.16, Ip= 52.17 Start lumi value: 1.85 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.29 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 173 e+(-) bunches = 188, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 7 HERA total lumi: 3.7 nb-1 HERA - physics: 2.33 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 113098 - 113108 P.S.1) Peak Lumi was fixed near 12:01 with L=3.00mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 12:01 with Lsp=0.480mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) at 12:06 positron beam was lost due to RF failure. 3) at 13:05 proton beam was dumped. 19.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made compression of old data sets (83114-family+3LUMIMONs) into M83117.C00-family data sets (H1Runs 108341-113001): From H1 Runs (108341-113001) it were selected: 39874 etpdnvc 91.1 Mbyte 71798 etpdvc 154.6 Mbyte 93798 s9291 ( 19122 s92 + 74344 s91 + 332 both) 171.4 Mbyte 99116 et44vc 217.8 Mbyte It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets and removed all intermediate 83114-family data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83117.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83117.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83117.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83117.C00 19.07.1995 ================= H01GOG === Lumi ST rates, s91 events In the table, which comes below, you can see the old and new prescale factors for our subtriggers, which were set since last weekend by F. Sefkow. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ST old prescale*10**-3 new new/old --------------------------------------------------------------------- s86 60 100 1.7 s90 50 300 6 s91 1000 1000 1 s92 300 300 1 s93 3000 1000 0.3 s94 100 50 0.5 s95 400 500 1.2 The values of the prescale factors given in this table are APPROXIMATE. The actual values for 3 of our ST are shown in the next table (you can find these values for all LUMIMON tapes in H01GOG.LMONI95.TEXT). --------------------------------------------------------------------- | prescale*10**-3 LUMIMON tapes |--------------------------------------------- | s86 | s90 | s91 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 105 65 20-160 250-1000 106 65 20-50 250-1000 107 65 50 1000 108 65 50 1000 109 65 20-50 250-1000 110 65 20-50 250-1000 111 65 50-160 1000 112 65 50-160 1000 113 65-130 50-320 1000 114 65-130 50-300 1000 115 65-130 50-300 1000 116 100 50-300 1000 117 100 100 1000 For s86 and s90 prescales are still varied by factor ~2 (maybe it depends on the background conditions or trigger phase), and for s91 the situation really didn't change. In order to understand, which part of all s91 events we can finally use for offline luminosity corrections (we need G+M s91 events with reconstructed E_gamma >~(8-9)GeV), I have investigated the following on several LUMIMON tapes: 1/ # of s91 events, per 1nb-1 2/ # of s91 events with E_gamma_rec > 9 GeV, per 1nb-1 3/ fraction of non-reconstructed s91 events (which gives an estimate on the purity of the sample) The points 1/, 2/ and 3/ were studied separately for (G+M) runs as well. The result is presented in the table. ----------------------------------------------------------------------= LUMIMON-file 105 106 107 108 109 112 113 ----------------------------------------------------------------------= L, nb-1 33.6 9.04 21.0 8.55 18.2 13.8 12.7 L(G+M),nb-1 (L*) 2.05 6.64 0 4.3 9.85 11.0 12.7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Nev(s91) 874 771 4435 601 1489 972 885 Nev(s91)(G+M) 153 591 0 303 1481 773 885 Nev(s91)&ep>9 225 172 405 305 729 533 495 Nev(s91)&ep>9&(G+M) 42 139 0 149 727 428 495 Nev(s91)&ep<1 36 13 3625 14 40 34 25 Nev(s91)&ep<1&(G+M) 5 7 0 6 36 27 25 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- N(s91)/L 26 49 157.4 56.2 80.5 70.4 69.7 N(s91)(G+M)/L* 74.6 89 - 70.5 150.4 70.3 69.7 N(s91)&ep>9/L 6.7 10.9 14.4 28.5 39.4 38.6 39 N(s91)&ep>9&(G+M)/L* 20.5 20.9 - 34.7 73.8 38.9 39 N(s91)&ep<1/N(s91) 0.04 0.02 0.8 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 N(s91)&ep<1&(G+M) ------------------ 0.03 0.01 - 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 N(s91)&(G+M) The purity of s91 is good: only less than 3% of events are not reconstructed (or have E < 1 GeV), but we still would like to increase the number of s91 events by factor ~1.5-2.0. 19.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Calibration Tests ........... Today it was made attempt to test existing calibration constants which were put into H1DataBase some days ago with data samples for calibrati- on. It was used for testing last LREC-release(from 07.00/03 H1Rec- release). Next values of mean and sigmas for ETrec+PDrec histos were produced: 1) bins 200 22 32: a) sample 1B (H1Runs 108822-110406) - ETPDnVC-events: all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 27.71 1.25 27.72 1.17 27.73 1.16 b) sample 1C (H1Runs 110407-111537) - ETPDnVC-events: all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 27.56 1.41 27.52 1.37 27.52 1.36 c) sample 1D (H1Runs 111538-113001) - ETPDnVC-events: all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 27.58 1.17 27.65 1.15 27.63 1.16 d) 1B+1C+1D-samples (H1Runs 108822-113001) - ETPDnVC-events: xetcut&vcdepcut Mean Sigma 27.60 1.21 e) 1B+1D-samples (H1Runs 108822-110406 & 111538-113001)- ETPDVC-events: xetcut Mean Sigma 27.63 1.24 2) bins 200 0 40: a) sample 1B (H1Runs 108822-110406) - ETPDnVC-events: all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 27.66 1.25 27.65 1.16 27.67 1.15 b) sample 1C (H1Runs 110407-111537) - ETPDnVC-events: all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 27.52 1.41 27.48 1.35 27.49 1.35 c) sample 1D (H1Runs 111538-113001) - ETPDnVC-events: all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 27.58 1.19 27.63 1.15 27.61 1.17 100th ntupels for analyze are kept at next LOOK binary data sets at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.LOOK.R108341.ETPDNVC.Y95 FAST09 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R108341.ETPDVC.Y95 FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R108341.S9291.Y95 FAST09 3010200E 00000 DASD 19.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === CC Behaivours with Time ..... It was built LOOK-binary set with set of vectors which keep informati- on about OnLine Calibration Constants behaivours with time. LOOK binary file is kept at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.LOOK3.R105252 FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD Vectors 2405-2419 keep CC behaiviour with time for hot PD-channels; Vectors 2221-2234 keep CC behaiviour with time for hot ET-channels; Vectors 1501-1506 keep CC behaiviour with time for hot ET44-channels; Vector 2226 keeps CCvcs behaivour with time. It was used ETPDnVC-samples (1A+1B+1C+1D) for building of these vectors - it means that time axis (at vectors this is event number at sample) connected with time period from 22.05.1995 up to 17.07.95 (56 days). It is possible to find which event number at sample connected with which H1 Run if You look into data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.MAYJULY.Y95 FAST05 3010200E 00000 DASD First conclusion - after 18 June large rate Lumi RUNs (713-716) almost all hot channels responses were decremented (up to 20%). Some from hot channels 'keep' this level of response up to now. Some channels come back to more or less same level which was before 18 June. Channel response degradation (which was fixed near 1 percent per day at 1A-sample) is less now or disappear at all at some channels. As seems situation with CC behaivour with time is reasonable and better then at previous data taking. There are no evidences of 'CCp11-jumps' type (on 50-100%) which were fixed near 10 times at last year and were the reasons of appearing of new boundaries at calibration samples. As seems large rate Lumi RUNs were the reason of degradation of resolution digits at ETrec+PDrec histos. 20/07/95 ================== formanek === Lumi RUN# 760 Start - End of Run 760: 19/7/95 19:33:00 - 6:15:47 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 20:52:16 - 6:15:47 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.2, Ip= 56.53 Start lumi value: 4.09 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.47 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 192, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 18, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 93.09 nb-1 HERA - physics: 91.08 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 63.77 nb-1 H1data - physics: 43.19 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 69 % , DT corr.: 67 % , Tot eff.: 47 % H1 Runs: 113153 - 113249 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 19:55 with L=4.16mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 00:55 with Lsp=0.530mkb-1sec-1mA-2 20.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made compression of old data sets (83117-family+4LUMIMONs) into M83121.C00-family data sets (H1Runs 108341-113239): From H1 Runs (108341-113239) it were selected: 49239 etpdnvc 114.1 Mbyte 81256 etpdvc 178.2 Mbyte 100200 s9291 ( 21638 s92 + 78230 s91 + 332 both) 187.0 Mbyte 108512 et44vc 240.9 Mbyte It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets and removed all intermediate 83117-family data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83121.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83121.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83121.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83121.C00 20.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === H1Run Quality at H1DataBase Long time ago (during calibration with 1A-sample) I firstly looked for that H1Run Quality is equal for all H1Runs included into sample and equal zero (non-specified) if I am using working during 94 Year calibration data sample function IQRH1. Up to now situtaion is the same - all H1Runs are labeled as zero - non-specified. Does anybody know the jenuine reason of this situtaion - may be I must use another library at link-step, may be some problems exist at H1DataBase at dice2 with this function call at this year etc. At MakeFile I am using next line: .... -L /h1/lib -lh1util \ .... It was not fixed any problems when I tryed to work with H1Runs from H1DataTaking'94. P.S. (S.Lev.) No changes in s/w (libraries, links) are required! Explanation. H1 run quality is taken from H1EP file and stored in BOS banks GQRx, MQRx, PQRx where x = 2,3,4,... for 1992,1993,1994,... These banks are finally stored in the database and can be used in various analyses. There is a tool to access them (IQRH1). Important: since a list of G,M and P runs is frequently updated ---------- during data taking, "fresh" banks are stored in DB only few times per year, and only at the end of the complete LUMI run (full year lumi run!) - they are stored in DB forever. The main reason - DB memory, which should not be overloaded by frequent updates of these banks during data taking. In order to get an access to the most up-to-date run quality infor- mation, GQR5, MQR5 and PQR5 banks can be used from regularly updated by Nelly Gogitidze IBM text file 'H01GOG.GMP95.TEXT'. Those who wants to use it on dice, should ftp it there. An example, how to include it in the job is shown below for IBM-case: //G.SYSIN DD * * * INPUT BOS file: * --------------- OPEN BOSINPUT UNIT=1 FILE="HERA03.H01.LUMIMON.C9500092" & & STAGE READ SKIPCOREV SELECT BOSINPUT CLASS = 26 TIMESTOP 4 END %MACRO 'H01GOG.GMP95.TEXT' // I.e. it must be put AFTER FPACK statements (after END which is always the last FPACK statement in the input). Similar - on dice. In your main program there should be the following (very standard!) statements (which, I believe are by now included in all main pr. within H1): * read i/o commands and steering banks CALL FPARMR(5) CALL BREADC * P.S. I will store first set of these banks for 1995 in the database soon (perhaps next week, or during the weekend). 20.07.1995 ================= H01GOG === H1 and ZEUS Luminosity Here is a comparison of the luminosity values for H1 and ZEUS _______________________________________________________________ | | | L (HERA-prod.) L (recorded) L (phys.) | | (nb-1) (nb-1) (nb-1) | | --------------------------------------------- | | | | H1 1474 835 238 | | | | ZEUS 2003 763 488 | | | |_____________________________________________________________| 20.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Problem with PDrec-energy At last calibration data sample (1D-Runs 111538-113239) it was seen some evidence that something not good with PDrec-energy (something non-standard). Anybody can look into this sample and try to make own conclusion. Today it were produced (for calibration constants test) new LOOK-binary data sets with processing of all events recorded from 22.05 up to 20.07.95. 100th ntupels are kept at next LOOK-binary data sets at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.ETPDNVC.Y95 FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.ETPDVC.Y95 FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.S9291.Y95 FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD Calibration samples could be described as next: do '/s1a=(run<106569&run>105262)' do '/s1b=(run<110407&run>108821)' do '/s1c=(run<111538&run>110406)' do '/s1d=(run<113240&run>111537)' If You select PDrec energy for sample 1D (pdr-name at 100th ntupel) You can see that near 4% (!) of total statistics is at energy region less then 3 GeV. There is enough large population of 'negative' energy (not seen at 1A and 1C-samples). PD-trigger element said that there is PhotonArm Energy more then threshold value. At some H1Runs this 'bad' PhotonArm rec energy is near 10% (H1Run 112129 for example). May be this is 'zero'-pedestals effect, may be 'bad' FADC-shifts - as seems it would be good to write some Lumi RUN with LRPF,LREF-banks but (it is pity) if Farm is ON (standard mode of H1DataTaking) these banks are rejected at FarmLevel. May be we can write some short H1Lumi Dedicated Run when enough large proton and electron beams will be ready for Lumi RUN (at first stage of Lumi RUN - when trackers HV are off or HV ramping in progress). P.S. All "bad" effects in PD-rec energy related ONLY to the E-veto. Negative energies are only possible from veto, never from PD itself. May be last VC calibration is not good? Or bad responce at VC? However, in e.g. LUMIMON 116,117 a fraction of such "bad" (due to the veto) events is small. (S.L.) P.S. I am agree that VCs has 'bad' response for PDnVC-triggered events (at VCdep-distribution for nVC-events - very large fraction of negative energy). As seems it is needed to think about decremen- ting of FADCshift for PD-channels on 1 unit (10 nsec) or about individual pedestal finding for VCs-signal (far from rest of t0-1 BC). VCs calibration is enough reasonable - only CCvcs value (near 8 MeV/FADCcount) puts some signal that VCs response is rejected with 'right' boundary of t0 FADC-window. 21.07.1995 ================= F11LEV === About Low bgr. conditions ... Last days (see A.F. message here from 18/07 and H1RUN pinboard from 19/07) there were discussions on the unusually low bakground and possible consequences. I have to add the following remarks to this topic: 1) My estimate (from 1987) of 10% e-gas bgr. in good conditions turned out to be not so bad, taking into account, how difficult is to define (in advance!) the vacuum and a composition of rest gas. 2) A remark in H1RUN, that we never had so far less than 10% bgr. (originating, as I guess from our group) is not fully correct. Indeed, an average 1994 bgr. conditions were ~15%, but for a long time we were running with < 10% e-gas background. E.g. in Oct-94 there were ~10 days with ~7-8% bgr. to lumi. The lowes value in 1994 was ~5.5% (yes, never 3.3%, as last days). 3) Please, don't increase an integrating time for the lumi estimate (as was proposed in A.F. message)! Remember, that the IMPROVED CONDITIONS BY DEFINITION CANNOT LEAD TO THE WORSE RESULT (lumi estimate) - obvious statement, isn't it? Yes, indeed, a RELATIVE error of the bgr. estimate increases, but since the bgr. itself become less, an error in the signal (total-bgr.) of coarse improved (reduces) with better vacuum! Think on the limiting case: no bgr. at all, or just 1 bgr. event per 10 sec time. This gives 100% error in bgr. estimate, so what? The bgr. itself is so small, that the error in signal gets smaller (100% error for 0.1% bgr.value is 10 times better, than 10% error to 10% bgr.value). 21/07/95 ================= M. Landon === Lumi RUN# 761 Start - End of Run 761: 20/7/95 17:27:52 - 2:24:19 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:55:20 - 2:24:19 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.52, Ip= 45.77 Start lumi value: 3.74 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.55 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 71.3 nb-1 HERA - physics: 69.32 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 55.42 nb-1 H1data - physics: 38.41 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 79 % , DT corr.: 69 % , Tot eff.: 55 % H1 Runs: 113359 - 113415 P.S. Max L_sp = 5.77*10^29 (from Usik's xshlu picture) - largest value in 1995. P.S.1) Peak Lumi was fixed near 17:50 with L=3.81mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 20:35 with Lsp=0.587mkb-1sec-1mA-2 (data from Egor's LongTermHistory files). 2) At this Lumi RUN new record value of Specific Lumi for this year was achieved (0.587mkb-1sec-1mA-2). Previous record was fixed at 16th July 1995 during Lumi RUN# 753 (0.57 mkb-1sec-1mA-2). 21/07/95 ================== M. Winde === Lumi RUN# 762 Start - End of Run 762: 21/7/95 5:11:36 - 6:49:18 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 6:46:58 - 6:49:18 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 23.17, Ip= 44.64 Start lumi value: 1.99 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.47 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 8.86 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.04 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.04 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.04 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 28 % , DT corr.: 28 % , Tot eff.: 28 % H1 Runs: 113427 - 113429 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 05:41 with L=2.42mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 06:22 with Lsp=0.510mkb-1sec-1mA-2 21.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Problem with PDrec-energy As seems it is needed to check last year off-line Lumi estimations with S91-subtrigger with accounting of yesterday mentioned effect of VCdep-energy. It is proposed to remove from analyze events with VC=1 at t0-1 Bunch Crossing (it is possible to see this value at TEL1-bank). As seems at both case (VC=1 and VC=0 at t0 BC) PDrec-energy can be reduced by with 'non-right' pedestal substraction from t0 BC VCs response. If VC=0 at t0-1 BC we can be shure that pedestal for t0 BC VCs was found and accounted with right manner. Especially this effect is big at start of Lumi RUNs (when probabilty of VC=1 at t0-1 BC is more due to large VC-rate). May be this effect is connected with underestimation of PDrec-energy at ET44VC-events (see message from 13.07.95). May be this effect has some influence on PD,PD1,PD2 thresholds values calculation for PhotonArm Rate method of Lumi calculation. There are some decisions of high mentioned problem: a) simpliest - decremention of FADC shift on 1 unit (for PD-channels) and let's see what happened (as seems CCvcs must be decremented and must disappear 20.07.95 4% fraction of ETPDnVC events at PDrec vs ETrec plot with PDrec<3GeV and ETrec>10GeV; but this decision is temporary - due to non-right acounting of pedestal will be significant with large rates; b) individual pedestal bin (shifted on 30 nsec) for VCs - is is not so simply - upgrade of assembler routines, obviously incre- mention of ReadOut time etc.); c) moving of LREE and LRPE-banks making into off-line (or Farm) level - and keeping of LREF and LRPF-banks at H1 Data Stream for possibility of different accounting of pedestal, analyze of zero-pedestals etc. So - large profit at ReadOut-time - but incremention af H1Lumi part of H1Event at H1RAWD etc. d) may be it is needed to make nothing at OnLine side but to make some additional analyze at LREC during PDrec-making - if VC=1 at t0-1 - to make some label at LREC-package for using it at off-line analyze - at this case PDrec value is non- right (or can be non-right). P.S. May be analyze of VC=1 at t0-1 BC is needed for Calibration Proc. especially. 21.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made compression of old data sets (83121-family+3LUMIMONs) into M83124.C00-family data sets (H1Runs 108341-113427): From H1 Runs (108341-113427) it were selected: 57176 etpdnvc 133.6 Mbyte 88966 etpdvc 197.3 Mbyte 107229 s9291 ( 23853 s92 + 83004 s91 + 332 both) 204.1 Mbyte 108512 et44vc 240.9 Mbyte 6411 s93 15.6 Mbyte (122-124 LUMIMONs only) <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets and removed all intermediate 83121-family data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83124.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83124.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83124.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83124.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M122124.C00 <-for V.Andreev 21.07.1995 ===== OnLine ==== H1KFOM === OnLine Programs Development It were made new releases of program for FIC1_Master and FIC1_Slave. It were changed so-called FADC-shifts connected with PipeLine Delay. FADC shifts were installed on the next values: PD: 139->138. These are creation dates and program sizes of last release: TwinFIC1...............MPST MPS .....88926 Fri, Jul 21, 14:24 1995 M TwinFIC1slave..........MPST MPS .....42172 Fri, Jul 21, 14:25 1995 M Releases were booted into both FIC1s today near 14:35 (after H1 Run 113524). Binary images of both programs at Wdog-directory were replaced too for using its at 'DAQ monitor'-application activity. 21.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Calibration Tests ......... Today it were updated early mentioned LOOK-binary sets for calibration tests and it was added new LOOK-binary data set with S93-events (only from 113239 H1Run): H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.ETPDNVC.Y95 FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.ETPDVC.Y95 FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.S9291.Y95 FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R113239.S93.Y95 FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD It were processed new data sets for calibration (83124-family). Calibration samples could be described as next: do '/s1a=(run<106569&run>105262)' do '/s1b=(run<110407&run>108821)' do '/s1c=(run<111538&run>110406)' do '/s1d=(run<113428&run>111537)' 22/07/95 =================== D. Kant === Lumi RUN# 763 Start - End of Run 763: 21/7/95 22:02:30 - 1:10:15 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 22:41:06 - 1:10:15 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.8, Ip= 68.24 Start lumi value: 4.5 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.45 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 37.60 nb-1 HERA - physics: 32.94 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 24.03 nb-1 H1data - physics: 14.62 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 72 % , DT corr.: 60 % , Tot eff.: 44 % H1 Runs: 113608 - 113624 P.S.1) Peak Lumi was fixed near 22:38 with L=4.67mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 00:18 with Lsp=0.507mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) Today late evening (22:40) during Start of Lumi RUN 763 it was fixed record value of Ip total for this year (68.24 mA). Before this record Iptotal value was fixed at 18.07.95 at start of Lumi RUN 755 (65.22mA). 23.07.1995 ================= F11LEV === H1Run Quality at H1DataBase A first set of G-M-P run list banks for 1995 is stored in the database (see a message from 20/07/95). It includes all permanent H1 runs until 113622 inclusively. 23.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Bunch beam currents problem Today during p-beam and e+beam injections and rampings it were fixed enough large quantity of errors at bunch currents values (seen as 'spikes' at Iptotal and Ietotal behaivours with time). Errors are enough specific - part of Iptotal are swapped into Ietotal (even when Ietotal did not exist). Due to this spikes there are for this time 3 spikes (into low value direction) at Lumi and SpecificLumi values (near 10:55, 11:42 and 11:48) during first stage of Lumi RUN 764. These spikes are grouping with 2-5 and these 'groups' of spikes are appearing once per one hour (from 04:50 today up to now - near 12:00). Forth 'spike' at Lumi RUN 764 (early mentioned type) was fixed near 12:53. HERA-team said to H1ShiftLeader that 'all and wherever connected with bunch currents is seen as exelent'. P.S. (S.Lev) Also on ZEUS lumi display there was nothing special seen on the currents history. No spikes, everything as usual. P.S. Problems with 'spikes' at beam currents was resolved by E.Elsen at 16:20 today before start of new Lumi RUN 765 - there was influence of same application at 2nd H1Ctrig MacII (Bus errors at Main H1Ctrig Macii were as reason of early mentioned spikes). 23/07/95 =================== m.winde === Lumi RUN# 764 Start - End of Run 764: 23/7/95 10:54:14 - 13:32:17 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 11:42:58 - 13:32:17 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.65, Ip= 49.34 Start lumi value: 2.17 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.34 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 176 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 182 e-pilot b. = 13, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 20.49 nb-1 HERA - physics: 15.89 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 7.27 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.62 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 45 % , DT corr.: 8 % , Tot eff.: 3 % H1 Runs: 113824 - 113847 P.S.1) Peak Lumi was fixed near 11:46 with L=2.73mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 13:08 with Lsp=0.475mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) 'e+ beam loss rf trip' declaration at HERA TV-screen at 13:27. 3) All period of H1DataTaking very large level of Dead Time was fixed (near 92%) <- Calo HV problem(under study) 23.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made compression of old data sets (83124-family+2LUMIMONs) into M83126.C00-family data sets (H1Runs 108341-113622): From H1 Runs (108341-113622) it were selected: 61539 etpdnvc 145.0 Mbyte 93908 etpdvc 210.1 Mbyte 116153 s9291 ( 25074 s92 + 90677 s91 + 402 both) 225.8 Mbyte 127147 et44vc 287.2 Mbyte 61477 s93 (?) 158.1 Mbyte (122-126 LUMIMONs only) <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets and removed all intermediate 83124-family data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83126.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83126.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83126.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83126.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M122126.C00 <-for V.Andreev Very large quantity of s93-triggered events were selected from 125-126 LUMIMONs (it is not understandable yet). P.S. Large quantity of s93-events were recorded during H1Runs 113565- 113610 when VC was at parking position (during ramping of super large p-beam (VCrate at C0 was up to 1.5 kHz)) and e+beam or absent (up to 20:10) or injected and ramped - after 20:10 up to start of Lumi RUN 763. 23.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Calibration Tests ......... Today it were updated early mentioned LOOK-binary sets for calibration tests and updated new LOOK-binary data set with S93-events (only from 113239 H1Run): H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.ETPDNVC.Y95 FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.ETPDVC.Y95 FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R105263.S9291.Y95 FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.R113239.S93.Y95 FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD It were processed new data sets for calibration (83126-family). Calibration samples could be described as next: do '/s1b=(run<110407&run>108821)' do '/s1c=(run<111538&run>110406)' do '/s1d=(run<113428&run>111537)' do '/s2a=(run<113623&run>113524)' It was checked data set 2A (with new Photon Arm FADC shifts) -as seems - all is OK. CCvcs had decremented on factor 0.7, all CCpd had decremen ted on factor 0.92. Population of events PDrec<3.0GeV became less (factor 3-3.5 at average) at ETPDnVC sample with 'best' cuts. Let's wait more statistics for first calibration with new FADC shift. There only 3129 ETPDnVC-events with new FADCshift. During Runs113565-113610 some signal is seen at VCs. It is recommended to skip this events for thresholds analysis (data were written mostly without e+beam and during ET and PD/VC at Parking position). 24/07/95 =================== meyer === Lumi RUN# 765 Start - End of Run 765: 24/7/95 0:03:07 - 11:02:04 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:34:31 - 11:02:04 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.1, Ip= 63.10 Start lumi value: 3.76 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.48 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 86.88 nb-1 HERA - physics: 83 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 59.11 nb-1 H1data - physics: 40.78 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 71 % , DT corr.: 68 % , Tot eff.: 49 % H1 Runs: 113899 - 113980 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 00:30 with L=3.81mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 03:50 with Lsp=0.517mkb-1sec-1mA-2 Both beam were dumped at 11:08.There is 'Short Break' announcement. 24.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made compression of old data sets (83126-family+2LUMIMONs) into M83128.C00-family data sets (H1Runs 108341-113946): From H1 Runs (108341-113936) it were selected: 67369 etpdnvc 159.1 Mbyte 100184 etpdvc 225.8 Mbyte 123391 s9291 ( 26972 s92 + 96017 s91 + 402 both) 243.7 Mbyte 133596 et44vc 303.1 Mbyte 67366 s93 172.4 Mbyte (122-128 LUMIMONs only) <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets and removed all intermediate 83126-family data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83128.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83128.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83128.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83128.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M122128.C00 <-for V.Andreev 25/07/95 =================== ?????? === Lumi RUN# 766 Start - End of Run 766: 24/7/95 17:43:01 - 3:00:48 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 20:19:41 - 3:00:48 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.1, Ip= 56.13 Start lumi value: 4.45 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.51 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 88.68 nb-1 HERA - physics: 87.36 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 38.79 nb-1 H1data - physics: 28.67 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 44 % , DT corr.: 73 % , Tot eff.: 32 % H1 Runs: 114029 - 114116 P.S.(S.L.) A record L_sp = 5.8*10^29 has been observed around 20:50 (from Usik's xshlu tool). P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 18:10 with L=4.59mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 20:53 with Lsp=0.584mkb-1sec-1mA-2 25.07.1995 ================= H1KAND === Offline lumi calculation.... A procedure of the luminosity calculation based on the LUMM bank has been performed. The results are the following. H1 runs: 111538 - 113615 (G+M only) (so called 1D-sample) Online L: 159.12 nb-1 Offline/online L difference: PD trigger -11.8 % PD_high trigger -10.6 % Conclusions: 1) For this sample there is enough statistic s93-subtrigger and all thresholds are calculated with precision ~ 1 % . 2) The values of the trigger thresholds for this 1D-sample are "shifted" to larger values as campared with 1A-sample: E_pdl: 4.50 GeV -> 5.09 GeV E_pd : 5.23 GeV -> 5.87 GeV E_pdh: 13.67 GeV -> 15.32 GeV 25.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made compression of old data sets (83128-family+4LUMIMONs) into M83132.C00-family data sets (H1Runs 108341-114215): From H1 Runs (108341-114215) it were selected: 81867 etpdnvc 194.7 Mbyte 114363 etpdvc 260.9 Mbyte 139305 s9291 ( 30892 s92 + 108011 s91 + 402 both) 282.4 Mbyte 150550 et44vc 348.8 Mbyte 78298 s93 198.8 Mbyte (122-132 LUMIMONs only) <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets and removed all intermediate 83128-family data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83132.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83132.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83132.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83132.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M122132.C00 <-for V.Andreev 25.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === Alarm checking: TCL#40-49 === Alarm checking of LRTL/LUMM/xxxx disappearance (for time.gt.1_min) is being done manually, during working days, step by step by TCLs. No Alarms were registered for the last period of LUMI activity: TCL#40-49 == H1RUNs 111263-114111 == LUMI_RUNs 742-766 == 09-25.07.95. 25.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === Alarm checking: E_sum_histos Alarm checking of L4_E_sum_histos=Ee+Eg+Ev (Etag and Etag_1) is being done manually, step by step by Lumi_Run_Summary, for each H1Run in the range shown in the Summary. For the last two Lumi_Runs 765-766 == H1RUNs 114029-114092 only one Alarm was registered: in H1RUN=114033 (nev=482) when the Sum for Etag_1(!) was ~7 Gev instead of ~28 Gev. 25/07/95 =================== meyer === Lumi RUN# 767 Start - End of Run 767: 25/7/95 6:42:01 - 14:03:17 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:34:08 - 14:03:17 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.27, Ip= 54.27 Start lumi value: 3.32 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.47 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 56.64 nb-1 HERA - physics: 54.57 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 33.39 nb-1 H1data - physics: 23.92 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 61 % , DT corr.: 71 % , Tot eff.: 43 % H1 Runs: 114184 - 114231 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 07:00 with L=3.39mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 07:43 with Lsp=0.495mkb-1sec-1mA-2 25.07.1995 ================= F11LEV === Re: Problem with PDrec-energy An effect of VC signal in "BC-1" have been tested on recent sample of s91 events in G+M runs (110940-113430). For motivation see A.Fomenko's message from 21/07/95. Results are the following: 1) Amount of such events is 3.4% in average, which is reasonable (this correspond to PURELY accidental overlap at R(VC)=~290kHz). 2) There is some visible effect on the reconstructed energy: parameter VC_bit(BC-1)=1 VC-bit(BC-1)=0 ------------------- -------------- -------------- Nev(E_gamma<1)/N_tot 31% (140/454) 1% (138/13378) E(e+gamma)_peak 25.02 GeV 27.56 GeV Thus, on the first view, it seems that E_gamma is indeed deteriorated by early veto signals. Quantitatively, the effect is not so big (~30% from 3.4% -> 1% of all s91 events get "lost"). Energy shift for the rest 70% of 3.4% (~2.3%) is not dangerous for offline lumi cross check, because it is effectively taken into account by the global re-calibration with PD-fit procedure. However, the eventual loss of 1% of (probably good?) s91 events has to be studied deeper. I will do it also for 1994 data. Note, that the sample used for present analysis was collected with old FADC shift at PD (i.e. before last shift by 10 ns, made 21/07). 26/07/95 =================== meyer === Lumi RUN# 768 Start - End of Run 768: 25/7/95 22:01:47 - 5:00:24 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 22:36:38 - 5:00:24 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.63, Ip= 56.95 Start lumi value: 3.28 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.37 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 70.16 nb-1 HERA - physics: 68.17 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 55.96 nb-1 H1data - physics: 43.52 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 81 % , DT corr.: 77 % , Tot eff.: 63 % H1 Runs: 114282 - 114322 P.S.(S.Lev) p-beam was lost at ~4:58, and then a stand alone e+ beam regime lasted until ~6:41. From lumi history plots (xshlu on dice) it is seen, that the online precision of e-gas bgr. estimate is quite OK: an error (extracted from the difference between total and bgr. lumi rates at Ip=0) is ~ 0.08kHz/62kHz = 0.13% P.S.(a.f.) Yura Soloviev who was H1 Shift Leader this night wrote 2 H1Lumi Dedicated Runs with e+beam only (after p- beam was lost) - Run 114329 (31.6K, Farm On), Run 114330 (186.7K, Farm Off) with Mode 1 (LREF,LRPF and LR1F-banks are presented at Run 114330 H1DataFlow). P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 23:12 with L=4.11mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 01:45 with Lsp=0.541mkb-1sec-1mA-2 26.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === Alarm checking: TCL#50 ===== TCL#50 was checked for losses of banks. NO Alarm.gt.1_min, OK. 26.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === Alarm checking: Lumi_Run_767 For Lumi_Run_767, each H1Run was checked for Means of (Ee+Eg+Ev). NO significant deviations were detected: Etag~28.x, Etag_1~25-27 Gev. 26.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === Alarm checking: Lumi_Run_768 For Lumi_Run_768, each H1Run was checked for Means of (Ee+Eg+Ev). NO significant deviations were detected: Etag~28.x, Etag_1~25-27 Gev. Comment: The means are taken from the peak_finder, not histo_summary. 26/07/95 =============== Niedzballa === Lumi RUN# 769 Start - End of Run 769: 26/7/95 11:30:03 - 12:02:57 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:02:44 - 12:02:57 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 34, Ip= 45.04 Start lumi value: 2 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.27 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 3.29 nb-1 HERA - physics: 1.85 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 114354 - 114363 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 11:52 with L=3.74mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 11:52 with Lsp=0.501mkb-1sec-1mA-2 27/07/95 ================ M.Mueller === Lumi RUN# 770 Start - End of Run 770: 26/7/95 20:07:51 - 6:06:03 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 20:54:57 - 6:06:03 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.94, Ip= 41.22 Start lumi value: 3.19 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.48 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 71.11 nb-1 HERA - physics: 69.79 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 54.43 nb-1 H1data - physics: 45.22 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 77 % , DT corr.: 82 % , Tot eff.: 64 % H1 Runs: 114414 - 114456 Comment: During this Lumi Run the max value of 6.2E29 for spec lumi was reached. P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 20:21 with L=3.31mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 01:57 with Lsp=0.616mkb-1sec-1mA-2 P.S. During this Lumi RUN it was achived 1.0pb-1 of H1 Data Taken Integrated Lumi at H1 IP from start of H1 Data Taking 95. Next values of Integrated Luminosity values were collected at H1Lumi after end of Lumi RUN# 770: 1989.540 nb-1 - HERA Produced 1496.210 nb-1 - H1 Run Gated 1045.160 nb-1 - H1 Data Taken 27.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === Alarm checking: Lumi_Run_770 For Lumi_Run_770, each H1Run was checked for Means of (Ee+Eg+Ev). NO significant deviations were detected: Etag~28.x, Etag_1~25-27 Gev. Comment: The means are taken from the peak_finder, not histo_summary. 27.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 1E Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 112624-113429 data sample (1E).It were selected 19062 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83136.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 19130 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83136.C00 -C 4600 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M83136.C00 -C It were got 19062 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 8348 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.921 0.811 0.754 1.444 0.674 0.000 0.743 0.447 0.817 0.832 0.803 0.844 0.798 0.912 0.894 1.016 0.901 0.870 0.930 0.909 0.885 0.871 0.938 0.922 0.914 0.933 0.917 0.893 1.225 0.791 1.101 0.920 0.944 0.905 0.901 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.087 0.993 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.404 0.985 1.181 1.235 0.000 1.024 1.099 1.057 1.119 1.026 1.087 1.063 1.102 1.106 0.958 1.149 1.077 0.999 1.092 1.041 1.265 0.939 1.224 1.022 0.960 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=8.086 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 112624-113429 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 19K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.30 1.12 27.31 1.07 27.30 1.09 Runs 112624-113429 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 19K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.28 1.15 27.24 1.09 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 1E-ext.sample Clbr.(see message from 17.07.95 CCvcs value was got from this Calibration too (see message from 17.07. 1995): (CCvcs start = 8.086 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made firstly at this year (thanks to S.Levonian). 27.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 1E Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1D sample with events from Runs 112624-113429: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R112624 (12892 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ3.R112624 3468 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.88%) and a enough large resolution digits (25-30%) for (12-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R112624 18934 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R111538 19019 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 8.086 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 27.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 1E It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0488 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9776 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.0838.So CCvcs =8.086*1.0838=8.764Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 112624-113429: Runs 112624-113429 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 19K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.52 1.10 Runs 112624-113429 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 19K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.11 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.350 4.283 4.249 4.843 4.736 4.287 5.071 5.128 2.597 5.689 6.112 3.726 5.459 5.289 6.872 5.625 6.012 5.633 5.249 5.722 5.156 5.851 4.204 6.249 4.502 5.215 5.314 4.577 5.404 3.678 3.480 4.705 4.359 4.372 4.190 e42= 4.286 4.290 4.319 4.549 4.307 4.281 4.285 p00= 2.644 2.279 1.459 2.317 3.058 1.357 2.596 3.217 2.773 1.780 2.371 3.289 3.373 3.086 1.753 3.181 2.936 3.213 2.564 2.364 p20= 2.551 1.708 2.806 2.660 3.057 vcs= 8.764 Energy spectrum VCdep is different in compare with last samples - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 8-9GeV. 27.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made compression of old data sets (83132-family+4LUMIMONs) into M83136.C00-family data sets (H1Runs 108341-114415): From H1 Runs (108341-114215) it were selected: 93880 etpdnvc 223.8 Mbyte 126795 etpdvc 291.5 Mbyte 152523 s9291 ( 34399 s92 + 117719 s91 + 405 both) 313.8 Mbyte 161787 et44vc 370.0 Mbyte 86988 s93 219.8 Mbyte (122-136 LUMIMONs only) <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets and removed all intermediate 83132-family data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83136.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83136.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83136.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83136.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M122136.C00 <-for V.Andreev 27/07/95 =============== p.-o. meyer === Lumi RUN# 771 Start - End of Run 771: 27/7/95 10:48:10 - 11:44:53 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 11:19:31 - 11:44:53 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 35.46, Ip= 41.27 Start lumi value: 1.57 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.22 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 8.63 nb-1 HERA - physics: 7.54 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 2.46 nb-1 H1data - physics: 1.7 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 32 % , DT corr.: 66 % , Tot eff.: 22 % H1 Runs: 114464 - 114471 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 11:12 with L=3.95mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 11:25 with Lsp=0.579mkb-1sec-1mA-2 27.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Large Rates/Trips at H1Lumi. Today during Lumi RUN 771 something happened at HERA (vacuum leakage or something else) and all H1Lumi Detectors (from 11:35 up to 11:46) were at very hard coditions (HV trips were fixed at all detectors - ET(upper lines),ET44(et4), PD(almost all channels exept 4 channels), VC(VCv). Large Rates were fixed at this period at all H1Lumi Detectors. Yura and Egor were a this period at North Hall and made all needed expert actions with this case. 27.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 2A Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 113524-114415 data sample (2A).It were selected 26335 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M8313600 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 27078 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83136.C00 -C 6100 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M83136.C00 -C It were got 26335 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 12335 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.916 0.797 0.736 1.349 0.663 0.997 0.706 0.416 0.923 0.841 0.838 0.867 0.830 0.815 0.858 0.995 0.939 0.889 0.958 0.900 0.854 0.888 0.945 0.894 0.904 0.915 0.923 0.885 1.224 0.784 1.109 0.900 0.935 0.893 0.892 0.000 1.001 1.005 1.006 0.991 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.403 0.970 1.253 1.176 0.000 0.990 1.069 1.032 1.027 0.983 1.055 1.055 1.060 1.063 0.935 1.081 1.036 0.989 0.914 1.009 1.247 0.910 1.230 0.957 0.905 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=5.660 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 113524-114415 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 26K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.31 1.10 27.33 1.03 27.30 1.04 Runs 113524-114415 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 27K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.33 1.14 27.34 1.11 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 1E Sample calibr. (see message from 27.07.95 all calibration coefficients of PD-channels were decremented on factor 0.95 - see earlier message from 23.07.95). CCvcs value was got from 1D-sample calibration corrected on factor 0.7 (see message at LLO from 23.07.95). (CCvcs start = 5.660 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 27.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 2A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1D sample with events from Runs 113524-114415: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R113524 (24893 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R113524 4734 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-5.95%) and a enough good resolution digits (20-23%) for (12-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R113524 26175 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R113524 27078 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 5.660 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 27.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 2A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0595 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9700 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.021.So CCvcs =5.660*1.021=5.779Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 113524-114415: Runs 113524-114415 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 26K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.10 Runs 113524-114415 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 27K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.10 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.348 4.299 4.235 4.448 4.811 4.288 5.028 5.126 3.073 5.825 6.263 3.813 5.858 4.796 6.658 5.681 6.183 5.761 5.283 5.648 5.041 5.989 4.250 6.306 4.505 5.155 5.458 4.608 5.518 3.679 3.460 4.724 4.361 4.377 4.191 e42= 4.286 4.295 4.313 4.190 4.297 4.281 4.285 p00= 2.502 2.202 1.377 2.193 2.905 1.329 2.501 3.129 2.513 1.684 2.331 3.352 3.158 2.991 1.680 2.937 2.826 3.225 2.022 2.269 p20= 2.435 1.622 2.664 2.528 2.906 vcs= 5.779 VCdep energy spectrum became almost the same as it was before 1D- and 1E- samples - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7-7.5 GeV. 27.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 1E Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 1E.It were selected 16276 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 112624-113429 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83136.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 16276 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 1469 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.85 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV8.13MHz,PD->2.4MHz,ET->1.8MHz,ET44-> 1MHz,ET&PD->1.06MHz), it were appeared HV trips at four ET-chan- nels (e35,e37,e42,e45). Movable Platforms were put into Parking Positions, HV was ON, e+beam was dumped. Profile of photon beam at PDdetector was far from standard - was fixed near +3.3cm, near -1.0 cm. 28.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Large Rates/Trips at H1Lumi. Today during Lumi RUN 773 after 8 min. from end of e+ring ramping all H1Lumi Detectors again were put into hard conditions. 4 channels at ET (e35,e37,e42,e45) had tripped. Huge rates were fixed at all H1Lumi Detectors: VC->8.13MHz,PD->2.4MHz,ET->1.8MHz,ET44->1MHz,ET&PD->1.06MHz. It were made all needed actions enough quickly -> Movable Platforms were put into parking position and HV was installed on standard values 28.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === H1Lumi Dedicated Runs ...... Today during start of Lumi RUN #774 it were written 2 H1Lumi Dedicated Runs: 114680 - for prescale gaps tuning and 114681 with tuned prescales s90-s95+random triggers were unmasked. Prescale Gaps were installed on next values: s90 - 4600; s91 - 8192; s92 - 2048; s93 - 16384; s94 - 984; s95 - 3740. 29/07/95 =================== Willard === Lumi RUN# 774 Start - End of Run 774: 28/7/95 16:01:52 - 1:10:03 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:05:15 - 1:10:03 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.47, Ip= 40.48 Start lumi value: 2.74 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.46 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 45.37 nb-1 HERA - physics: 44.42 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 27.02 nb-1 H1data - physics: 11.92 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 60 % , DT corr.: 43 % , Tot eff.: 26 % H1 Runs: 114677 - 114752 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 16:35 with L=2.81mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 19:20 with Lsp=0.525mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) 2 H1Lumi Dedicated Runs (114680,114681 - see earlier message) 3) from 17:00 up to 18:30 at H1Ctrigger Local Timing was ON (HERA team was informed about) - so Lumi and Specific Lumi at this period was non-right (less on factor near 0.5). 29.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === New RC Sets in H1DataBase.... As final action of all 27.06.95 calibration steps it was made update of LFRC and LESC banks at H1DataBase with S.Levonyan's tool. All Relation Coefficients values, CCvcs and Global Energy Shift constants were got from the next messages at LLO: 27.07.1995 ----- dice2 ----- H1KFOM --- Sample 1E Relation Coeff.Set 27.07.1995 ----------------- H1KFOM --- Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 1E 27.07.1995 ----------------- H1KFOM --- ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 1E 27.07.1995 ----- dice2 ----- H1KFOM --- Sample 2A Relation Coeff.Set 27.07.1995 ----------------- H1KFOM --- Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 2A 27.07.1995 ----------------- H1KFOM --- ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 2A Bank-ID Rtyp Dtyp Version 1.Run L.Run Words Date Author Bank LFRC (_501) 57 e-p data 507291438 112624 113523 83 950729 H1KFOM 58 e-p data 507291445 113524 0 83 950729 H1KFOM Bank-ID Rtyp Dtyp Version 1.Run L.Run Words Date Author Bank LESC (_582) 74 e-p data 507291438 112624 113523 4 950729 H1KFOM 75 e-p data 507291445 113524 0 4 950729 H1KFOM 29.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === 5 LUMIMONs are skipped ...... Today it was found that 5 LUMIMONs (137-141) are absent at /acs/data/ /95/spec-directory.Next 6 (142-146) are presented. H1Lumi Dedicated Run are disposed at 142,143 and 144 LUMIMONs. I wrote mail to Ralf Gerhards with asking to help. Let's wait. P.S. The reason why these tapes are not in this directory is that it was full. Yesterday I asked Claus to put them from ampex to osm and he promised, but started from tape 142. If somebody needs these tapes,they exist on IBM since yesterday.(N.G.) 29.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selction of needed for calibration events from last 6 LUMIMON data sets (142-146 -> H1 Runs 114593-114877): From H1 Runs 114593-114877 it were selected (H1Lumi Dedicated Runs were skipped): 8890 etpdnvc 22.8 Mbyte 8808 etpdvc 21.8 Mbyte 8955 s9291 ( 2241 s92 + 6714 s91 + 0 both) 23.3 Mbyte 10162 et44vc 25.9 Mbyte 6319 s93 16.4 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M142146.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M142146.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M141246.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M142146.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M142146.C00 <-for V.Andreev 29/07/95 ========== Zaali Garutchava === Lumi RUN# 775 Start - End of Run 775: 29/7/95 9:14:21 - 18:46:58 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 9:58:21 - 18:46:58 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.68, Ip= 49.34 Start lumi value: 3.03 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 62.82 nb-1 HERA - physics: 61.32 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 43.92 nb-1 H1data - physics: 26.56 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 71 % , DT corr.: 60 % , Tot eff.: 43 % H1 Runs: 114835 - 114903 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 10:30 with L=3.27mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 12:06 with Lsp=0.546mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) Somebody from H1 Shift Crew during this Lumi RUN called me by city-phone and informed that something is not good with L4-histos of H1Lumi:(ET1+PD+VC)-energy distribution is far from standard (from reference histo). Peak is shifted into low energy region - into 14 GeV (Run 114894). 30/07/95 it were checked CCet44 online values and found that CCet2 has very low value (1.548). Before high rates accidents (27-28.07.95) this value was near 2.6. It is possible to suppose that during high rate incident CCet2 got this low value and after relaxation processes this value was too low for making of events selection for ET44-calibration. 30/07/95 at 14:50 CCet44 was installed on 3.0 value and selection of events for ET44-calibration became more reasonable (before H1 Run 115049). 30/07/95 ========== Zaali Garutchava === Lumi RUN# 776 Start - End of Run 776: 30/7/95 0:11:45 - 9:26:20 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 2:50:53 - 9:26:20 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 36.53, Ip= 50.35 Start lumi value: 3.73 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 75.52 nb-1 HERA - physics: 73.45 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 37.52 nb-1 H1data - physics: 23.66 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 51 % , DT corr.: 62 % , Tot eff.: 32 % H1 Runs: 114959 - 115018 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 00:33 with L=4.30mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 02:38 with Lsp=0.539mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2)During Lumi RUN #776 at 04:10:31 H1Lumi MacII was rebooted and from this time Lserver4unix show 'red line' - no unix request already 23930 s. Connection was recovered near 11:00 today. 3)HERAclient-application at HERA Control Room crashed during Lumi RUN and reboot did not help with aliving - No LAN Connection. H1Lumi-application is working at HERA Control Room. As temporary decision - this application worked during start of the next Lumi RUN - 777. After Reset of SPARC-unit today at 14:15 HERAclient application alived again. 30.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === LUMIMON141 corrupted? Today I had problem with LUMIMON 141st data set during staging from IBM to dice2 (4 attempts had finished with errors after transmission of 142606336 bytes). May be this data set is corrupted? Who had experience of working with 141st LUMIMONs? P.S. No, not at all. This tape is not corrupted. I have read it on Friday and result is written in WWW. I think the reason of the bad transmission was a ftp problem beetwen IBM and DICE2. This problem was solved some time ago. Probably, you just started the transmission in a bad time. Try it again, Sasha!(N.G.) 30.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 5 LUMIMON data sets (147-151) and from staged from IBM-starage 5 'old' LUMIMON data sets (137-141). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (142146-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 114415-115057): From H1 Runs 114415-115057 it were selected (H1Lumi Dedicated Runs were skipped): 43679 etpdnvc 115.5 Mbyte 41860 etpdvc 110.4 Mbyte 44330 s9291 ( 11405 s92 + 32925 s91 + 0 both) 117.3 Mbyte 55277 et44vc 146.0 Mbyte 30069 s93 79.4 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137151.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M137151.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M137151.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137151.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M137151.C00 <-for V.Andreev and it were removed some intermediate data sets (142146-family). 30/07/95 ========== Zaali Garutchava === Lumi RUN# 777 Start - End of Run 777: 30/7/95 12:38:35 - 20:03:33 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 13:54:48 - 20:03:33 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.6, Ip= 49.23 Start lumi value: 3.72 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.48 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 59.11 nb-1 HERA - physics: 56.36 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 37.58 nb-1 H1data - physics: 24.97 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 66 % , DT corr.: 66 % , Tot eff.: 44 % H1 Runs: 115035 - 115066 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 12:43 with L=3.90mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 18:20 with Lsp=0.534mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) after H1Run 115049 new value of CCet2 was installed (ET44-chan- nel) and I hope L4 histo for ET1+PD+VC must become more reasona- ble). 31.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === TCL#52-54: NO bank losses,OK. TCL#52-54 were checked for losses of banks. NO Alarm.gt.1_min, OK. By the way, there is no TCL#51 at the disk, only in H1-protokol. P.S. The reason is again the same as for the missing LUMIMON tapes: no space in OSM (N.G.) 31.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Ie+total = 40.12 mA ......... After end of Lumi RUN #777 (yesterday at 20:03) both beams were dumped. At 20:40 new p-beam injection was started and at 23:00 new p-beam with Iptotal=46.7mA and Ep=820GeV was ready. e+beam injection was started at 23:00 and at 00:31 31/07/95 Ie+total achieved of record value 40.12 mA (never seen before).e+ring ramping was started and at 00:38 record e+beam was lost (together with p-beam). From 03:15 up to 06:00 new p-beam was prepared with Iptotal=50.1mA. At 08:30 new e+beam injection was started and 09:25 Ie+total achieved of value 38.83mA. Again during ramping of e+ring both beams were lost near 09:31. From 11:00 it is proclaimed "INJECTION" at HERA screen and some attempts to inject new p-beam are made (up to now - not more then 60 bunches and Iptotal not more then 15mA). 31.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === dice2 crashed/alived......... Today at 13:35 dice2.desy.de crashed. Lserver4unix-application shows 'red line' with message '13:42:03 - no unix requests already 429 sec.' Around 14:08 dice2 alived again and Lserver4unix-application alived too. 31.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 1 LUMIMON data set (152). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (137151-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 114415-115065): From H1 Runs 114415-115065 it were selected (H1Lumi Dedicated Runs were skipped): 45987 etpdnvc 121.7 Mbyte 43895 etpdvc 116.0 Mbyte 46505 s9291 ( 11968 s92 + 34537 s91 + 0 both) 123.2 Mbyte 58394 et44vc 154.5 Mbyte 31461 s93 83.2 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137152.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M137152.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M137152.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137152.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M137152.C00 <-for V.Andreev and it were removed some intermediate data sets (137151-family). 31.07.1995 ================= H01LNS === L4H_LR_772-777: ALARM_Etag44 Lumi_runs_772-777 were checked for Means of (Ee+Eg+Ev). NO significant deviations were detected for Etag: Esum ~ 28.x GeV. At the same time, Esum( Etag44 ) ~ 14-16 GeV, instead of usial 26 GeV. It is looking like a real ALARM, even SOS. May be I am mistaken ? ALARM for Etag_44 started at the beginning of Lumi_Run_772, and was continuing at all the H1_Runs of 773-77, and at ~1/2 of the 777. At about 1/2 of 777 the situation returned to normal: Esum ~25-27 GeV. Return to normal Etag_44 happened between the H1Runs 115048 and 115049. Sorry, that at the weekend I was not at Pitomnik, to catch the ALARM. But I was lucky to have caught the ALARM before crushing of the dice2. P.S. (a.f.) Phone call me from H1 Control Room was at Saturday evening with the same problem. Problem was resolved yesterday 'inside' Lumi RUN 777 (distinctly at mentioned H1Run range). It was first evidence on some 'unstability' of ET44-calibration (never looked for ET-PD-VCs OnLine Calibration). Reason is known - huge rates 27-28 July. But CCet4-behaivour was enough unwaitable. At 18 June 95 high rates accident this situtaion was not seen. 31.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last H1Lumi Dedicated Runs (114680-114681) from H1RAWD-data sets HERA04.H1RAWD.C9502189-2190. From H1 Runs 114680-114681 it were selected: 40069 etpdnvc 60.5 Mbyte 42488 etpdvc 64.1 Mbyte 52800 s9291 ( 23972 s92 + 28822 s91 + 2 both) 79.6 Mbyte 12951 et44vc 19.5 Mbyte 26458 s93 39.8 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev Its were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M189190.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M189190.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M189190.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M189190.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M189190.C00 <-for V.Andreev 31.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Ie+total = 42.36 mA ......... Today at 16:20 new p-beam with Iptotal near 53 mA was ready and new e+beam was inlected from 16:20 up to 17:28 with Ie+total=42.36mA. But during ramping (at the last phase of ramping when Ee was near 27.0) both beams were lost again. Same scenario as previous two attempts. 31.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 2B Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 114471-115048 data sample (2B).It were selected 21721 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137152.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 19767 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M137152.C00 -C 5027 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M137152.C00 -C It were got 21721 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 9405 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.913 0.766 0.733 1.326 0.630 0.997 0.752 0.383 0.755 0.768 0.747 0.772 0.803 0.854 0.893 0.960 0.859 0.816 0.860 0.815 0.846 0.847 0.932 0.886 0.882 0.919 0.886 0.818 1.257 0.759 1.098 0.000 0.925 0.881 0.873 0.999 1.003 1.005 1.005 0.989 0.999 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.474 0.898 1.304 1.158 0.920 0.974 1.065 1.113 1.115 0.961 1.145 1.101 1.075 1.092 0.889 1.091 1.115 1.114 1.033 0.967 1.233 0.694 0.905 0.834 0.864 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=5.779 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 114471-115048 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 22K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.29 1.22 27.24 1.17 27.32 1.15 Runs 114471-115048 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 20K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.13 1.22 27.13 1.17 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 2A Sample calibr. (see message from 27.07.95) CCvcs value was got from 2A-sample calibration (see message 27/07/95). (CCvcs start = 5.779 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was not very succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 31.07.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 2B Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1D sample with events from Runs 114471-115048: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R114471 (19582 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R114471 3848 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.02%) and a enough bad resolution digits (32-35%) for (12-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R114471 21627 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R114471 19716 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 5.779 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 31.07.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 2B It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0402 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9816 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.16. So CCvcs =5.779*1.16=6.704Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 114471-115048: Runs 114471-115048 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 22K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.17 Runs 114471-115048 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 20K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.23 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.348 4.301 4.232 4.540 4.816 4.288 5.045 5.128 2.809 5.783 6.031 3.783 5.465 4.791 7.158 5.845 6.163 6.843 7.025 5.791 6.407 6.864 5.355 7.047 5.805 7.583 6.757 4.493 5.666 3.681 3.469 4.723 4.362 4.297 4.190 e42= 4.287 4.303 4.315 4.206 4.292 4.282 4.285 p00= 2.509 2.194 1.356 2.193 2.904 1.638 2.729 3.543 2.941 1.684 2.488 3.500 3.265 3.060 1.802 3.796 3.253 3.630 2.631 2.261 p20= 2.451 1.638 2.658 2.541 2.906 vcs= 6.704 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 01.08.1995 ================= H01LNS === L4H_LR_772-777: protocol === Below is a supplemento to the above LLO "L4H_LR_772-777: ALARM_Etag44". It is a fragment of the protocol for catching ALARMs on (Ee+Eg+Ev), this fragment is for Lumi_Run_777 only, when ALARM_Etag_44 ended. R: 777 115035 sEtag: 251 66% 27.2 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 173 78% 12.9 +/- 1.8 R: 777 115036 sEtag: 2551 67% 28.0 +/- 1.4 sEt44: 1861 64% 14.0 +/- 1.5 R: 777 115039 sEtag: 1530 74% 28.1 +/- 1.4 sEt44: 1145 76% 14.4 +/- 1.5 R: 777 115040 sEtag: 619 73% 28.2 +/- 1.4 sEt44: 495 85% 14.5 +/- 1.6 R: 777 115043 sEtag: 1428 68% 27.9 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 1058 74% 14.2 +/- 1.4 R: 777 115044 sEtag: 1213 43% 27.3 +/- 1.4 sEt44: 238 84% 14.3 +/- 2.0 R: 777 115048 sEtag: 966 48% 27.5 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 188 97% 14.6 +/- 2.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- R: 777 115049 sEtag: 1759 60% 27.5 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 437 55% 25.8 +/- 2.3 R: 777 115050 sEtag: 242 70% 27.4 +/- 1.4 sEt44: 57102% 22.6 +/- 4.6 R: 777 115051 sEtag: 47 90% 28.5 +/- 1.5 sEt44: 11 74% 28.2 +/- 2.4 R: 777 115052 sEtag: 721 61% 27.7 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 178 92% 25.2 +/- 3.7 R: 777 115055 sEtag: 704 61% 27.5 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 443 78% 26.1 +/- 3.4 R: 777 115056 sEtag: 438 76% 27.4 +/- 1.4 sEt44: 302 78% 25.4 +/- 3.5 R: 777 115057 sEtag: 889 64% 27.4 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 642 82% 26.1 +/- 3.5 R: 777 115058 sEtag: 1042 70% 27.2 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 740 76% 26.0 +/- 3.8 R: 777 115060 sEtag: 171 78% 27.2 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 122 65% 25.2 +/- 1.8 R: 777 115061 sEtag: 185 82% 27.5 +/- 1.1 sEt44: 131 96% 26.1 +/- 3.8 R: 777 115062 sEtag: 808 65% 27.7 +/- 1.0 sEt44: 565 52% 26.1 +/- 2.4 R: 777 115063 sEtag: 334 80% 27.5 +/- 1.5 sEt44: 230 90% 24.9 +/- 3.9 R: 777 115064 sEtag: 1797 71% 27.4 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 1235 68% 25.3 +/- 3.0 R: 777 115065 sEtag: 902 74% 27.6 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 627 1% 9.1 +/- 1.2 R: 777 115066 sEtag: 0***% 9.1 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 1108% 23.9 +/- 0.1 R: 777 115066 sEtag: 6128***% 25.4 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 4293 70% 23.6 +/- 2.6 01.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from H1Lumi Dedicated Runs (114329-114330) from H1RAWD-data sets HERA04.H1RAWD.C9502084-2086. This Runs were recorded after p-beam lost at Lumi RUN 768 with e+beam only (non e+p, only e+gas) by Yu.Soloviev when he was as H1 Shift leader (R114330 with LREF,LRPF and LR1F-banks): From H1 Runs 114329-114330 it were selected: 58470 etpdnvc 131.0 Mbyte 59774 etpdvc 134.1 Mbyte 84770 s9291 ( 32658 s92 + 51809 s91 + 303 both) 189.3 Mbyte 4281 et44vc 9.5 Mbyte 42586 s93 94.8 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev Its were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M084086.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M084086.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M084086.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M084086.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M084086.C00 <-for V.Andreev 01.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Run 114329 Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 114329-114330 - H1Lumi Dedicated Runs written after p-lost (e+gas). It were selected 58470 ET&PD&nVC events from these Runs which are kept data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M084086.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from these Runs: 59774 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M084086.C00 -C 29086 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M084086.C00 -C It were got 58470 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 30281 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.914 0.797 0.791 1.663 0.653 0.997 0.745 0.428 0.914 0.850 0.822 0.835 0.803 0.748 0.905 0.968 0.896 0.918 0.960 0.930 0.884 0.864 1.104 0.914 0.881 0.932 0.913 0.873 1.236 0.821 1.095 0.951 0.929 0.856 0.893 0.999 1.006 0.000 1.005 0.992 0.999 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.636 1.039 1.244 1.171 0.921 1.085 1.035 0.995 1.005 0.998 1.020 1.035 1.059 1.060 0.973 1.094 1.078 0.933 0.979 0.999 1.240 0.970 1.214 0.945 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=5.779 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 114329-114330 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 58K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.35 1.03 27.36 1.00 27.40 1.01 Runs 114329-114330 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 60K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.23 1.07 27.25 1.03 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 2A Sample calibr. (see message from 27.07.95) CCvcs value was got from 2A-sample calibration (see message 27/07/95). (CCvcs start = 5.779 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was not very succesful (with good statistics) with e+gas option. 01.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Run 114329 Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned sample with events from Runs 114329-114330: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R114329 (74759 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R114329 25816 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.90%) and a enough reasonable resolution digits (23-28%) for (14-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R114329 58352 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R114329 59648 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 5.779 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 01.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Run114329 It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.049 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9748 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.0811. So CCvcs =5.779*1.0811=6.248MeV /FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi Dediacted Runs 114329-114330: Runs 114329-114330 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 58K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.02 Runs 114329-114330 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 60K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.06 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.352 4.358 4.554 5.479 4.769 4.288 5.188 5.365 2.992 5.950 5.837 3.803 5.596 4.431 6.822 5.338 5.910 5.925 5.459 5.834 5.158 5.923 4.914 6.286 4.443 5.083 5.344 4.476 5.545 4.009 3.476 5.078 4.376 4.206 4.196 e42= 4.286 4.320 4.313 4.205 4.305 4.283 4.285 p00= 2.687 2.448 1.304 2.187 2.905 1.456 2.463 3.022 2.461 1.714 2.243 3.207 3.201 2.947 1.765 3.018 2.946 3.057 2.308 2.287 p20= 2.419 1.650 2.525 2.507 2.906 vcs= 6.248 Energy spectrum VCdep is almost the same in compare with last samples- visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 01.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Run 114680 Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for H1Runs 114680-114681 - H1Lumi Dedicated Runs written at start of Lumi RUN 774 (after huge rates/trips at 27/28 July 95). It were selected 40069 ET&PD&nVC events from these Runs which are kept data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M189190.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from these Runs: 42488 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M084086.C00 -C 21119 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M084086.C00 -C It were got 40069 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 15410 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.913 0.782 0.754 1.776 0.644 0.997 0.780 0.398 0.902 0.823 0.849 0.861 0.858 0.853 0.873 0.961 0.898 0.874 0.882 0.902 0.908 0.875 0.955 0.922 0.897 0.936 0.954 0.929 1.336 0.773 1.112 0.885 0.923 0.883 0.890 0.999 1.004 0.000 1.006 0.988 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.562 1.007 1.305 1.172 0.000 0.992 1.094 0.996 1.079 0.951 1.006 1.041 1.069 1.046 1.066 1.145 0.973 1.013 0.993 0.982 1.256 0.728 1.039 0.823 0.903 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.704 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 114680-114681 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 40K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.27 1.17 27.34 1.14 27.39 1.09 Runs 114680-114681 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 42K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.58 1.28 27.56 1.24 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 2B Sample calibr. (see message from 31.07.95) CCvcs value was got from 2B-sample calibration (see message 31/07/95). (CCvcs start = 6.704 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was very succesful (with good statistics) with e+p option. 01.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Run 114680 Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned sample with events from Runs 114680-114681: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R114680 (46915 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R114680 13778 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-3.925%) and a enough reasonable resolution digits (20-21%) for (08-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R114680 39839 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R114680 42354 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.704 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 01.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Run114680 It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.03925 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9782 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.963. So CCvcs =6.704*0.963=6.456MeV /FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi Dedicated Runs 114680-114681: Runs 114680-114681 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 40K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.12 Runs 114680-114681 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 42K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.21 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.354 4.336 4.274 5.964 4.806 4.288 5.051 5.146 3.292 6.029 6.660 4.002 5.497 4.582 7.250 6.333 6.529 7.271 7.247 6.146 6.766 7.191 5.923 7.381 6.232 8.772 7.403 4.760 5.981 3.690 3.472 4.717 4.362 4.308 4.198 e42= 4.287 4.306 4.315 4.209 4.288 4.282 4.285 p00= 2.621 2.400 1.375 2.196 2.904 1.716 2.879 3.325 2.944 1.696 2.545 3.607 3.335 3.044 2.158 4.181 3.215 3.567 2.681 2.289 p20= 2.475 1.921 3.237 2.587 2.906 vcs= 6.456 Energy spectrum VCdep is another in compare with last samples- visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 8.0-8.5GeV 01.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Run 114680 Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Runs 114680-81.It were selected 12951 events with ET44&VC from Runs 114680-114681 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44VC.M189190.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 12951 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 2128 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV0.60 GeV. 3) Samples 2B and R114680 were collected with famous 'L4-alarm' existing at ET1+PD+VC - so Relation Coefficient for et2 is enough large and significantly different from all previous calibration. Sample R114329 was collected before huge rates/trips and relation coefficient for et2 must be similar as at 2A-sample - but (it is pity)collection of ET44VC-events at R114329-sample is very poor (4281 ET44VC events). 01.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 2B Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 2B.It were selected 23973 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 114471-115048 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137152.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 23973 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 5255 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV wrong pedestal)? Or faulty triggers (e.g. the purity of say, s91 is not 100%)? In order to answer this question, a fraction of ET-triggers was studied in the following samples: a) VC_bit(BC-1)=0 & E_gamma > 1 b) VC_bit(BC-1)=0 & E_gamma < 1 c) VC_bit(BC-1)=1 & E_gamma > 1 d) VC_bit(BC-1)=1 & E_gamma < 1 If b) and d) are good lumi events with PD-readout errors, then the fraction of ET-events in these samples must be the same, as in a) and c) and typically ~45%, according to the ET-acceptance. If however, these events are "faulty" triggers, then the fraction is much less (typically ~2%, corresponding to accidental overlap of ET events with anything else). Result: ------- Year Sample Nev N(ET) ET-fraction 1994 a) 24692 10780 43.7+-0.4% b) 918 29 3.2+-0.6% c) 569 248 43.6+-2.7% d) 380 1 0.3+-0.3% 1995 a) 17996 8817 49.0+-0.4% b) 3820 18 0.5+-0.1% c) 426 222 52.1+-3.6% d) 217 7 3.2+-1.2% Preliminary conclusions: ------------------------ 1) The fraction of ET-events in various samples shows, that the events with "bad" E_gamma (not reconstructed, negative) are NOT good lumi events! And thus there is NO EVIDENCE, that even a small part (1%) of good lumi events triggered by s91, are lost. It is most likely some non-purity of the PD-trigger, or just very soft gammas (~1-2 GeV or less) which still has non zero probability to fire PD_low trigger (remember: the threshold is not a step function, but has a tail towards small enegries). 2) Still (see message from 25/07) there is an effect on E_gamma from early VC-events (shift by ~2.5 GeV of the E-total peak) 02.08.1995 ================= H01LNS === L4H_LR_778: Esum ~ OK ====== For Lumi_Run_778, each H1Run was checked for Means of (Ee+Eg+Ev). NO significant deviations were detected: Etag~28.x, Etag_1~25-27 Gev. Warning: At the ending part of LR, from R_115307, too low Entries/run 02.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Run 114329 Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Runs 114329-30.It were selected 4281 events with ET44&VC from Runs 114329-114330 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44VC.M084086.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 4281 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 760 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.726 0.704 1.265 0.580 0.997 0.753 0.369 0.618 0.580 0.604 0.643 0.755 0.695 0.855 0.923 0.853 0.814 0.842 0.821 0.784 0.863 0.940 0.871 0.858 0.857 0.859 0.854 1.146 0.744 1.110 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.998 1.004 1.059 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.775 0.975 1.156 1.212 0.000 0.856 1.133 1.147 1.027 0.995 1.185 1.153 1.137 1.178 0.837 1.088 1.154 1.077 1.013 1.011 1.315 0.630 0.705 0.000 0.900 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.704 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 115049-115291 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 6K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.35 1.11 27.27 1.06 27.43 1.04 Runs 115049-115291 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 5K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.36 1.26 27.34 1.23 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 2B Sample calibr. (see message from 31.07.95) CCvcs value was got from 2B-sample calibration (see message 31/07/95). (CCvcs start = 6.704 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was not enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 02.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 2C Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1D sample with events from Runs 115049-115291: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R115049 ( 4994 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R115049 942 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-1.43%) and a enough bad resolution digits (35%) for (12-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R115049 5510 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R115049 5248 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.704 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 02.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 2C It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0143 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.996 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.065. So CCvcs =6.704*1.065=7.140Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 115049-115291: Runs 115049-115291 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 6K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.03 Runs 115049-115291 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 5K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.27 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.335 4.232 4.219 4.551 4.784 4.288 5.058 5.113 2.466 4.535 5.069 3.510 5.624 4.202 6.943 5.699 6.165 6.709 6.831 6.009 6.036 6.910 5.011 6.617 5.622 7.040 6.510 4.612 5.237 3.686 3.508 4.533 4.349 4.373 4.186 e42= 4.285 4.283 4.308 4.433 4.303 4.281 4.285 p00= 2.799 2.422 1.178 2.322 3.058 1.403 2.748 3.531 2.571 1.791 2.569 3.598 3.273 3.173 1.718 3.577 3.216 3.466 2.457 2.396 p20= 2.641 1.566 2.128 2.639 3.054 vcs= 7.140 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 02.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 2C Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 2C.It were selected 7067 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 115049-115291 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137153.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 7067 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 1564 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV4.3MHz) - at 02:35 0.45MHz->2.2 MHz -> 4.4MHz(3:05) - at 04:00 2.5MHz ->2.7 MHz and slow decrementing up to end of Lumi RUN (to 0.8MHz level near 06:50). Nothing unusual it were fixed on ET,PD,ET44 total rates. 03.08.1995 ================= H01LNS === newTCL#56: NO bank losses,OK. New TCL#56 was checked for losses of banks: NO Alarm.gt.1_min, OK. 03.08.1995 ================= H01LNS === L4H_LR_779: Esum ~ OK ====== For Lumi_Run_779, each H1Run was checked for Means of (Ee+Eg+Ev). NO significant deviations were detected: Etag~28.x, Etag_1~25-27 Gev. 03.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 2 LUMIMON data sets(154-155). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (137153-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 114415-115541): From H1 Runs 114415-115541 it were selected (H1Lumi Dedicated Runs were skipped): 50727 etpdnvc 134.8 Mbyte 49588 etpdvc 131.8 Mbyte 52761 s9291 ( 13325 s92 + 39435 s91 + 1 both) 140.5 Mbyte 70778 et44vc 188.9 Mbyte 40519 s93 108.6 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets (/acs/user/fomenko-pool is full now): H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137155.C00 K39555 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M137155.C00 K45477 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137155.C00 K43065 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M137155.C00 K43823 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M137155.C00 <-- for V.Andreev K44412 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 03/08/95 ================ m. lehmann === Lumi RUN# 780 Start - End of Run 780: 3/8/95 15:08:28 - 23:15:38 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:48:45 - 23:15:38 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.42, Ip= 54.31 Start lumi value: 2.14 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.27 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 57.46 nb-1 HERA - physics: 54.71 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 28.45 nb-1 H1data - physics: 13.48 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 51 % , DT corr.: 47 % , Tot eff.: 24 % H1 Runs: 115589 - 115662 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 16:17 with L=3.43mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 18:42 with Lsp=0.513mkb-1sec-1mA-2 04/08/95 =================== d.lueke === Lumi RUN# 781 Start - End of Run 781: 4/8/95 4:13:24 - 7:52:07 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 6:07:58 - 7:52:07 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.1, Ip= 52.82 Start lumi value: 2.3 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 28.34 nb-1 HERA - physics: 11.59 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 8.35 nb-1 H1data - physics: 4.79 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 71 % , DT corr.: 56 % , Tot eff.: 40 % H1 Runs: 115684 - 115713 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 04:36 with L=3.07mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 06:00 with Lsp=0.428mkb-1sec-1mA-2 04.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 2 LUMIMON data sets(156-157). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (137155-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 114415-115684): From H1 Runs 114415-115684 it were selected (H1Lumi Dedicated Runs were skipped): 55139 etpdnvc 146.9 Mbyte 54206 etpdvc 144.2 Mbyte 57362 s9291 ( 14460 s92 + 42901 s91 + 1 both) 153.2 Mbyte 77946 et44vc 208.6 Mbyte 43880 s93 117.9 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets (/acs/user/fomenko-pool is full): H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137157.C00 K45252 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M137157.C00 K45255 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137157.C00 K43297 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M137157.C00 K45402 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M137157.C00 <-- for V.Andreev K45395 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were removed from IBM-storage 'old' data sets (137155-family). 04.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === CC Behaivours with Time ..... It were built LOOK-binary sets with set of vectors which keep informa- tion about OnLine Calibration Coefficients behaivours with time during 75 days time period (from 22.05 up to 04.08.95). LOOK binary files are kept at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.LOOK.ETPDNVC.CCET32.F2205.U0408 FAST10 3010200E 00000 DASD Vectors 2221-2234 keep CC behaiviour with time for hot ET-channels; H1KFOM.LOOK.ETPDNVC.CCET44.F2205.U0408 FAST07 3010200E 00000 DASD Vectors 1501-1506 keep CC behaiviour with time for all ET44-channels; H1KFOM.LOOK.ETPDNVC.CCPDVC.F2205.U0408 FAST02 3010200E 00000 DASD Vectors 2405-2419 keep CC behaiviour with time for hot PD-channels; Vector 2226 keeps CCvcs behaivour with time. It were used ETPDnVC-samples (1A+1B+.+2C) for building of these vectors - it means that time axis (at vectors this is event number at sample) connected with time period from 22.05.1995 up to 04.08.95 (75 days). 163678 ETPDnVC events were fixed during this time period. It is possible to find which event number at sample connected with which H1 Run if You look into data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.B2205408 FAST07 3010200E 00000 DASD X-value 117868 - end of Lumi RUN 771 when huge rates/trips happened at H1Lumi Detectors. You can see that all hot channels decremented their responses. Enough soon PD-channels responses became as before trips. ET-channels and ET44-channels have new stable 'low' level responses. ET44-coefficient - CCet2 was installed on new 'stable' level by hands (remember L4-alarm with ET1+PD+VC-energy). There are 4 'stable' more or less levels of ET-channels responses during these 75 days: 1) 1A-sample - 10 days of H1 Data Taking before large problems with HERA p-ring (22.05.95 - 31.05.95); 2) after 1st huge rates accident (18.06.95) up to 2nd huge rates/trips accident (27.07.95); 3) after 2nd huge rates/trips accident (27.07.95) up to 02.08.95 when Yura switched off all HV on all day (day without any LUMI RUNs); 4) after 02.08.95 up to 04.08.95 - last 3 Lumi RUNs (779-781). First 'level' was described earlier - with near 1% per day degrada- dation responses at some channels. Second 'level' most stable and with largest statistics for today: responses at all hot channels were decremented (as rule) but with one exeption - e29 response was incremented after 1st accident. Some digits (percents from level 1): e21(-25%),e22(-17%),e23(-20%),e24(-20%),e25(-20%),e26(-18%),e27(-22%) e28(-18%),e29(+18%),e30(-12%),e31(-13%),e32(-13%),e33(-16%),e34(-10%) Third 'level' most impressionable - due to large quantity of trips and enough long huge rates existing. Responses of all ET hot channels were decremented (some responses - very significantly) - percents from level 2: e21(-15%),e22(-17%),e23(-17%),e24(-40%),e25(-60%),e26(-20%),e27(-40%) e28(-40%),e29(-40%),e30(-20%),e31(-40%),e32(-60%),e33(-40%),e34(-05%) Fourth 'level' of more or less stable responses became after one day photomultipliers relax without HV. Some chanells responses were incre- mented (percents from level 3): e21( 00%),e22(+15%),e23(+10%),e24(+15%),e25(+30%),e26(+10%),e27(+15%) e28(+20%),e29(+10%),e30(+15%),e31(+15%),e32( 00%),e33(+15%),e34(+05%) Note: sizes of CCET32 and CCPDVC LOOK-binary data sets are more then 16 Mbytes. 04/08/95 =================== stella === Lumi RUN# 783 Start - End of Run 783: 4/8/95 20:24:58 - 20:25:24 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 20:25:18 - 20:25:24 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.17, Ip= 50.78 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 115797 - 115797 05/8/95 ==================== h1kste === Lumi RUN# 784 Start - End of Run 784: 4/8/95 20:26:53 - 4:37:41 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:31:51 - 4:37:41 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.04, Ip= 50.77 Start lumi value: 3.63 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.46 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 56.74 nb-1 HERA - physics: 52.8 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 28.32 nb-1 H1data - physics: 18.98 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 53 % , DT corr.: 66 % , Tot eff.: 35 % H1 Runs: 115797 - 115878 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 21:02 with L=3.66mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 23:38 with Lsp=0.540mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2)After end of Lumi RUN #784 at North Hall power loss had happened near 06:00. 05.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 3 LUMIMON data sets(158-160). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (137157-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 114415-115869): From H1 Runs 114415-115869 it were selected (H1Lumi Dedicated Runs were skipped): 62870 etpdnvc 166.5 Mbyte 63081 etpdvc 164.5 Mbyte 64852 s9291 ( 16350 s92 + 48501 s91 + 1 both) 172.8 Mbyte 89323 et44vc 236.8 Mbyte 49192 s93 131.9 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets (/acs/user/fomenko-pool is full): H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137160.C00 K48898 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M137160.C00 K48901 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M137160.C00 K48910 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137160.C00 K49785 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M137160.C00 <-- for V.Andreev K49041 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were removed from IBM-storage 'old' data sets (137157-family). 05/08/95 ------------------- h1kste --- Lumi RUN# 785 Start - End of Run 785: 5/8/95 20:29:54 - 20:36:57 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 20:34:37 - 20:36:57 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 36, Ip= 46.98 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 116024 - 116024 P.S. Soon after end of e+ramping during Luminosity tuning both beams were lost. HERA proclaimed "Injection delayed. Refill about 22:45" 06/08/95 =================== h01ulf === Lumi RUN# 786 Start - End of Run 786: 6/8/95 13:30:10 - 16:05:42 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:19:42 - 16:05:42 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.5, Ip= 49.38 Start lumi value: 2.82 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.39 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 172 e+(-) bunches = 187, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 8 HERA total lumi: 19.03 nb-1 HERA - physics: 17.21 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 2.5 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.81 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 14 % , DT corr.: 31 % , Tot eff.: 4 % H1 Runs: 116129 - 116145 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 15:10 with L=3.22mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 15:10 with Lsp=0.524mkb-1sec-1mA-2 07/08/95 =================== stella === Lumi RUN# 787 Start - End of Run 787: 6/8/95 23:11:03 - 3:04:00 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:50:57 - 3:04:00 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.52, Ip= 48.49 Start lumi value: 3.01 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.44 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 173 e+(-) bunches = 186, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 13, p-pilot b. = 7 HERA total lumi: 32.21 nb-1 HERA - physics: 30.31 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 14.73 nb-1 H1data - physics: 2.81 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 48 % , DT corr.: 18 % , Tot eff.: 9 % H1 Runs: 116168 - 116187 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 23:22 with L=3.08mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 01:38 with Lsp=0.462mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) after end of Lumi RUN up to 05:00 it was stable proton beam; 3) at 05:00 H1 Main Magnet was put into Dump Condition; 4) at 07:00 - Access into HERA tunnel. 07.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === High Voltage Off at H1Lumi Today morning (from 08:36) High Voltage was switched off at all H1Lumi Detectors. There are some hopes that during little 'shutdown' period photomultipliers can 'relax' and responses can be incremented at all or some channels (especially ET and ET44) after little 'dark' pause. 07.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Ext.Sample 2C Relat.Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 115049-115869 data sample (2C).It were selected 15003 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137160.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 14953 events with ET&PD&VC trigger /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M137160.C00 -C 3470 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.S9291.M137160.C00 -C It were got 15003 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 6387 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.733 0.706 1.272 0.592 0.997 0.750 0.370 0.812 0.748 0.709 0.778 0.842 0.837 0.877 0.973 0.891 0.889 0.942 0.877 0.868 0.878 0.941 0.898 0.887 0.881 0.914 0.871 1.227 0.744 1.187 0.817 0.893 0.883 0.000 0.000 1.003 1.006 1.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.485 0.884 1.274 1.152 0.000 1.124 1.116 1.099 1.018 0.936 1.079 1.078 1.068 1.109 0.885 1.121 1.108 1.023 1.013 0.951 1.232 0.659 0.979 0.000 0.852 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.704 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 115049-115869 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 15K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.30 1.18 27.37 1.09 27.44 1.10 Runs 115049-115869 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 15K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.43 1.21 27.55 1.17 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 2B Sample calibr. (see message from 31.07.95) CCvcs value was got from 2B-sample calibration (see message 31/07/95). (CCvcs start = 6.704 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was not enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 07.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-sp.for Ext.Sample 2C Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 1D sample with events from Runs 115049-115869: H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ4.R115049 (14129 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ4.R115049 2588 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ4-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.91%) and not very good resolution digits (27-31%) for (08-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ2.R115049 14939 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ3.R115049 14896 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.704 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 07.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Ext.Sm.2C It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0491 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.973 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.007. So CCvcs =6.704*1.007=6.751Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 115049-115869: Runs 115049-115869 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 15K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.12 Runs 115049-115869 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 15K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.16 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00=4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.348 4.319 4.242 4.567 4.859 4.288 5.036 5.130 3.196 5.693 5.804 4.064 6.125 5.028 7.085 5.754 6.222 6.832 6.874 6.055 6.368 6.452 4.939 6.694 5.453 7.303 6.702 4.630 5.552 3.687 3.792 4.726 4.367 4.298 4.190 e42=4.287 4.303 4.317 4.207 4.292 4.282 4.285 p00=2.505 2.198 1.282 2.193 2.904 1.714 2.649 3.327 2.515 1.683 2.339 3.322 3.182 2.999 1.845 3.604 3.078 3.248 2.355 2.254 p20=2.451 1.638 2.722 2.541 2.906 vcs= 6.751 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 07.08.1995 ================= H01GOG === Lumi cross check The offline value of the luminosity has been calculated. The calculations are based on s91 events from LUMIMON files 104-155. Only G+M runs with enabled s91 trigger were used. A short summary is given in the table below. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- H1 run period E_gamma shift Online Lumi Offline Lumi Correction ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 110946-113414 -1.8 % 158.28 nb-1 138.77 nb-1 -12.3 % 113614-114456 -0.7 % 187.44 nb-1 173.74 nb-1 -7.3 % 114470-115501 +0.7 % 110.85 nb-1 106.42 nb-1 -4.0 % ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 456.57 nb-1 418.93 nb-1 -8.2 % ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 07.08.1995 ================= H01LNS === TCL#57-58: NO bank losses,OK. 07.08.1995 ================= H01LNS === LR_780-787: all Esum are ~OK. NO significant deviations have been detected: Etag~28.x, Et44~25-27 GeV 07.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Ext.Smp.2C Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Ext.Smp.2C.It were selected 22168 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 115049-115869 which are kept at data set at dice2: /acs/user/fomenko/H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137160.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 22168 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 5474 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeVup to 8.75MHz,PD->up to 4.0MHz,ET->up to 1.77MHz, ET44->up to 1.17MHz,ET&PD total rate up to 1.57 MHz. e+beam bkg at this period had peak value near 6.47MHz,p-beam bkg - near 4 MHz. Radiation Monitor had peak rate near 111 kHz. At 05:40 some part of e+beam was lost (from 34.69 up to 28.22mA) and at 05:55 significant part of e+beam was lost again (from 26.92 up to 2.8 mA). At 06:38 rest of e+beam was dumped and at 07:14 new e+beam injection was started. 12/08/95 =================== H01ULF === Lumi RUN# 788 Start - End of Run 788: 12/8/95 5:29:02 - 6:17:01 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 6:16:53 - 6:17:01 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 35.94, Ip= 62.63 Start lumi value: 0.01 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.02 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 117 e+(-) bunches = 132, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 63 HERA total lumi: 2.26 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 116844 - 116847 12/08/95 =================== H01ULF === Lumi RUN# 789 Start - End of Run 789: 12/8/95 6:31:28 - 6:46:30 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 6:46:22 - 6:46:30 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 2.41, Ip= 62.54 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0.01 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 116847 - 116849 12/08/95 =================== H01ULF === Lumi RUN# 790 Start - End of Run 790: 12/8/95 8:26:58 - 18:25:56 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 10:06:55 - 18:25:56 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 36, Ip= 62.33 Start lumi value: 3.87 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.42 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 89.74 nb-1 HERA - physics: 74.48 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 45.29 nb-1 H1data - physics: 23.23 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 60 % , DT corr.: 51 % , Tot eff.: 31 % H1 Runs: 116851 - 116962 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 08:48 with L=4.427mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 15:05 with Lsp=0.483mkb-1sec-1mA-2 13/08/95 ========== Gogitidze Nelly === Lumi RUN# 791 Start - End of Run 791: 12/8/95 21:07:49 - 3:05:51 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:50:37 - 3:05:51 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.15, Ip= 56.42 Start lumi value: 3.88 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.44 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 55.04 nb-1 HERA - physics: 49.32 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 32.14 nb-1 H1data - physics: 18.27 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 65 % , DT corr.: 56 % , Tot eff.: 36 % H1 Runs: 116965 - 117040 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 21:10 with L=4.191mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 21:15 with Lsp=0.444mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) During this Lumi RUN it was crossed boundary 2.0 pb-1 of H1 Run Gated Integrated Luminosity: 2693.500 nb-1 - HERA Produced 2036.010 nb-1 - H1 Run Gated 1391.490 nb-1 - H1 Data Taken 14.08.1995 ====== TCL ====== H01LNS === TCL#61-62: NO bank losses,OK. 14/08/95 =================== schacht === Lumi RUN# 792 Start - End of Run 792: 14/8/95 8:33:01 - 10:18:44 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 9:45:13 - 10:18:44 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 27.25, Ip= 54.30 Start lumi value: 3.16 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.43 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 16.57 nb-1 HERA - physics: 14.59 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.91 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.46 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 6 % , DT corr.: 45 % , Tot eff.: 3 % H1 Runs: 117199 - 117223 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 08:55 with L=3.394mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 09:05 with Lsp=0.478mkb-1sec-1mA-2 14.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 6 LUMIMON data set (163-168) - H1Runs 116309-117181. From H1 Runs 116309-117181 it were selected: 13551 etpdnvc 33.2 Mbyte 15766 etpdvc 38.3 Mbyte 13357 s9291 ( 3234 s92 + 9800 s91 + 323 both) 32.8 Mbyte 22058 et44vc 51.8 Mbyte 16705 s93 41.6 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163168.C00 K43569 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M163168.C00 K43704 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M163168.C00 K43740 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163168.C00 K43798 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M163168.C00 <- for V.Andreev K43793 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C due to /acs/user/fomenko/-pool is non-accessible for writting at last days. 14.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 3A Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 116309-117181 data sample (3A).It were selected 8272 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163168.C00 K43569 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 8628 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M163168.C00 K43704 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 1901 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M163168.C00 K43740 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were got 8272 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 3398 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.705 1.321 0.585 0.000 0.717 0.000 0.882 0.839 0.792 0.888 0.967 0.879 0.953 0.965 0.868 0.874 0.927 0.839 0.866 0.837 0.958 0.953 0.886 0.916 0.924 0.940 1.223 0.724 1.200 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.003 1.007 1.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.369 0.992 1.302 0.000 0.000 0.979 1.044 1.022 1.060 0.931 1.061 1.058 1.042 1.030 0.862 1.017 1.030 1.061 1.052 0.968 1.181 0.771 1.069 0.808 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.704 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 116309-117181 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 8K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.20 1.20 27.15 1.15 27.20 1.09 Runs 116309-117181 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 9K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.20 1.20 27.22 1.19 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from Ext.2C Sample clbr(see message from 07.08.95) CCvcs value was got from Ext.2C sample clbr. (see message 07/08/95). (CCvcs start = 6.751 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was not enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 14.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 3A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 3A sample with events from Runs 116309-117181: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R116309 ( 7214 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R116309 1378 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-6.22%) and very bad resolution digits (35%) for (12-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R116309 8218 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R116309 8578 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.751 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 14.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 3A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0622 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9758 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.050. So CCvcs =6.751*1.050=7.089Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 116309-117181: Runs 116309-117181 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 8K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.12 Runs 116309-117181 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 9K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.22 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00=4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.348 4.319 4.239 4.571 4.859 4.288 5.036 5.130 3.081 5.841 6.138 4.175 5.908 5.005 7.147 5.573 5.632 6.150 6.488 4.011 6.173 6.727 5.386 7.155 5.199 7.936 6.238 4.694 5.472 3.698 3.781 4.726 4.367 4.298 4.190 e42=4.287 4.302 4.320 4.201 4.292 4.282 4.285 p00=2.385 2.205 1.279 2.193 2.904 1.590 2.541 3.220 2.690 1.689 2.395 3.526 3.294 2.985 1.906 3.560 2.978 3.524 2.558 2.260 p20=2.453 1.768 2.726 2.541 2.906 vcs= 7.089 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 14.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 3A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 3A.It were selected 10102 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 116309-117181 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163168.C00 K43798 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 10102 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 2197 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.736 0.712 1.321 0.587 0.000 0.713 0.332 0.839 0.849 0.781 0.843 0.871 0.863 0.935 0.972 0.860 0.859 0.940 0.760 0.866 0.847 0.951 0.943 0.884 0.910 0.915 0.917 1.212 0.724 1.198 0.000 0.886 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.003 1.007 1.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.378 0.992 1.303 1.204 0.000 0.994 1.052 1.032 1.046 0.936 1.075 1.068 1.058 1.048 0.902 1.114 1.039 1.057 1.007 0.967 1.180 0.825 1.098 0.809 0.848 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.751 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 116309-117504 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 13K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.23 1.19 27.21 1.14 27.30 1.12 Runs 116309-117504 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 15K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.47 1.31 27.38 1.27 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from Ext.2C Sample clbr(see message from 07.08.95) CCvcs value was got from Ext.2C sample clbr. (see message 07/08/95). (CCvcs start = 6.751 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was not enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 15.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 3A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 3A sample with events from Runs 116309-117504: H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ4.R116309 (12308 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ3.R116309 2440 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.35%) and not enough good resolution digits (28-33%) for (6-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ2.R116309 13281 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ3.R116309 14549 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.751 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 15.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 3A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0435 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.98443 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.003. So CCvcs =6.751*1.003=6.771Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 116309-117504: Runs 116309-117504 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 13K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.11 Runs 116309-117504 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 15K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.27 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00=4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.348 4.319 4.257 4.570 4.856 4.288 5.035 5.129 2.883 5.899 6.078 3.842 5.326 5.010 7.041 5.522 5.672 6.090 6.388 4.053 6.061 6.360 4.937 6.595 5.137 7.512 6.342 4.629 5.409 3.698 3.781 4.726 4.367 4.298 4.190 e42=4.287 4.302 4.320 4.207 4.292 4.282 4.285 p00=2.388 2.205 1.268 2.191 2.904 1.527 2.562 3.238 2.628 1.690 2.401 3.448 3.283 3.059 2.015 3.801 2.979 3.450 2.373 2.259 p20=2.452 1.739 2.707 2.541 2.906 vcs= 6.771 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 16/08/95 =========== Lebedev Andrei === Lumi RUN# 795 Start - End of Run 795: 16/8/95 4:26:32 - 10:48:40 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:05:07 - 10:48:40 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.62, Ip= 55.93 Start lumi value: 2.89 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.31 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 166 e+(-) bunches = 180, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 14, p-pilot b. = 14 HERA total lumi: 69.08 nb-1 HERA - physics: 66.48 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 44.77 nb-1 H1data - physics: 20.07 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 67 % , DT corr.: 44 % , Tot eff.: 30 % H1 Runs: 117594 - 117666 P.S. Peak Lumi was fixed near 04:38 with L=3.748mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 08:10 with Lsp=0.500mkb-1sec-1mA-2 16.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Beam Currents Problem Decided Yesterday J.Coughlan made temporary decision of early mentioned Beam Currents delivering problem from H1CTRIG into H1Lumi. He changed MacII at room 301 on old one (from start of this year as H1Ctrig MacII it was used new MacII - Quadra model). 16.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 2 LUMIMON data set (173-174). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (163172-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 116309-117655): From H1 Runs 116309-117655 it were selected: 24167 etpdnvc 59.9 Mbyte 28687 etpdvc 71.2 Mbyte 25207 s9291 ( 6443 s92 + 18441 s91 + 323 both) 62.5 Mbyte 38633 et44vc 93.5 Mbyte 24977 s93 62.2 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163174.C00 K45081 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M163174.C00 K45234 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163174.C00 K45318 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M163174.C00 K45252 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M163174.C00 <- for V.Andreev K45255 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C due to /acs/user/fomenko/-pool is non-accessible for writting at last days. It were removed some intermediate data sets (163172-family). 16.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 3A Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 116309-117655 data sample (3A).It were selected 16398 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163174.C00 K43569 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 18295 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M163174.C00 K43704 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 4100 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M163174.C00 K43740 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were got 16398 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 6702 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.736 0.712 1.333 0.592 0.000 0.715 0.330 0.852 0.860 0.782 0.842 0.857 0.862 0.921 0.971 0.856 0.852 0.948 0.743 0.860 0.849 0.950 0.937 0.885 0.918 0.913 0.907 1.210 0.724 1.185 0.811 0.886 0.894 0.000 0.000 1.003 1.006 1.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.392 0.953 1.306 1.203 0.000 1.003 1.063 1.036 1.050 0.936 1.077 1.071 1.060 1.050 0.921 1.129 1.044 1.055 1.011 0.969 1.179 0.826 1.102 0.809 0.848 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.751 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 116309-117655 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 16K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.37 1.16 27.41 1.14 27.44 1.13 Runs 116309-117655 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 18K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.58 1.29 27.56 1.28 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from Ext.2C Sample clbr(see message from 07.08.95) CCvcs value was got from Ext.2C sample clbr. (see message 07/08/95). (CCvcs start = 6.751 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was not enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 16.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 3A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 3A sample with events from Runs 116309-117655: H1KFOM.XLOOKQ4.R116309 (15218 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ3.R116309 3010 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ3-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.38%) and not enough good resolution digits (28-33%) for (8-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.XLOOKQ2.R116309 16291 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.XLOOKQ3.R116309 18295 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.751 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 16.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 3A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0438 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9743 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.999. So CCvcs =6.751*0.999=6.744Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 116309-117655: Runs 116309-117655 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 16K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.11 Runs 116309-117655 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 18K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.26 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00=4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.348 4.329 4.256 4.566 4.868 4.288 5.034 5.139 2.949 5.984 6.105 3.836 5.276 5.004 6.969 5.559 5.703 6.078 6.289 4.063 6.013 6.324 4.876 6.579 5.155 7.172 6.336 4.594 5.403 3.698 3.743 4.731 4.367 4.302 4.190 e42=4.287 4.302 4.319 4.203 4.292 4.282 4.285 p00=2.391 2.206 1.268 2.191 2.904 1.528 2.564 3.244 2.645 1.690 2.380 3.547 3.245 3.010 2.067 3.786 2.993 3.436 2.391 2.266 p20=2.452 1.740 2.708 2.541 2.906 vcs= 6.744 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 16.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 3A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 3A.It were selected 21970 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 116309-117655 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163174.C00 K43798 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 21970 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 4842 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV05.69mA) and at 21:08 e+beam was dumped. 5) after Lumi RUN #797 it were fixed 2 attempts of new e+injections with the same record Ip total but at 00:00 during 2nd injection this p-beam was lost. New p-beam was injected and ramped from 03:30 up to 05:10. 17/08/95 ============ Schacht/Lomas === Lumi RUN# 798 Start - End of Run 798: 17/8/95 6:20:21 - 6:27:02 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 6:26:54 - 6:27:02 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 34.67, Ip= 56.02 Start lumi value: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.04 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 0.35 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.32 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.01 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 2 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 117776 - 117776 P.S. This Lumi RUN was fixed due to some errors of H1Shifter. Next Lumi RUN #799 was started from 06:29 with the same beams and in progress now (10:04). 17.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Problems with Beam Currents Today it were seen new problem with beam currents values transmitted to H1Lumi. During current Lumi RUN #799 it were fixed 5 spikes at Ie+ total values (up to 10:00). 1) 06:18 (35.21->54.62mA) 2) 07:30 (30.29->41.42mA) 3) 08:15 (27.96->55.66mA) 4) 08:22 (27.44->50.22mA) 5) 09:25 (24.33->27.18mA) There were no any spikes (as earlier) at Ip total values into low direction at Egor's history. As seems this is problem of HERA (?). TCUR-bank contents can show this fact. Usik's pictures at H1Lumi2 MacII with BeamCurrents history on last 24 hours show spikes into low direction for Iptotal (at Egor's history these spikes are not seen). 08:15, 08:55, 09:27, 10:35, 10:37 and 10:45. As seems the reason of these spikes has another nature then earlier. E.Elsen supposed that may be there are some correlation with H1CTRIG- reboot procedure (due to H1Ctrig has now some problems with tuning of priorities at new many processors configuration). 17.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_795: all Runs Ee+Eg+Ev~OK. 17.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 2 LUMIMON data set (174-176). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (163174-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 116309-117828): From H1 Runs 116309-117828 it were selected: 29340 etpdnvc 72.5 Mbyte 35060 etpdvc 86.0 Mbyte 30392 s9291 ( 7724 s92 + 22345 s91 + 323 both) 75.3 Mbyte 45584 et44vc 110.2 Mbyte 28864 s93 71.8 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163176.C00 K43227 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M163176.C00 K43523 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163176.C00 K43800 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M163176.C00 K43674 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M163176.C00 <- for V.Andreev K44286 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C due to /acs/user/fomenko/-pool is non-accessible for writting at last days. It were removed some intermediate data sets (163174-family). 17/08/95 =================== lomas === Lumi RUN# 799 Start - End of Run 799: 17/8/95 6:29:13 - 19:07:34 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:12:58 - 19:07:34 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 34.05, Ip= 56.00 Start lumi value: 4.13 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.43 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 95.97 nb-1 HERA - physics: 94.5 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 65.06 nb-1 H1data - physics: 43.8 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 68 % , DT corr.: 67 % , Tot eff.: 46 % H1 Runs: 117776 - 117897 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 06:52 with L=4.252mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 14:58 with Lsp=0.506mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) it were fixed 13 spikes at Ietotal values (all spikes into high direction) and 1 spike at Ip total value (into low direction): times for e+spikes: 07:30,08:15,08:22,09:25,10:37,10:47,11:30,11:43 13:38,17:20,17:26,18:52,18:56 time for p spike : 17:39 3) from 11:43 up to 12:13 Luminosity was measured non-right due to non-standard timing (at this period it were recorded 2 H1Runs with SPACAL at readout only - 117832,117834). Measured Lumi value was on 42% less then can be measured with standard timing. 18/08/95 =================== lomas === Lumi RUN# 800 (jubileum) Start - End of Run 800: 18/8/95 0:46:21 - 4:04:44 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 2:06:10 - 4:04:44 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.31, Ip= 53.13 Start lumi value: 3.12 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.42 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 31.94 nb-1 HERA - physics: 20.19 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 14.16 nb-1 H1data - physics: 6.56 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 69 % , DT corr.: 46 % , Tot eff.: 32 % H1 Runs: 117931 - 117946 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 00:56 with L=3.573mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 02:38 with Lsp=0.446mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) after yesterday 23:00 up to now (10:40) it were not fixed any spikes at Ietotal and Iptotal behaivours with time - all is OK now. 18.08.1995 ====== TCL ====== H01LNS === TCL#63-65: NO bank losses,OK. 18.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_799-800 all Ee+Eg+Ev ~OK. 18/08/95 =================== lomas === Lumi RUN# 801 Start - End of Run 801: 18/8/95 6:11:39 - 13:56:19 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 6:55:28 - 13:56:19 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 34.12, Ip= 46.99 Start lumi value: 2.96 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.4 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 51.68 nb-1 HERA - physics: 45.87 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 35.41 nb-1 H1data - physics: 20.31 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 77 % , DT corr.: 57 % , Tot eff.: 44 % H1 Runs: 117947 - 118033 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 06:18 with L=3.146mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 08:56 with Lsp=0.417mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2)both beams were dumped after end of Lumi RUN# 801 (at 14:02). 3)During this Lumi RUN it was achived 3.0pb-1 of HERA produced Integrated Lumi at H1 IP from start of H1 Data Taking 95. Next values of Integrated Luminosity values were collected at H1Lumi after end of Lumi RUN# 801: 3022.145 nb-1 - HERA Produced 2279.490 nb-1 - H1 Run Gated 1537.660 nb-1 - H1 Data Taken 18.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 7 LUMIMON data set (177-183). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (163176-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 116309-118020) From H1 Runs 116309-118020 it were selected: 45237 etpdnvc 110.9 Mbyte 52036 etpdvc 127.3 Mbyte 45731 s9291 ( 11607 s92 + 33801 s91 + 323 both) 112.4 Mbyte 60324 et44vc 145.9 Mbyte 38956 s93 96.2 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163183.C00 K46499 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M163183.C00 K46974 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163183.C00 K42084 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M163183.C00 K48505 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M163183.C00 <- for V.Andreev K42071 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C due to /acs/user/fomenko/-pool is non-accessible for writting at last days. It were removed some intermediate data sets (163176-family). 18.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 3B Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 117655-118020 data sample (3B).It were selected 14722 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163183.C00 K43569 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 15678 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M163183.C00 K43704 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 3215 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M163183.C00 K43740 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were got 14722 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 5951 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.733 0.726 1.438 0.602 0.000 0.712 0.334 0.878 0.843 0.762 0.873 0.851 0.845 1.011 0.959 0.926 0.877 0.945 0.882 0.846 0.807 0.953 0.888 0.904 0.912 0.933 0.905 1.218 0.710 1.223 0.810 0.882 0.888 0.853 0.000 1.003 0.000 1.006 0.989 0.999 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.431 0.872 1.307 1.201 0.000 0.999 1.084 1.032 1.049 0.977 1.050 1.041 1.047 1.035 0.958 1.088 1.020 0.962 1.083 0.976 1.181 0.841 1.068 0.838 0.845 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.744 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 117655-118020 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 15K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.38 1.14 27.34 1.09 27.40 1.06 Runs 117655-118020 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 16K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.52 1.24 27.55 1.20 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 3A Sample clbr(see message from 16.08.95) CCvcs value was got from 3A sample clbr. (see message 16/08/95). (CCvcs start = 6.744 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was very succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 18.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 3B Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 3B sample with events from Runs 117655-118020: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R117655 (12877 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R117655 2275 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-3.23%) and very good resolution digits (19-20%) for (6-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R117655 14647 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R117655 15610 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.744 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 18.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 3B It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0323 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9800 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.981. So CCvcs =6.744*0.981=6.616Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 117655-118020: Runs 117655-118020 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 15K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.07 Runs 117655-118020 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 15K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.20 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00=4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.348 4.338 4.258 4.782 4.867 4.288 5.036 5.204 2.987 5.736 5.898 3.949 5.403 4.948 7.344 5.371 6.112 6.115 6.092 5.415 5.585 5.927 4.735 6.368 4.983 6.757 6.022 4.538 5.462 3.731 3.896 4.764 4.367 4.294 4.189 e42=4.287 4.303 4.319 4.215 4.292 4.282 4.285 p00=2.407 2.208 1.267 2.188 2.904 1.489 2.639 3.283 2.614 1.687 2.412 3.597 3.256 3.070 2.128 3.444 2.944 3.179 2.606 2.310 p20=2.453 1.850 2.670 2.538 2.906 vcs= 6.616 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 18.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 3B Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 3B.It were selected 12099 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 117655-118020 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163183.C00 K43798 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 12099 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 2862 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.897 0.742 0.731 1.454 0.596 0.000 0.733 0.328 0.888 0.837 0.800 0.919 0.922 0.841 0.921 0.939 0.945 0.905 0.929 0.946 0.934 0.870 0.970 0.907 0.903 0.946 0.914 0.884 1.271 0.703 1.269 0.793 0.000 0.870 0.851 0.000 1.003 0.000 1.004 0.986 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.236 0.927 1.278 1.200 0.000 1.028 1.090 0.993 1.079 0.988 1.019 1.026 1.035 1.030 1.015 1.038 1.032 0.998 1.056 0.988 1.175 0.941 0.993 0.840 0.844 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.616 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 118020-118504 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 25K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.30 1.10 27.27 1.06 27.35 1.04 Runs 118020-118504 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 30K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.37 1.11 27.42 1.07 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 3B Sample clbr(see message from 18.08.95) CCvcs value was got from 3B sample clbr. (see message 18/08/95). (CCvcs start = 6.616 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 21.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 3C Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 3C sample with events from Runs 118020-118504: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R118020 (21291 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R118020 3969 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-3.51%) and enough good resolution digits (24-26%) for (6-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R118020 25134 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R118020 29637 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.616 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 21.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 3C It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0351 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9850 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.998. So CCvcs =6.616*0.998=6.603Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 118020-118504: Runs 118020-118504 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 25K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.07 Runs 118020-118504 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 30K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.06 (!) P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.352 4.357 4.260 4.717 4.865 4.288 5.068 5.220 2.815 5.410 5.927 4.056 5.457 4.700 6.928 5.291 6.178 6.237 6.080 6.063 5.962 6.245 4.836 6.575 5.031 6.942 5.986 4.446 5.684 3.734 3.872 4.765 4.367 4.294 4.188 e42= 4.287 4.304 4.319 4.217 4.293 4.282 4.285 p00= 2.202 2.441 1.264 2.183 2.904 1.576 2.762 3.238 2.782 1.686 2.376 3.498 3.299 3.019 2.371 3.390 3.041 3.269 2.610 2.321 p20= 2.450 1.861 2.619 2.541 2.906 vcs= 6.603 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 21.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 3C Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 3C.It were selected 9626 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 118020-118504 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163192.C00 K43798 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 9626 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 2052 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV no Lumi -> call H1Lumi expert near 21:20 -> call Eckhard Elsen -> he made all needed tuning -> OK. 22.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_805: all Ee+Eg+Ev ~OK. 22.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_806: all Ee+Eg+Ev ~OK. 22.08.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#68: NO bank losses,OK. 22.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 2 LUMIMON data set (193-194) - H1Runs 118504-118607. From H1 Runs 118504-118607 it were selected: 7968 etpdnvc 21.4 Mbyte 7045 etpdvc 19.0 Mbyte 7796 s9291 ( 2018 s92 + 5778 s91 + 0 both) 20.9 Mbyte 7535 et44vc 20.3 Mbyte 4987 s93 13.4 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M193194.C00 K47013 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M193194.C00 K47716 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M193194.C00 K47281 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M193194.C00 K47170 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M193194.C00 <- for V.Andreev K47741 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C due to /acs/user/fomenko/-pool is non-accessible for writting at last days. P.S. From this message it is finished reports about creation of some data sets for calibration - if anybody will interest which data sets are and where exist call H1KFOM directly. 22.08.1995 ================= F11LEV === Calibration info ............ I found, that ~30-35% of LLO space is used for the standard calibration information, produced by A.Fomenko. We have to be thankful to A.F. for this very valuable work, however, why not to keep kind of summary table for all calibration steps separately, and write in LLO only short messages on the non-standard situations, observations, problems. Like it is done for example for LUMIMON files processing. It is not obligatory to have the calibration results www-accessable, although it would be not bad. Main - to design a standard format for this information, containing all relevant results in a reasonable size. Obvious advantages: 1) Easier overview on the calibration at any time, by any person 2) Easier access to the rest of LLO messages. By the way, since we have now LUMI run summaries available via Usik's tool on dice2, those could be also removed from LLO, provided H1 run range is added to the Usik's LUMI run summaries. All the rest is there. This would save another 1/3 of LLO space. P.S. (N.G.) No, I don't agree with the last statement. These run summaries allow me very easily to update a text-file H01GOG.HLUMI.Y95.TEXT. Please, keep them. P.P.S.(N.G.) Forget my previous message. Since the original summary file (LRUNS) is available for me, I don't really care. 22/08/95 ============= Dusan Bruncko === Lumi RUN# 807 Start - End of Run 807: 22/8/95 12:40:25 - 20:35:48 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 13:10:26 - 20:35:48 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.4, Ip= 49.13 Start lumi value: 2.55 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.38 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 63.16 nb-1 HERA - physics: 59.71 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 50.03 nb-1 H1data - physics: 42 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 83 % , DT corr.: 83 % , Tot eff.: 70 % H1 Runs: 118705 - 118747 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 12:55 with L=3.82mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 15:01 with Lsp=0.570mkb-1sec-1mA-2 23/08/95 ============== Ivan Herynek === Lumi RUN# 808 Start - End of Run 808: 23/8/95 0:49:16 - 4:31:48 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:59:36 - 4:31:48 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.8, Ip= 46.89 Start lumi value: 1.94 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.33 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 155 e+(-) bunches = 168, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 13, p-pilot b. = 25 HERA total lumi: 21.66 nb-1 HERA - physics: 17.28 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 12.86 nb-1 H1data - physics: 11.22 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 73 % , DT corr.: 86 % , Tot eff.: 64 % H1 Runs: 118776 - 118779 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 00:58 with L=2.38mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 00:58 with Lsp=0.379mkb-1sec-1mA-2 23.08.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#69: NO bank losses,OK. 23.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_807-808: all Ee+Eg+Ev ~OK: LR# 807 NH1R= 20 Etag: 26382 27.73+/-1.23 Et44: 16818 25.82+/-3.09 LR# 808 NH1R= 5 Etag: 12868 27.58+/-1.18 Et44: 11784 26.00+/-3.54 23.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Power Trips at HERA and H1 Today during last phase of e+injection (Ie+total = 30.265 mA, Iptotal = 52.347 mA) power trip happened and both beams were lost (near 13:31). Set of power suplly alarms had appeared at H1 Control Room. H1Lumi HV is OK. There are no problems at H1Lumi during these power supply problems. Visually at 13:31 light at H1 Control Room became not as ordinary during some seconds. H1Lumi MacIIs are OK too. Only H1Lumi FADC crate direct current was off during this power trip. At HERA TV_screen at 14:40 it was announced "Recovering from trip. Restart not before 16:00". At HERA TV_screen at 16:10 it was announced "Recovering from trip. Restart not before 18:00". At HERA TV_screen at 17:11 it was proclaimed "Injection" At 17:40 again Power Trip happened at H1 Area -> light, H1Lumi FADC direct current off. It was happened during HERA preparing to injection. HERA proclaimed at 17:45 "Temporary power outage. Injection delayed" At 17:58 new Power Trip at H1 Area - at this case H1Lumi FADC crate is OK. As seems all trips are connected with thundestorm near Hamburg. At 18:20 HERA proclaimed "Technical Problems. Restart about 20:00". 23.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Strange Monitor Counter Rate Today it was found else one consiquence of Power Off at Room 101 21.08 - from this time Monitor Cherenkov Counter has strange behaivour between Lumi RUNs. Its rate during pause between neighbour Lumi RUNs became around 65-75 kHz. Before 21.08.95 Power off ordinary rate at pauses was near 10-20 Hz. Behaivour of Monitor Cherenkov counter during Lumi RUNs is (as seems) the same as before. 24.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === There is no Lumi ........... After yesterday trips (started near 13:31) up to now (09:22) there is no Lumi at HERA. Near 03:00 tonight it was fixed single low current p-beam injection. After 03:35 - there are no beams. HERA declared "Injection". 24.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === H1Lumi Expert Call 3-10.09.95 Today it was made agreement with Phill Biddulph that at period from 03.09.95 up to 10.09.95 when nobody from H1Lumi experts are at Hamburg at case of extremal situation (not understandable by H1Lumi shift and any persons from H1Lumi-team which will be at Hamburg at this period) it is possible and recommended to call anybody from Sheviakov,Soloviev, Fomenko by phone to call directly from H1Lumi telephone to Troitsk. At day time (08:00-17:00) - standrad procedure call "11" - DESY telephonist service (English speaking) and ask to make connection with Lebedev Physical Institute - telephone at Russia - 09660-12183(Shev.), 09660-12883(Soloviev) and 09660-13706(Fomenko). At non-day time ordinary '11'-phone call is switching on DESY Main Gate and it is possible to make the same procedure (but ordinary german speaking). There is another posibility for non-day time call - automatic telephone connection from room 201 - 007-09960-..... This is only single telephon apparatus for automatic telephone connection (only for non-privat talking). It is not so good due to this telephone apparatus is far from H1Lumi. City-phone at this period will be kept at somebody from H1LPI-community who will be here at this time (more probably that at Rusakov's hands) as contact person. 24.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Calibration Upgrade Ideas... From first experience with Calibration of H1Lumi Detectors from Data Taking'95 it became clear that it is needed to make some upgrade at both OnLine- and OffLine Calibration procedures: 1) most vital correction (as seems) at ET&PD&nVC-events selection for both OnLine and OffLine-calibration of all PD- and ET-channels: - up to now it were selected events with VCdep<0.2GeV. It was more or less good and reasonable for situation existed up to middle of September 94 when VC-trigger element was switched on VCv (front sensetive) from VCs (amplitude sensetive). Now it is clear that cut |VCdep|-6.0cm) 27.57 1.10 88656 entries - xc&|vcd|<0.5 GeV etr+pdr histo for events from sample with VC=1 at previous BC: 25.26 2.77 8839 entries (&vc1.eq.1) <- 6.3% from 139833 events. It is obviously that it is better not use these events for future OffLine calibration. - obviously that it is needed to make monitoring of this quota - as seems with large rates (induced with future incrementing of Iptotal and Ietotal values) this quota can be incremented from 6.3% into more significant values. - VCdep (as seems) most sensetive to presence of signal at VC at pre- vious bunch crossing - due to specific of VCs-pulse disposition at FADC window for t0 but nevetheless: high mentioned 100th ntupel has PD1 and ET11 values - PD and ET trigger elements values at previous bunch crossing: etr+pdr histos for events from sample with PDorET=1 at previous BC: 22.55 2.51 4101 enrries (&pd1.eq.1) <- 2.9% from 139833 events 21.17 3.28 2209 enrries (&et11.eq.1) <- 1.6% from 139833 events if any from VC,PD or ET trigger elements is hitted at previous BC: 25.29 2.76 9233 entries (&vc1.eq.1.or.pd1.eq.1.or.et11.eq.1) 6.6% of events must be cutted before calibration. So it is obviously that this additional cut is needed for future OffLine Calibration too. - for any case these are the sources of ET&PD&nVC-events at H1DataFlow a) s94 - (74.06%) b) s92 - (12.43%) c) s91 - ( 7.06%) d) another H1 subtriggers - ( 4.34%) e) H1 Random triggers - ( 1.29%) f) s90 - ( 0.46%) g) s86 = ET&nPDlow - ( 0.35%) 2) significant changing at Sigma values at etr+pdr histos for last calibration of VCs at ET&PD&VC from very good - 1.09 GeV (sample 3C) up to enough bad - 1.26 GeV(sample 3A) as seems connected with significant changing of CCvcs during Lumi RUN at some Lumi RUNs and using of 'old' method of defining CCvcs as some averaging value for some period became not best decision - may be better let's go to Relation Coefficient defining for VCs too (see message from 09.06 95 at LLO) - it will be better for future Lumi RUNs with large rates. Quantity of 'bad'-events at ETPDVC-sample is less then at ETPDnVC sample - from the same G+M H1Run range we have: ETPDVC-sample (150513 events) H1KFOM.LOOK2.R105252.ETPDVC FAST09 3010200E 00000 DASD 27.53 1.23 150153 entries 27.56 1.19 115300 entries (&xc) 26.56 1.57 3298 entries (&vc1.eq.1) 23.07 2.68 884 enrries (&pd1.eq.1) 22.76 3.78 342 enrries (&et11.eq.1) 26.50 1.63 3805 entries (&vc1.eq.1.or.pd1.eq.1.or.et11.eq.1) 3805/150153 = 2.5% <- but this value only factor 2.5 less then at ETPDnVC sample (not so low). 3) Defining of Global Energy Shift for Photon Arm with PD&n(VC) events as seems worked normally all period. It was added cut |VCdep|<0.3GeV and enough large part of S92-events was cutted at each sample. S92 is poorest sample at H1Lumi calibration. For future it would be good to make some modification of S92 and s95 prescale factors into decremention of s95-events and incremention of s92-events due to there are additional ETPDVC-events sources at H1Lumi subtriigers: - active subtriggers for ETPDVC events: a) s95 - (31.47%) b) s91 - (29.90%) c) another H1 subtriggers (15.67%) d) s93 - (14.65%) e) H1 Random triggers - ( 5.09%) f) s90 - ( 3.11%) g) s86 = ET&nPDlow - ( 0.12%) I had made selection of s91-events together with s92 and had some attempts to make correction of pdrec-spectrum on VCeff=f(pdrec) but up to now I am not shure that it is right - behaivour of VCeff= =f(pdrec) has incremention at high pdrec-values and as seems it is connected with second photons (not with VCeff itself). Influence of accounting VCeff-correction on Global Photon Arm Energy shift was around 1.0-1.5%. Up to now all Global Energy Shifts are presented without accounting of VCeff. 4) Calibration of ET44-channels (OnLine part) must be tuned on using the same cuts as OffLine part. Experience with unrecoverable CCet2 value after huge rates at 28 July shows that it is needed to make some improvements at OnLine algorithm of ET44-calibration. OffLine ET44-calibration must be improved with attempt to use Relation Coefficients for PhotonArm Energy defining (at this year Final values of CCpd were used). Relation Coefficient for VCs must be used (at this year averaging CCvcs was used). Three iteration algorithm (as for PD- and ET- channels) must be used (at this year one iteration is used). May be it is needed to change at future ET44(s90) on ET44VC(s90) if no any contradictions. As seems now we are writting very large quantity ET44-triggered events which are not used anywhere. As You know at both (OnLine and OffLine) calibration procedures it is using simpliest energy 'reconstruction' algorithm - see message 19.03.95 and for using of CCet44 or RCet44 produced with these algorithmes at latest LREC-release it was used some correction factor which is kept at LESC-bank. This decision was made due to latest LREC-release had appeared at May 95 but OnLine And OffLine Calibration algorithm were made earlier (see 19.03.95 message at LL11). May be it is needed to involve latest LREC-package into OnLine too. I did not check very long time correctness of this LESC-bank correction factor - value from 02.06.95 is permanently presented at LESC banks for all last calibrations. It would be good if at future at L4 histos family there will be histo et44rec+pdrec with cuts used for calibration - at this case this histo would help at case of LESC correction factor became non- -right. Existing et44rec+pdrec L4Histo is far from ideal - mean value is significantly less then e+beam energy, Sigma is very large etc. H1 Community thinks that ET44 is not good detector - a lot of questions etc. Example of good histo et44rec+pdrec we have at H1Lumi MacII at "Energy_fic1"-application. Almost the same Mean and Sigma values as for 'old' etrec+pdrec. Involving of this type histo into H1Lumi L4 histos family as seems must be connected with s90 making as ET44&VC (due to statistics problem for one H1Run). 5) Technically calibration jobs and procedures were improved and simplified in compare with last year. But as seems it is needed to make new improvements - due to appearence of latest LREC-release - (H1Lumi Calibration is working with previous LREC-release). 24.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Beam Currents Problem....... Today it were made new attempt to struggle with problem of non-right beam currents delivering to H1Lumi. E.Elsen with S.Burov made some modifications at H1CTRIG MacVEEs. Today from 16:00 both applications are working (at H1Ctrig MacII and at Eckhard's MacII) and during last p-injection started at 16:03 it were not fixed any spikes at Iptotal value. May be at this case problem is decided. New attempts to make some modification were connected with yesterday again fixed spikes at Ip total values during last p-beam existing before yesterday trip. W.Bartel (as H1 Shift Lieder) had negoutiations with E.Elsen yesterday with this question. 24.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Unsuccesful p-beam rampings Today twice it was injected good p-beam and soon after end of ramping these beams were lost (first p -beam lived from 13:43 up to 14:50, second one - from 16:25 up to 17:12). Iptotal was enough large - near 58 mA. 25.08.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#70: NO bank losses,OK. 25.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === There is no Lumi again Yesterday near 22:00 new p-beam injection had started and p-beam with Ip total near 63 mA was succesfully ramped near 23:00. From 01:30 it was injected e+beam with low Ie+total near 5.9 mA. At 04:40 both beams were dumped due problems with ZEUS collimators. HERA proclaimed "Technical problems. Restart about". At 10:00 today HERA p-ring alived again. HERA proclaimed "Injection". From 10:30 it was started new p-beam injection and during last phase of injection it was lost significant part of p-beam. This p-beam was dumped at 10:51. Yesterday intervention of E.Elsen and S.Burov into MacVEE at H1CTRIG Master Crate for struggle with 'spikes' at beam currents delivering to H1Lumi was succesful. During last 2 p-filling and last e+filling it were not fixed any spikes at Iptotal and Ie+total behaivours with time at Egor's and Usik's history plots (with simultaneously working of H1Ctrig-applications at H1CtrigMacII and at Eckhard's MacII. As seems problem is resolved. 25.08.1995 ================= F11LEV === Re: New Calibration procedure I have small remark/questions to a long message of A.F. concerning his proposal for new calibration procedure. What is proposed in fact is just a new selection of events for the online and offline calibration. The reason is -- as it is claimed -- an influence of the events of various kind (not only VC! -- see A.F. statistics for other BC-1 bits) which happend on 1 BC earlier than the studied events. My questions/remarks: 1) According to A.F. this happend after hardware change of VC-bit construction. But why then also PD (BC-1) and ET(BC-1) have similar effect? As far as I know, nothing were changed in their definitions. Moreover, it seems, that ET(BC-1) has the biggest effect on E_sum at current BC. 2) The strict selection for the calibration is a simplest way to avoid "early" events effect. However, it does not solve all problems, if indeed such influence exists. How to be with physics analysis for example? We cannot so simply to reject all these events without careful corrections of all losses. Could we instead (or in addition) to the proposed procedure to try to correct dynamically the pedestals during the readout, or after that online? Such, that to guarantee a correct energy in any case (independent on what happened 1 BC earlier)? 25.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Re: Re:New Calibration proced As I remember up to this year nobody had attempts to make analyze of influence of presence VC=1, PD=1 and ET=1 at previous bunch cros- sing (t0-1) on value of amplitude at VC, PD and at ET at t0 bunch crossing. As seems this influence existed always and with the same conseguences. Situtaion with VC switching on VC front sensetive underlined this effect - puts our attention on this effect. For VC- energy this effect is more understandable due to specific of VCs - response pulse disposition inside FADC-window (shifted on 20-30 nsec). For PD and ET pulses it is possible to suppose that may be these are effects of very long time ago discussed 'zero pedestal' situations. Events with 'zero pedestal' should be cutted at any analyze due to bad digitization - there is no full information about response - part of pulse is 'kept' at nonvisual region of t0 FADC window. But attempts to introduce some procedure for defining of this 'zero pedestal' situtaion were unsuccesful and labels 20001 were removed from LREE and LRPE-banks. It means that at any case this events should be removed from analyze, calibration etc. Quota of this events must be accounted at some analyze procedures for needed correction. If it is really zero pedestal situations - there is simply way to remove it - Egor has experince to increment pedestal values at FADCs. If it is effect of non-right accounting of pedestal value - more probably for VC-case (due to 20-30nsec shift existing) - it is possible to make individual pedestal accounting for VCs signal - but it means intervention into very delicate places of ReadOut- program (made ordinary at shutdown period). Egor supposed that it would be good at next year Data Taking to remove creation of LREE,LRPE,LR1E-banks from H1LumiReadOut and put this procedure into L4,L5-levels. H1Lumi will produced only original data (LREF,LRPF and LR1F) as it is made for NeutronCounter data for example (LRNA-bank). It would be possible to make all high mentioned analyze and pedestal finding at LREC-level. At this case it would be full clearity what happened - we have full history of pulse at t0 FADC window. It is possible to suppose that appearence LREF,LRPF and LR1F will provocate anybody on finding of different digitization procedures, different pedestal substraction procedures etc. It is very pity that at H1DataTaking'95 L4-level is suppressing LREF,LRPF and LR1F-banks. It would be possible to make collection of these banks and to make some analyze. But as seems we must be ready to recommend the removing from analyze where energy value is important of events for which TEL1,1 bank shows presence VC=1 or PD=1 (for PDrec-energy) and ET=1 (for ETrec- energy) and (may be) ET44=1 (for ET44rec energy). We agreed at some time that overflow situations must be cutted from analyze - why it is not possible for events with hits at previous BCs? 25.08.1995 ================= F11LEV === Re: Re: Re: ................. OK, then let me put it that way: May be I am wrong, but my impression is, that the online LUMI guys always tend to shift the problems to higher level, rather than to try to solve them as early as possible. This leads to the situations, when less and less people in H1 really understand a quality of our data and only very few of them are able to perform a complete analysis correctly (because the analysis procedure became more and more complicated). You should be prepared, that shifting the problematic areas from DAQ to L4,L5 etc. does not remove the responsibility on the data quality from us. Please be prepared to 1) write and support L4/L5 parts of LREC code making "E"-banks from "F"-banks (and to defend in front of H1 community the real necessity of 5 (or 6?) times larger data volume coming from our branch because of that!) 2) make a clear recommendations for the physics analysis about corrections which have to be applied in order to account for all cuts made internally in LREC (or even online, if there are any) P.S. Response pulses are enough long (due to long cables) - it is impossible as seems to make as early as possible actions (a.f.) 25.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Birth Day of 200th LUMIMON .. Today 200th LUMIMON had appeared at /acs/data/95/spec-directory. As seems it is little jubileum of H1Lumi community. At H1DataTaking'94 we had only 138 LUMIMON data sets at moment of its finishing. P.S. (S.L.) An expected amount of LUMIMON files for 1995 data taking was 400. Let see how precise was this prediction, made in March-April. 25.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Local Timing vs Lumi ........ Today during Lumi RUN# 809 after end of Lumi tuning H1Ctrig switched on so called "local timing'- Free Hera Clock - and as ordinary Lumi and Specific Lumi droped into lw direction on 40-42%. It was happened near 16:00 today. At 16:07 standard HERA-clock was ON. Lumi and Specific Lumi came back to reasonable values. It was looked for that during this 'local timing' period etrec+pdrec peak became very wide (OnLine Calibration was ON at this period). As seems influence of this 'local timing' periods on OnLine CC behaivour must be accounted at future. 25/08/95 ============== Igor Gorelov === Lumi RUN# 809 Start - End of Run 809: 25/8/95 15:38:50 - 18:08:57 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:05:16 - 18:08:57 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.6, Ip= 51.20 Start lumi value: 2.82 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.42 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 23.21 nb-1 HERA - physics: 22.38 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 16.03 nb-1 H1data - physics: 12.44 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 71 % , DT corr.: 77 % , Tot eff.: 55 % H1 Runs: 119255 - 119274 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 15:59 with L=3.806mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 17:32 with Lsp=0.592mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) Near 18:00 something happened at HERA - at both Lumi H1 and ZEUS it was seen drop of Lumi values on factor 10. HERA soon proclaimed "Switch off Your HV" and dumped e+beam. Without any intervention from HERA crew Beam Positions - and became far from standard around 18:00. 26/08/95 ============= gerard villet === Lumi RUN# 810 Start - End of Run 810: 25/8/95 22:36:38 - 7:36:49 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:52:23 - 7:36:49 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 24.88, Ip= 50.59 Start lumi value: 2.75 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.51 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 55.39 nb-1 HERA - physics: 46.58 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 39.5 nb-1 H1data - physics: 35 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 84 % , DT corr.: 88 % , Tot eff.: 74 % H1 Runs: 119291 - 119342 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 23:04 with L=3.076mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 23:04 with Lsp=0.536mkb-1sec-1mA-2 26.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 3D Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 118505-119318 data sample (3D).It were selected 26581 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M193202.C00 K43569 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 28103 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M193202.C00 K43704 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 5779 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M193202.C00 K43740 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were got 26581 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 10991 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.896 0.744 0.731 1.460 0.608 0.996 0.699 0.322 1.087 0.863 0.902 0.980 0.912 0.879 0.944 1.018 0.948 0.966 0.951 1.012 0.940 0.870 0.938 0.938 0.909 0.983 0.927 0.930 1.373 0.697 1.282 0.755 0.857 0.858 0.930 0.999 1.004 1.007 1.015 0.990 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.178 0.902 1.226 1.191 0.000 0.998 1.056 0.989 1.073 0.984 0.980 0.991 1.013 1.000 0.994 1.023 0.956 0.943 0.952 0.983 1.167 0.900 0.998 0.848 0.842 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.603 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 118504-119318 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 27K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.33 1.13 27.29 1.10 27.35 1.11 Runs 118504-119318 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 28K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.64 1.23 27.61 1.19 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 3C Sample clbr(see message from 21.08.95) CCvcs value was got from 3C sample clbr. (see message 21/08/95). (CCvcs start = 6.603 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with poor statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 26.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 3D Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 3C sample with events from Runs 118504-119318: H1KFOM.XLOOKQ4.R118504 (22817 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ3.R118504 4186 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ3-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-7.19%) and not enough good resolution digits (27-29%) for (8-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.XLOOKQ2.R118504 26460 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.XLOOKQ3.R118504 28004 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.603 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 26.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 3D It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0719 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9540 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.9773.So CCvcs =6.603*0.9773=6.453Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 118504-119318: Runs 118504-119318 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 27K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.11 Runs 118504-119318 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 28K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.53 1.18 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.351 4.358 4.261 4.655 4.867 4.289 5.070 5.233 3.186 5.564 6.420 4.137 5.570 4.895 7.056 5.657 6.067 6.509 6.167 6.439 5.950 6.215 5.012 6.371 4.921 6.817 5.925 4.649 6.236 3.736 3.931 4.791 4.389 4.304 4.700 e42= 4.285 4.309 4.322 4.257 4.311 4.282 4.285 p00= 2.208 2.467 1.219 2.167 2.904 1.509 2.668 3.240 2.813 1.686 2.309 3.437 3.197 2.995 2.398 3.389 2.828 3.103 2.292 2.315 p20= 2.437 1.817 2.485 2.539 2.906 vcs= 6.453 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 26.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 3D Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 3D.It were selected 13453 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 118504-119318 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M193202.C00 K43798 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 13453 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 3100 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV changing from standard value near 0.0cm into +3.2-+3.5cm) due to some of Power Supply Problem at HERA. After 22:00 this Power Supply was changed. 27/08/95 ============= Gerard Villet === Lumi RUN# 812 Start - End of Run 812: 27/8/95 4:36:07 - 11:23:33 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:20:03 - 11:23:33 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.8, Ip= 55.90 Start lumi value: 3.99 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.52 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 66.51 nb-1 HERA - physics: 62.78 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 56.34 nb-1 H1data - physics: 37.08 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 89 % , DT corr.: 65 % , Tot eff.: 58 % H1 Runs: 119446 - 119464 P.S. Near 11:20 e+beam was lost. P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 05:05 with L=4.117mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 07:22 with Lsp=0.566mkb-1sec-1mA-2 27.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 7 LUMIMON data set (203-209). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (193202-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 118504-119463) From H1 Runs 118504-119463 it were selected: 49854 etpdnvc 123.1 Mbyte 51648 etpdvc 124.1 Mbyte 49243 s9291 ( 12578 s92 + 36665 s91 + 0 both) 122.6Mbyte 36672 et44vc 91.1 Mbyte 33214 s93 82.6 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into IBM-storage next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M193209.C00 K44092 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M193209.C00 K44179 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M193209.C00 K44206 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M193209.C00 K44195 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M193209.C00 <- for V.Andreev K44448 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C due to /acs/user/fomenko/-pool is non-accessible for writting at last days. It were removed some intermediate data sets (193202-family). 27.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Stable p-beam .............. Today after end of Lumi RUN# 812 it was proclaimed 'Stable p-beam' at HERA TV-screens. 27.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Ntupel with ET44VC-data..... Today it was produced 100th ntupel with ET44VC-data collected for all period of H1dataTaking'95 (from 22.05.1995 up to 26.08.1995, for only G+M H1Runs 105252-119318). Data were get from all data sets with ET44VC-selected events. Ntupel consists of 196652 events. Events were reconstructed with latest LREC-release. There are all needed for 'good selection' variables at this ntupel: ET44-deposited energy, ET44deposited energy at 'right'-column (et1+et3+et5), PDrec, Xet44,Yet44, Xpd,Ypd,values of Trigger elements VC,PD and ET44 at previous bunch crossing etc. It were selected events from these ntupel with standard calibration cuts and with Xet.ne.-1.1 (bad reconstruction flag) and Xet>-1.625cm (enough far from boundary) and it were produced enough reasonable energy and coordinate spectra for ET44*VC-events (21352 entries): etrec44+pdrec - X-peak 27.54 GeV, Sigma 1.65 GeV; etrec44 - X-peak 25.00 GeV, Sigma 1.54 GeV; pdrec - X-peak 2.49 GeV, Sigma 0.49 GeV; vcd - X-peak 0.68 GeV, Sigma 0.34 GeV; Very informative and reasonable are two-dimensional plots: Xet44 vs Yet44, Xet44 vs ETrec44, Xpd vs Ypd, ETrec44 vs pdrec etc. It was found that presence of VC=1 or PD=1 or ET44=1 at previous bunch-xing is not making so large effect on et44rec+pdrec energy spectra:there are 2053 evnts from 38696 (5%)with VC=1 or PD=1 or ET44=1 presence at previous bunch crossing (27.80(1.76) all -> 27.73(1.69)) or 27.49(1.54)->27.46(1.40)). It is possible to explain with enough low responses for ET44 (CCet2 is near 11-12 MeV/FADC count) from one side (pulses are not so long) and little quota of PDrec at et44rec+pdrec values (only 2.5 GeV is peak value for PDrec at these events) from another side. Investigate ET44*VC-events Yourself if You want - see on 100th ntupel at data set: H1KFOM.LOOK2.R105252.ET44VC FAST09 3010200E 00000 DASD and be shure that ET44 is good calibrated at these H1Runs (both as On- Line (LR1P-banks at H1DataFlow) and OffLine (LFRC and LESC-banks at H1DataBase)). 27/08/95 =========== Igor V. Gorelov === Lumi RUN# 813 Start - End of Run 813: 27/8/95 14:33:55 - 19:18:11 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:15:18 - 19:18:11 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.5, Ip= 54.29 Start lumi value: 3.97 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.49 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 50.1 nb-1 HERA - physics: 43.71 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 39.86 nb-1 H1data - physics: 28.28 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 90 % , DT corr.: 70 % , Tot eff.: 64 % H1 Runs: 119476 - 119496 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 14:43 with L=4.194mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 18:35 with Lsp=0.520mkb-1sec-1mA-2 28/08/95 ================== G.Villet === Lumi RUN# 814 Start - End of Run 814: 27/8/95 23:59:40 - 3:10:21 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:37:21 - 3:10:21 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.04, Ip= 54.23 Start lumi value: 2 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.25 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 176 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 183 e-pilot b. = 13, p-pilot b. = 7 HERA total lumi: 31.08 nb-1 HERA - physics: 30.62 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 27.23 nb-1 H1data - physics: 25.06 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 88 % , DT corr.: 91 % , Tot eff.: 81 % H1 Runs: 119506 - 119514 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 00:52 with L=3.883mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 02:57 with Lsp=0.571mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2)During this Lumi RUN it was achived 2.0pb-1 of H1 Data Taken Integrated Lumi at H1 IP from start of H1 Data Taking 95. Next values of Integrated Luminosity values were collected at H1Lumi after end of Lumi RUN# 814: 3658.525 nb-1 - HERA Produced 2847.360 nb-1 - H1 Run Gated 2005.910 nb-1 - H1 Data Taken 28.08.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#71: NO bank losses,OK. 28.08.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#72: #72 is absent.Why? 28.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_809: Ee+Eg+Ev down at end Lumi Run LR_809 included H1Runs 119255-119274. During most of these H1Runs, the sums Ee+Eg+Ev were OK. But at the end of this Lumi-run, at H1Run=119273, the sums Ee+Eg+Ev went down both for the Etag, and for the Et44. Here is a bit of log: 809 119256 sEtag: 85 91% 28.2 +/- 1.6 sEt44: 84 88% 26.9 +/- 2.6 809 119266 sEtag: 163 84% 28.0 +/- 2.2 sEt44: 138 74% 25.4 +/- 2.5 809 119267 sEtag: 347 70% 27.7 +/- 1.7 sEt44: 202120% 27.7 +/- 1.7 809 119269 sEtag: 333 60% 27.9 +/- 1.5 sEt44: 237101% 24.9 +/- 4.9 809 119270 sEtag: 483 68% 28.1 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 186 71% 25.8 +/- 4.3 809 119272 sEtag: 1306 55% 27.8 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 1008 0% 6.2 +/- 0.6 809 119273 sEtag: 3634 32% 13.1 +/- 0.7 sEt44: 2321 35% 10.9 +/- 1.3 See also the comment to this Lumi Run at the Lumi Run Summary above. By the way, interruptes in H1Run-nimbers mean zero entries in histos. P.S. H1 Run 119273 was written during mentioned at comments to Lumi RUN#809 'something happened at HERA' and and became far from standard. May be it is possible to explain this fact with this 'something happened' - may be timing became bad etc., may be into ETrec+PDrec values it were involved some channels which had 'bad calibration' etc. This H1 Run is mentioned at H1EP as "M"-quality - may be it is needed to proclaimed it as "P"- quality due to mention fact? (a.f.) 28.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_810-814: all Ee+Eg+Ev ~OK: LR# 809 NH1R= 6 Etag: 6588 25.56+/-1.38 Et44: 4203 20.30+/-2.46 LR# 810 NH1R= 50 Etag: 37856 27.18+/-1.18 Et44: 25946 24.31+/-3.12 LR# 811 NH1R= 32 Etag: 48766 27.21+/-1.17 Et44: 55996 24.46+/-3.15 LR# 812 NH1R= 26 Etag: 56006 26.48+/-1.17 Et44: 42030 23.57+/-2.76 LR# 813 NH1R= 26 Etag: 34778 27.62+/-1.40 Et44: 27704 24.66+/-2.87 LR# 814 NH1R= 5 Etag: 11766 27.64+/-1.40 Et44: 7612 23.16+/-2.90 Note: The lower values for LR# 809 correspond to the above LLO, see up. It is curiosly, that after #809, at #810, all returned to the OK. 28.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Summary of e+p95 Calibrations It were made 12 H1Lumi calibrations for e+p95 data up to now. Motivations for making of any samples for calibration were different: a) due to huge rates presence at H1Lumi Detectors (responce degradation was enough large) 1A->1B, 2A->2B; b) due to timing changing (H1Ctrig Upgrade and H1Lumi timing tuning): 1B->1C, 1C->1D, 1E->2A; c) due to G+M H1Runs selection involving for calibration: 1D->1E; d) all another samples were fixed due to collection of enough statistics 2B,2C,3A,3B,3C,3D; Short characteristics of each sample is seen from next table: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.1A 22.05 105252 13590 27.52 0.90 27.54 0.99 1.015 0.999 4.403 ----- H1 Main Magnet is Off ---------------------------------------- ----- at this time Huge rates at 17-18.06 were fixed at H1Lumi ----- 2.1B 22.06 108822 8944 27.54 1.16 27.54 1.20 1.095 0.952 5.152 ----- at this time new timing was installed at H1 (H1CTRIG upgrade)- ----- H1 Main Magnet is ON ---------------------------------------- 3.1C 03.07 110407 8400 27.55 1.30 - - 1.066 0.955 - ----- at this time new FADC shifts installed at H1Lumi ------------- 4.1D 11.07 111538 10342 27.55 1.10 27.53 1.19 1.056 0.975 8.086 ----- at this time selection of G+M H1Runs was made for calibration- 5.1E 16.07 112624 19130 27.52 1.10 27.55 1.11 1.049 0.978 8.764 ----- at this time new FADC shifts installed at H1Lumi (PhotonArm)-- 6.2A 21.07 113524 26175 27.54 1.10 27.54 1.10 1.060 0.970 5.779 ----- at this time Huge rates at 27.07 were fixed at H1Lumi -------- 7.2B 27.07 114471 21627 27.54 1.17 27.54 1.23 1.040 0.982 6.704 8.2C 30.07 115049 14939 27.54 1.12 27.54 1.16 1.049 0.973 6.751 9.3A 12.08 116309 16291 27.54 1.11 27.54 1.26 1.044 0.974 6.744 10.3B 16.08 117655 14647 27.54 1.07 27.54 1.20 1.032 0.980 6.616 11.3C 18.08 118020 25134 27.54 1.07 27.54 1.06 1.035 0.985 6.603 12.3D 21.08 118504 26460 27.55 1.11 27.53 1.18 1.072 0.954 6.453 where 2 - sample 'name'; 3 - start day of data sample for calibration dd.mm; 4 - start H1Run of data sample for calibration; 5 - Number of ET&PD&nVC-events at Data Sample; 6 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum mean value(LOOK peak finder, bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm&|EVeto|<0.2GeV) - for ET&PD&nVC-sample; 7 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder,bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm&|EVeto|<0.2GeV) - for ET&PD&nVC-sample; 8 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder, bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm) - for ET&PD&VC-sample; 9 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder,bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm) - for ET&PD&VC-sample; 10 - Global Energy Shift factor for PD-channels; 11 - Global Energy Shift factor for ET-channels; 12 - CCvcs for data sample. P.S. All digits were produced with using of tools for H1Lumi Calibration. 28/08/95 =================== AJ === Lumi RUN# 815 Start - End of Run 815: 28/8/95 11:12:49 - 14:34:28 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:00:51 - 14:34:28 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 27.2, Ip= 53.27 Start lumi value: 2.72 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.4 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 176 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 183 e-pilot b. = 13, p-pilot b. = 7 HERA total lumi: 15.75 nb-1 HERA - physics: 12.17 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 7.14 nb-1 H1data - physics: 4.47 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 58 % , DT corr.: 61 % , Tot eff.: 36 % H1 Runs: 119525 - 119538 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 11:48 with L=2.777mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 12:10 with Lsp=0.406mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) AJ means A.Jacholkowska (Orsay team); 3) near 12:12 it was lost near 30% of e+beam 4) from 13:05 up to 14:28 it was switched on Free HERA Clock again (random trigger with average rate as HERA-clock - near 10MHz) for SPACAL-special Run writting. At this period Lumi values droped on 42% and H1Lumi Calibration was wrong (very wide peak at etrec+ +pdrec). It is needed to think about protection of H1Lumi OnLine Calibration from Free HERA Clock - if these Runs will be made again and again OnLine CC values can get some unrecoverable values and H1LumiCalibration will be impossible at future without intervention into OnLine CC-values setting etc. (it is bad). 5) after end of Lumi RUN# 815 it were dumped both beams(near 15:05) it was proclaimed "Injection Delayed. Restart about:". 29.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_815: H1Run 119535 spoiled. Lumi Run LR_815 included H1Runs 119525-119538. During most of these H1Runs, the sums Ee+Eg+Ev were OK. But at the end of this Lumi-run, at H1Run=119535, the sums Ee+Eg+Ev went down both for the Etag, and for the Et44. Here is a bit of log: 815 119529 sEtag: 890 62% 27.7 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 694 65% 25.8 +/- 2.9 815 119530 sEtag: 814 64% 27.5 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 451 59% 26.4 +/- 2.7 815 119531 sEtag: 760 62% 27.8 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 518 84% 25.3 +/- 4.0 815 119535 sEtag: 2464 23% 10.4 +/- 0.5 sEt44: 1663 26% 9.7 +/- 1.2 See also the PS to this Lumi Run at the Lumi Run Summary above. This story is the same as it was for Lumi_Run 809, see up. P.S. May be at case Run 119535 main influence on etrec+pdrec from Free HERA Clock involving (due to this Run was written during mentioned at comments to Lumi RUN#815 period from 13:23 up to 13:26. This Run is labeled at H1EP as "P"-quality - all is OK . (a.f.) 29.08.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#72: NO bank losses,OK. 29/08/95 =========== Igor V. Gorelov === Lumi RUN# 816 Start - End of Run 816: 28/8/95 21:34:52 - 6:33:45 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 22:10:17 - 6:33:45 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.86, Ip= 59.51 Start lumi value: 3.78 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 90.53 nb-1 HERA - physics: 85.12 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 79.34 nb-1 H1data - physics: 67.05 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 93 % , DT corr.: 84 % , Tot eff.: 78 % H1 Runs: 119618 - 119642 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 21:50 with L=4.990mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 02:10 with Lsp=0.553mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) Red Line at server for unix presented from 06:30 up to 09:30 when after intervention of Kleinwort connection was established (after lumiclient-process killing). 29.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_816: all Ee+Eg+Ev ~OK: LR# 815 NH1R= 4 Etag: 4928 23.35+/-1.05 Et44: 3326 21.80+/-2.70 LR# 816 NH1R= 20 Etag: 35982 27.53+/-1.35 Et44: 34733 26.06+/-3.42 Note: At LR# 815 Ee+Eg+Ev are lowered, see LLO message above, but at LR# 816 all is looking OK, all H1Runs are OK in this LR#. 29/08/95 --------- R. K. Griffiths --- Lumi RUN# 817 Start - End of Run 817: 29/8/95 8:08:55 - 8:14:17 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 8:14:10 - 8:14:17 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 11.4, Ip= 57.26 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 119646 - 119647 P.S. Soon after end of ramping significant part of e+beam was lost (26.79->11.45mA - 57%, at 08:05) and at 08:08 e+beam was dumped. 29.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Lumi = 4.990*10**30 cm-2sec-1 Yesterday at Start period of Lumi RUN# 816 it was fixed new record level of Current Luminosity value: 4.990*10*30 cm-2sec-1. Time slice of some parameters at this time (21:50 28.08.95): Ietotal = 31.45 mA Iptotal = 59.41 mA Lsp = 0.517 mkb-1sec-1mA-2 VCtotalRate = 828 kHz PDtotalRate = 313 kHz ETtotalRate = 234 kHz ET44totalRate = 132 kHz ET*PDtotalRate = 168 kHz rate = 3.83kHz rate = 16.88 kHz = -1.92cm = +0.39cm H1Run = 119619 29/08/95 ========= Konrad Rosenbauer === Lumi RUN# 818 Start - End of Run 818: 29/8/95 11:09:53 - 20:30:39 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:03:00 - 20:30:39 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.42, Ip= 56.79 Start lumi value: 3.33 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.42 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 68.77 nb-1 HERA - physics: 64.03 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 56.4 nb-1 H1data - physics: 49.73 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 87 % , DT corr.: 88 % , Tot eff.: 77 % H1 Runs: 119652 - 119692 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 11:21 with L=3.708mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 18:18 with Lsp=0.482mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) During this Lumi RUN it was crossed boundary 3.0 pb-1 of H1 Run Gated Integrated Luminosity: 3833.574 nb-1 - HERA Produced 3006.170 nb-1 - H1 Run Gated 2141.290 nb-1 - H1 Data Taken 29.08.1995 ================= H01GOG === Records,records,... It is really astonishing how many records were registered today! 1/ See A.F. message above. 2/ The biggest single H1Run Int.Luminosity, namely 17.502 nb-1 in run 119656. (Compare to 1994 record run 89256 with 17.899 nb-1). Both runs lasted ~2 hours. 3/ 106.8 nb-1 of Int.Luminosity were collected during this day. (Compare to 1994: 95.2 nb-1 on 18.09). P.S. (N.G.) All data given according to H1EP. 30.08.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_818,all H1R: Ee+Eg+Ev ~OK: LR# 818 NH1R= 19 Etag: 27754 27.50+/-1.17 Et44: 34684 25.92+/-3.06 30.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 8 LUMIMON data set (210-217). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (193209-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 118504-119642) From H1 Runs 118504-119642 it were selected: 77953 etpdnvc 194.9 Mbyte 77987 etpdvc 192.1 Mbyte 76391 s9291 ( 19575 s92 + 56792 s91 + 24 both) 192.0Mbyte 52041 et44vc 130.5 Mbyte 50874 s93 127.7 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M193217.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M193217.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M193217.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M193217.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M193217.C00 <-for V.Andreev and it were removed some intermediate data sets (193209-family) from IBM storage. 30/08/95 =================== H1KFOM === Free HERA Clock again Today during last phase of Lumi RUN# 819 it was switched on again Free HERA clock and only SPACAL was installed at some Runs into ReadOut (from H1 Run 119727 etc., from near 10:12 today).Specific Lumi 'jumped' from 0.551 to 0.322mkb-1sec-1mA-2 value (near 42% again). H1LumiOnLine Calibration again was disturbed. It is needed to wait again alarms from L4-histos at H1Runs after 119727. 30/08/95 ================= G. Villet === Lumi RUN# 819 Start - End of Run 819: 30/8/95 3:15:58 - 11:19:57 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:49:00 - 11:19:57 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.44, Ip= 53.31 Start lumi value: 2.86 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.44 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 59.29 nb-1 HERA - physics: 55.25 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 51.41 nb-1 H1data - physics: 41.73 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 92 % , DT corr.: 81 % , Tot eff.: 75 % H1 Runs: 119718 - 119727 P.S.Peak Lumi was fixed near 03:25 with L=3.068mkb-1sec-1. Peak SpecificLumi was fixed near 09:53 with Lsp=0.557mkb-1sec-1mA-2 2) free HERA clock at H1CTRIG from 10:12 -> Lumi was less on 42% H1LumiCalibration was disturbed again. 3) Really last H1Run which was recorded at this Lumi RUN is 119733 but after Run 119727 all branches (exept SPACAL) were off from ReadOut up to End of Lumi RUN so: H1 Runs: 119718 - 119733 <- corrected for this unique Lumi RUN 30.08.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#73: NO bank losses,OK. 30.08.1995 ====== L4H LR_819 H01LNS === ALARM at H1RUN=119727 (last). L4Histos for LR_819 were OK for all H1RUNs=119718-119726, but at the end of this Lumi-run, at H1Run=119727, ALARM was on Ee+Eg+Ev: 819 119718 sEtag: 1502 72% 27.5 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 1363 56% 26.1 +/- 2.5 819 119719 sEtag: 175 90% 27.6 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 150 88% 25.3 +/- 3.6 819 119720 sEtag: 8103 56% 27.5 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 8152 0% 8.7 +/- 1.5 819 119721 sEtag: 3832 55% 27.5 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 6353 66% 27.0 +/- 3.3 819 119723 sEtag: 4766 59% 27.4 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 7832 64% 26.1 +/- 3.0 819 119724 sEtag: 2030 67% 27.4 +/- 1.2 sEt44: 3574 67% 26.2 +/- 3.2 819 119725 sEtag: 335 72% 27.5 +/- 0.9 sEt44: 451 62% 26.5 +/- 2.8 819 119726 sEtag: 1070 75% 27.6 +/- 1.3 sEt44: 1334 72% 26.3 +/- 3.4 819 119727 sEtag:21813 60% 24.4 +/- 1.1 sEt44:29209 52% 21.4 +/- 2.6 See also the PS to this Lumi Run at the Lumi Run Summary above. This story is the same as it was for Lumi_Runs 809 & 815, see above. Using the shown N_of_H1RUNs, it is possible to make any corrections. 30.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Data Sets for Calibration... Today it was made selection of needed for calibration events from last 7 LUMIMON data set (218-224). It was made compression of earlier made data sets (193217-family) with new data sets (H1Runs 118504-119724) From H1 Runs 118504-119724 it were selected: 98043 etpdnvc 246.1 Mbyte 97998 etpdvc 243.6 Mbyte 97318 s9291 ( 25405 s92 + 71889 s91 + 24 both) 245.1Mbyte 74239 et44vc 187.1 Mbyte 64207 s93 161.4 Mbyte <- for V.Andreev It were moved into /acs/user/fomenko-pool next data sets: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M193224.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M193224.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M193224.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M193224.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M193224.C00 <-for V.Andreev and it were removed some intermediate data sets (193217-family) from /acs/user/fomenko - pool. 30.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Attempts of Recovering ..... Today during pause after Lumi RUN 819 it was made attempt to recover Monitor Counter (Tunnel Counter) behaivour between neighbour Lumi RUNs. As You remember after 21.08.95 switching off of Power Supply at 101 room rate of this counter became near 100 kHz during absence of positron beam at HERA (ordinary rate before 10-20 Hz). We had some interventions in this Rate between 12:30 and 13:00 today. You can see at history plots that at this period due to some touching, reconnection,attempts of thresholds changing the Rate of tunnel counter was changed from 60kHz up to 1 MHz (we cannot find any conditions with Rate less then 60 kHz). As seems something not good with signal itself (reason may be at cable connectors). S.Burov and me made all recommended by Egor steps - but best what we have 60 kHz (not 100kHz as before). 31/08/95 ============== V. Schroeder === Lumi RUN# 820 Start - End of Run 820: 30/8/95 18:23:38 - 4:28:41 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 19:03:35 - 4:28:41 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.28, Ip= 51.02 Start lumi value: 3.31 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.47 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 68.26 nb-1 HERA - physics: 65.48 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 55.16 nb-1 H1data - physics: 47.01 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 84 % , DT corr.: 85 % , Tot eff.: 71 % H1 Runs: 119766 - 119814 P.S. Near 23:48 it was fixed anti-spike at Ie total value (Specific Lumi had large value and Lumi - low value). 31.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 3E Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 119318-119724 data sample (3E).It were selected 60095 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at /acs/user/fomenko-pool: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M193224.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 57874 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M193224.C00 -C 14430 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M193224.C00 -C It were got 60095 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 23432 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.896 0.755 0.749 1.785 0.628 0.997 0.694 0.306 1.109 0.883 0.923 0.942 0.908 0.914 0.920 0.987 0.925 0.887 0.950 0.912 0.934 0.854 0.944 0.899 0.913 0.941 0.943 0.902 1.448 0.686 1.342 0.738 0.845 0.856 0.929 0.999 1.003 1.007 1.019 0.991 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.185 0.899 1.138 1.183 0.000 1.012 1.007 1.008 0.989 0.995 1.011 1.028 1.031 1.036 1.020 1.092 0.994 0.975 1.007 0.955 1.138 0.954 1.043 0.871 0.840 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.453 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 119318-119724 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 60K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.28 1.14 27.26 1.09 27.34 1.08 Runs 119318-119724 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 58K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.54 1.19 27.54 1.15 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 3D Sample clbr(see message from 26.08.95) CCvcs value was got from 3D sample clbr. (see message 26/08/95). (CCvcs start = 6.453 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 31.08.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 3E Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 3E sample with events from Runs 119318-119724: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R119318 (54434 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R119318 10313 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-5.014%) and not enough good resolution digits (30-31%) for (8-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R119318 59834 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R119318 57674 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.453 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 31.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 3E It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.05014 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9735 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.9600.So CCvcs =6.453*0.9600=6.195Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 119318-119724: Runs 119318-119724 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 60K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.10 Runs 119318-119724 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 59K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.13 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.353 4.386 4.416 5.484 4.920 4.292 5.068 5.273 3.038 5.696 6.494 3.920 5.320 4.966 6.728 5.579 5.948 6.049 6.067 5.905 5.857 6.140 4.736 6.370 4.782 6.530 5.906 4.561 6.528 3.742 4.070 4.809 4.408 4.344 4.729 e42= 4.286 4.303 4.322 4.295 4.313 4.282 4.285 p00= 2.209 2.550 1.246 2.157 2.904 1.541 2.606 3.316 2.570 1.664 2.414 3.526 3.278 3.039 2.506 3.488 2.900 3.216 2.436 2.333 p20= 2.394 2.005 2.600 2.537 2.906 vcs= 6.195 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 31.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 3E Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 3E.It were selected 43023 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 119318-119724 which are kept at data set at /acs/user/fomenko-pool: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M193224.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 43023 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 10293 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV1B, 2A->2B; b) due to timing changing (H1Ctrig Upgrade and H1Lumi timing tuning): 1B->1C, 1C->1D, 1E->2A; c) due to G+M H1Runs selection involving for calibration: 1D->1E; d) all another samples were fixed due to collection of reasonable statistics 2B,2C,3A,3B,3C,3D,3E; Short characteristics of each sample is seen from next table: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.1A 22.05 105252 13590 27.52 0.90 27.54 0.99 1.015 0.999 4.403 ----- H1 Main Magnet is Off ---------------------------------------- ----- at this time Huge rates at 17-18.06 were fixed at H1Lumi ----- 2.1B 22.06 108822 8944 27.54 1.16 27.54 1.20 1.095 0.952 5.152 ----- at this time new timing was installed at H1 (H1CTRIG upgrade)- ----- H1 Main Magnet is ON ---------------------------------------- 3.1C 03.07 110407 8400 27.55 1.30 - - 1.066 0.955 - ----- at this time new FADC shifts installed at H1Lumi ------------- 4.1D 11.07 111538 10342 27.55 1.10 27.53 1.19 1.056 0.975 8.086 ----- at this time selection of G+M H1Runs was made for calibration- 5.1E 16.07 112624 19130 27.52 1.10 27.55 1.11 1.049 0.978 8.764 ----- at this time new FADC shifts installed at H1Lumi (PhotonArm)-- 6.2A 21.07 113524 26175 27.54 1.10 27.54 1.10 1.060 0.970 5.779 ----- at this time Huge rates at 27.07 were fixed at H1Lumi -------- 7.2B 27.07 114471 21627 27.54 1.17 27.54 1.23 1.040 0.982 6.704 8.2C 30.07 115049 14939 27.54 1.12 27.54 1.16 1.049 0.973 6.751 9.3A 12.08 116309 16291 27.54 1.11 27.54 1.26 1.044 0.974 6.744 10.3B 16.08 117655 14647 27.54 1.07 27.54 1.20 1.032 0.980 6.616 11.3C 18.08 118020 25134 27.54 1.07 27.54 1.06 1.035 0.985 6.603 12.3D 21.08 118504 26460 27.55 1.11 27.53 1.18 1.072 0.954 6.453 13.3E 26.08 119318 60095 27.54 1.10 27.54 1.13 1.050 0.974 6.195 where 2 - sample 'name'; 3 - start day of data sample for calibration dd.mm; 4 - start H1Run of data sample for calibration; 5 - Number of ET&PD&nVC-events at Data Sample; 6 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum mean value(LOOK peak finder, bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm&|EVeto|<0.2GeV) - for ET&PD&nVC-sample; 7 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder,bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm&|EVeto|<0.2GeV) - for ET&PD&nVC-sample; 8 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder, bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm) - for ET&PD&VC-sample; 9 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder,bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm) - for ET&PD&VC-sample; 10 - Global Energy Shift factor for PD-channels; 11 - Global Energy Shift factor for ET-channels; 12 - CCvcs for data sample. P.S. All digits were produced with using of tools for H1Lumi Calibration. 2) 13th is last OffLine Calibration which I made at DESY. I hope that it will be possible to make next steps from Moscow as it was made at 94 year (not so quickly as at DESY but in principle possible as previous experience shows). 31.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Files ...................... Today I moved all collected at DESY IBM files with selected for H1LumiCalibration events into /acs/user/fomenko/-pool. So there are 5 families of data sets for calibration. Selection of S93-events was made due to asking from Vova Andreev (after 122nd LUMIMON). Digits after letter M at data set name mean first and last LUMIMON data set number used for selection for this data set: 6274 - selected events from LUMIMON 62nd up to LUMIMON 74th etc. 1A-samples (H1Runs 105252-106757, 22.05-01.06) H1KFOM.ET44VC.M6274.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M6274.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M6274.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M6274.C00 1B,1C,1D,1E,2A-samples (H1Runs 108341-114415, 18.06-26.07) H1KFOM.ET44VC.M83136.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83136.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M83136.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M83136.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M122136.C00 <-(from H1Run 113239, 20.07-26.07) 2B and 2C-samples (H1Runs 114415-116309, 26.07-08.08) H1KFOM.ET44VC.M137162.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137162.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M137162.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M137162.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M137162.C00 3A,3B,3C-samples (H1Runs 116309-118504, 08.08-21.08) H1KFOM.ET44VC.M163192.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163192.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M163192.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M163192.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M163192.C00 3D and 3E samples (H1Runs 118504-119724, 21.08-30.08) H1KFOM.ET44VC.M193224.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M193224.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M193224.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M193224.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M193224.C00 31.08.1995 ====== L4H LR_820 H01LNS === WARNING H1RUN=119814 (last). L4Histos for LR_820 were OK for all H1RUNs=119769-119813, but at the end of this Lumi-run, at H1Run=119814, Ee+Eg+Ev got lower, up to 22.8 GeV. This is again like for the LRuns 809,815,819. The effect is looking not so strong, nevertheless, it is strange. 31.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === More Wide Recommended Today I found some note near H1Lumi MacII. At this note it was explained that 30.08 it was decided (Ph.Biddulph and HERA crew) that recommended are between -2.0 and 0.0 cm (not -2.0 and -1.0 cm as it was recommended earlier). They asked to make some update at H1Lumi and HERA_client application where recommended values are reflected at some windows. 31.08.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Red line at unix-server Today I was called by V.Schroeder who is Lumi/Calo person at current H1ShiftCrew - he said that more then 1 hour - red line at window for unix-server. Really 'shlu' and 'xshlu' tools show status 16:50. I recommended to call Gerhards or Kleinwort to kill lumiclient process. But 'xshlu -f' tool is working and show fresh data. As seems 'xshlu -f' tool gets information without unix-server good operation at H1Lumi MacII (has another source of data?). 01/09/95 ============= K. Rosenbauer === Lumi RUN# 821 Start - End of Run 821: 31/8/95 15:17:12 - 1:42:32 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:53:20 - 1:42:32 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.1, Ip= 48.41 Start lumi value: 3.2 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.43 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 64.96 nb-1 HERA - physics: 63.1 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 54.43 nb-1 H1data - physics: 49.29 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 86 % , DT corr.: 90 % , Tot eff.: 77 % H1 Runs: 119879 - 119908 P.S.(N.G.) According to Usik's run-summaries on dice2 next max values were achieved: L = 3.62*10**30 cm-2s-1 Lsp = 5.11*10**29 cm-2s-1mkA-2 01/09/95 ============= K. Rosenbauer === Lumi RUN# 822 Start - End of Run 822: 1/9/95 3:52:22 - 10:01:23 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:10:56 - 10:01:23 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.61, Ip= 42.58 Start lumi value: 1.91 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.4 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 31.23 nb-1 HERA - physics: 27.3 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 21.05 nb-1 H1data - physics: 18.02 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 76 % , DT corr.: 85 % , Tot eff.: 65 % H1 Runs: 119908 - 119922 P.S.(N.G.) According to Usik's run-summaries on dice2 next max values were achieved: L = 2.11*10**30 cm-2s-1 Lsp = 4.45*10**29 cm-2s-1mkA-2 01.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#74: NO bank losses,OK. 01.09.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_821: OK for all H1Runs: LR# 821 NH1R= 13 Etag: 22380 27.44+/-1.19 Et44: 20724 23.32+/-2.75 01.09.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_822: OK for all H1Runs: LR# 822 NH1R= 8 Etag: 11341 27.33+/-1.19 Et44: 13435 25.73+/-3.04 01/09/95 ============== S. Movsesian === Lumi RUN# 823 Start - End of Run 823: 1/9/95 14:10:47 - 16:41:38 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 14:31:18 - 16:41:38 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.42, Ip= 64.89 Start lumi value: 3.53 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.33 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 36.4 nb-1 HERA - physics: 32.27 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 12.41 nb-1 H1data - physics: 5.52 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 38 % , DT corr.: 44 % , Tot eff.: 17 % H1 Runs: 119979 - 120004 01.09.1995 ================= H01GOG === LH1R/LH1T banks in DB In the evening 31.08 L.Criegee changed the database s/w in the RunEnd job (TCL-job). As a result, Lumi banks LH1R and Lh1T were not written into the DB. The error in the s/w was discovered only next morning and changed back into the old version. Ralf Gerhards claimed that only Lumi banks were affected. The run-range was 119890-119919. I have recovered these banks from the corresponding TCL-tape and put them into the DB. 02.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Wrong Timing at H1Lumi(H1?) Today morning I was called by H1ShiftCrew with problem of absence BeamPosition Monitoring at H1Lumi (all another facilities as seems worked). Problem started with H1 Slow Control upgrade (VIC-inserting), after this it was found that prescale factors which are ordinary are kept at H1 SlowControl Crate DPM-module are not working. After some attempts to alive H1CTRIG it was decided to make step back - return to old release of program. After this at Luminosity subbranch and at Photoproduction subbranch of H1Lumi it was shifted PipeLine Delay on 20 nsec. L4 histos with energy sums show shift into low direction. Pictures at "NewFastLumiMonitor_95"-SuperCard project show shift on 20 nsec. I put (by hand) new FADC shifts for ET,PD,ET44 at Luminosity subbranch and starting from H1Run 120087 new FADC-shifts for ET,PD,ET44 and NC. It was found that CCet2 was put into unrecoverable level again (as 28 July)- so from middle of H1Run 120087 I put (by hand) new value (as seems reasonable) of CCet2 (from 1.8->3.4 at NewFastLumi Monitor95-SuperCard project). So after this 2 manipulation H1Lumi is OK. But problem as seems exists at another branches of H1. For any case: for Lumi subbranch: a) default values of FADC-shifts: ET - $93, PD - $5B, ET44 -$8A b) new values of FADC-shifts: ET - $95, PD - $5D, ET44 -$8C For any case: for Photoproduction Branch: a) default values of FADC-shifts: ET - $C3, PD - $8A, ET44 -$BA, NC - $88 b) new values of FADC-shifts: ET - $C5, PD - $8C, ET44 -$BC, NC - $8A It was made agreement with H1 Run Coordinator that we shall keep old releases of FICs programs under WatchDog application (it is possible to make come back to old release and default values of FADC shifts with Reboot both FICs procedures). Update of FADC shifts on new values will be made from MPW Shell application from menu item. Each time after operation of WatchDog-application it will be needed to make update of FADC-shifts. As seems it is temporary situation due to John Couglahn is called and (I hope) he will make 'Return to Old Timing at H1' which existed up to last changing. P.S. Nothing was made for making of 'Update of FADC shifts on new values'-tool due to problem was resolved earlier - see next message. 02.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Problem of Timing is Solved Starting from H1Run 120089 all is OK with timing at H1Lumi and H1 - it was found that HERA Clock synchronisation was instaled on e-beam. After changing syncronizattoon on p-beam and rebooting of both H1Lumi FICs (back to default values) all is OK. 02/09/95 ============== V. Schroeder === Lumi RUN# 824 Start - End of Run 824: 1/9/95 18:11:45 - 5:21:33 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:31:47 - 5:21:33 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 12.44, Ip= 64.66 Start lumi value: 1.78 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.18 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 41.64 nb-1 HERA - physics: 40.1 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 10.59 nb-1 H1data - physics: 9.08 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 26 % , DT corr.: 84 % , Tot eff.: 22 % H1 Runs: 120004 - 120067 02/09/95 ============== V. Schroeder === Lumi RUN# 825 Start - End of Run 825: 2/9/95 8:39:26 - 15:13:35 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 9:17:39 - 15:13:35 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.64, Ip= 59.70 Start lumi value: 3.35 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.35 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 56.97 nb-1 HERA - physics: 53.21 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 45.3 nb-1 H1data - physics: 36.81 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 84 % , DT corr.: 81 % , Tot eff.: 69 % H1 Runs: 120077 - 120103 P.S.(N.G.) According to Usik's run-summaries on dice2 next max values were achieved: L = 3.61*10**30 cm-2s-1 Lsp = 3.81*10**29 cm-2s-1mkA-2 03/09/95 ================ A.Panitch === Lumi RUN# 826 Start - End of Run 826: 2/9/95 18:29:47 - 6:02:59 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 18:55:30 - 6:02:59 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.73, Ip= 57.65 Start lumi value: 4.48 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.49 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 95.31 nb-1 HERA - physics: 93.36 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 86.79 nb-1 H1data - physics: 75.61 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 92 % , DT corr.: 87 % , Tot eff.: 80 % H1 Runs: 120112 - 120139 P.S.(N.G.) According to Usik's run-summaries on dice2 next max values were achieved: L = 4.48*10**30 cm-2s-1 Lsp = 5.01*10**29 cm-2s-1mkA-2 03/09/95 =================== P.Bruel === Lumi RUN# 827 Start - End of Run 827: 3/9/95 9:41:51 - 13:17:21 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 10:28:08 - 13:17:21 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.2, Ip= 56.22 Start lumi value: 3.34 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.39 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 34.69 nb-1 HERA - physics: 28.77 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 25.62 nb-1 H1data - physics: 16.71 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 88 % , DT corr.: 64 % , Tot eff.: 57 % H1 Runs: 120142 - 120151 P.S.(N.G.) According to Usik's run-summaries on dice2 next max values were achieved: L = 3.74*10**30 cm-2s-1 Lsp = 4.03*10**29 cm-2s-1mkA-2 03.09.1995 ================= H01GOG === poor data... The data taken during Lumi runs 823(all), 824(all) and 825(till H1-run 120089) is poor, because of CT and timing problems. For details see messages of A.F. and run-coordinator's report. 03.09.1995 ================= H01GOG === missing banks in DB For the run 120138 no LH1R/LH1T banks were written in DB. I have recovered these banks from the corresponding TCL-tape and put them into the DB. 04/09/95 ============== S. Movsesian === Lumi RUN# 828 Start - End of Run 828: 3/9/95 19:25:24 - 6:09:04 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 19:55:29 - 6:09:04 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 34.1, Ip= 59.56 Start lumi value: 4.58 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.46 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 103.06 nb-1 HERA - physics: 98.34 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 90.91 nb-1 H1data - physics: 77.01 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 92 % , DT corr.: 84 % , Tot eff.: 78 % H1 Runs: 120171 - 120197 04.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#75: NO bank losses,OK. 04.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#76: NO bank losses,OK. 04.09.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_823: OK for all H1Runs: LR# 823 NH1R= 5 Etag: 1086 27.66+/-1.29 Et44: 680 25.46+/-3.44 04.09.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_824: WARNING: LR# 823 For all the H1Runs NO entries for L4Histo of Ee+Eg+Ev. 04.09.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_825-828 OK for all H1Runs: LR# 825 NH1R= 9 Etag: 18082 27.21+/-1.13 Et44: 15500 25.76+/-3.11 LR# 826 NH1R= 17 Etag: 45998 27.42+/-1.12 Et44: 53695 24.41+/-2.71 LR# 827 NH1R= 7 Etag: 13783 27.46+/-1.19 Et44: 17498 25.27+/-3.14 LR# 828 NH1R= 18 Etag: 50781 27.38+/-1.19 Et44: 71086 26.05+/-3.22 05.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#77: NO bank losses, OK. 06.09.1995 ================= F11LEV === H1Run Quality at H1DataBase A list of G-M-P runs for 1995 is updated in the master database (IBM). It includes all permanent H1 runs until 120617 inclusively. 06/09/95 ================ D. Zarbock === Lumi RUN# 829 Start - End of Run 829: 6/9/95 8:55:27 - 17:41:14 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 11:42:30 - 17:41:14 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.38, Ip= 62.45 Start lumi value: 0.05 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.01 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 48.82 nb-1 HERA - physics: 48.77 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 33.9 nb-1 H1data - physics: 28.21 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 69 % , DT corr.: 82 % , Tot eff.: 57 % H1 Runs: 120591 - 120650 06/09/95 =================== K.Golec === Lumi RUN# 830 Start - End of Run 830: 6/9/95 23:17:37 - 23:48:28 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:48:22 - 23:48:28 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.5, Ip= 66.12 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 3.39 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 120671 - 120671 07/09/95 =================== K.Golec === Lumi RUN# 831 Start - End of Run 831: 7/9/95 1:14:03 - 8:19:03 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:55:02 - 8:19:03 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.45, Ip= 65.86 Start lumi value: 4.18 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.4 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 80.46 nb-1 HERA - physics: 78.52 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 67.56 nb-1 H1data - physics: 47.76 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 85 % , DT corr.: 70 % , Tot eff.: 60 % H1 Runs: 120676 - 120704 07.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#78: NO bank losses, OK. 07.09.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_829: OK for all H1Runs: LR# 829 NH1R= 29 Etag: 23568 27.53+/-1.19 Et44: 33994 25.69+/-2.97 07.09.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_830: 0 nb-1 for physics 07.09.1995 ====== L4H ====== H01LNS === LR_831: OK for all H1Runs: LR# 831 NH1R= 10 Etag: 21986 27.49+/-1.20 Et44: 17826 25.65+/-3.46 07.09.1995 ================= F11LEV === LUMIMON-260 missing ......... A file HERA01.H01.LUMIMON.C9500260 is missing on dice in /asc/data/95/spec directory. The previous and following files are there and OK. P.S. The reason was time limit stop while copying from dice1 to dice2. Thanks to Jan Olsson, the file was transferred from dice1 to IBM directly. Ralf Gerhards will take care on copying the file to dice2 when he arrives. 08/09/95 =================== P.Bruel === Lumi RUN# 832 Start - End of Run 832: 7/9/95 23:33:46 - 1:15:00 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:10:50 - 1:15:00 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.94, Ip= 72.51 Start lumi value: 4.91 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 27.27 nb-1 HERA - physics: 23.43 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 17.23 nb-1 H1data - physics: 11.5 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 73 % , DT corr.: 66 % , Tot eff.: 48 % H1 Runs: 120805 - 120812 P.S. (S.L.) According to A.Usik's tool, showing LUMI history, there was a record instanteneous lumi achieved around 23:50 : L = 5.30*10^30 cm-2s-1. A high lumi > 5*10^30 was seen for more than hour. There was also a record p-current in this Lumi Run. 09/09/95 =================== P.Bruel === Lumi RUN# 833 Start - End of Run 833: 8/9/95 21:52:31 - 7:43:50 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 22:28:16 - 7:43:50 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.1, Ip= 73.40 Start lumi value: 4.88 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.41 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 101.02 nb-1 HERA - physics: 100.23 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 80.52 nb-1 H1data - physics: 63.39 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 80 % , DT corr.: 78 % , Tot eff.: 63 % H1 Runs: 120905 - 120959 09/09/95 ================ A.Panitch === Lumi RUN# 834 Start - End of Run 834: 9/9/95 17:24:35 - 17:31:18 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:31:09 - 17:31:18 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.3, Ip= 54.71 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 121004 - 121004 10/09/95 ================ D.Zarbock === Lumi RUN# 835 Start - End of Run 835: 10/9/95 0:29:39 - 10:54:06 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:07:59 - 10:54:06 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.2, Ip= 65.52 Start lumi value: 4.43 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.42 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 100.64 nb-1 HERA - physics: 99.54 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 84.66 nb-1 H1data - physics: 69.55 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 84 % , DT corr.: 82 % , Tot eff.: 69 % H1 Runs: 121050 - 121087 10/09/95 ================ M.Dirkmann === Lumi RUN# 836 Start - End of Run 836: 10/9/95 16:16:17 - 20:13:20 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:45:42 - 20:13:20 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.17, Ip= 56.97 Start lumi value: 4.09 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.44 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 46.65 nb-1 HERA - physics: 44.54 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 39.9 nb-1 H1data - physics: 28.95 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 89 % , DT corr.: 72 % , Tot eff.: 64 % H1 Runs: 121155 - 121168 11/09/95 =============== M.Fleischer === Lumi RUN# 837 Start - End of Run 837: 11/9/95 3:19:58 - 5:06:17 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:50:16 - 5:06:17 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.66, Ip= 53.51 Start lumi value: 3.28 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.39 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 17.07 nb-1 HERA - physics: 14.3 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 10.11 nb-1 H1data - physics: 8 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 70 % , DT corr.: 78 % , Tot eff.: 55 % H1 Runs: 121179 - 121187 11/09/95 =============== M.Fleischer === Lumi RUN# 838 Start - End of Run 838: 11/9/95 6:48:10 - 6:52:48 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 6:52:40 - 6:52:48 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.81, Ip= 53.28 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 121188 - 121188 11.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_832-837 OK for ALL H1Runs: LR# 832 NH1R= 6 Etag: 10549 27.72+/-1.38 Et44: 9727 25.24+/-3.58 LR# 833 NH1R= 27 Etag: 35978 27.69+/-1.26 Et44: 24504 24.01+/-3.02 LR# 835 NH1R= 17 Etag: 34734 27.57+/-1.18 Et44: 51517 24.83+/-2.84 LR# 836 NH1R= 11 Etag: 18166 27.58+/-1.26 Et44: 9232 24.49+/-2.96 LR# 837 NH1R= 6 Etag: 14516 27.78+/-1.28 Et44: 7312 25.14+/-2.77 NOTES: LR# 834 0 nb-1 for physics LR# 836 warning: in LLO written "835" instead of "836" 11/09/95 =============== S. Willard === Lumi RUN# 839 Start - End of Run 839: 11/9/95 12:30:13 - 20:33:59 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 13:13:17 - 20:33:59 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.76, Ip= 64.10 Start lumi value: 4.12 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.43 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 78.63 nb-1 HERA - physics: 75.42 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 63.61 nb-1 H1data - physics: 58.31 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 84 % , DT corr.: 91 % , Tot eff.: 77 % H1 Runs: 121236 - 121261 12.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#79: NO bank losses, OK. 12.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#80: NO bank losses, OK. 12.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#81: NO bank losses, OK. 12.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_839: OK for ALL H1Runs: LR# 839 NH1R= 15 Etag: 20164 27.65+/-1.20 Et44: 11868 25.88+/-3.15 12/09/95 ================ S. Willard === Lumi RUN# 840 Start - End of Run 840: 12/9/95 15:38:15 - 20:46:11 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:08:28 - 20:46:11 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.8, Ip= 46.95 Start lumi value: 3.02 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.39 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 45.18 nb-1 HERA - physics: 41.81 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 32.31 nb-1 H1data - physics: 20.61 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 77 % , DT corr.: 63 % , Tot eff.: 49 % H1 Runs: 121449 - 121478 13/09/95 ================ M.Dirkmann === Lumi RUN# 841 Start - End of Run 841: 13/9/95 1:16:39 - 1:33:43 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 1:33:33 - 1:33:43 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.2, Ip= 46.09 Start lumi value: 0 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 121483 - 121483 13.09.1995 ================= F11LEV === LUMI banks missing in DB..... Since LUMI RUN 840 onwards there are no Lumi banks in the database. Last information written to DB was for the run 121262. The reason is unknown. Lutz Criegee is investigating. H1TCL file with these last runs is not yet ready on dice, so one has to wait with the offline recovering job. 13.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_840: OK for ALL H1Runs: LR# 840 NH1R= 20 Etag: 18983 27.63+/-1.24 Et44: 10940 25.03+/-3.40 13/09/95 ================= A.Semenov === Lumi RUN# 842 Start - End of Run 842: 13/9/95 7:54:20 - 17:04:10 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 8:24:21 - 17:04:10 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.9, Ip= 44.29 Start lumi value: 3.8 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.52 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 67.65 nb-1 HERA - physics: 63.87 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 57.77 nb-1 H1data - physics: 52.01 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 90 % , DT corr.: 89 % , Tot eff.: 81 % H1 Runs: 121491 - 121542 14.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_842: OK for ALL H1Runs: LR# 842 NH1R= 25 Etag: 20672 27.64+/-1.22 Et44: 23529 25.90+/-3.09 14.09.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#82: There is no #82. Why? Whom this question is addressed to? The right people to ask are: Jan Ollson, C.Kleinwort, R.Gerhards. They usually do not read our internal information (LLO). (S.Lev.) 14.09.1995 ================= H01GOG === TCL-82 For everybody who is interested: TCL-82 tape exists on IBM. See HERA03.H01.H1TCL.C95000xx. 15.09.1995 ================= F11LEV === LUMI banks missing in DB..... It was found, that the reason for the missing LUMI banks in the DB is corrupted online TCL job on dice: for unknown reason the call to our s/r LH1RU was commented out. Since there were several changes in this job made simultaneousely (e.g. to fix Fwd.Tracker info prob- lem) it will take some time, until experts fix this properly. Therefore, for some time LH1R/LH1T banks will be created offline from H1TCL files. This means that a typical delay of 1-2 days is possible, which as a concequence will cause the same delay in LUMIMON data processing by #LMONI job of Nelly Gogitidze. And of course, LUMI data in WWW will also be 1-2 days late. Nothing else in a standard LUMI chain analysis should be affected. 15.09.1995 ================= H01GOG === TCL-83 Tape HERA03.H01.H1TCL.C9500083 exists on IBM (thanks to J.Olsson) 17.09.1995 ================= F11LEV === Online TCL job is OK ........ Online TCL job seems to run again correctly (as far as LUMI data is concerned). LH1R/LH1T banks in DB are all there. 17/09/95 ================ A.Semenov === Lumi RUN# 843 Start - End of Run 843: 16/9/95 23:45:06 - 3:17:24 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:24:07 - 3:17:24 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 11.69, Ip= 65.53 Start lumi value: 1.67 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.45 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 16.91 nb-1 HERA - physics: 15.5 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 12.23 nb-1 H1data - physics: 8.11 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 78 % , DT corr.: 65 % , Tot eff.: 51 % H1 Runs: 121967 - 121996 17/09/95 ================ A.Semenov === Lumi RUN# 844 Start - End of Run 844: 17/9/95 4:57:55 - 8:37:25 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 8:37:17 - 8:37:25 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.63, Ip= 64.13 Start lumi value: 3.14 mkb-1 s-1 , Sp.lumi: 0.35 mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 31.24 nb-1 HERA - physics: 27.99 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 121998 - 122015 17/09/95 ================== T.Kurca === Lumi RUN# 845 Start - End of Run 845: 17/9/95 12:50:15 - 18:18:10 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 13:23:12 - 18:18:10 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.73, Ip= 62.63 max lumi value, (last record): 3.501, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.512, (0.546) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 51.69 nb-1 HERA - physics: 50.29 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 42.03 nb-1 H1data - physics: 21.87 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 83 % , DT corr.: 51 % , Tot eff.: 43 % H1 Runs: 122022 - 122054 17/09/95 ================ M.Dirkmann === Lumi RUN# 846 Start - End of Run 846: 17/9/95 19:31:22 - 22:32:18 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 22:30:01 - 22:32:18 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 24.85, Ip= 61.80 max lumi value, (last record): 3.324, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.436, (0.546) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 26.77 nb-1 HERA - physics: 21.82 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 122054 - 122056 18/09/95 ================ A.Semenov === Lumi RUN# 847 Start - End of Run 847: 18/9/95 4:27:27 - 13:13:59 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 4:56:20 - 13:13:59 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 25.36, Ip= 66.71 max lumi value, (last record): 4.069, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.524, (0.546) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 76.03 nb-1 HERA - physics: 75.37 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 68.59 nb-1 H1data - physics: 63.56 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 90 % , DT corr.: 92 % , Tot eff.: 84 % H1 Runs: 122071 - 122096 18.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_843-847 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 843 NH1R= 9 Etag: 6592 27.82+/-1.20 Et44: 6216 26.01+/-3.10 LR# 844 No entries for L4Histo LR# 845 NH1R= 17 Etag: 15393 27.64+/-1.20 Et44: 15143 25.76+/-3.34 LR# 846 No entries for L4Histo LR# 847 NH1R= 20 Etag: 29126 27.62+/-1.19 Et44: 23883 26.28+/-3.10 18/09/95 =================== D.Lueke === Lumi RUN# 848 Start - End of Run 848: 18/9/95 16:43:10 - 17:53:15 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:53:02 - 17:53:15 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.7, Ip= 63.90 max lumi value, (last record): 3.495, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.423, (0.546) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 9.68 nb-1 HERA - physics: 4.84 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 122115 - 122117 19/09/95 =================== D.Lueke === Lumi RUN# 849 Start - End of Run 849: 18/9/95 21:22:06 - 1:50:38 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:50:58 - 1:50:38 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32, Ip= 60.67 max lumi value, (last record): 4.924, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.514, (0.546) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 55.39 nb-1 HERA - physics: 51.9 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 46.06 nb-1 H1data - physics: 29.87 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 88 % , DT corr.: 64 % , Tot eff.: 57 % H1 Runs: 122128 - 122138 19/09/95 ================= A.Semenov === Lumi RUN# 850 Start - End of Run 850: 19/9/95 4:08:17 - 11:40:25 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 4:41:26 - 11:40:25 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 20.24, Ip= 59.44 max lumi value, (last record): 2.62, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.444, (0.546) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 42.39 nb-1 HERA - physics: 40.21 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 35.59 nb-1 H1data - physics: 25.4 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 88 % , DT corr.: 71 % , Tot eff.: 63 % H1 Runs: 122140 - 122155 P.S. (S.L.) During this run a LUMIMON-300 file was written. Thus last 100 LUMIMON files were collected for ~1 month. It can be extrapolated to ~500 LUMIMON files till the end of LUMI-95 (end of November?). 20% more than expected 19/09/95 =================== T.Kurca === Lumi RUN# 851 Start - End of Run 851: 19/9/95 16:16:24 - 16:23:38 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:23:21 - 16:23:38 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 2.31, Ip= 57.05 max lumi value, (last record): 0, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0, (0.546) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 122174 - 122174 20/09/95 =================== T.Kurca === Lumi RUN# 852 Start - End of Run 852: 19/9/95 17:56:19 - 3:21:39 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 18:26:30 - 3:21:39 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.05, Ip= 56.97 max lumi value, (last record): 4.718, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.505, (0.546) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 77.75 nb-1 HERA - physics: 73.65 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 67.39 nb-1 H1data - physics: 50.42 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 91 % , DT corr.: 74 % , Tot eff.: 68 % H1 Runs: 122206 - 122238 20.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_848-852 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 848 No Physics Lumi LR# 849 NH1R= 8 Etag: 20251 27.58+/-1.24 Et44: 28588 26.17+/-3.35 LR# 850 NH1R= 9 Etag: 11878 27.50+/-1.18 Et44: 16099 24.98+/-3.03 LR# 851 No Physics Lumi LR# 852 NH1R= 19 Etag: 24394 27.52+/-1.21 Et44: 39010 26.15+/-3.34 20.09.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 3F Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 119724-120198 data sample (3F).It were selected 71004 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M225254.C00 K42833 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 71964 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M225254.C00 K42887 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 19931 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M225254.C00 K42850 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were got 71004 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 29844 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.895 0.747 0.764 1.633 0.622 0.000 0.790 0.315 1.050 0.879 0.866 0.887 0.863 0.964 0.924 0.985 0.914 0.929 0.932 0.930 0.906 0.859 0.948 0.925 0.902 0.959 0.939 0.918 1.425 0.691 1.358 0.722 0.824 0.871 0.915 1.000 1.006 1.006 1.016 0.990 0.999 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.231 0.888 1.158 1.191 0.890 0.975 1.060 0.977 1.058 1.039 0.996 1.014 1.029 1.023 1.049 1.070 1.002 0.978 1.038 0.959 1.143 0.837 0.964 0.865 0.838 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.195 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 119724-120168 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 71K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.27 1.12 27.27 1.08 27.34 1.10 Runs 119724-120168 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 72K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.29 1.16 27.28 1.13 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 3E Sample clbr(see message from 31.08.95) CCvcs value was got from 3E sample clbr. (see message 31/08/95). (CCvcs start = 6.195 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 20.09.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 3F Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 3F sample with events from Runs 119724-120198: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R119724 (65985 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R119724 14424 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.35%) and enough reasonable resolution digits (24-26%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R119724 70750 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R119724 71771 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.195 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 20.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 3F It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0435 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9775 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.0700.So CCvcs =6.195*1.0700=6.629Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 119724-120198: Runs 119724-120198 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 71K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.11 Runs 119724-120198 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 72K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.15 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.359 4.401 4.515 5.177 4.918 4.292 5.071 5.309 3.059 5.415 6.212 3.619 4.999 5.460 6.690 5.515 5.963 6.191 6.055 6.032 5.487 6.119 4.680 6.567 4.681 6.501 5.963 4.589 6.444 3.845 4.046 4.841 4.425 4.576 4.733 e42= 4.288 4.319 4.316 4.304 4.313 4.283 4.285 p00= 2.243 2.432 1.224 2.155 2.904 1.527 2.724 3.239 2.782 1.635 2.344 3.499 3.350 3.012 2.553 3.410 2.885 3.221 2.475 2.315 p20= 2.439 1.784 2.430 2.544 2.907 vcs= 6.629 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 20.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 3F Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 3F.It were selected 68494 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 119724-120198 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M225254.C00 K42963 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 68494 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 15899 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.901 0.740 0.766 1.772 0.641 0.995 0.806 0.297 0.994 0.808 0.876 0.858 0.813 0.931 0.921 0.966 0.911 0.887 0.895 0.911 0.860 0.852 0.938 0.910 0.897 0.933 0.917 0.890 1.461 0.688 1.180 0.704 0.808 0.883 0.897 0.000 1.014 1.010 1.134 0.966 0.998 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.178 0.948 1.082 1.153 0.888 1.030 1.023 1.033 1.053 1.027 1.019 1.029 1.038 1.027 1.036 1.115 1.025 0.998 1.052 0.995 1.140 0.849 0.976 0.907 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.629 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 120594-121497 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 74K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.27 1.15 27.28 1.10 27.35 1.10 Runs 120594-121497 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 77K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.57 1.24 27.54 1.19 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 3F Sample clbr(see message from 20.09.95) CCvcs value was got from 3F sample clbr. (see message 20/09/95). (CCvcs start = 6.629 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 22.09.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 4A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 4A sample with events from Runs 120594-121497: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R120594 (62910 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R120594 10952 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-2.50%) and enough reasonable resolution digits (25-26%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R120594 73341 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R120594 76334 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.629 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 22.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 4A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0250 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9923 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.9450.So CCvcs =6.629*0.9450=6.264Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 120594-121497: Runs 120594-121497 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 74K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.11 Runs 120594-121497 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 77K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.16 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.368 4.402 4.522 5.678 5.027 4.293 5.074 5.355 2.776 5.438 5.992 3.555 4.833 5.423 6.830 5.502 5.905 6.087 5.769 5.790 5.256 6.169 4.638 6.559 4.691 6.188 5.805 4.532 6.585 3.839 3.475 4.878 4.430 4.583 4.720 e42= 4.288 4.354 4.338 4.819 4.207 4.279 4.285 p00= 2.206 2.607 1.241 2.157 2.906 1.599 2.666 3.406 2.821 1.606 2.393 3.637 3.310 3.182 2.537 3.497 2.975 3.333 2.532 2.311 p20= 2.428 1.799 2.407 2.573 2.907 vcs= 6.264 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 22.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 4A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 4A.It were selected 57337 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 120594-121497 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M255284.C00 K43349 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 57337 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 12444 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.908 0.730 0.772 1.658 0.643 0.000 0.820 0.289 0.994 0.822 0.866 0.866 0.795 0.848 0.873 1.008 0.898 0.909 0.896 0.887 0.855 0.870 0.915 0.916 0.892 0.936 0.919 0.901 1.472 0.660 1.258 0.678 0.792 0.850 0.867 0.000 1.009 1.016 1.141 0.966 0.998 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.180 0.960 0.958 1.141 0.000 1.021 1.076 0.994 1.042 1.026 1.019 1.025 1.034 1.039 1.028 1.086 1.002 1.013 1.039 0.976 1.134 0.882 0.933 0.902 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.264 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 121497-122735 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 77K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.25 1.14 27.25 1.09 27.32 1.09 Runs 121497-122735 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 83K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.38 1.20 27.37 1.15 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 4A Sample clbr(see message from 22.09.95) CCvcs value was got from 4A sample clbr. (see message 22/09/95). (CCvcs start = 6.264 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 25.09.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 4B Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 4B sample with events from Runs 121497-122735: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R121497 (68397 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R121497 12498 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-2.063%) and enough reasonable resolution digits (23-24%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R121497 76507 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R121497 83100 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.264 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 25.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 4B It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.02063 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9970 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.9900.So CCvcs =6.264*0.9900=6.201Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 121497-122735: Runs 121497-122735 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 77K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.10 Runs 121497-122735 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 83K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.15 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.387 4.373 4.524 5.149 5.044 4.293 5.048 5.367 2.749 5.224 5.994 3.543 4.711 4.771 6.721 5.430 5.876 6.179 5.844 5.805 5.080 6.230 4.820 6.595 4.713 6.310 5.916 4.562 6.561 3.921 3.681 4.898 4.435 4.348 4.704 e42= 4.288 4.356 4.370 4.837 4.208 4.284 4.285 p00= 2.243 2.682 1.314 2.162 2.906 1.571 2.768 3.338 2.802 1.605 2.404 3.487 3.427 3.100 2.585 3.477 2.987 3.353 2.523 2.315 p20= 2.434 1.840 2.289 2.565 2.907 vcs= 6.201 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 25.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 4B Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 4A.It were selected 57337 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 120594-121497 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M285314.C00 K38720 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 44135 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 9798 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV new configuration of the IP region and machine magnets around it --> different acceptances for ET,PD etc.) Therefore it is natural that somebody from H1 luminosity community would join this working group (conveners are F.Willeke, W.Bartel and E.Lohrmann) Is anybody interested in that work? If yes, then please contact me or directly W.Bartel as soon as you are certain. 26.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_862-863 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 862 NH1R= 18 Etag: 17416 27.55+/-1.19 Et44: 22581 25.97+/-3.25 LR# 863 NH1R= 15 Etag: 16293 27.45+/-1.18 Et44: 17383 25.77+/-3.42 26/09/95 =============== F.Squinabol === Lumi RUN# 864 Start - End of Run 864: 26/9/95 10:37:03 - 14:32:20 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 11:02:59 - 14:32:20 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.16, Ip= 64.09 max lumi value, (last record): 4.513, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.507, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 50.18 nb-1 HERA - physics: 46.28 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 40.31 nb-1 H1data - physics: 37.04 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 86 % , DT corr.: 91 % , Tot eff.: 79 % H1 Runs: 123157 - 123188 26/09/95 ================= P.Smirnov === Lumi RUN# 865 Start - End of Run 865: 26/9/95 16:18:57 - 18:23:02 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:53:03 - 18:23:02 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.55, Ip= 63.31 max lumi value, (last record): 3.884, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.439, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 24.11 nb-1 HERA - physics: 21.56 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 16.12 nb-1 H1data - physics: 14.43 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 74 % , DT corr.: 88 % , Tot eff.: 66 % H1 Runs: 123199 - 123209 27/09/95 ================= P.Smirnov === Lumi RUN# 866 Start - End of Run 866: 26/9/95 21:16:47 - 7:39:39 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:43:16 - 7:39:39 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.41, Ip= 67.73 max lumi value, (last record): 4.472, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.511, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 98.24 nb-1 HERA - physics: 95.5 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 85.18 nb-1 H1data - physics: 77.42 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 89 % , DT corr.: 90 % , Tot eff.: 80 % H1 Runs: 123232 - 123264 27.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_864-866 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 864 NH1R= 4 Etag: 14744 27.47+/-1.25 Et44: 11433 20.07+/-2.27 LR# 865 NH1R= 7 Etag: 17860 27.55+/-1.25 Et44: 14128 26.17+/-3.35 LR# 866 NH1R= 9 Etag: 12181 27.41+/-1.18 Et44: 14979 23.71+/-2.74 Warning: Emean( Et44 ) for LR# 864 and LR# 866 are lower than usial. 27/09/95 ================== v.Korbel === Lumi RUN# 867 Start - End of Run 867: 27/9/95 11:41:54 - 14:36:23 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:04:58 - 14:36:23 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.3, Ip= 71.19 max lumi value, (last record): 4.574, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.496, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 41.19 nb-1 HERA - physics: 38.16 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 30.55 nb-1 H1data - physics: 25.64 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 79 % , DT corr.: 83 % , Tot eff.: 67 % H1 Runs: 123297 - 123309 27.09.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_867: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 867 NH1R= 7 Etag: 11751 27.35+/-1.27 Et44: 11378 25.71+/-3.94 28/09/95 =============== F.Squinabol === Lumi RUN# 868 Start - End of Run 868: 27/9/95 16:54:48 - 2:35:34 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:22:19 - 2:35:34 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 28.61, Ip= 70.51 max lumi value, (last record): 4.531, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.473, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 96.64 nb-1 HERA - physics: 92.73 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 80.31 nb-1 H1data - physics: 62.42 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 86 % , DT corr.: 77 % , Tot eff.: 67 % H1 Runs: 123330 - 123357 28/09/95 ================== V.Korbel === Lumi RUN# 869 Start - End of Run 869: 28/9/95 11:38:20 - 21:56:56 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:08:14 - 21:56:56 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.41, Ip= 65.49 max lumi value, (last record): 4.302, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.47, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 90.86 nb-1 HERA - physics: 87.73 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 76.87 nb-1 H1data - physics: 63.56 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 87 % , DT corr.: 82 % , Tot eff.: 72 % H1 Runs: 123377 - 123411 29/09/95 ================= P.Smirnov === Lumi RUN# 870 Start - End of Run 870: 29/9/95 2:25:29 - 12:04:31 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 2:54:16 - 12:04:31 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29, Ip= 66.28 max lumi value, (last record): 4.726, (5.312) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.498, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 94.78 nb-1 HERA - physics: 90.28 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 84.55 nb-1 H1data - physics: 74.1 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 93 % , DT corr.: 87 % , Tot eff.: 81 % H1 Runs: 123430 - 123452 29.09.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 4C Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 122735-123437 data sample (4C).It were selected 75607 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data sets at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M315333.C00 K41061 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 72552 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M315333.C00 K41677 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 17514 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M315333.C00 K42691 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were got 75607 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 30089 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.728 0.764 1.568 0.644 0.997 0.845 0.268 0.987 0.878 0.955 0.907 0.849 0.855 0.935 0.969 0.922 0.885 0.927 0.928 0.912 0.848 0.944 0.929 0.909 0.959 0.934 0.896 1.480 0.631 1.077 0.681 0.758 0.852 0.852 1.000 1.008 1.017 1.149 0.966 0.999 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.162 0.943 0.895 1.131 0.000 1.055 1.030 0.987 1.002 1.017 1.000 1.012 1.029 1.039 0.977 1.002 0.993 0.996 0.991 0.966 1.123 0.927 0.920 0.912 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.201 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 122735-123437 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 76K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.27 1.18 27.32 1.14 27.39 1.16 Runs 122735-123437 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 73K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.29 1.19 27.30 1.15 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 4B Sample clbr(see message from 25.09.95) CCvcs value was got from 4B sample clbr. (see message 25/09/95). (CCvcs start = 6.201 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 29.09.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 4C Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 4C sample with events from Runs 122735-123437: H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ4.R122735 (65015 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ3.R122735 12014 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ3-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.157%) and enough reasonable resolution digits (23-24%) for (8-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ2.R122735 75330 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.ZLOOKQ3.R122735 72388 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.201 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 29.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 4C It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.04157 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9736 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.0810.So CCvcs =6.201*1.0810=6.703Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 122735-123437: Runs 122735-123437 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 76K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.17 Runs 122735-123437 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 73K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.16 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.387 4.389 4.529 4.753 5.042 4.298 5.046 5.383 2.745 5.439 6.703 3.631 5.011 4.649 6.694 5.416 5.865 6.024 5.912 6.085 5.421 6.236 4.826 6.879 4.719 5.959 5.873 4.583 6.752 3.946 3.055 5.265 4.445 4.377 4.702 e42= 4.291 4.367 4.370 4.871 4.209 4.285 4.285 p00= 2.218 2.665 1.331 2.152 2.906 1.614 2.742 3.391 2.705 1.603 2.427 3.527 3.460 3.178 2.514 3.246 2.972 3.390 2.449 2.297 p20= 2.432 1.867 2.297 2.574 2.907 vcs= 6.703 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 29.09.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 4C Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 4C.It were selected 48576 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 122735-123437 which are kept at data set at DESY IBM: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M315333.C00 K43430 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 48576 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 11316 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV 123903 to include an additional dead channel in ET44 (#1) for which HV supply was taken off. 06/10/95 =================== P.ZINI === Lumi RUN# 880 Start - End of Run 880: 5/10/95 19:03:49 - 3:37:32 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 19:40:56 - 3:37:32 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.9, Ip= 59.82 max lumi value, (last record): 3.486, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.501, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 61.15 nb-1 HERA - physics: 57.93 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 50.88 nb-1 H1data - physics: 43.09 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 87 % , DT corr.: 84 % , Tot eff.: 74 % H1 Runs: 124089 - 124141 06.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_880: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 880 NH1R= 17 Etag: 20227 27.51+/-1.26 Et44: 17336 26.09+/-2.67 07/10/95 ============= h.-h.kaufmann === Lumi RUN# 881 Start - End of Run 881: 6/10/95 19:34:13 - 6:14:00 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 20:09:00 - 6:14:00 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.22, Ip= 55.23 max lumi value, (last record): 4.064, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.468, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 82.84 nb-1 HERA - physics: 78.79 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 68.35 nb-1 H1data - physics: 60.65 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 86 % , DT corr.: 88 % , Tot eff.: 76 % H1 Runs: 124215 - 124271 07.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_881: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 881 NH1R= 13 Etag: 28082 27.60+/-1.24 Et44: 28629 25.72+/-2.89 07/10/95 =========== Alice Valkarova === Lumi RUN# 882 Start - End of Run 882: 7/10/95 19:04:55 - 22:46:40 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 19:44:06 - 22:46:40 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.8, Ip= 56.98 max lumi value, (last record): 3.607, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.45, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 37.74 nb-1 HERA - physics: 34.76 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 24.53 nb-1 H1data - physics: 8.65 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 70 % , DT corr.: 35 % , Tot eff.: 24 % H1 Runs: 124345 - 124367 08.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_882: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 882 NH1R= 7 Etag: 8512 27.67+/-1.30 Et44: 4816 25.70+/-3.32 08/10/95 ============= h.-h.kaufmann === Lumi RUN# 883 Start - End of Run 883: 8/10/95 5:13:05 - 16:16:10 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:36:35 - 16:16:10 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.5, Ip= 51.16 max lumi value, (last record): 3.842, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.475, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 83.95 nb-1 HERA - physics: 81.45 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 73.77 nb-1 H1data - physics: 66.23 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 90 % , DT corr.: 89 % , Tot eff.: 81 % H1 Runs: 124403 - 124457 09.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_883: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 883 NH1R= 20 Etag: 29823 27.46+/-1.19 Et44: 28932 25.09+/-2.90 08/10/95 ================ Niedzballa === Lumi RUN# 884 Start - End of Run 884: 8/10/95 20:40:55 - 21:46:47 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:13:35 - 21:46:47 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.45, Ip= 61.07 max lumi value, (last record): 4.618, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.469, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 15.13 nb-1 HERA - physics: 12.16 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 7.28 nb-1 H1data - physics: 6.25 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 59 % , DT corr.: 84 % , Tot eff.: 50 % H1 Runs: 124480 - 124486 09/10/95 ============= h.-h.kaufmann === Lumi RUN# 885 Start - End of Run 885: 9/10/95 1:40:56 - 9:10:45 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 2:04:24 - 9:10:45 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.65, Ip= 53.87 max lumi value, (last record): 3.991, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.476, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 67.38 nb-1 HERA - physics: 64.47 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 59.18 nb-1 H1data - physics: 53.26 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 91 % , DT corr.: 89 % , Tot eff.: 82 % H1 Runs: 124491 - 124518 09/10/95 ============= Patrice Verre === Lumi RUN# 886 Start - End of Run 886: 9/10/95 13:37:22 - 17:31:44 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 14:09:50 - 17:31:44 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.62, Ip= 56.81 max lumi value, (last record): 4.289, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.484, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 46.32 nb-1 HERA - physics: 42.59 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 31 nb-1 H1data - physics: 26.42 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 72 % , DT corr.: 84 % , Tot eff.: 61 % H1 Runs: 124580 - 124609 09/10/95 ================= A.Lebedev === Lumi RUN# 887 Start - End of Run 887: 9/10/95 21:26:44 - 22:06:02 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 21:55:52 - 22:06:02 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.38, Ip= 55.75 max lumi value, (last record): 3.95, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.454, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 8.13 nb-1 HERA - physics: 4.11 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 1.68 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.61 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 39 % , DT corr.: 34 % , Tot eff.: 14 % H1 Runs: 124633 - 124638 10/10/95 ============= K. Rosenbauer === Lumi RUN# 888 Start - End of Run 888: 10/10/95 3:38:07 - 3:41:11 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:41:03 - 3:41:11 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 12.3, Ip= 58.18 max lumi value, (last record): 0, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 76 e+(-) bunches = 84, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 8, p-pilot b. = 104 HERA total lumi: 0 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 124644 - 124644 10/10/95 ============ Patrice Verrec === Lumi RUN# 889 Start - End of Run 889: 10/10/95 8:56:10 - 15:36:46 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 9:40:15 - 15:36:46 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.59, Ip= 57.80 max lumi value, (last record): 4.285, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.445, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 60.04 nb-1 HERA - physics: 54.07 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 44.75 nb-1 H1data - physics: 35.15 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 82 % , DT corr.: 78 % , Tot eff.: 64 % H1 Runs: 124669 - 124700 11/10/95 ============= K. Rosenbauer === Lumi RUN# 890 Start - End of Run 890: 10/10/95 22:50:47 - 2:42:00 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:25:25 - 2:42:00 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.8, Ip= 62.61 max lumi value, (last record): 4.589, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.478, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 50.28 nb-1 HERA - physics: 46.64 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 35.83 nb-1 H1data - physics: 29.95 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 76 % , DT corr.: 83 % , Tot eff.: 64 % H1 Runs: 124752 - 124770 P.S.(N.G.) The run was stopped by the loss of the positron beam. 11.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_884-887 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 884 NH1R= 6 Etag: 12062 27.65+/-1.36 Et44: 8236 26.00+/-3.53 LR# 885 NH1R= 19 Etag: 25877 27.61+/-1.27 Et44: 24336 25.93+/-2.99 LR# 886 NH1R= 23 Etag: 21703 27.49+/-1.22 Et44: 20773 24.86+/-2.74 LR# 887 NH1R= 6 Etag: 3852 27.61+/-1.36 Et44: 2594 22.35+/-3.10 11.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_888-890 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 888 No Lumi for Physics. LR# 889 NH1R= 24 Etag: 27862 27.38+/-1.18 Et44: 26097 25.95+/-2.75 LR# 890 NH1R= 10 Etag: 11742 27.44+/-1.30 Et44: 9148 26.01+/-2.97 11/10/95 =================== J.Baehr === Lumi RUN# 891 Start - End of Run 891: 11/10/95 13:26:28 - 23:17:03 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 14:03:07 - 23:17:03 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.37, Ip= 49.83 max lumi value, (last record): 4.002, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.497, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 81.08 nb-1 HERA - physics: 76.9 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 69.71 nb-1 H1data - physics: 55.7 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 90 % , DT corr.: 79 % , Tot eff.: 72 % H1 Runs: 124818 - 124853 12/10/95 =================== J.Baehr === Lumi RUN# 892 Start - End of Run 892: 12/10/95 2:24:44 - 7:45:46 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 2:57:41 - 7:45:46 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 29.74, Ip= 58.89 max lumi value, (last record): 4.208, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.476, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 59.15 nb-1 HERA - physics: 57.14 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 50.15 nb-1 H1data - physics: 41.94 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 87 % , DT corr.: 83 % , Tot eff.: 73 % H1 Runs: 124863 - 124873 12/10/95 =================== J.Baehr === Lumi RUN# 893 Start - End of Run 893: 12/10/95 12:45:19 - 14:28:35 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 14:28:28 - 14:28:35 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.65, Ip= 51.25 max lumi value, (last record): 2.88, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.355, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 0, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 180 HERA total lumi: 13.41 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 124934 - 124937 13/10/95 ============ Andrei Lebedev === Lumi RUN# 894 Start - End of Run 894: 13/10/95 2:55:38 - 10:45:13 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 4:29:40 - 10:45:13 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.87, Ip= 55.82 max lumi value, (last record): 4.389, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.509, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 79.75 nb-1 HERA - physics: 72.26 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 49.4 nb-1 H1data - physics: 44 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 68 % , DT corr.: 88 % , Tot eff.: 60 % H1 Runs: 124969 - 125010 14/10/95 ================ B Clerbaux === Lumi RUN# 895 Start - End of Run 895: 13/10/95 18:35:38 - 4:56:27 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 18:59:20 - 4:56:27 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.63, Ip= 63.68 max lumi value, (last record): 4.674, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.47, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 99.05 nb-1 HERA - physics: 95.88 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 79.33 nb-1 H1data - physics: 57.71 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 82 % , DT corr.: 72 % , Tot eff.: 60 % H1 Runs: 125072 - 125120 14.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_891-895 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 891 NH1R= 21 Etag: 30961 27.43+/-1.18 Et44: 21471 25.80+/-3.45 LR# 892 NH1R= 7 Etag: 11334 27.34+/-1.20 Et44: 12038 25.75+/-2.81 LR# 893 No Lumi for Physics. LR# 894 NH1R= 22 Etag: 25419 27.55+/-1.21 Et44: 23881 25.73+/-2.97 LR# 895 NH1R= 31 Etag: 37917 27.42+/-1.23 Et44: 27996 25.82+/-3.01 14/10/95 =============== K. Rabbertz === Lumi RUN# 896 Start - End of Run 896: 14/10/95 9:52:41 - 10:10:03 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 10:07:18 - 10:10:03 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.6, Ip= 55.88 max lumi value, (last record): 4.298, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.64, (0.64) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 <--?? collided bunches = 1 e+(-) bunches = 1, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 0, p-pilot b. = 179 HERA total lumi: 2.86 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 125133 - 125135 14/10/95 =============== K. Rabbertz === Lumi RUN# 897 Start - End of Run 897: 14/10/95 11:51:17 - 12:35:08 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 12:32:51 - 12:35:08 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 30.41, Ip= 55.58 max lumi value, (last record): 3.716, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.447, (0.64) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 5.51 nb-1 HERA - physics: 2.65 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 125136 - 125137 15/10/95 ================ B.Clerbaux === Lumi RUN# 898 Start - End of Run 898: 14/10/95 16:55:11 - 1:04:13 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:24:24 - 1:04:13 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.07, Ip= 51.02 max lumi value, (last record): 3.469, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.412, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 59.90 nb-1 HERA - physics: 56.84 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 45.50 nb-1 H1data - physics: 36.34 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 79 % , DT corr.: 79 % , Tot eff.: 63 % H1 Runs: 125154 - 125206 15/10/95 ============== E. Fretwurst === Lumi RUN# 899 Start - End of Run 899: 15/10/95 4:05:06 - 11:06:11 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 4:38:07 - 11:06:11 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.91, Ip= 63.74 max lumi value, (last record): 4.729, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.459, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 73.25 nb-1 HERA - physics: 68.47 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 58.83 nb-1 H1data - physics: 47.24 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 85 % , DT corr.: 80 % , Tot eff.: 68 % H1 Runs: 125218 - 125255 16/10/95 ================ T. Wilksen === Lumi RUN# 900 (jubileum) Start - End of Run 900: 15/10/95 15:20:46 - 0:14:30 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:56:39 - 0:14:30 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.8, Ip= 56.75 max lumi value, (last record): 4.211, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.474, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 79.72 nb-1 HERA - physics: 76.1 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 61.14 nb-1 H1data - physics: 49.08 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 80 % , DT corr.: 80 % , Tot eff.: 64 % H1 Runs: 125262 - 125327 16/10/95 ================ T. Wilksen === Lumi RUN# 901 Start - End of Run 901: 16/10/95 3:05:15 - 11:06:28 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:27:30 - 11:06:28 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 34.15, Ip= 56.12 max lumi value, (last record): 4.557, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.478, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 75.65 nb-1 HERA - physics: 73.89 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 62 nb-1 H1data - physics: 53.45 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 83 % , DT corr.: 86 % , Tot eff.: 72 % H1 Runs: 125346 - 125377 16/10/95 =================== H1KSHE === last beam scan Dear colleagues find, please, bellow some data that are related to last beam scan, which was yesterday between 18:30 and 21:30. tilt X - horizontal e+ beam tilt (accoding HERA data) PD X(sm) - X beam position in the our PD Ypos(mm) - vertical e+ beam position (accoding HERA data) Xpos(mm) - gorizontal e+ beam position(accoding HERA data) SpLum**29 - Specific Lumi value in sm-2 s-1 mA-2 ET/PD - Bkg subtructed ET, PD trigger rate ratio. time tilt X(mr) PD X(sm) Ypos(mm) Xpos(mm) SpLum**29 ET/PD (%) 18:33 0.5853 -1.20 -38.59 0.6398 4.40 58.4 19:09 0.5853 -1.20 -38.38 0.8960 4.43 59.8 19:19 0.5853 -1.24 -38.18 1.0494 4.49 60.8 19:33 0.5853 -1.30 -37.98 1.2520 4.58 61.9 19:48 0.5853 -1.30 -37.77 1.4547 4.56 62.8 20:05 0.5853 -1.35 -38.52 0.6516 4.41 59.2 20:18 0.5853 -1.40 -38.89 0.2443 4.25 57.1 20:51 0.5853 -1.40 -38.47 0.6379 4.40 59.8 21:02 0.3755 -0.50 -38.47 0.6379 4.14 54.3 21:13 0.1324 +0.60 -38.47 0.6379 3.36 50.3 21:25 0.7946 -2.20 -38.47 0.6379 4.15 69.2 P.S. It is interesting that for 21:02 conditions the fluctuations for all our trigger rates were unbeliveble small. 16/10/95 ============== E. Fretwurst === Lumi RUN# 902 Start - End of Run 902: 16/10/95 14:55:06 - 17:47:17 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 15:43:34 - 17:47:17 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 34.68, Ip= 53.73 max lumi value, (last record): 4.068, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.453, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 181 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 189 e-pilot b. = 8, p-pilot b. = 8 HERA total lumi: 31.6 nb-1 HERA - physics: 23.13 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 14.47 nb-1 H1data - physics: 8.74 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 62 % , DT corr.: 59 % , Tot eff.: 37 % H1 Runs: 125390 - 125412 17.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_898-902 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 896-897 No Lumi for Physics. LR# 898 NH1R= 22 Etag: 19896 27.53+/-1.22 Et44: 18537 26.02+/-3.00 LR# 899 NH1R= 28 Etag: 30543 27.34+/-1.29 Et44: 27785 25.26+/-2.39 LR# 900 NH1R= 37 Etag: 31664 27.43+/-1.17 Et44: 27138 25.31+/-2.82 LR# 901 NH1R= 9 Etag: 11596 27.37+/-1.27 Et44: 10387 25.46+/-2.57 LR# 902 NH1R= 9 Etag: 10858 27.23+/-1.23 Et44: 6824 25.94+/-2.75 17/10/95 ================ L.Goerlich === Lumi RUN# 903 Start - End of Run 903: 17/10/95 4:49:10 - 5:00:53 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 5:00:45 - 5:00:53 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 21.26, Ip= 63.85 max lumi value, (last record): 1.739, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.253, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 0 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 0 e-pilot b. = 189, p-pilot b. = 0 HERA total lumi: 0.47 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 125466 - 125466 17/10/95 ================ B.Clerbaux === Lumi RUN# 904 Start - End of Run 904: 17/10/95 10:52:57 - 16:13:07 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 11:30:37 - 16:13:07 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 26.47, Ip= 58.36 max lumi value, (last record): 3.379, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.444, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 44.72 nb-1 HERA - physics: 41.89 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 34.1 nb-1 H1data - physics: 28.57 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 81 % , DT corr.: 83 % , Tot eff.: 68 % H1 Runs: 125524 - 125557 18/10/95 ================= W Dlugosz === Lumi RUN# 905 Start - End of Run 905: 18/10/95 3:29:44 - 6:31:11 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:59:24 - 6:31:11 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 4.07, Ip= 62.69 max lumi value, (last record): 0.528, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.445, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 19 e+(-) bunches = 21, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 2, p-pilot b. = 161 HERA total lumi: 4.07 nb-1 HERA - physics: 3.57 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 2.72 nb-1 H1data - physics: 2.54 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 74 % , DT corr.: 90 % , Tot eff.: 69 % H1 Runs: 125596 - 125620 18.10.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 4D Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 123437-123896 data sample (4D).It were selected 71851 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at data set at /acs/user/fomenko -pool at dice2-environment: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M334352.C00 -C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 69218 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M334352.C00 -C 16165 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M334352.C00 -C It were got 71851 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 27505 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.925 0.760 0.760 1.768 0.649 0.997 0.790 0.268 1.186 0.876 0.938 0.862 0.885 0.855 0.914 0.994 0.908 0.896 0.930 0.902 0.889 0.847 0.939 0.929 0.906 0.952 0.938 0.911 1.447 0.612 1.100 0.695 0.733 0.853 0.847 0.998 0.945 1.017 1.149 0.967 1.001 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.138 1.005 0.862 1.130 0.000 1.017 1.058 1.028 1.001 1.029 1.004 1.008 1.027 1.028 1.019 1.048 0.997 0.977 1.011 0.957 1.114 0.925 0.921 0.942 0.833 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.703 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 123437-123896 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 72K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.26 1.16 27.26 1.12 27.34 1.14 Runs 123437-123896 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 69K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.35 1.20 27.39 1.17 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 4C Sample clbr(see message from 29.09.95) CCvcs value was got from 4C sample clbr. (see message 29/09/95). (CCvcs start = 6.703 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 18.10.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 4D Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 4D sample with events from Runs 123437-123896: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R123437 (60904 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R123437 10878 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-3.888%) and enough reasonable resolution digits (22-25%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R123437 71589 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R123437 69024 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.703 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 18.10.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 4D It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.03888 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9796 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.033. So CCvcs =6.703*1.033 =6.924Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 123437-123896: Runs 123437-123896 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 72K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.14 Runs 123437-123896 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 69K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.18 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.454 4.697 4.525 5.497 5.036 4.300 5.044 5.439 3.318 5.566 6.495 3.461 5.206 4.637 6.660 5.504 5.846 6.047 5.969 5.979 5.290 6.286 5.320 6.684 4.728 5.914 5.914 4.666 6.652 3.905 3.201 5.542 4.501 4.376 4.727 e42= 4.280 4.033 4.370 4.872 4.214 4.292 4.285 p00= 2.191 2.933 1.346 2.152 2.906 1.557 2.785 3.442 2.677 1.622 2.426 3.566 3.400 3.123 2.592 3.345 3.014 3.294 2.480 2.286 p20= 2.435 1.906 2.295 2.582 2.908 vcs= 6.924 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 18.10.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 4D Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 4D.It were selected 61392 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 123437-123896 which are kept at data set at /acs/user/fomenko-pool: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M334352.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 61392 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 14650 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.924 0.784 0.756 1.824 0.649 0.997 0.771 0.268 1.126 0.899 0.951 0.873 0.882 0.912 0.911 0.967 0.915 0.898 0.913 0.913 0.940 0.855 0.946 0.915 0.906 0.955 0.942 0.895 1.399 0.613 1.290 0.696 0.720 0.862 0.838 0.998 0.931 1.016 1.149 0.968 1.002 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.361 1.052 0.838 1.132 0.000 0.996 1.018 1.005 1.000 1.035 1.007 1.015 1.031 1.031 1.003 1.052 0.995 0.984 1.012 0.964 1.080 0.985 0.910 0.949 0.831 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.924 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 124089-124864 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 76K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.32 1.15 27.32 1.12 27.38 1.13 Runs 124089-124864 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 78K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.60 1.22 27.58 1.18 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 4D Sample clbr(see message from 18.10.95) CCvcs value was got from 4D sample clbr. (see message 18/10/95). (CCvcs start = 6.924 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 18.10.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 5A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 5A sample with events from Runs 124089-124864: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R124089 (64873 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R124089 11081 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-2.888%) and enough reasonable resolution digits (18-20%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R124089 75263 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R124089 77510 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.924 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 18.10.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 5A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.02888 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.987 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.942. So CCvcs =6.924*0.942 =6.522Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 124089-124864: Runs 124089-124864 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 76K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.13 Runs 124089-124864 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 78K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.15 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.455 4.744 4.521 5.556 5.045 4.301 5.049 5.439 3.061 5.619 6.609 3.653 5.197 4.974 7.611 5.375 5.930 6.090 5.869 6.013 5.566 6.306 5.542 6.695 4.614 5.834 5.969 4.604 6.564 3.998 3.808 5.559 4.574 4.406 4.752 e42= 4.281 4.032 4.368 4.868 4.218 4.296 4.285 p00= 2.518 3.031 1.356 2.155 2.906 1.552 2.640 3.426 2.695 1.628 2.406 3.585 3.468 3.069 2.525 3.380 2.973 3.277 2.482 2.301 p20= 2.399 2.021 2.258 2.589 2.909 vcs= 6.522 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 18.10.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_904-905 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 904 NH1R= 21 Etag: 17246 27.59+/-1.26 Et44: 15146 26.04+/-3.02 LR# 905 NH1R= 7 Etag: 2650 27.61+/-1.24 Et44: 1903 25.91+/-3.37 18/10/95 ================= W Dlugosz === Lumi RUN# 906 Start - End of Run 906: 18/10/95 17:55:11 - 18:51:41 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 18:23:48 - 18:51:41 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 18.91, Ip= 56.49 max lumi value, (last record): 2.391, (5.527) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.446, (0.552) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 172 e+(-) bunches = 187, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 8 HERA total lumi: 6.46 nb-1 HERA - physics: 5.21 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 2.84 nb-1 H1data - physics: 2.56 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 53 % , DT corr.: 87 % , Tot eff.: 48 % H1 Runs: 125699 - 125705 19.10.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 5A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 5A.It were selected 49031 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 124089-124864 which are kept at data set at /acs/user/fomenko-pool: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M353377.C00 -C From this data set it were selected 49031 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 9171 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.926 0.771 0.749 1.887 0.653 0.000 0.793 0.264 1.164 0.914 0.949 0.998 0.829 0.916 0.921 0.976 0.913 0.899 0.936 0.911 0.976 0.855 0.944 0.932 0.907 0.957 0.940 0.893 1.349 0.609 1.323 0.701 0.694 0.869 0.850 0.000 0.932 1.016 1.151 0.968 1.012 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.427 1.027 0.823 1.134 0.000 0.934 1.021 1.008 1.004 1.042 1.003 1.010 1.023 1.032 0.934 1.005 0.987 0.964 0.996 0.969 1.076 0.989 1.002 0.953 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.522 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 124868-126065 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 85K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.28 1.15 27.28 1.10 27.34 1.12 Runs 124868-126065 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 89K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.39 1.22 27.35 1.19 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 5A Sample clbr(see message from 18.10.95) CCvcs value was got from 5A sample clbr. (see message 18/10/95). (CCvcs start = 6.522 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 25.10.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 5B Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 5B sample with events from Runs 124868-126065: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R124868 (79708 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R124868 14223 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-3.938%) and enough reasonable resolution digits (22-25%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R124868 85040 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R124868 88260 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.522 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 25.10.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 5B It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.03938 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.979 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.023. So CCvcs =6.522*1.023 =6.672Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 124868-126065: Runs 124868-126065 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 85K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.53 1.13 Runs 124868-126065 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 89K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.55 1.19 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.466 4.752 4.550 5.608 5.072 4.301 5.062 5.399 3.295 5.854 6.560 3.970 4.802 5.025 7.431 5.396 5.948 6.121 6.000 6.128 5.683 6.144 5.762 6.643 4.708 5.672 6.066 4.596 6.439 3.989 3.774 5.630 4.584 4.431 4.835 e42= 4.281 4.038 4.370 4.912 4.218 4.348 4.285 p00= 2.494 3.028 1.422 2.160 2.906 1.469 2.695 3.414 2.648 1.643 2.411 3.529 3.457 3.161 2.321 3.293 3.004 3.294 2.407 2.300 p20= 2.395 1.971 2.511 2.588 2.909 vcs= 6.672 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 25.10.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 5B Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 5B.It were selected 59489 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 124868-126065 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M378406.C00 K48512 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 59489 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 10681 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.926 0.748 0.744 1.881 0.666 0.997 0.791 0.261 1.145 0.873 0.845 0.902 0.915 0.918 0.906 0.963 0.881 0.916 0.843 0.856 0.900 0.852 0.949 0.907 0.889 0.966 0.965 0.897 1.363 0.596 1.379 0.708 0.687 0.878 0.849 0.999 0.938 1.017 1.164 0.000 1.014 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.458 1.032 0.821 1.135 0.000 0.956 1.025 1.000 1.008 1.049 1.028 1.035 1.041 1.036 0.983 1.057 0.985 0.990 0.965 0.965 1.078 1.025 1.013 0.970 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.672 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 126442-127007 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 63K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.29 1.15 27.27 1.11 27.37 1.11 Runs 126442-127007 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 62K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.56 1.24 27.55 1.21 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 5B Sample clbr(see message from 25.10.95) CCvcs value was got from 5B sample clbr. (see message 25/10/95). (CCvcs start = 6.672 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 31.10.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 6A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 6A sample with events from Runs 126442-127007: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R126442 (58473 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R126442 11511 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-1.68% ) and enough reasonable resolution digits (20-21%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R126442 62561 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R126442 61388 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.672 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 31.10.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 6A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0168 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.999 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.933. So CCvcs =6.672*0.933 =6.225Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 126442-127007: Runs 126442-127007 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 63K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.12 Runs 126442-127007 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 62K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.17 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.462 4.751 4.558 5.753 5.233 4.301 5.059 5.415 3.290 5.646 5.855 3.699 5.494 5.122 7.213 5.347 5.812 6.498 6.237 6.396 5.424 5.629 6.090 6.775 4.732 5.969 6.487 4.989 6.476 3.893 3.935 5.692 4.627 4.501 4.852 e42= 4.285 4.066 4.370 4.987 4.218 4.350 4.285 p00= 2.527 3.025 1.420 2.161 2.906 1.498 2.688 3.351 2.651 1.650 2.500 3.584 3.561 3.146 2.524 3.333 2.975 3.338 2.327 2.282 p20= 2.397 2.034 2.473 2.631 2.909 vcs= 6.225 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 31.10.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 6A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 6A.It were selected 44014 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 126442-127007 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M410425.C00 K43343 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 44014 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 7778 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV = -70cm. 19.11.1995 ================= H01GOG === Corrupted LUMIMON tapes LUMIMON tapes 483 and 489 on dice2 are corrupted and incomplete ( some part of the data is missing and there is no proper EOF). The reason is that there was a problem with diskspace. All necessary actions to recover these tapes will be taken today. 20.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_953-958:ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 952 - No Lumi for Physics. LR# 953 NH1R= 11 Etag: 22061 27.21+/-1.16 Et44: 7132 24.24+/-2.32 LR# 954 NH1R= 12 Etag: 21730 27.16+/-1.21 Et44: 6415 25.65+/-3.02 LR# 955 - No Lumi for Physics. LR# 956 NH1R= 8 Etag: 27259 27.21+/-1.15 Et44: 7077 25.78+/-2.85 LR# 957 NH1R= 7 Etag: 18284 27.20+/-1.15 Et44: 7318 25.57+/-2.37 LR# 958 NH1R= 5 Etag: 10827 27.86+/-1.32 Et44: 2346 25.86+/-3.84 20.11.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#124 - 125 : OK,NO losses. 20/11/95 =================== i.sheviakov === Lumi RUN# 959 Start - End of Run 959: 19/11/95 15:50:39 - 0:03:41 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 19:17:15 - 0:03:41 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.65, Ip= 49.59 max lumi value, (last record): 2.611, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.347, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 41.46 nb-1 HERA - physics: 18.19 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 15.13 nb-1 H1data - physics: 14.12 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 82 % , DT corr.: 92 % , Tot eff.: 77 % H1 Runs: 129999 - 130084 20/11/95 =================== S.Cocks === Lumi RUN# 960 Start - End of Run 960: 20/11/95 2:56:06 - 9:42:06 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:16:45 - 9:42:06 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.17, Ip= 51.86 max lumi value, (last record): 2.982, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.356, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 30.22 nb-1 HERA - physics: 28.85 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 24.11 nb-1 H1data - physics: 17.66 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 83 % , DT corr.: 72 % , Tot eff.: 61 % H1 Runs: 130128 - 130159 20.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_959-960:ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 959 NH1R= 23 Etag: 52366 27.51+/-1.22 Et44: 18748 26.46+/-2.91 LR# 960 NH1R= 11 Etag: 24472 27.45+/-1.22 Et44: 7648 26.11+/-2.89 20/11/95 =================== M.Klein === Lumi RUN# 961 Start - End of Run 961: 20/11/95 13:00:55 - 13:57:27 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 13:29:48 - 13:57:27 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 35.46, Ip= 55.86 max lumi value, (last record): 3.078, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.317, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 9.72 nb-1 HERA - physics: 7.92 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 3.92 nb-1 H1data - physics: 1.83 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 48 % , DT corr.: 45 % , Tot eff.: 22 % H1 Runs: 130172 - 130180 21.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_961: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 961 NH1R= 9 Etag: 11184 27.54+/-1.27 Et44: 3274 24.40+/-3.14 21/11/95 =================== i.sheviakov === Lumi RUN# 962 Start - End of Run 962: 21/11/95 5:39:56 - 13:07:26 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:02:16 - 13:07:26 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 31.9, Ip= 53.04 max lumi value, (last record): 2.64, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.309, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 23.81 nb-1 HERA - physics: 16.37 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 13.69 nb-1 H1data - physics: 12.61 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 83 % , DT corr.: 91 % , Tot eff.: 76 % H1 Runs: 130247 - 130278 22.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_962: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 962 NH1R= 22 Etag: 50048 27.51+/-1.23 Et44: 15540 24.40+/-3.03 22/11/95 =================== s.tchetchelnits === Lumi RUN# 963 Start - End of Run 963: 22/11/95 0:20:36 - 1:19:12 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 0:42:37 - 1:19:12 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 35.6, Ip= 58.02 max lumi value, (last record): 3.127, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.305, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 8.88 nb-1 HERA - physics: 6.94 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 4.08 nb-1 H1data - physics: 2.69 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 57 % , DT corr.: 64 % , Tot eff.: 38 % H1 Runs: 130374 - 130385 22.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_963: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 963 NH1R= 8 Etag: 12047 27.60+/-1.36 Et44: 4968 26.61+/-3.08 22/11/95 =================== S.Cocks === Lumi RUN# 964 Start - End of Run 964: 22/11/95 8:37:01 - 16:19:14 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 9:09:06 - 16:19:14 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 32.1, Ip= 48.28 max lumi value, (last record): 3.284, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.457, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 49.56 nb-1 HERA - physics: 47.77 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 36.95 nb-1 H1data - physics: 24.71 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 77 % , DT corr.: 66 % , Tot eff.: 51 % H1 Runs: 130399 - 130449 23.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_964: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 964 NH1R= 25 Etag: 26500 27.46+/-1.25 Et44: 13981 23.41+/-2.43 23.11.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#126 - 127 : OK,NO losses. 23/11/95 =================== s.tchetchelnits === Lumi RUN# 965 Start - End of Run 965: 22/11/95 21:39:32 - 6:52:09 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 22:28:47 - 6:52:09 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.38, Ip= 63.70 max lumi value, (last record): 4.558, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.482, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 82.46 nb-1 HERA - physics: 74.55 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 61.16 nb-1 H1data - physics: 49.6 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 81 % , DT corr.: 80 % , Tot eff.: 66 % H1 Runs: 130478 - 130556 23.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_965: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 965 NH1R= 12 Etag: 18834 27.50+/-1.34 Et44: 14188 24.74+/-2.32 23/11/95 =================== S.Cocks === Lumi RUN# 966 Start - End of Run 966: 23/11/95 10:33:43 - 19:15:47 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 11:00:51 - 19:15:47 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 35.35, Ip= 62.57 max lumi value, (last record): 5.351, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.494, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 83.06 nb-1 HERA - physics: 79.36 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 65.69 nb-1 H1data - physics: 43.55 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 82 % , DT corr.: 66 % , Tot eff.: 54 % H1 Runs: 130597 - 130627 24/11/95 =================== s.tchetchelnits === Lumi RUN# 967 Start - End of Run 967: 24/11/95 1:59:39 - 3:47:55 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:47:42 - 3:47:55 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 34.88, Ip= 64.41 max lumi value, (last record): 4.57, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.441, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 23.96 nb-1 HERA - physics: 2.53 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 0 % , DT corr.: 0 % , Tot eff.: 0 % H1 Runs: 130659 - 130665 24/11/95 =================== i.sheviako === Lumi RUN# 968 Start - End of Run 968: 24/11/95 8:32:25 - 9:55:09 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 9:09:26 - 9:55:09 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.61, Ip= 59.98 max lumi value, (last record): 3.372, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.354, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 15.07 nb-1 HERA - physics: 10.22 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 6.08 nb-1 H1data - physics: 3.99 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 58 % , DT corr.: 64 % , Tot eff.: 38 % H1 Runs: 130768 - 130777 24.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_966: ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 966 NH1R= 24 Etag: 24685 27.34+/-1.21 Et44: 20170 26.14+/-3.11 LR# 967 - No Lumi for Physics. LR# 968 - No entries at L4, a little strange. P.S.(N.G.) L4 histograms for runs 130768,130769,130771, 130774-130777 exist and look reasonable. 24.11.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#128 : OK,NO losses. 24.11.1995 ================= H01GOG === Missing lumi banks in MDB The Database MDB has crashed several times recently (see messages in newsgroup/pinboard h1news). For this reason lumi banks LH1R/LH1T were not written for runs after 130158. I have recovered them from TCL-tapes and put into the Database. Note: for quite some runs the ZRCT banks are still missing in MDB ! 24/11/95 =================== S.Cocks === Lumi RUN# 969 Start - End of Run 969: 24/11/95 17:22:40 - 19:57:35 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 17:56:21 - 19:57:35 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 36.83, Ip= 61.59 max lumi value, (last record): 4.356, (5.62) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.416, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 30.82 nb-1 HERA - physics: 27.66 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 20.16 nb-1 H1data - physics: 13.56 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 72 % , DT corr.: 66 % , Tot eff.: 48 % H1 Runs: 130828 - 130855 25/11/95 =================== V. Boudry === Lumi RUN# 970 Start - End of Run 970: 25/11/95 7:03:23 - 19:27:29 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 7:50:29 - 19:27:29 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 35.6, Ip= 71.80 max lumi value, (last record): 5.659, (5.659) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.487, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 131.7 nb-1 HERA - physics: 121.69 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 97.48 nb-1 H1data - physics: 69.89 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 80 % , DT corr.: 71 % , Tot eff.: 57 % H1 Runs: 130875 - 130928 P.S. A new record instant. lumi is reached 5.659 mkb-1 s-1 26/11/95 =================== V. Boudry === Lumi RUN# 971 Start - End of Run 971: 25/11/95 22:35:12 - 2:09:20 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:19:30 - 2:09:20 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 39.38, Ip= 73.32 max lumi value, (last record): 5.833, (5.833) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.528, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 55.69 nb-1 HERA - physics: 49.56 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 39.93 nb-1 H1data - physics: 20.08 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 80 % , DT corr.: 50 % , Tot eff.: 40 % H1 Runs: 130945 - 130956 P.S. A new record instant. lumi is reached 5.833 mkb-1 s-1 26/11/95 =================== s.tchetchelnits === Lumi RUN# 972 Start - End of Run 972: 26/11/95 10:02:04 - 12:27:54 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 10:57:59 - 12:27:54 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 35.57, Ip= 71.87 max lumi value, (last record): 5.896, (5.896) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.487, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 42.38 nb-1 HERA - physics: 34.48 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 24.05 nb-1 H1data - physics: 12.44 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 69 % , DT corr.: 51 % , Tot eff.: 35 % H1 Runs: 130987 - 130999 P.S. A new record instant. lumi is reached 5.896 mkb-1 s-1 26/11/95 =================== s.tchetchelnits === Lumi RUN# 973 Start - End of Run 973: 26/11/95 15:04:10 - 16:35:59 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 16:34:15 - 16:35:59 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 38, Ip= 71.15 max lumi value, (last record): 6.012, (6.012) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.457, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 25.61 nb-1 HERA - physics: 0.26 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 0.09 nb-1 H1data - physics: 0.04 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 24 % , DT corr.: 21 % , Tot eff.: 11 % H1 Runs: 131005 - 131008 P.S. A new record instant. lumi is reached 6.012 mkb-1 s-1 27/11/95 =================== i.sheviakov === Lumi RUN# 974 Start - End of Run 974: 26/11/95 22:57:30 - 1:42:48 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 23:47:49 - 1:42:48 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 33.4, Ip= 65.68 max lumi value, (last record): 5.358, (6.012) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.529, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 45.08 nb-1 HERA - physics: 41.9 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 28.99 nb-1 H1data - physics: 16.28 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 69 % , DT corr.: 55 % , Tot eff.: 38 % H1 Runs: 131028 - 131034 27/11/95 =================== V. Boudry === Lumi RUN# 975 Start - End of Run 975: 27/11/95 2:54:06 - 4:41:27 Collision time for H1Run - physics: 3:51:38 - 4:41:27 Currents at the begining (mA): Ie= 35.7, Ip= 65.15 max lumi value, (last record): 5.419, (6.012) mkb-1 s-1 max sp.Lumi value, (last record): 0.51, (0.553) mkb-1 s-1 mA-2 collided bunches = 174 e+(-) bunches = 189, p-bunches = 180 e-pilot b. = 15, p-pilot b. = 6 HERA total lumi: 29.74 nb-1 HERA - physics: 16.02 nb-1 H1Run - physics: 11.18 nb-1 H1data - physics: 5.99 nb-1 H1 operation eff.: 69 % , DT corr.: 53 % , Tot eff.: 37 % H1 Runs: 131036 - 131046 28.11.1995 ====== TCL ep === H01LNS === TCL#129 : OK,NO losses. 28.11.1995 ====== L4Histos = H01LNS === LR_969-975 ALL H1Runs are OK: LR# 969 NH1R= 12 Etag: 17564 27.42+/-1.25 Et44: 8508 25.87+/-3.11 LR# 970 NH1R= 28 Etag: 31762 27.30+/-1.30 Et44: 41305 25.51+/-3.22 LR# 971 NH1R= 9 Etag: 16015 27.31+/-1.34 Et44: 9632 26.08+/-3.13 LR# 972 NH1R= 8 Etag: 16523 27.35+/-1.30 Et44: 8120 26.13+/-3.01 LR# 973 NH1R= 3 Etag: 11860 27.26+/-1.30 Et44: 4039 26.50+/-3.36 LR# 975 NH1R= 7 Etag: 19514 27.11+/-1.34 Et44: 8852 26.91+/-3.40 19.12.1995 ================= F11LEV === Shifts in North Hall ........ Please find below a summary on the shifts made in past by LPI members. This statistics has to be taken into account when preparing the shift schedule for 1996. As you may already know, LPI got its first set of 6 shift days for 11-16 Feb'96. Be prepared for further surprises... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NN Name 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Andreev V.F. 6 6 2. Baranov P.S. 6 6 3. Belousov A.S. 6 4. Fomenko A.M. 6 6 6 5. Gogitidze N. 6 6+6 6+6+6 6. Kotelnikov S.K. 6+6 6 6 7. Lebedev A.I. 6 6 6+6 8. Levonian S.V. 6 6+6+RC RC+6 6+RC 9. Malinovski E.I. 6 6 10. Rusakov S.V. 6 6 6 11. Sheviakov I.P. 6 6 12. Shtarkov L.N. 6 6 13. Smirnov P.A. 6 6 6 14. Soloviev Yu.V. 6 6 6+6 15. Usik A.P. 6 6 6 16. Vazdik, Ya.A. 6 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 23.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === Sample 6B Relation Coeff.Set Today it was made attempt to produce Rel.Coeff.Set for G+M H1Runs 127007-128228 data sample (6B).It were selected 60155 ET&PD&nVC events from this sample which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M426445.C00 K47793 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were selected too ET&PD&VC events and S92-events from this sample: 58668 events with ET&PD&VC trigger H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M426445.C00 K47818 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 14279 events with S92-trigger (PD&nVC-events). H1KFOM.S9291.M426445.C00 K47890 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were got 60155 ET&PD&nVC from these Runs and it were used for calibration 24494 events (after all cuts). Final Relation Coefficient Set is the next: ==> Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.925 0.791 0.739 1.562 0.688 0.997 0.792 0.258 1.127 0.869 0.804 0.905 0.848 0.989 0.857 0.988 0.889 0.923 0.941 0.887 0.872 0.882 0.948 0.914 0.895 0.936 0.943 0.888 1.311 0.593 1.342 0.713 0.691 0.880 0.814 0.999 0.937 1.018 1.167 0.967 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.511 1.029 0.824 1.136 0.000 1.058 1.001 1.058 0.961 1.049 1.011 1.029 1.030 1.032 0.990 1.107 0.989 1.010 1.034 0.983 1.071 1.041 1.025 0.977 0.826 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.225 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 127007-128228 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 60K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.29 1.14 27.30 1.11 27.38 1.11 Runs 127007-128228 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 59K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.28 1.23 27.32 1.17 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 6A Sample clbr(see message from 31.10.95) CCvcs value was got from 6A sample clbr. (see message 31/10/95). (CCvcs start = 6.225 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 23.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 6B Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 6B sample with events from Runs 127007-128228: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R127007 (52286 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R127007 10140 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-2.80% ) and enough reasonable resolution digits (18-19%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R127007 59974 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R127007 58518 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.225 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 23.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 6B It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.0280 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9895 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.049. So CCvcs =6.225*1.049 =6.530Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 127007-128228: Runs 127007-128228 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 60K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.11 Runs 127007-128228 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 59K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.18 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.469 5.170 4.562 4.688 5.394 4.301 5.064 5.456 3.384 5.910 5.759 3.928 5.210 5.854 6.983 5.550 6.000 6.578 6.822 6.655 5.428 5.742 6.135 6.923 4.822 5.836 6.625 5.150 6.195 3.895 3.825 5.738 4.671 4.501 4.612 e42= 4.288 4.057 4.375 4.997 4.219 4.350 4.285 p00= 2.574 3.001 1.438 2.161 2.906 1.638 2.680 3.516 2.538 1.655 2.486 3.535 3.453 3.178 2.485 3.411 3.006 3.413 2.496 2.344 p20= 2.372 2.035 2.472 2.650 2.909 vcs= 6.530 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 23.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 6B Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 6B.It were selected 30097 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 127007-128228 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M426445.C00 K47958 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 30097 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 5387 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.925 0.801 0.739 1.526 0.689 0.997 0.767 0.263 1.117 0.874 0.882 0.920 0.949 0.880 0.897 0.989 0.916 0.893 0.945 0.911 0.889 0.878 0.962 0.930 0.907 0.953 0.953 0.911 1.404 0.593 1.337 0.715 0.694 0.900 0.803 0.999 0.938 1.017 1.164 0.000 1.013 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.446 0.965 0.833 1.136 0.000 0.977 1.012 0.982 1.024 1.035 1.005 1.013 1.024 1.032 0.986 0.994 0.995 1.037 1.003 0.984 1.071 1.043 1.033 0.985 0.825 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.530 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 128229-129461 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 62K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.34 1.15 27.29 1.11 27.32 1.11 Runs 128229-129461 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 61K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.49 1.21 27.50 1.18 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 6B Sample clbr(see message from 23.12.95) CCvcs value was got from 6B sample clbr. (see message 23/12/95). (CCvcs start = 6.530 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 25.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 6C Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 6C sample with events from Runs 128229-129461: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R128229 (54406 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R128229 9931 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.375% ) and more or less good resolution digits (23-25%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R128229 61746 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R128229 61155 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.530 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 25.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 6C It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.04375 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9780 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.969. So CCvcs =6.530*0.969 =6.328Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 128229-129461: Runs 128229-129461 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 62K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.12 Runs 128229-129461 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 61K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.53 1.16 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.466 5.232 4.567 4.667 5.392 4.301 4.893 5.597 3.452 5.764 6.475 3.856 5.983 5.203 7.364 5.490 6.092 6.514 6.716 6.627 5.472 5.795 6.183 6.935 4.731 5.816 6.777 5.299 6.649 3.908 3.830 5.747 4.711 4.599 4.609 e42= 4.287 4.066 4.372 4.979 4.219 4.346 4.285 p00= 2.481 2.779 1.478 2.163 2.906 1.546 2.703 3.386 2.693 1.631 2.447 3.476 3.444 3.103 2.446 3.205 2.994 3.342 2.399 2.329 p20= 2.375 1.996 2.471 2.653 2.908 vcs= 6.328 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 25.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 6C Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 6C.It were selected 37165 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 128229-129461 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M446462.C00 K48213 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 37165 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 7268 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.799 0.735 1.484 0.689 0.000 0.763 0.261 1.209 0.929 0.915 1.001 0.887 0.912 0.948 1.033 0.944 0.918 0.965 0.926 0.928 0.890 0.986 0.938 0.946 0.985 0.981 0.929 1.530 0.594 1.190 0.719 0.693 0.912 0.829 0.999 0.941 1.017 1.156 0.967 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.425 1.009 0.835 1.133 0.794 1.013 0.966 0.994 1.037 1.029 0.960 0.992 1.004 1.014 0.941 1.054 0.962 1.021 1.009 0.986 1.069 0.994 0.960 0.985 0.823 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.328 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 129462-129645 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 70K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.31 1.11 27.30 1.08 27.35 1.09 Runs 129462-129645 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 53K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.25 1.15 27.25 1.11 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 6C Sample clbr(see message from 25.12.95) CCvcs value was got from 6C sample clbr. (see message 25/12/95). (CCvcs start = 6.328 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 26.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 7A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 7A sample with events from Runs 129462-129645: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R129462 (70089 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R129462 13897 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-3.989% ) and more or less good resolution digits (22-24%) for (6-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R129462 69617 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R129462 52796 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.328 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 26.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 7A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.03989 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9815 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.080. So CCvcs =6.328*1.080 =6.834Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 129462-129645: Runs 129462-129645 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 70K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.10 Runs 129462-129645 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 53K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.13 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.466 5.226 4.549 4.582 5.383 4.301 4.896 5.638 3.842 6.174 6.840 4.323 5.728 5.631 7.786 5.991 6.323 6.834 7.079 6.980 5.724 6.088 6.390 7.135 5.079 6.309 7.104 5.587 7.231 3.920 3.387 5.799 4.725 4.674 4.773 e42= 4.286 4.080 4.374 4.980 4.225 4.346 4.285 p00= 2.477 2.931 1.484 2.160 2.906 1.633 2.674 3.444 2.778 1.626 2.418 3.493 3.466 3.138 2.296 3.436 2.996 3.297 2.450 2.333 p20= 2.368 1.889 2.283 2.651 2.908 vcs= 6.834 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 26.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 7A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 7A.It were selected 22493 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 129462-129645 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M463471.C00 K49564 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 22493 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 4177 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.924 0.803 0.741 1.391 0.688 0.998 0.764 0.239 1.207 0.915 0.896 0.939 0.970 0.943 0.988 0.993 0.943 0.921 0.914 0.915 0.884 0.868 0.975 0.930 0.935 0.993 0.975 0.922 1.561 0.603 1.190 0.720 0.691 0.975 0.827 0.000 0.941 1.017 1.155 0.000 0.000 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.428 0.951 0.829 1.133 0.000 0.984 1.019 0.976 1.003 1.032 0.976 0.996 1.009 1.015 0.955 0.972 0.997 1.060 1.017 0.999 1.078 0.959 0.908 0.987 0.823 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=6.834 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 129645-129836 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 72K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.30 1.12 27.30 1.07 27.36 1.10 Runs 129645-129836 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 60K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.33 1.17 27.32 1.14 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 7A Sample clbr(see message from 26.12.95) CCvcs value was got from 7A sample clbr. (see message 26/12/95). (CCvcs start = 6.834 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 26.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 7B Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 7B sample with events from Runs 129645-129836: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R129645 (69716 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R129645 13583 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-4.067% ) and more or less good resolution digits (25-28%) for (6-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R129645 71348 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R129645 59976 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 6.834 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 26.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 7B It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.04067 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9789 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.050. So CCvcs =6.834*1.050 =7.176Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 129645-129836: Runs 129645-129836 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 72K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.11 Runs 129645-129836 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 60K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.14 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.465 5.240 4.587 4.251 5.386 4.305 4.892 5.667 3.883 6.188 6.696 4.005 6.284 6.032 7.887 5.825 6.474 6.836 6.850 6.986 5.558 6.120 6.628 6.993 5.030 6.362 6.960 5.648 7.387 4.007 3.426 5.834 4.733 5.139 4.791 e42= 4.286 4.079 4.373 4.973 4.225 4.346 4.285 p00= 2.476 2.702 1.530 2.159 2.906 1.594 2.762 3.456 2.724 1.634 2.465 3.598 3.584 3.224 2.398 3.248 3.093 3.405 2.519 2.355 p20= 2.370 1.803 2.204 2.663 2.907 vcs= 7.176 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 26.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 7B Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 7B.It were selected 25054 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 129645-129836 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M472481.C00 K42956 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 25054 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 4774 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.924 0.803 0.744 1.401 0.695 0.998 0.762 0.226 1.273 0.856 0.923 1.019 0.971 0.942 0.981 0.982 0.941 0.943 0.966 0.910 0.903 0.863 0.996 0.935 0.931 0.988 0.984 0.927 1.582 0.612 1.207 0.717 0.687 0.994 0.827 0.999 0.942 0.000 1.169 0.968 1.014 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.426 0.972 0.815 1.132 0.814 0.945 0.973 0.944 1.016 1.030 0.963 0.989 1.007 1.012 1.035 1.019 0.963 1.017 0.998 1.008 1.080 0.999 0.921 0.987 0.823 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=7.176 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 129836-129973 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 69K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.33 1.15 27.34 1.11 27.42 1.12 Runs 129836-129973 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 102K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.43 1.21 27.41 1.17 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 7B Sample clbr(see message from 26.12.95) CCvcs value was got from 7B sample clbr. (see message 26/12/95). (CCvcs start = 7.176 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 27.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 7C Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 7C sample with events from Runs 129836-129973: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R129836 (77810 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R129836 11409 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-5.375% ) and more or less good resolution digits (28-30%) for (8-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R129645 68460 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R129645 101765 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 7.176 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 27.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 7C It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.05375 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9670 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.050. So CCvcs =7.176*1.050 =7.535Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 129836-129973: Runs 129836-129973 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 69K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.13 Runs 129836-129973 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 102K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.17 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.466 5.222 4.592 4.255 5.451 4.306 4.863 5.735 4.211 5.891 6.920 4.425 6.060 6.158 8.020 5.796 6.505 6.974 7.113 6.829 5.655 6.051 6.777 7.010 4.902 6.290 7.027 5.732 7.473 4.143 3.487 5.868 4.755 5.158 4.804 e42= 4.289 4.081 4.373 5.043 4.227 4.350 4.285 p00= 2.478 2.876 1.533 2.156 2.907 1.515 2.728 3.291 2.694 1.636 2.417 3.522 3.628 3.165 2.617 3.321 2.987 3.314 2.456 2.357 p20= 2.376 1.945 2.239 2.663 2.908 vcs= 7.535 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 27.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 7C Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 7C.It were selected 23040 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 129836-129973 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M482491.C00 K45385 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 23040 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 4197 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.923 0.797 0.746 1.474 0.702 0.000 0.824 0.227 1.132 0.911 0.896 0.942 0.954 0.882 0.931 0.955 0.938 0.893 0.925 0.899 0.906 0.839 0.957 0.910 0.904 0.935 0.945 0.911 1.468 0.621 1.194 0.735 0.678 1.000 0.826 0.000 0.944 0.000 1.173 0.968 1.022 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.436 1.036 0.820 1.133 0.000 1.039 1.026 1.059 1.019 1.024 1.035 1.054 1.036 1.046 1.029 1.057 1.042 1.061 1.036 1.013 1.080 0.976 1.071 0.000 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=7.535 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 129974-130145 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 49K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.38 1.10 27.37 1.06 27.41 1.05 Runs 129974-130145 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 43K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 28.28 1.40 28.33 1.37 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 7C Sample clbr(see message from 27.12.95) CCvcs value was got from 7C sample clbr. (see message 27/12/95). (CCvcs start = 7.535 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 29.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 8A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 8A sample with events from Runs 129974-130145: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R129974 (50007 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R129974 8489 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-5.833% ) and more or less good resolution digits (28-34%) for(12-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R129974 49261 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.XLOOKQ3.R129974 42657 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 7.535 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 29.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 8A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.05833 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9540 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.707. So CCvcs =7.535*0.707 =5.327Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 129974-130145: Runs 129974-130145 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 49K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.08 Runs 129974-130145 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 43K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.53 1.13 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.464 5.225 4.593 4.451 5.507 4.306 4.917 5.768 3.582 6.205 6.473 3.957 5.834 5.598 7.249 5.459 5.860 6.209 6.361 6.326 5.199 5.399 5.937 6.377 4.492 5.546 6.411 5.299 6.877 4.159 3.475 6.104 4.764 5.167 4.806 e42= 4.289 4.092 4.373 5.054 4.227 4.389 4.285 p00= 2.494 3.073 1.548 2.156 2.907 1.758 2.782 3.987 2.683 1.625 2.608 5.477 3.598 3.337 2.559 3.679 3.112 3.368 2.445 2.354 p20= 2.378 1.896 2.717 2.663 2.908 p20= 2.376 1.945 2.239 2.663 2.908 vcs= 5.327 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 29.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 8A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 8A.It were selected 21709 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 129974-130145 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M491500.C00 K45560 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 21709 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 5853 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.924 0.804 0.746 1.654 0.681 0.999 0.888 0.228 1.045 0.783 0.870 0.785 0.848 0.791 0.917 1.000 0.897 0.889 0.935 0.939 0.877 0.832 0.946 0.895 0.883 0.906 0.861 0.904 1.372 0.599 1.191 0.743 0.675 0.975 0.827 0.999 0.944 1.016 1.172 0.969 1.022 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.421 1.107 0.842 1.133 0.000 1.127 1.033 1.057 1.023 1.023 1.040 1.062 1.043 1.058 1.061 1.119 1.133 1.062 1.052 1.013 1.077 1.045 1.211 0.984 0.000 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=5.327 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 130146-130400 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 44K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.34 1.07 27.31 1.04 27.39 1.04 Runs 130146-130400 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 40K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.53 1.18 27.54 1.13 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 8A Sample clbr(see message from 29.12.95) CCvcs value was got from 8A sample clbr. (see message 29/12/95). (CCvcs start = 5.327 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was more or less succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 30.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 8B Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 8B sample with events from Runs 130146-130400: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R130146 (47785 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R130146 9540 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-3.544% ) and more or less good resolution digits (28-33%) for (6-22)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R130146 44359 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R130146 39833 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 5.327 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 30.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 8B It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.03544 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9750 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 0.957. So CCvcs =5.327*0.957 =5.098Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 130146-130400: Runs 130146-130400 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 44K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.06 Runs 130146-130400 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 40K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.15 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.468 5.262 4.573 5.001 5.267 4.307 5.065 5.780 3.387 5.188 6.264 3.232 5.283 5.048 7.074 5.549 5.592 5.968 6.174 6.330 4.841 5.364 5.721 6.309 4.322 5.429 5.864 5.161 6.472 4.000 3.473 6.164 4.777 5.061 4.807 e42= 4.287 4.091 4.370 5.050 4.233 4.386 4.285 p00= 2.470 3.268 1.598 2.157 2.907 2.086 2.829 4.022 2.747 1.616 2.679 5.708 3.584 3.514 2.657 3.979 3.361 3.457 2.568 2.361 p20= 2.378 2.061 3.020 2.663 2.908 vcs= 5.098 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 30.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 8B Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 8B.It were selected 15681 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 130146-130400 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M501510.C00 K45973 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 15681 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 3879 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV Relation Coeff.Set for ET 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.924 0.822 0.742 1.659 0.672 0.000 0.928 0.233 1.096 0.832 0.839 0.783 0.826 0.752 0.949 0.967 0.891 0.896 0.936 0.919 0.919 0.862 0.964 0.932 0.888 0.940 0.942 0.878 1.431 0.597 1.199 0.732 0.668 0.982 0.847 0.999 0.944 1.017 1.178 0.970 1.022 0.000 ==> Relation Coeff.Set for PD 2.398 1.060 0.846 1.154 0.000 0.921 1.023 1.054 1.062 1.012 1.008 1.025 1.027 1.025 1.051 1.055 1.008 1.016 1.056 1.003 1.086 1.016 1.158 0.990 0.823 It were analized ETrec+PDrec energy distribution with using of these Relation Coefficients and CCvcs=5.098 MeV/FADCcount: Runs 130401-131046 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 64K events) all events xetcut xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 27.24 1.19 27.24 1.13 27.32 1.14 Runs 130401-131046 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 77K events) all events xetcut Step Mean Sigma Mean Sigma 3 26.91 1.14 26.92 1.11 As start values of Calibration Coefficients for Photoproduction Branch were got ones from 8B Sample clbr(see message from 30.12.95) CCvcs value was got from 8B sample clbr. (see message 30/12/95). (CCvcs start = 5.098 MeV/FADCcount). Attempt to make fit of PhotonArm Energy spectrum was enough succesful (with good statistics). Selection of G and M H1Runs was made again. 30.12.1995 ===== dice2 ===== H1KFOM === PDREC-spectra for Sample 9A Today it were produced 100th ntuple for S92=1 events from earlier mentioned 9A sample with events from Runs 130401-131046: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ4.R130401 (84256 entries) FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD At interactive LOOK-session it was produced 70th histo for this data set and written into the next LOOK-binary data set: H1KFOM.BLOOKQ2.R130401 11328 entries in 70h FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD First attempt to fit 70th histo at BLOOKQ2-data set put negative sign of Global Energy Shift at Photon Arm (-1.871% ) and more or less good resolution digits (19-23%) for (8-20)-35GeV regions. It were prepared 100th tuples with ET&PD&nVC and ET&PD&VC-events for procedure of defining Global Energy Shifts and CCvcs: H1KFOM.YLOOKQ2.R130401 64177 entries FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.YLOOKQ3.R130401 77199 entries FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD CCvcs value was used as 5.098 MeV/FADCcount for Ntupels making. 30.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === Global Shifts,CCvcs Sample 9A It was estimated (preliminary) that Global Shifts for both H1Lumi arms are: 1.01871 for PD Channels (exept VCs), 0.9993 for ET channels. Correction factor for CCvcs is 1.243. So CCvcs =5.098*1.243 =6.337Mev/ FADCcount. These digits are valid for H1Lumi events from G+M Runs 130401-131046: Runs 130401-131046 (ET&PD&nVC-sample - near 64K events) xetcut&vcdepcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.13 Runs 130401-131046 (ET&PD&VC-sample - near 77K events) xetcut Step Mean Sigma 0 27.54 1.18 P.S.Final values of Calibration Coefficients for ET,PD and VCs are next ==> ET Calibr.Coefficients Final Status e00= 4.139 4.609 4.199 3.408 4.061 2.997 3.333 4.469 5.301 4.558 4.914 5.275 4.307 5.055 6.037 3.644 5.677 6.052 3.344 5.337 4.858 7.472 5.539 6.058 6.604 6.694 6.614 5.504 5.906 6.202 6.983 4.771 5.786 6.593 5.345 6.719 4.101 3.571 6.166 4.774 5.102 5.009 e42= 4.288 4.092 4.374 5.084 4.234 4.387 4.285 p00= 2.482 3.137 1.592 2.196 2.907 1.572 2.736 3.555 2.808 1.616 2.584 3.797 3.636 3.180 2.598 3.392 3.093 3.407 2.551 2.324 p20= 2.370 2.003 2.836 2.691 2.908 vcs= 6.337 Energy spectrum VCdep is the same in compare with last sample - visible part of spectrum (at linear scale) is finishing near 7.0-7.5GeV 30.12.1995 ================= H1KFOM === ET44 Rel.Coeff.Set Sample 9A Today it were defined Relation Coefficients Set for ET44-channels at Sample 9A.It were selected 34858 events with ET44&VC from G+M Runs 130401-131046 which are kept at DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.ET44VC.M511533.C00 K46179 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C From this data set it were selected 34858 events with VC=1 and with using of all earlier mentioned cuts it were got for calibration 7720 events. Next cuts were used: 1) Energy deposited at et1,et3 and et5 must be more then 0.60 GeV; 2) 19.1GeV1B, 2A->2B; b) due to timing changing (H1Ctrig Upgrade and H1Lumi timing tuning): 1B->1C, 1C->1D, 1E->2A; c) due to G+M H1Runs selection involving for calibration: 1D->1E; d) due to access with HV switching off: 3F->4A, 4D->5A, 5B->6A; e) due to vertex position changing: 6C->7A, 7C->8A, 8B->9A; d) all another samples were fixed due to collection of reasonable statistics 2B,2C,3A,3B,3C,3D,3E,4A,4B,4C,5A,6A,6B,7A,7B,8A,9A. Short characteristics of each sample is seen from next table: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.1A 22.05 105252 13590 27.52 0.90 27.54 0.99 1.015 0.999 4.403 ----- H1 Main Magnet is Off ---------------------------------------- ----- at this time Huge rates at 17-18.06 were fixed at H1Lumi ----- 2.1B 22.06 108822 8944 27.54 1.16 27.54 1.20 1.095 0.952 5.152 ----- at this time new timing was installed at H1 (H1CTRIG upgrade)- ----- H1 Main Magnet is ON ---------------------------------------- 3.1C 03.07 110407 8400 27.55 1.30 - - 1.066 0.955 - ----- at this time new FADC shifts installed at H1Lumi ------------- 4.1D 11.07 111538 10342 27.55 1.10 27.53 1.19 1.056 0.975 8.086 ----- at this time selection of G+M H1Runs was made for calibration- 5.1E 16.07 112624 19130 27.52 1.10 27.55 1.11 1.049 0.978 8.764 ----- at this time new FADC shifts installed at H1Lumi (PhotonArm)-- 6.2A 21.07 113524 26175 27.54 1.10 27.54 1.10 1.060 0.970 5.779 ----- at this time Huge rates at 27.07 were fixed at H1Lumi -------- 7.2B 27.07 114471 21627 27.54 1.17 27.54 1.23 1.040 0.982 6.704 8.2C 30.07 115049 14939 27.54 1.12 27.54 1.16 1.049 0.973 6.751 9.3A 12.08 116309 16291 27.54 1.11 27.54 1.26 1.044 0.974 6.744 10.3B 16.08 117655 14647 27.54 1.07 27.54 1.20 1.032 0.980 6.616 11.3C 18.08 118020 25134 27.54 1.07 27.54 1.06 1.035 0.985 6.603 12.3D 21.08 118504 26460 27.55 1.11 27.53 1.18 1.072 0.954 6.453 13.3E 26.08 119318 60095 27.54 1.10 27.54 1.13 1.050 0.974 6.195 14.3F 30.08 119724 71004 27.54 1.11 27.54 1.15 1.044 0.978 6.229 ----- access with switching off HV at 301 room --------------------- 15.4A 06.09 120594 73671 27.55 1.11 27.54 1.16 1.025 0.992 6.264 16.4B 13.09 121497 76807 27.54 1.10 27.55 1.15 1.021 0.997 6.201 17.4C 24.09 122735 38010 27.54 1.16 27.54 1.17 1.041 0.968 6.455 18.4D 29.09 123443 71851 27.54 1.14 27.54 1.18 1.039 0.980 6.924 ----- access with making et01 as dead channel (ET44) --------------- 19.5A 05.10 124089 75607 27.54 1.13 27.54 1.15 1.029 0.987 6.522 20.5B 12.10 124868 85351 27.53 1.13 27.55 1.19 1.039 0.979 6.672 ----- access with switching off HV at 301 room (intervention ET32)-- 21.6A 26.10 126442 62747 27.54 1.12 27.54 1.17 1.017 0.999 6.225 22.6B 30.10 127007 60155 27.54 1.11 27.54 1.18 1.028 0.990 6.530 23.6C 06.11 128229 61973 27.54 1.12 27.53 1.16 1.044 0.978 6.328 ----- shifted vertex (+70cm) data ---------------------------------- 24.7A 15.11 129462 69766 27.54 1.10 27.54 1.13 1.040 0.982 6.834 25.7B 16.11 129645 71527 27.54 1.11 27.54 1.14 1.041 0.979 7.176 27.7C 17.11 129836 68692 27.54 1.13 27.54 1.17 1.054 0.967 7.535 ----- shifted vertex (-70cm) data ---------------------------------- 28.8A 19.11 129974 49377 27.54 1.08 27.54 1.13 1.058 0.954 5.327 29.8B 20.11 130146 44457 27.54 1.06 27.54 1.15 1.035 0.975 5.098 ----- nominal vertex ----------------------------------------------- 30.9A 22.11 130401 64390 27.54 1.13 27.54 1.18 1.019 0.999 6.337 where 2 - sample 'name'; 3 - start day of data sample for calibration dd.mm; 4 - start H1Run of data sample for calibration; 5 - Number of ET&PD&nVC-events at Data Sample; 6 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum mean value(LOOK peak finder, bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm&|EVeto|<0.2GeV) - for ET&PD&nVC-sample; 7 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder,bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm&|EVeto|<0.2GeV) - for ET&PD&nVC-sample; 8 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder, bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm) - for ET&PD&VC-sample; 9 - ETrec+PDrec spectrum sigma value(LOOK peak finder,bins 200 22 32, abs(Xet)<6.0cm) - for ET&PD&VC-sample; 10 - Global Energy Shift factor for PD-channels; 11 - Global Energy Shift factor for ET-channels; 12 - CCvcs for data sample. P.S. All digits were produced with using of tools for H1Lumi Calibration. 11.01.1996 ================= H1KFOM === Files ...................... 4C samples (H1Runs 122735-123437, 24.09-29.09) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M315333.C00 L03713 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M315333.C00 L12791 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M315333.C00 L12791 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M315333.C00 L03713 78048081 00003 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M315333.C00 L03713 78048081 00004 ACS-E-C 4D samples (H1Runs 123437-123896, 29.09-04.10) H1KFOM.ET44VC.M334352.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M334352.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M334352.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M334352.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M334352.C00 5A samples (H1Runs 124089-124864, 05.10-12.10) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M353377.C00 H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M353577.C00 H1KFOM.ET44VC.M353377.C00 H1KFOM.S9291.M353377.C00 H1KFOM.S93.M353377.C00 5B samples (H1Runs 124868-126065, 12.10-21.10) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M378406.C00 L04615 78048081 00007 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M378406.C00 L13407 78048081 00012 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M378406.C00 L03915 78048081 00018 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M378406.C00 L04615 78048081 00010 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M378406.C00 L03915 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 6A samples (H1Runs 126442-127007, 26.10-30.10) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M410425.C00 L13407 78048081 00005 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M410425.C00 L13407 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M410425.C00 L13407 78048081 00004 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M410425.C00 L13407 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M410425.C00 L13407 78048081 00003 ACS-E-C 6B samples (H1Runs 127007-128228, 30.10-06.11) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M426445.C00 L04118 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M426445.C00 L04118 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M426445.C00 L04118 78048081 00005 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M426445.C00 L04118 78048081 00003 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M426445.C00 L04118 78048081 00004 ACS-E-C 6C samples (H1Runs 128229-129461, 06.11-14.11) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M446462.C00 L04118 78048081 00006 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M446462.C00 L04118 78048081 00007 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M446462.C00 L04118 78048081 00010 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M446462.C00 L04118 78048081 00008 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M446462.C00 L04118 78048081 00009 ACS-E-C 7A samples (H1Runs 129462-129645, 15.11-16.11) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M463471.C00 L04872 78048081 00005 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M463471.C00 L04872 78048081 00006 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M463471.C00 L04872 78048081 00004 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M463471.C00 L04872 78048081 00007 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M463471.C00 L05897 78048081 00008 ACS-E-C 7B samples (H1Runs 129645-129836, 16.11-17.11) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M472481.C00 L04872 78048081 00009 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M472481.C00 L04883 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M472481.C00 L04872 78048081 00008 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M472481.C00 L04883 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M472481.C00 L02441 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 7C samples (H1Runs 129836-129973, 17.11-19.11) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M482491.C00 L04721 78048081 00009 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M482491.C00 L04872 78048081 00003 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M482491.C01 L02441 78048081 00003 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M482491.C00 L04872 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M482491.C00 L04872 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M482491.C00 L02441 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C 8A samples (H1Runs 129974-130145, 19.11-20.11) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M491500.C00 L00465 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M491500.C00 L00465 78048081 00003 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M491500.C00 L00465 78048081 00004 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M491500.C00 L00465 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M491500.C00 L04721 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C 8B samples (H1Runs 130146-130400, 20.11-22.11) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M501510.C00 L03063 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M501510.C00 L03063 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M501510.C00 L03063 78048081 00004 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M501510.C00 L03063 78048081 00003 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M501510.C00 L04721 78048081 00002 ACS-E-C 9A samples (H1Runs 130401-131046, 22.11-27.11) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M511533.C00 L04721 78048081 00003 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M511533.C00 L04721 78048081 00005 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDVC.M511533.C01 L04721 78048081 00008 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ET44VC.M511533.C00 L04721 78048081 00004 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S9291.M511533.C00 L04721 78048081 00006 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.S93.M511533.C00 L04721 78048081 00007 ACS-E-C 18.01.1996 ================= H1KMAL === Dosimeters from LUMI95 ===== CHECK-UP OF DOSIMETERS BY RADIATION-MONITORING GROUP. Area of ET-calorimeter Dosimeters A,B and F have been not moved. A(7) - it means that Dosimeter A had number of 7 at Soloviev's sketch (see LLO 06.03.1995). _____________________________________________ | | beam | | ___ | | | | | | | | A B C ------- ------ D --------- E F <---- beam plane | | 2.5 cm | | | H ---- | --- | 2.5 cm | pipe | G ---- | | | |____________________________________________| Unit - 10**3 Gy A(7) = 9.9 B(1) = 9.5 C(0) = 7.5 D(4) = 6.8 H(5) = 8.0 G(6) = 14.0 E(2) = 7.5 F(3) = 6.2 --------------------------------------------------------------- Area of Etag44 ____________________________ ________ | | \ | | | | | + ---- P Q ------ beam plate------ R | | | ________/ | | ----------------------------- P(9) = 7.3 Q(10) = 40 R(11) = 0.12 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Area of the Photon arm: last plate Fixed VETO | Moved VETO |-| | | | | | S | Y ------- | L beam | | | | 1.5 cm | | ------> | O --- | X -------- | K------> | | | | | | | | | | | | |_| | | | | ------- \-----------/ O(13) = 36 S(14) = 100 X(18) = 1 Y(17) = 18 K(15) == 50 L(16) 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Area of 188 m: Z(12) = 9.9 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- P.S. I would like to note that the results look very strangely. But the experts from the radiation-monitoring group have excluded any errors.. 24.01.1996 ================= H1KFOM === CCs Behaviour vs Time Picture At the last week I started preparing of LOOK-binary files and pictures (.GIF-format at unix machines) with Calibration Constants Behaivour with time. It were used ETPDnVC-sample of events collected from 22.05.1995 up to 27.11.1995 (only for *M and *G H1 Runs). This sample consists of 1340276 ETPDnVC events and is kept at DESY IBM storage and partly at dice2-accessible storage: Compressed ETPDNVC-data sets (only G+M H1 Runs) for CCbehaivour investigation with time: 1A-samples (H1Runs 105252-106757, 22.05-01.06) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M6274.C00 1B,1C,1D,1E,2A-samples (H1Runs 108341-114415, 18.06-26.07) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M83136.C00 2B and 2C-samples (H1Runs 114415-116309, 26.07-08.08) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M137162.C00 3A,3B,3C-samples (H1Runs 116309-118504, 08.08-21.08) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M163192.C00 3D and 3E samples (H1Runs 118504-119724, 21.08-30.08) H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M193224.C00 268 mByte split 119724-124864 (#819-#891, 30.08.95-11.10.95) 450056 events H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M225377.C00 K40294 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M225377.C01 K40344 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M225377.C02 K40942 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M225377.C03 K41031 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M225377.C04 K45155 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 124868-129645 (#892-#950, 12.10.95-16.11.95) 339748 events H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M378471.C00 K42662 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M378471.C01 K42663 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M378471.C02 K42838 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M378471.C03 K45625 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 129645-131045 (#950-#975, 16.11.95-27.11.95) 298443 events H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M472533.C00 K49530 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M472533.C01 K49581 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C H1KFOM.ETPDNVC.M472533.C02 K49639 78048081 00001 ACS-E-C It were built first 9 LOOK-binary files with near 10MByte each and put into IBM storage with next names: H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE21.F2252711 2221 vec FAST05 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE22.F2252711 2222 vec FAST10 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE23.F2252711 2223 vec FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE24.F2252711 2224 vec FAST02 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE25.F2252711 2225 vec FAST02 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE26.F2252711 2226 vec FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE27.F2252711 2227 vec FAST09 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE28.F2252711 2228 vec FAST03 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.LOOK.CCE29.F2252711 2229 vec FAST02 3010200E 00000 DASD X-axis at each from mentioned 2221-2229 vectors consists of 1.3Mevent Contents of next ASCII data set at DESY IBM can say which event number corresponds to which H1 Runs and after this it is possible to connect event number at sample with Dates at 1995 DataTaking: H1KFOM.EVENTS.RUNS.F2252711 FAST09 3010200E 00000 DASD For quick and fast (integral) view on CC-behaivours with time it were prepared family of .GIF- data sets (accessible for viewing through xv graphical editor at unix machines). Mentioned .GIF-data sets (binary) are kept both at sgi.lpi.msk.su and DESY IBM storage: H1KFOM.CCE21.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST03 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.CCE22.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST02 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.CCE23.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST07 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.CCE24.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST09 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.CCE25.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.CCE26.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST08 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.CCE27.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST07 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.CCE28.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST04 3010200E 00000 DASD H1KFOM.CCE29.F2205.U2711.Y1995.GIF FAST01 3010200E 00000 DASD Preparing of one LOOK-binary data set at dice2 gets near 2 hours of CPU-time.